CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Music › Nike "borrows" album art

Nike "borrows" album art

Started by analogpilot382 · · 👁 6 views · 70 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants analogpilot382Jason Diaz34Tyler Grant86Kevin Chavez3mistypanthergentlepuma20David Sullivan4coastalpanther11Susan Miller3boldscout72Roger Jones5Daniel Bailey7stormywolf39northerntrucker42ruggedcrane22Amanda Chase13Nicholas Perez33analogharbor442ASean Lee7hollowangler68Roger Cruz71Robin BoothJonathan Ross6 …
analogpilot382 analogpilot382 Active MemberOP
137 messages
joined Mar 2008
#1 ·
After those nauseating Reebok ads, where our supposed "idols" drone on about how many times they've been hit on and all that other garbage being shoved down our throats from every angle, here is the latest crap from your favorite 'brand', Nike...:

image
image
In case the link breaks, which isn't out of the question when Pitchfork is involved

rob Kleckner reports : you don't need a degree in graphic design to notica The similarities here

They're the fucking same. Oh, wait—one is blue instead of red. And major , not Minor. And There ara som Nika logos tossed in There. It reminds me of that interview where Vanilla Ice tried to defend the differences between "Ice Ice Baby" and "Under Pressure"...
Give me a break, Nike. Swoosh is One of The most iconic brand images in The World , perhaps a tiny notch below The Golden Arches and maybe coca-cola; you really don't need to hijack another culture just to boost your numbers.
But surely Nike is savvy enough to play by the rules, right? They must have cleared it first. We reached out to a contact at Dischord Records, Minor Threat's label, to see if Nika Had asked to borrow Thes images. Their response was blunt: "No, they stole it and we're not happy about it. Nike is a giant corporation which is attempting to manipulate the alternative skate culture to create an even wider demand for their already ubiquitous brand. Nika represents Just about The antithesis of What Dischord stands for and IT makes me sick to my stomach to think They ara using this explicit imagery to fool Kids into thinking that The general ethos of this label , and Minor Threat in particular can somehow be linked to Nike's mission. It's disgusting."
analogpilot382 analogpilot382 Active MemberOP
137 messages
joined Mar 2008
#2 ·
Forgot to include the link http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/news/05-06/23.shtml

I'm glad I never wore Nika sneakers...

thanks Andrew for the heads up 🙂
Jason Diaz34 Jason Diaz34 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Aug 2005
#3 ·
Pure nonsense. I mean, sure, people who listen to Minor Threat will probably start buying Nike sneakers the second they see an ad like this.

But yeah, they're idiots.
Tyler Grant86 Tyler Grant86 Regular
267 messages
joined Dec 2002
#4 ·
This news over at Pitchfork actually left me pretty shaken... now I finally get why I never bought any Nike gear... well, except for a basketball 😳
Kevin Chavez3 Kevin Chavez3 Veteran
2.4K messages
joined Dec 2002
#5 ·
Melissa Collins41 said:I mean, yeah, people who listen to Minor Threat are probably going to start buying Nike sneakers once they see an ad like this... or whatever.

Well, plenty of them will. I mean, why does everyone end up buying Chuck Taylors anyway?...
mistypanther mistypanther Member
45 messages
joined Nov 2003
#6 ·
Kevin Chavez3 said:Well, plenty of people do. Why else does everyone end up buying Nikes?

Because they're actually comfortable to wear, obviously. 😕
Kevin Chavez3 Kevin Chavez3 Veteran
2.4K messages
joined Dec 2002
#7 ·
Exactly. Fashion doesn't have anything to do with it, because punks are just so far above all that nonsense. 🙄
Jason Diaz34 Jason Diaz34 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Aug 2005
#8 ·
Converse and Doc Martens have been staples since before I was even born. Converse because they're dirt cheap, and Docs because they're indestructible—perfect for a quick getaway if things get messy. You never see anyone wearing Nike around, at least not among people who listen to Minor Threat. And those types of people aren't exactly known for changing their habits, especially when it comes to what they wear. 😁

So, they didn't really achieve anything besides becoming a punchline. Honestly, they were just fools for trying.
gentlepuma20 gentlepuma20 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2005
#9 ·
Kevin Chavez3 said:Well, plenty of people do. I mean, why else would we all be buying Nikes in the first place?

just because they look good, I guess 😍
David Sullivan4 David Sullivan4 Regular
663 messages
joined Jul 2005
#10 ·
btw, isn't it basically the same thing since Nike bought Converse anyway...
coastalpanther11 coastalpanther11 Regular
252 messages
joined Nov 2004
#11 ·
David Sullivan4
By the way, why hasn't Nike just bought out Converse yet? It’s basically the same thing anyway...

So what's the move now? Are we all going to hold a massive bonfire for our sneakers just to prove a point? Look, I don't care if Nike runs sweatshops in Asia where people get paid peanuts; apparently, that doesn't bother anyone. But the second they touch something related to Minor Threat, suddenly everyone's outraged. Seriously, grow the fuck up. Dischord will take their money and call it a day.
Tyler Grant86 Tyler Grant86 Regular
267 messages
joined Dec 2002
#12 ·
Melissa Collins41 said:Converse were originally worn because they were dirt cheap, and Doc Martens because they're incredibly durable—good for kicking things, etc.

Neither Converse nor Doc Martens fit those descriptions anymore...

If you want quality gear that’s decent for a fight but won't break the bank, just buy skater shoes... say, you can find Vans for half the price of those damn Chuck Taylors...
If you want top-tier quality and don't mind paying a bit more, go with Adidas...

The only reason Converse ever became a staple of the American underground rock scene was specifically because of the price tag—Ian and his crew bought them because they cost $15-$20, whereas kids today buy them simply because they look cool...
I stopped wearing them ten years ago. No matter how good they look or how much nostalgia hits me, I always force myself to buy something comfortable, waterproof, and—crucially—cheaper...
David Sullivan4 David Sullivan4 Regular
663 messages
joined Jul 2005
#13 ·
coastalpanther11 said:So what now? Are we going to hold a ritual bonfire for our Nikes just to show how pissed off we are?

Not happening. I’m wearing mine out tonight. Honestly, I couldn't care less...🙂
Susan Miller3 Susan Miller3 Member
14 messages
joined Aug 2003
#14 ·
Tyler Grant86 said:Converse aren't cheap and Doc Martens don't last forever either...

If you're looking for something decent that won't break the bank but actually holds up, just grab some skater shoes... I mean, you can find Vans for like half what those damn Chucks cost...
If you want top-tier quality and don't mind paying a bit extra, go with Adidas...

👍
That's pretty much where my head's at too. 😁
Back in the day (haha), I used to just grab the cheapest sneakers I could find, mostly because I knew they wouldn't last a week riding a BMX with no brakes. 😁
boldscout72 boldscout72 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Apr 2007
#15 ·
Well, I actually went out and picked up some new Nikes today... which means you've all just been officially invited to a massive mosh pit at a punk show. 😁
Roger Jones5 Roger Jones5 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jul 2007
#16 ·
I honestly have no clue how this thread ended up in the music section 😁

If you've been paying attention, Pitchfork has been aggressively pushing clothing and footwear brands lately—including the widely hated Nike. It feels pretty hypocritical to me, you know? Like, advertising them one minute and then tearing them apart in their articles the next.
David Sullivan4 David Sullivan4 Regular
663 messages
joined Jul 2005
#17 ·
boldscout72 said:It’s a total collective stomp

cigarettes or livers 🙂
Daniel Bailey7 Daniel Bailey7 Regular
526 messages
joined Dec 2002
#18 ·
boldscout72 said:I actually picked up some new sneakers today. Consider yourselves invited to a mass stomp session at the punk show. 😁

Are they black with red accents? 😁

btw—in the album art, Ian is rocking Vans, while Brian—*gasp*—is wearing Nikeice

np. Jens Lekman - No Time For Breaking Up

Argh! How does he manage to write songs that are simultaneously so stupid and yet so beautiful?
boldscout72 boldscout72 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Apr 2007
#19 ·
David Sullivan4 said:either Converse or Levi's 🙂

Both, naturally... 😁
stormywolf39 stormywolf39 Member
17 messages
joined Dec 2008
#20 ·
Seriously, what is the deal with people still rocking Chuck Taylors? There is nothing more uncomfortable, and honestly, your feet just end up sweating through them all summer long.😕

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads