CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Immigration discussion in Women's Corner

Immigration discussion in Women's Corner

Started by Aaron Phillips2 · · 👁 6 views · 117 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Aaron Phillips2nimblecrane6coastalwolf87Alex Miller3Morgan Rodriguez57jadecyclist36hollowmason64Bradley White73Joseph Bailey41Chris Green83Gerald Rivera17David Foster80rustyharbor3driftingcanyon16Chloe Harris2Nancy Cruz3Roger Gray7Michelle Evansrestlesshound3Bradley Sanders4electricjackal55Michael Lee75Thomas Morgan67silentbear22 …
David Foster80 David Foster80 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2008
#21 ·
driftingcanyon16 said:Exactly. It feels like topics lose their actual point because people end up arguing about whatever they want instead. Honestly, the way discussions go here is what really matters—specifically the way things are handled in Women's Corner. That level of narrow-mindedness is honestly scary... No wonder this whole site feels like it’s run by a tiny circle of twenty regulars. Every single controversial topic ends up proving the same thing: there’s zero real freedom of speech here. Not all members are treated equally, and some people definitely get a free pass while others don't...

Back when I was first bringing this up in the early nineties, nobody would give me the time of day. 🐔
driftingcanyon16 driftingcanyon16 Member
40 messages
joined Oct 2012
#22 ·
Honestly, a moderator shouldn't just be there to slam the door shut once everyone is elbow-deep in drama... they should actually be steering the conversation—adding something constructive to the table. Instead of letting everything devolve into this "progressive heroes vs. evil racists" narrative. It’s like they completely ignore the huge group of users who were right in the middle all along. But nope—the second you don't fall in line with their side, you're basically cast out into the wilderness

David Foster80 said:Back when I was first bringing this up in the early nineties, nobody would give me the time of day. 🐔

🤣
Alex Miller3 Alex Miller3 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2015
#23 ·
driftingcanyon16 said:Exactly. It feels like topics lose their actual point because people end up arguing about whatever they want instead. Honestly, the way discussions go here is what really matters—specifically the way things are handled in Women's Corner. That level of narrow-mindedness is honestly scary... No wonder this whole site feels like it’s run by a tiny circle of twenty regulars. Every single controversial topic ends up proving the same thing: there’s zero real freedom of speech here. Not all members are treated equally, and some people definitely get a free pass while others don't...

And look, since I actually know you and what you stand for, if someone tried to label you a fascist or a Nazi, they'd just be acting like a straight-up rude, malicious, dictatorial troll.
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#24 ·
rustyharbor3 said:I’ve been lurking in this thread since day one, but honestly? I haven't felt like typing anything. It just doesn't feel worth the effort. Every single time a topic like this pops up in this corner of the internet, it follows the exact same predictable trajectory and ends in the same inevitable disaster.

I just want to send some solidarity to everyone—Hilda, kiss me, David Foster80, Leeloo, and the rest of you—who still possesses the sheer willpower and patience to engage in debates with that absolute tumor known as Zillow, or that infantile clique of people who lack even the most basic social skills and can't hold a conversation without descending into hysterics, vomiting insults, and being plain abusive. And all of this happens under official supervision, no less.

Of course it always ends the same way—you can see it coming a mile away. But that’s exactly why I won’t let these individuals, who you keep flattering by calling them broad-minded and tolerant (🤣🤣🤣🤣), just go ahead and fawn over each other while admiring how "cool" they are. They really need a little nudge to lose their cool, just enough to reveal the absolute poverty of their ability to actually argue with logic. 😁

image
I have to say, looking at this picture, they all look a bit lost to me—kind of like flies without heads, and honestly, a little pathetic. 😢

David Foster80 said:I guess that’s why they went ahead and colluded with the site admins and moderators 🎉

They wouldn't even let me brag about how many refugees from Canada we've taken into our homes. 😢

ET, and there's that "humanity" in action for you. 😢
Chloe Harris2 Chloe Harris2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2015
#25 ·
I’m really not one for getting into arguments 😬 but I decided to stop by and sign the petition. 👋
I’ll be watching how this all unfolds with great interest... 🍿
David Foster80 David Foster80 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2008
#26 ·
hollowmason64 said:Of course it always ends the same way—you can see it coming a mile away. But that’s exactly why I won’t let these individuals, who you keep flattering by calling them broad-minded and tolerant (🤣🤣🤣🤣), just go ahead and fawn over each other while admiring how "cool" they are. They really need a little nudge to lose their cool, just enough to reveal the absolute poverty of their ability to actually argue with logic. 😁

image
I have to say, looking at this picture, they all look a bit lost to me—kind of like flies without heads, and honestly, a little pathetic. 😢

ET, and there's that "humanity" in action for you. 😢

Just like the usual crowd running the Forum. 😁
Btw, I fixed your post for you. Don't mention it. ☕

hollowmason64 said:Of course it always ends the same way—you can see it coming a mile away. But that’s exactly why I won’t let these individuals, who you keep flattering by calling them broad-minded and tolerant (🤣🤣🤣🤣), just go ahead and fawn over each other while admiring how "cool" they are. They really need a little nudge to lose their cool, just enough to reveal the absolute poverty of their ability to actually argue with logic. 😁

image
I have to say, looking at this picture, they all look a bit lost to me—kind of like flies without heads, and honestly, a little pathetic. 😢

ET, and there's that "humanity" in action for you. 😢

Look at that. Look how far things have actually gone. 😢
Nancy Cruz3 Nancy Cruz3 Member
15 messages
joined Dec 2011
#27 ·
😍

Where are you ladies?

It seems you were a bit stung by losing your little discussion platform—so naturally, you’ve decided to take your frustrations out on me instead.

I figured it would be best to give everyone some breathing room to cool off before half the subreddits ended up banned, but clearly, you aren't interested in playing nice.
You're entitled to your opinions.

Since I have zero interest in getting dragged into a massive debate, I'll just say this: feel free to join the moderation team. You can clean up your own messes then. I'm sure the other mods would love the extra hands, and it would certainly take a load off my plate.
Roger Gray7 Roger Gray7 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2015
#28 ·
Chloe Harris2 said:I’m really not one for getting into arguments 😬 but I decided to stop by and sign the petition. 👋
I’ll be watching how this all unfolds with great interest... 🍿

+1 😁
David Foster80 David Foster80 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2008
#29 ·
Nancy Cruz3 said:😍

Where are you ladies?

It seems you were a bit stung by losing your little discussion platform—so naturally, you’ve decided to take your frustrations out on me instead.

I figured it would be best to give everyone some breathing room to cool off before half the subreddits ended up banned, but clearly, you aren't interested in playing nice.
You're entitled to your opinions.

Since I have zero interest in getting dragged into a massive debate, I'll just say this: feel free to join the moderation team. You can clean up your own messes then. I'm sure the other mods would love the extra hands, and it would certainly take a load off my plate.

Let's not play innocent here. The real issue is which half of this group actually deserved the ban. If the women in this thread had a track record of posting garbage worthy of a permanent ban, this topic would still be live and they'd all just be grayed out.🙂

Anyway, if you want some actual work to do, check this out:
Nancy Cruz3 Nancy Cruz3 Member
15 messages
joined Dec 2011
#30 ·
Let's not pretend we're being overly sensitive here—there was plenty of reason for bans on both sides of the aisle.

Feel free to aim all that misplaced aggression my way if you need to. It doesn't bother me—but don't expect a response.
Besides, I checked out of the debate once it devolved into nothing more than "you're this, and we're that" finger-pointing.
Gerald Rivera17 Gerald Rivera17 Member
38 messages
joined Oct 2005
#31 ·
Nancy Cruz3 said:😍

Where are you ladies?

It seems you were a bit stung by losing your little discussion platform—so naturally, you’ve decided to take your frustrations out on me instead.

I figured it would be best to give everyone some breathing room to cool off before half the subreddits ended up banned, but clearly, you aren't interested in playing nice.
You're entitled to your opinions.

Since I have zero interest in getting dragged into a massive debate, I'll just say this: feel free to join the moderation team. You can clean up your own messes then. I'm sure the other mods would love the extra hands, and it would certainly take a load off my plate.

😲 you just shut down any criticism by being completely inflexible 🤦

kudos to you 🙂
Michelle Evans Michelle Evans Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2013
#32 ·
This isn't the Women's Corner, so please keep the discussion level appropriate. I ask that you refrain from calling other members "complexists" or using any other insults, provoking one another, starting unnecessary arguments, or dragging content over from the Women's Corner... let's just stick to the rules outlined in this PDF.
restlesshound3 restlesshound3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2015
#33 ·
The topic was honestly pretty fascinating, and I was actually kind of caught off guard when it got locked. 👎 Either it should have been moderated from the jump, or they just should have let the debate play out.

But even beyond this, I’ve always found the rules and how the mods handle things over in the Women's Corner to be a bit strange. It’s not rare to see someone get sent a private message, or for people to be called complete idiots—even having new users pushed away from a thread—all without a moderator stepping in. (And by the way, this happens even with some of the folks who get labeled as fascists during those heated debates about immigration. 😁 )
Aaron Phillips2 Aaron Phillips2 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Aug 2015
#34 ·
Nancy Cruz3 said:😍

Where are you ladies?

It seems you were a bit stung by losing your little discussion platform—so naturally, you’ve decided to take your frustrations out on me instead.

I figured it would be best to give everyone some breathing room to cool off before half the subreddits ended up banned, but clearly, you aren't interested in playing nice.
You're entitled to your opinions.

Since I have zero interest in getting dragged into a massive debate, I'll just say this: feel free to join the moderation team. You can clean up your own messes then. I'm sure the other mods would love the extra hands, and it would certainly take a load off my plate.

Hey Nancy!
Look, I know you're flying solo right now, but being the only moderator on duty doesn't excuse how you're handling things.

The gossip thread belongs to certain users who, from what I can see, are still getting by just fine.
It actually matters to me when people on my main boards start calling me a fascist or total trash. And I'm not talking about those random trolls who swoop in, spit on everyone, and leave in a fit of self-righteous rage.
What bugs me even more is seeing how fascist rhetoric and "motherf***er" insults—and everything else that comes with that package—get a free pass.
How long ago was that post reported? 4 hours?
The post is still sitting there without a warning, and nobody has been banned.
clones

Afrikin

The Forum rules say something completely different.

You aren't following the rules of the site you work for. You're just protecting one of your fellow mods. Instead of actually moderating a heated topic, you just swoop in and lock the whole thing down so nobody ends up getting banned.
And you're doing it by nitpicking tiny details. To put it in the language of the people who throw the word "fascist" around so easily—yet you don't react to actual fascism—honestly, aren't you embarrassed?

You know what? That invitation to join the mod team is useless. This is YOUR job, not a charity case. Do your job. If you can't handle it, call another mod for backup. Don't just toss the ball into our court.
David Foster80 David Foster80 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2008
#35 ·
Nancy Cruz3 said:Let's not pretend we're being overly sensitive here—there was plenty of reason for bans on both sides of the aisle.

Feel free to aim all that misplaced aggression my way if you need to. It doesn't bother me—but don't expect a response.
Besides, I checked out of the debate once it devolved into nothing more than "you're this, and we're that" finger-pointing.

So why didn't you just share them?

Nancy Cruz3 said:Let's not pretend we're being overly sensitive here—there was plenty of reason for bans on both sides of the aisle.

Feel free to aim all that misplaced aggression my way if you need to. It doesn't bother me—but don't expect a response.
Besides, I checked out of the debate once it devolved into nothing more than "you're this, and we're that" finger-pointing.

Nice move. When we run out of arguments, let's just pivot to passive-aggression. 👏

Btw, did you finally ban that Afrikin troll?

Gerald Rivera17 said:😲 you just shut down any criticism by being completely inflexible 🤦

kudos to you 🙂

That's just how this crew operates. 🤷
Joseph Bailey41 Joseph Bailey41 Veteran
1K messages
joined Apr 2021
#36 ·
Nancy Cruz3 said:😍

Where are you ladies?

It seems you were a bit stung by losing your little discussion platform—so naturally, you’ve decided to take your frustrations out on me instead.

I figured it would be best to give everyone some breathing room to cool off before half the subreddits ended up banned, but clearly, you aren't interested in playing nice.
You're entitled to your opinions.

Since I have zero interest in getting dragged into a massive debate, I'll just say this: feel free to join the moderation team. You can clean up your own messes then. I'm sure the other mods would love the extra hands, and it would certainly take a load off my plate.

Seriously? Honestly, I'd volunteer to moderate myself. 🐔
Aaron Phillips2 Aaron Phillips2 MemberOP
13 messages
joined Aug 2015
#37 ·
Michelle Evans said:This isn't the Women's Corner, so please keep the discussion level appropriate. I ask that you refrain from calling other members "complexists" or using any other insults, provoking one another, starting unnecessary arguments, or dragging content over from the Women's Corner... let's just stick to the rules outlined in this PDF.

Pringles

So, you're asking what we can actually use to write stuff here? Seriously? Is that really the question? Look, it's pretty straightforward. You just jump in and start typing. No special equipment required, no fancy setup. Just your thoughts and a keyboard. What else would you need?

Besides being a direct answer to my question in the opening post, isn't it also just a blatant violation of the Forum rules?

Thanks!
Nancy Cruz3 Nancy Cruz3 Member
15 messages
joined Dec 2011
#38 ·
Peter, Aaron Phillips2!

I won't bother quoting that massive wall of text right now.

The fallout went both ways—everyone was getting called out. It wasn't just about people swooping in without contributing anything useful to the debate and then throwing a tantrum when they didn't get their way.

On the flip side, there was a systematic, repeated violation of rule 6, specifically that second half of the policy.

I stand by my actions—and everything else I’ve said here. Everyone seems to have lost their moral compass. You either want flimsy rules and loose moderation on the Forum, or you demand trust and then immediately fail to maintain a decent level of discourse.

There are higher authorities on this Forum than me—they can certainly reopen this thread if they decide I'm actually the one in the wrong.
Morgan Rodriguez57 Morgan Rodriguez57 Active Member
216 messages
joined Oct 2011
#39 ·
restlesshound3 said:The topic was honestly pretty fascinating, and I was actually kind of caught off guard when it got locked. 👎 Either it should have been moderated from the jump, or they just should have let the debate play out.

But even beyond this, I’ve always found the rules and how the mods handle things over in the Women's Corner to be a bit strange. It’s not rare to see someone get sent a private message, or for people to be called complete idiots—even having new users pushed away from a thread—all without a moderator stepping in. (And by the way, this happens even with some of the folks who get labeled as fascists during those heated debates about immigration. 😁 )

Well, those have been the "jungle rules" of the Women's Corner for a long time now... 🙂

The way the rules are set up isn't exactly an accident, either. A specific little group gathered there—the "progressive" crowd, you know?—to talk about all sorts of social issues. They could have easily just hung out in the Politics section like everyone else, but apparently, they're so "advanced" that even the left-leaning moderation team over in Politics wasn't quite enough for them... so they found themselves a cozy little sanctuary instead.

Everything was running smoothly for the longest time, with them just patting themselves on the back, praising how enlightened and smart they all are... while basically kicking anyone "backward" or "Catholic zealot" out of the fold if they accidentally wandered too close to the edge.

That is, until now. This latest crisis has been so intense that some of those "progressives" are finally starting to see things clearly... and now, suddenly, they're being tossed aside just like the people they used to look down on.

I guess revolution really does eat its own children... 🙂
David Foster80 David Foster80 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2008
#40 ·
Nancy Cruz3 said:Peter, Aaron Phillips2!

I won't bother quoting that massive wall of text right now.

The fallout went both ways—everyone was getting called out. It wasn't just about people swooping in without contributing anything useful to the debate and then throwing a tantrum when they didn't get their way.

On the flip side, there was a systematic, repeated violation of rule 6, specifically that second half of the policy.

I stand by my actions—and everything else I’ve said here. Everyone seems to have lost their moral compass. You either want flimsy rules and loose moderation on the Forum, or you demand trust and then immediately fail to maintain a decent level of discourse.

There are higher authorities on this Forum than me—they can certainly reopen this thread if they decide I'm actually the one in the wrong.

Can I get an answer to my questions?

David Foster80 said:So why didn't you just share them?

Nice move. When we run out of arguments, let's just pivot to passive-aggression. 👏

Btw, did you finally ban that Afrikin troll?

That's just how this crew operates. 🤷

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads