James Taylor3 said:I haven't watched their matches once in my life, but I did read about them last year when they almost made it into the Champions League. Leading up to that first game against the LA Galaxy, our media outlets were all over the idea that last year's squad and this season's roster have almost nothing in common. They kept saying that since so many players left, the team is significantly weaker now—which, honestly, was pretty obvious during that first match against the Galaxy, regardless of how poorly the LA team played.
And maybe the clearest sign of their current quality is seeing Pokrivach in the starting eleven. 😬
Haha... right. It’s funny, isn't it? Our media experts act like they have some deep insight into the strength of Kazakhstani players or those third-rate foreign imports. They suddenly become experts on who was better last year versus who is in the lineup today. Look at the facts: Shakhtar dominated Shirak from Armenia 6-1 this season and beat Lithuania's Atlantas 3-0. Meanwhile, the LA Galaxy lost at home to Dundalk.
Compared to the Shakhtar squad that faced Celtic last year, we are looking at a starting eleven featuring Mokin, Vičius, Finočenko, Maliy, Džidić, and Poryaev. On top of that, the new starters include Maslo, Kirov, Pokrivach, Konysbaev, and Topčagić. I can already see our journalists "smartly" concluding that Maslo, Kirov, and Konysbaev are inferior to the guys they replaced. 😁
Is there any universe where the LA Galaxy makes up a two-goal deficit from the first leg? Sure, theoretically, they could pull off a 2-0 win. But given the state of their defense, isn't it a bit delusional to expect them to keep a clean sheet? They'd have to score multiple goals just to stay in it. Personally, I highly doubt it.