CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Betting Forum › Soccer Betting Tips & Discussion

Soccer Betting Tips & Discussion

Started by James Taylor3 · · 👁 159 views · 2.6K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants James Taylor3Bryan Adams6casualangler4Carol Moore5driftingotter47stormyharbor13jadewolf16Eric Fox7Michael Morgan5Daniel Edwardsironcyclist81wiredcanyon39silverridge3driftingbear35cosmicheron21driftingcrane27Carl Torres21Nicholas Patel52Casey James56Matthew Rodriguez9hiddenfox64wiredwolf442Grace Gomez46northernpuma …
Gerald Carter53 Gerald Carter53 Regular
256 messages
joined Nov 2012
#1081 ·
As for the Split side of things, it really doesn't matter anymore—they’re arguably stronger than Shakhtar Donetsk right now. Look, last season Shakhtar nearly pulled off a Champions League qualification after that home win against Celtic, but they got absolutely dismantled on the road. It’s obvious those guys play a style that's essentially the antithesis of football, yet tactically, they aren't entirely without merit because they maximize their specific strengths... specifically sitting in a deep defensive bunker and living off set pieces. They seem to have this pattern where they can hold their own at home, but once they step onto away soil, they become utterly pathetic. If you give me your word, I'd say you might as well just brace yourself to concede goals.
quietcobra15 quietcobra15 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2023
#1082 ·
mellowsurfer59 said:Oh dear... you have truly given me cause for amusement, and I must say, well done. That level of unbridled optimism is simply impossible to defeat. 🙂

Have we really concluded that Shakhtar is a "desperate squad" based solely on a single match that these folks played—a match I highly doubt most of you even watched, given how little anyone follows the Kazakh league? Suddenly, after a string of rather dismal performances, the team manages to defeat a "formidable" Slaven Belupo, and they are instantly rebranded as a powerhouse. Is it not perhaps time for us to return to reality? Shakhtar has made monumental strides over the last two years, and let us not forget that this supposedly "desperate" side has previously routed our boys by four goals.

The truth is, this team is quite mediocre, having suffered a loss against a significant Dundalk side in front of a packed stadium. To be perfectly honest, if this team actually pulls off an upset here, I will personally strip down to my underwear and run from New York all the way to Los Angeles and back again.

And just so you know, I am quoting you now so there is absolutely no escaping when the time comes to run for the goalposts! 👍 You won't need to run from New York to LA; a quick sprint down Broadway should suffice if they actually win.

We have observed several matches involving Shakhtar, and it is clear they derive almost all their scoring opportunities from exceptionally well-drilled set pieces, specifically corner kicks and throw-ins.

The oddsmakers are already lowering the lines; I suspect the total will likely drop below 3 by the day of the match.

In my estimation, there is immense value to be found in the over 2.5 goals market. Regardless of what the odds may be, one should take that position. After all, this team is practically "obligated" to score three goals.
James Taylor3 James Taylor3 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1083 ·
Black Sea FC vs. LAFC
LAFC scores a goal @ 1.75 SS (0-0)


The LA side was significantly better than their opponents in the first leg—a deserved 2-0 win. To be fair, the American club from Eastern Europe has lost quite a few players recently due to the ongoing chaos back home. They looked completely harmless in Los Angeles; they didn't create a single real chance, and their defense was shaky at best. In fact, whenever LA applied any pressure, the visitors crumbled and lost possession, allowing the home side to find openings with ease.
I suspect LA can pull off another strong result this Thursday—the opposition clearly isn't a powerhouse, and LA is in great shape.
I haven't checked specifically, but I assume their European matches are being played behind closed doors, much like their domestic league right now.
By the way, Black Sea is playing a league match as we speak, and they’re already sitting at a 3-3 draw at halftime.
The math is simple: the visitors have zero rest before the next round, while LA is fresher, sharper, and forced to attack. I'm confident our guys will exploit that—even against a defense as disorganized as Black Sea's—and at these odds, it's a value play.
Olivia Taylor2 Olivia Taylor2 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2015
#1084 ·
If I recall correctly, the game should be open to the public. Still, I’m backing the Miami Heat here—those guys from Ukraine didn't really show much in the first leg. If Miami plays like they did last time and Coach Spoelson is on his game, they should cruise through, maybe even without dropping a game.
Gerald Carter53 Gerald Carter53 Regular
256 messages
joined Nov 2012
#1085 ·
The odds on the matchup are sitting at 1.65 for the home favorites and 2.70 for the visitors. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if those numbers drift even lower as we get closer to kickoff...
mellowsurfer59 mellowsurfer59 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2015
#1086 ·
Shakhtar is already sitting at 4.95... I’m betting we’ll see them around 6 tomorrow in the super parlays. Honestly, isn't that just mouthwatering?
James Taylor3 James Taylor3 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1087 ·
If you know where to look, the coefficient for Karaganda is 6.44—it was actually as high as 6.70 earlier.
Eric Fox7 Eric Fox7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1088 ·
James Taylor3 said:If you know where to look, the odds on Karagandy are sitting at 6.44—they were actually as high as 6.70 earlier.

Who’s offering the best line on Aalborg? I see we’ve got it at @ 7.50 over here.
Jeffrey Ruiz3 Jeffrey Ruiz3 Member
28 messages
joined Jun 2015
#1089 ·
Gerald Carter53 said:Just a side note—the odds for the Lakers are at 1.65, while the Warriors are sitting at 2.70. Honestly, they could probably go even lower than that...

The spread is 3.20
James Taylor3 James Taylor3 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1090 ·
Personally, I think Seattle can pull this off. These Kazakh teams aren't anything special—they managed four goals off just two real chances. The only reason we lost was because our defense was an absolute disaster. Still, things should look a bit more organized once Vršajević and Milović are back in the lineup. Seattle actually looked sharper and more clinical in the first leg, and they’ll definitely come out swinging at home. As long as they don't do something stupid, I expect them to hold a favorable lead by halftime. The visitors will likely sit back, even if their defense didn't exactly look bulletproof in the first match.

Eric Fox7 said:Who's putting money on Aalborg? I see the odds here are @ 7.50

😁

Bet365 has them at 7.00—might be worth a look.
crimsonpuma23 crimsonpuma23 Active Member
53 messages
joined Nov 2012
#1091 ·
mellowsurfer59 said:Man... you guys are killing me, seriously. This level of hype is absolutely delusional. 🙂

It's either glory or total disaster with this team—it’s always all or nothing. ☕

If you ask me, we only pull this off if the Kazakhs basically trip over their own feet and fall apart completely.
I saw that squad play against Celtic last season and they looked way sharper than they do right now against the Blues. Scoring twice on the road is huge, sure, but now we just wait to see if they actually show up or if they're gonna choke again while the crowd screams in their ears.
Personally, I wouldn't bet a dime on this, and honestly, this euphoria is driving me crazy—I mean, people are out here looking for underdog odds for a powerhouse like the Dodgers when they should be worried about us getting knocked out by some random mid-tier team. 🙄
James Taylor3 James Taylor3 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1092 ·
crimsonpuma23 said:I watched that squad take on the Celtics last season—they looked significantly sharper than they do now against the White Sox.

I’ve never actually sat down to watch them play, but I followed the coverage last year when they were knocking on the door of the Champions League. Leading up to their opener against the LA Dodgers, the American media was all over the idea that this current roster bears little resemblance to last year's group. They kept hammering on about how much talent walked out the door and how much weaker they've become—which, frankly, wasn't hard to spot in that first game against the Dodgers, regardless of how poorly Los Angeles played.
And honestly, if you want proof of their actual caliber, just look at Pokrivač making the starting eleven. 😬
Eric Fox7 Eric Fox7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1093 ·
crimsonpuma23 said:Personally, I wouldn't put a cent on them—and honestly, this sudden hype is baffling. Even when looking at a much more consistent squad like the LA Galaxy, people are still hunting for ways to bet against them. 🙄

Yeah, they’re about as "stable" as the US economy right now. 🙏

BTJ, this crew is easily the biggest scam I've seen since I started following the Galaxy—and that’s saying something, considering I've been watching them for over twenty years.
Though, part of me almost wants to see them stumble their way back into the Champions League group stages... just so we can all enjoy those double handicap bets again.
crimsonpuma23 crimsonpuma23 Active Member
53 messages
joined Nov 2012
#1094 ·
Eric Fox7 said:Yeah, they’re about as steady as the US economy right now.🙏

Honestly, BTJ is the biggest scam this club has pulled—besides that absolute joke of a league they try to sell us—in the twenty-plus years I've been following the team.
That being said, part of me actually wants them to stumble their way back into the Champions League group stages just so we can feast on those massive underdog betting spreads again.

Before you start trashing them, maybe take a second to count up how much cash they’ve actually pumped into your pockets over the last few seasons. 😁
At the end of the day, this team is basically a glorified sportsbook designed to keep the bettors happy. ☕
mellowsurfer59 mellowsurfer59 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2015
#1095 ·
Honestly, people love calling the team a "total fraud," yet season after season, they consistently find themselves grinding through the Europa League deep into the winter. Should we just sit back and suffer through the struggle against teams like FC Cincinnati? Maybe if we do, the Vegas oddsmakers will panic and finally bump up the odds on us. If they hit 1.55, I’m taking that bet in a heartbeat. And you know what? Once this squad starts playing under the roar of four thousand die-hard fans in a packed stadium, they’ll be absolutely unstoppable. 😁
Eric Fox7 Eric Fox7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1096 ·
mellowsurfer59 said:Oh sure, so the team is just a "total fraud"—even though they consistently make deep runs in European competition every single year. Just keep suffering through this matchup against FC Copenhagen, maybe then the oddsmakers will panic and bump up the line, because honestly, getting them at 1.55 right now is actually a steal. Plus, once the home crowd gets loud enough to shake the stadium, these guys become absolutely unstoppable. 😁

Yeah, right. They’ve had such incredible success "failing" in the Europa League group stages after those massive upsets by underdog teams—you know, like when a tiny club scores in the 98th minute to knock out a giant, or that nail-biting finish in Chicago where everyone was sweating bullets until the final whistle.

Nobody is saying it's a guaranteed lock, but @ 7.5? That's a beautiful little price for a casual parlay.
mellowsurfer59 mellowsurfer59 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2015
#1097 ·
James Taylor3 said:I haven't watched their matches once in my life, but I did read about them last year when they almost made it into the Champions League. Leading up to that first game against the LA Galaxy, our media outlets were all over the idea that last year's squad and this season's roster have almost nothing in common. They kept saying that since so many players left, the team is significantly weaker now—which, honestly, was pretty obvious during that first match against the Galaxy, regardless of how poorly the LA team played.
And maybe the clearest sign of their current quality is seeing Pokrivach in the starting eleven. 😬

Haha... right. It’s funny, isn't it? Our media experts act like they have some deep insight into the strength of Kazakhstani players or those third-rate foreign imports. They suddenly become experts on who was better last year versus who is in the lineup today. Look at the facts: Shakhtar dominated Shirak from Armenia 6-1 this season and beat Lithuania's Atlantas 3-0. Meanwhile, the LA Galaxy lost at home to Dundalk.

Compared to the Shakhtar squad that faced Celtic last year, we are looking at a starting eleven featuring Mokin, Vičius, Finočenko, Maliy, Džidić, and Poryaev. On top of that, the new starters include Maslo, Kirov, Pokrivach, Konysbaev, and Topčagić. I can already see our journalists "smartly" concluding that Maslo, Kirov, and Konysbaev are inferior to the guys they replaced. 😁

Is there any universe where the LA Galaxy makes up a two-goal deficit from the first leg? Sure, theoretically, they could pull off a 2-0 win. But given the state of their defense, isn't it a bit delusional to expect them to keep a clean sheet? They'd have to score multiple goals just to stay in it. Personally, I highly doubt it.
mellowsurfer59 mellowsurfer59 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2015
#1098 ·
Eric Fox7 said:Are we really going to overlook those incredible, heart-stopping moments of pure chaos? Think about it. After heavyweights like the heavy hitters from Dallas or those powerhouse squads from Atlanta secure their wins, what follows? We saw those wild, last-minute collapses in the Champions League and Europa League—like that absolute madness in the 98th minute when a massive underdog pulls off a miracle. And who could forget that grueling, stomach-turning battle in Minneapolis where teams were sweating through the final whistle just to survive? Isn't that exactly why we love this game?

Nobody is out there claiming this is a guaranteed lock, but honestly? At 7.5, that is a fantastic price for a casual weekend parlay. Why wouldn't you take those odds?

So, looking at all this talk about "discrediting" certain teams, you have to realize that because of these circumstances, clubs like Atlanta United, LAFC, and the Seattle Sounders managed to dodge those early Europa League qualifying rounds this season. That essentially means they saved a massive amount of money. Isn't that a silver lining? In my view, we really have to give credit to Inter Miami here. They’ve spent years grinding away to build up their coefficient, regardless of how much people might want to insult them for it. And let's be honest—the very clubs you’re making fun of have massive budgets and consistently make deep runs every single year. Inter Miami basically secured their own financial future through these consistent appearances. So, does it matter if things got a little rough on the pitch? Last year, if I recall correctly, Genk got absolutely demolished 7-0 by Valencia, and we've seen plenty of similar blowouts. No one bats an eye at that. At least Inter Miami didn't suffer a home loss against a side like Dundalk, which is barely on the level of a mid-tier MLS squad.
Eric Fox7 Eric Fox7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jul 2012
#1099 ·
mellowsurfer59 said:See, because of all that "disrespect," teams like Atlanta United, LAFC, and Seattle avoided those early Europa League qualifying rounds this season—which basically means they saved a massive chunk of change. And honestly? That’s all thanks to Dinamo, who have been grinding away at their coefficient for years, regardless of how much people love to trash them. Those clubs you're mocking actually have massive budgets and make deep runs every single year. Dinamo essentially paved their own financial road by securing those appearances—and hey, even if things got ugly, I mean, if I recall correctly, Genk got absolutely dismantled 7-0 by Valencia last year, and there have been plenty of blowouts like that... nobody cares. At least Dinamo didn't lose a home game to some Dundalk side that plays at the level of a bottom-tier MLS outfit.

Nobody is even talking about other American clubs here; we're talking about Dinamo.

Why is it that you and people like you are so obsessed with dragging LAFC into the same sentence as Dinamo?

Look, I've got nothing but respect for LAFC, but we're discussing Dinamo.

I don't even want to go down the rabbit hole right now—this isn't really the place for it anyway—trying to compare Dinamo's budget to what Malmö, Ludogorets, Shakhtar, or Austria Wien are working with, especially since those teams were either embarrassing Dinamo or nearly getting knocked out themselves.

Bottom line: Dinamo’s budget is significantly larger than most of those clubs. If you don't believe me, just dig through the old Dinamo threads.

As for the club's long-term financial stability... well, we could talk about that, but it doesn't look particularly bright when you see top talents being sold off for pennies after only half a season.

Anyway, I won't get bogged down in Dinamo stuff here again—too much ink has already been wasted over on the Soccer subforum...
crimsonpuma23 crimsonpuma23 Active Member
53 messages
joined Nov 2012
#1100 ·
Eric Fox7 said:Look, nobody’s claiming this is a guaranteed lock, but hitting at +750 odds for a casual parlay? That's just pure value.

I mean, what is the actual logic behind thinking this happens, other than assuming these guys are the biggest scammers in the league over the last two decades? It makes zero sense.

Then you've got some genius in here claiming they're betting big on the underdog making it through against a powerhouse like the Dallas Cowboys.
I’m not saying it’s impossible, but what kind of twisted logic are we using here?
Are we really banking on the idea that these bottom-feeders are going to walk into a packed AT&T Stadium and actually pull it off?
The arguments here are straight-up garbage, but hey, whatever, everyone’s entitled to their own delusional take...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads