wiredotter14 said:That cooler isn't too weak for a 5600X—honestly, almost any decent aftermarket cooler handles that chip just fine. It’s definitely not worth dropping cash on an entry-level AIO when you could get performance that matches or even beats it with a solid air cooler like the Noctua NH-U14S.
As for the motherboard, even that B550 you mentioned supports PCIe 4.0 and gives you two M.2 slots. One goes straight to the CPU—perfect for your main NVMe drive—and the second one runs through the chipset, which is plenty for a SATA SSD.
Total supports 2 x M.2 slot(s) and 6 x SATA 6Gb/s ports
1 x M.2_1 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support(SATA & PCIe 4.0 x4 mode)
AMD B550 Chipset :
1 x M.2_2 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (SATA & PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)*
1 x M.2_1 socket 3, with M key, type 2242/2260/2280/22110 storage devices support (SATA & PCIE 3.0 x 4 mode)
6 x SATA 6Gb/s port(s)
Support Raid 0, 1, 10
I don't get why the B550 memory specs only list the AMD 4000 series and not the 5000 series.
Their website was confusing me since they listed the M.2_1 slot twice.
So, if I'm reading this right, there are enough M.2 slots to run two Samsung 980 Pro drives?
In case I want to upgrade later?
And with 6 x SATA ports, I can plug in two Samsung 860 evo 2.5 drives and still have full speed, right?
Do I really need more than 500GB if I already have another 2TB SSD sitting there?
I mean, looking at the games I'll be playing most of the time, that's maybe 250GB.
In three years, those same types of games might grow by 25%, so maybe 310GB?
I can always just move stuff over to the two extra drives.
Regarding networking, the pricier board has that ROG GameFirst junk—supposedly helps with streaming or upload speeds while gaming.
Seems useless, but can it actually be used for anything else besides that?
On the audio side, honestly, I don't see much difference aside from the expensive one having some sound management software.
Whatever, who cares.
Everything else looks identical—they just rearranged the layout to make the first one look different, making you think the expensive one is better.
The cheaper one actually lists way more software on their site—probably because someone was too lazy to write it all down.
What's the point of these "special features"?
Is there actually a reason to go for this X570 board?
It doesn't even support SLI anymore since Nvidia ditched it for newer models.
So why was the ROG Strix X570-F picked as a "best buy" for AMD CPUs?
I don't see the advantage at all.
The ROG Strix X570-E at least has 2.5GB networking if you really need it.
For watching movies, 4K/8K, Dolby Atmos, or Hi-Fi playback, I don't see a difference between these two cards.
Maybe I'm wrong.