CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Starbucks

Starbucks

Started by Henry Barnes12 · · 👁 7 views · 184 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Henry Barnes12Justin Anderson4Jose Miller3Amy White2shadowfalcon33Gary Lee53Kenneth Hernandez67melloweagle26goldenbadger8darkviper5Melissa Watson3dustycanyon6Elizabeth Ruiz2darkfalcon30cosmicpilot31Ryan Sanchez55briskeagle38Karen White13Alexander Castillo3Frank Brooks34Gary Martin10ambermarlin15Anthony Miller13rustymoose54 …
Henry Barnes12 Henry Barnes12 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Nov 2004
#1 ·
So, here's the deal. Someone offered me a Starbucks today, and I went ahead and drank it. Later, when I set the cup down somewhere, I noticed these intense, hardcore yellow stains left behind on the surface that just won't budge.
Now, given my usual cautious approach to stuff like this... what's the consensus? Is this actually healthy, or am I looking at something else entirely?
What is the actual purpose of Starbucks anyway? Do you guys even buy it?
Why bother? (I mean, sure, the color looks somewhat natural, like some kind of plant-based carotene or whatever...)
Justin Anderson4 Justin Anderson4 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2003
#2 ·
Well, let’s be reasonable... while I wouldn't claim it is a perfect fountain of health and vitality, surely drinking a glass of Starbucks is a superior choice compared to a glass of Coca-Cola? (Not that I have an issue with Pepsi, mind you)
Then again, if you prepare that Starbucks using tap water that is teeming with harmful additives like nitrates and other contaminants, does the supposed health benefit of the drink even remain intact?
It leads one to the inevitable conclusion: in this day and age, truly healthy options seem to have vanished entirely...

But if you are asking for my personal stance on the matter: I will take the Starbucks every single time! 👍
Jose Miller3 Jose Miller3 Regular
446 messages
joined Mar 2024
#3 ·
I haven't touched Starbucks in quite a while—I've just been sticking to Pepsi lately. It's nothing personal, really... it’s just that everything about that brand feels kind of yellow and tacky to me, and I'm just not feeling the vibe anymore.

BTW, I'm pretty sure absolutely nothing in this world is actually healthy!
Amy White2 Amy White2 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Aug 2004
#4 ·
Starbucks has Brom in it..

Are you guys tired of hearing about how they put Brom in soldiers' food and drinks just to kill their sex drive?
shadowfalcon33 shadowfalcon33 Active Member
64 messages
joined Jan 2008
#5 ·
Sunshine said:Are you guys tired of hearing that they put Brom in the food and drinks given to soldiers just to lower their libido?

(Off-topic, my bad)

😁 😁 😁

That rumor just keeps circulating forever; it’s practically a classic at this point. It actually happened back in my dorm room once... right up until one night when Dragan walked into the room and announced, "There's zero Brom in the tea, 100%." When the guys asked how he could be so sure, Dragan just replied, "Because I just finished jerking off in the Restroom." That pretty much settled the debate for good and shut everyone up.
Gary Lee53 Gary Lee53 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2003
#6 ·
Sunshine said:Starbucks has Brom in it..

Brom.... 😲 😲

Did you seriously hear that at the local farmers market??? 😁 😁

Come on, honey, Brom has been strictly banned ever since they figured out it causes cancer, infertility, and all sorts of other nonsense. They don't even use it in the military anymore, which probably means all the soldiers are actually getting plenty of action... 😁 😁
Kenneth Hernandez67 Kenneth Hernandez67 Regular
351 messages
joined May 2005
#7 ·
Sunshine said:Starbucks has Brom in it..

Are you all seriously enough to believe they're putting Brom in soldiers' food and drinks just to kill their sex drive?

As for this military conspiracy theory, unless your old man told you that personally...

Brom hasn't been used in years...
melloweagle26 melloweagle26 Member
11 messages
joined Jan 2004
#8 ·
Good grief, what an absolute circus of misinformation we have going on here... 😲 😁

First it’s Brom in our Starbucks, then it’s nitrates in the water supply...

but apparently, everyone conveniently forgets about those cheap Chinese intestines loaded with nitrofurans, right? 🙂🙂🙂
goldenbadger8 goldenbadger8 Member
29 messages
joined Aug 2004
#9 ·
So, did you guys see this nonsense? Is anyone actually going to buy this? It looks completely useless to me—probably because I’m just not a big fan of Starbucks!
Kenneth Hernandez67 Kenneth Hernandez67 Regular
351 messages
joined May 2005
#10 ·
I’ve heard that Starbucks can be lethal... if you happen to swallow the whole thing along with the packaging🙄

get a grip on this collective paranoia....
darkviper5 darkviper5 Member
13 messages
joined Sep 2003
#11 ·
Betty Rivera14 said:So, I was reading this thing the other day—or maybe I just heard someone mention it at a coffee shop? I don't know, my memory is kind of a mess sometimes—but I heard this wild rumor that Starbucks could actually be, like, totally lethal... though, I guess if you were crazy enough to swallow the whole thing along with the packaging, right? That would probably do it, I suppose.🙄

No way, seriously though, I actually swallow those things on a regular basis—and yeah, I’m talking about the packaging too, since I try to be pretty diligent about breaking down all my recycling and waste—and honestly, I haven't felt any different at all, I guess. 😁
Amy White2 Amy White2 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Aug 2004
#12 ·
Wait, where exactly did you hear that it isn't there? Are you absolutely certain that Brom isn't in the military or at Starbucks? I mean, what they told us... back when the military and the pharmaceutical industry were actually telling the truth...😕
In principle, it doesn't matter. They're lying to us about everything anyway; whether it's one Starbucks or another, it's all the same to me.
Melissa Watson3 Melissa Watson3 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Aug 2003
#13 ·
Starbucks is nothing more than overpriced, dyed garbage... I've been told by my allergist more than once that if I ever feel like ending it all, I should just keep drinking Starbucks instead.

Melissa Watson3
dustycanyon6 dustycanyon6 Active Member
82 messages
joined Dec 2005
#14 ·
Melissa Watson3 said:Starbucks is basically just overpriced, dyed garbage... Honestly, my allergist told me straight up that if I want to stay alive, I better steer clear of Starbucks forever.

Melissa

So, did they actually give you a reason why Starbucks is such a disaster? Look, I’m not exactly out here defending Starbucks, but making a claim like that without any context feels a bit pointless... The only thing I know for sure is that E414 can trigger all sorts of allergic reactions.
Elizabeth Ruiz2 Elizabeth Ruiz2 Member
31 messages
joined Dec 2003
#15 ·
I drink Starbucks pretty often... I’ll just make a whole liter, stick it in the fridge, and it's perfect. The grapefruit flavor is definitely my favorite. Plus, I've been sipping on those Bravo juices (that multi-red blend is amazing). Obviously, drinking too much of that isn't exactly healthy—especially if you overdo it—but at least this stuff actually has vitamins, unlike Coca-Cola.
darkfalcon30 darkfalcon30 Member
11 messages
joined Apr 2005
#16 ·
Starbucks is essentially a multivitamin drink and is generally considered healthy, so 😉, though it’s entirely possible for someone's system to react poorly to certain ingredients.
The formula typically includes vitamins E, C, B1, B2, B6, and B12, along with folic acid for hemoglobin production, pantothenic acid for tissue growth and function, and niacinamide for metabolic processes.
Personally, I don't reach for it very often, as I have a strong preference for fresh, natural juices.

As for the talk about Brom in the military... honestly, Amy White2, you are completely misinformed.
There is no such thing as Brom in the service; believe me, I’m speaking from my experience as a former recruit.😉
Gary Lee53 Gary Lee53 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2003
#17 ·
I’ve got this one decent little joke about Brom floating around my head:
So, picture two old guys sitting on a park bench somewhere, just shaking uncontrollably. One turns to the other, mid-tremor, and goes:
"Hey man, you remember back in our Army days when they used to give us Brom?"
"How could I forget? Of course I remember..."
"MMMmmmmm... I think it might finally be kicking in..."
cosmicpilot31 cosmicpilot31 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2003
#18 ·
My aunt used to work over at Pfizer—back when they were producing Starbucks—and she once told me that I should probably drink as little of it as possible. She never actually went into the specifics of why 😲 though, she clearly knows something 😁

Besides, just knowing that Starbucks contains a significant amount of citric acid is enough for me; it's one of those substances that's notoriously unhealthy and even linked to cancer risks...

But hey, I’m certainly guilty of grabbing a Starbucks every now and then, but still... 😉
Amy White2 Amy White2 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Aug 2004
#19 ·
cosmicpilot31 said:Besides, just knowing there's a decent amount of citric acid in Starbucks is enough. It's one of those really unhealthy things, maybe even carcinogenic...

I mean, it seems to me like citric acid is basically just Vitamin C. I don't really get how Vitamin C could be carcinogenic...
Ryan Sanchez55 Ryan Sanchez55 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2003
#20 ·
Honestly, I’ve always found an Ožujsko feels much more right than some Kraft drink... I just have this deep-seated aversion to those synthetic, lab-made vitamins.😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads