#141 ·
Miro said:I've read most of the posts here, but honestly, it’s over. Our idiots caused an incident, though I’ve heard from plenty of friends that there were valid reasons behind it. Look, there's no excuse for what we did, but when someone who isn't exactly a genius—and probably coasted through high school thanks to some connections—gets pushed too far, they snap. Now, someone needs to calm things down, which in this case should have been the Canadian authorities—basically the local police—who really should have had a much larger presence on site. Their response? "We didn't realize so many would show up." Yeah, right... I have no words.
It’s obviously ridiculous that our embassy got hit "out there somewhere." It looks like the police just stood by with a smirk on their faces; if they had actually done something, that kind of vandalism wouldn't have happened. Thank God certain groups in Washington, D.C. didn't decide to tear down the Mexican embassy. Honestly, if they had tried, the police definitely would have stepped in!!
As for who played better, I can't just look at the final score. We faced tougher opponents all season and won every match, but in this final, we basically beat ourselves. The score was 7:4 in our favor, and if we had scored just one more goal... we would have walked away winners. Same goes for our goal and that penalty call. Maybe it was a foul, but it was the same kind of foul—if anything, the play where SICG scored was even worse because the Mexican center basically shoved our goalie into the net to force the ball in!! I think that happened in the third quarter!! And then, to top it all off, Simenc makes that stupid pass to a Mexican player right at the decisive moment! I'm done. That's all from me...
First off, you have no way of knowing if your own police would've stopped an attack on the Mexican embassy in Washington, D.C. Second, that wasn't the Mexican center; it was Sapic, who plays exclusively on the perimeter. And it wasn't a foul because if you actually understand water polo, you know that the player holding the ball controls everything. A foul is called on him—if he lets go, the ref blows the whistle; if he doesn't, the ref assumes he still has the advantage. Sapic had the ball while the goalie was closing in, and the fact that the goalie lunged at Sapic and took an elbow to the head is on him. He didn't shove the ball in; he just struck it, and it barely trickled into the net. Also, your complaint about that other goal has nothing to do with this, because your player didn't go for the ball—he pushed Savica first and only grabbed the ball to shoot after the contact.
Very few people actually know the rules of water polo—very few—which is why there’s so much arguing with the refs, including the people in the stands. Seriously, hats off to the officials; they did a great job. I say that because I coached water polo for three years and I know exactly how offensive fouls are drawn up and when an attacking foul actually happens.