CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Ego, explain your bias to me.

Ego, explain your bias to me.

Started by Roger Hughes14 · · 👁 15 views · 85 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Roger Hughes14Nicole Jameswanderingheron52Morgan Ruiz3Morgan Rodriguez57Jason Clark7Susan Price30coppersailor28Timothy Davis59Amanda Hughes37Steven Wood72boldgull19jadeseal4Larry Walker24Amanda DiazDaniel Ward87bluecyclist64rowdyhawk10
Roger Hughes14 Roger Hughes14 MemberOP
39 messages
joined Mar 2012
#81 ·
Timothy Davis59 said:I think you're lying.
Your real issue is just pure hatred for everything and everyone, and that's why you can't have kids...

Honestly, I think bluecyclist64's problem is just age. If I'm not mistaken, the guy is almost 60. 🤷
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#82 ·
Roger Hughes14 said:Well, look at that... the Pope right next to the Pope.

😂

Look at the people posting here. Honestly... Christianophobia is a real thing...

All The Best,
Reddit[/I]

I don't get what your problem is... 🤷 First, I’ll ease up on the warnings regarding homosexuality... but now you're moving on to questions about Christianophobia?... 😕

User old-soul80 wrote this:

If he had his head on straight—if he were a Christian who actually believed in something more substantial than what he’s clinging to now—none of this would bother him...

I just saw what Roger Hughes14 said on Reddit... honestly, I don't see it that way. It feels like we're missing the bigger picture here. Everyone is reacting so intensely, but maybe we should just take a breath first...

No red cards...


Yeah, truth hurts. Christians have slaughtered people like nobody else in history. Hundreds of millions killed and tortured... all in the name of a calling. No other force in history has caused as much evil in the world as Christianity...

No red cards...

I don't know about all this... just seems like people want to make everything more complicated than it needs to be. There isn't much to say really... turns out some things just are what they are.

It's just historical fact from various sources. If there were trillions of Christians out there, they'd have killed trillions too...

No red cards...

I don't know what to say... just saw the news about the Criminal Code Amendments. It feels like everything is shifting under our feet lately. People are talking on Reddit, but nobody seems to have a clear answer. Just more uncertainty...

...and he doesn't even get flagged for any of this. I know you might privately agree with him, but that isn't a fair position to take, and what he wrote was honestly just disgusting. This isn't how you run a Reddit community...

No, don't you dare try to give me a ban for this post (Reason: Harassing forum members)...

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=4...0&postcount=54

Clearly, the term "Christianophobia" is the trigger word here, and it's eating at you, but that’s not my concern. If you have an issue with Christianophobia, take it up with Wikipedia. While we're being labeled homophobic left and right, the truth is I don't hate anyone—not even people who are gay. But you don't seem to care about that; instead, certain users just get to feast on us like vultures on a carcass.

Moderator Nicole James, please justify why you hold an admin position if you aren't going to objectively moderate this mess. So far, that isn't happening.

Until next time.
Daniel Ward87 said:Atheism is definitely a real thing. It isn’t a religion, but if you look online, there’s plenty of debate about what it actually entails. To be fair, it lacks the unified structure you see in organized religions, but there’s still a distinct community of people who call themselves atheists and hold their own set of convictions—just like believers treat their doctrines as sacred.

Man, I remember seeing something pretty similar to this back when Ivkošić wrote his column. Honestly, this feels like nothing more than trolling at this point. If you asked an atheist, they’d tell you that people are the ones primarily responsible for the greatest atrocities throughout history.

Can you drop the link to that scale?

rowdyhawk10 said:I think Nicole James is doing a perfectly fine job, both as a moderator and an administrator.

I think you’re starting from the wrong premise here, and honestly, what you're asking for seems impossible. You're essentially demanding that a user be punished simply for voicing an opinion, while expecting the moderators to shield a group—one that has a documented history of criminal activity—from any kind of criticism. If that's the case, then I suppose what you're actually looking for is an echo chamber. That kind of forced consensus only really happens on sites like Reddit. www.catholics.org I guess there isn't much more to say on that. I don't have much to say about that specific site, I suppose. It seems like just another corner of the internet dedicated to certain regional perspectives. Maybe it holds some interest for people looking for that particular viewpoint, but I can't say I find myself drawn to it. But that isn't the case here on Reddit, because this is an open forum where no specific religion is favored—nor is any group discriminated against, for that matter. All the best.

I’d suggest you all actually get your stories straight before you start jumping in to lecture people. Otherwise, you just look ridiculous.😉

So, is it trolling to claim Christians are responsible for certain crimes, or is it only considered trolling when people say the same thing about atheists?

I’d say people are primarily to blame here too, so I have to wonder: is the moderator rowdyhawk10 going to get a warning for this?
Daniel Ward87 Daniel Ward87 Active Member
195 messages
joined May 2023
#83 ·
Amanda Diaz said:

I’d suggest you all actually get your stories straight before you start jumping in to lecture people. Otherwise, you just look ridiculous.😉

So, is it trolling to claim Christians are responsible for certain crimes, or is it only considered trolling when people say the same thing about atheists?

I’d say people are primarily to blame here too, so I have to wonder: is the moderator rowdyhawk10 going to get a warning for this?
Neither Christians nor atheists are to blame for the worst crimes of the 20th century. That said, both sides have certainly committed their fair share of atrocities.

rowdyhawk10 isn't a moderator.

Regarding those reported posts mentioned in the first post of this thread, both received warnings.
Roger Hughes14 Roger Hughes14 MemberOP
39 messages
joined Mar 2012
#84 ·
To state:

"Yeah, truth hurts. Christians have slaughtered people like nobody else in history. Hundreds of millions killed and tortured, and they did it in the name of their calling. No other evil force in history has caused the world as much damage as Christianity."

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=4...9&postcount=43

It’s an expression of blatant hatred toward Christians. But, honestly, I'm just a troll here. Just being honest. You don't have any credibility with me...
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#85 ·
Daniel Ward87 said:Neither Christians nor atheists are to blame for the worst crimes of the 20th century. That said, both sides have certainly committed their fair share of atrocities.

rowdyhawk10 isn't a moderator.

Regarding those reported posts mentioned in the first post of this thread, both received warnings.

Of course that first point stands. And my apologies regarding the comment about rowdyhawk10 being a moderator—I don't know what I was thinking, I honestly thought his username had turned black...

As for the sanctions on those posts, I'm glad that happened, but it makes me wonder: how was the supermoderator sanctioned, the one who fought tooth and nail to prevent those posts from being flagged in the first place?
Daniel Ward87 Daniel Ward87 Active Member
195 messages
joined May 2023
#86 ·
I wouldn't sweat the small stuff. The posts were flagged, so there's really no need to keep this thread alive.

Amanda Diaz said:Of course that first point stands. And my apologies regarding the comment about rowdyhawk10 being a moderator—I don't know what I was thinking, I honestly thought his username had turned black...

As for the sanctions on those posts, I'm glad that happened, but it makes me wonder: how was the supermoderator sanctioned, the one who fought tooth and nail to prevent those posts from being flagged in the first place?

You can't penalize someone just for having an opinion on whether something should be flagged or not. That’s what a forum is for—discussing different perspectives. Anyway, the issue with the controversial posts is settled.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads