CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Trash PDF moderation issues — again

Trash PDF moderation issues — again

Started by brightjackal13 · · 👁 11 views · 88 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants brightjackal13gentlehound9Joshua Parker11Daniel Ward87Nicholas KingBrandon Lopez6gentlegull93Edward Howard46hollowsailor48swiftcrane96David Joneswiredmason10rustydrifter10Bryan Rogers9Henry Adams3Steven ReedWalter Watson30Frank Gonzalez65analoglynx23steelskipper5Kyle Martin3urbantrucker5slygardener33northerncyclist2
Steven Reed Steven Reed Regular
354 messages
joined Dec 2014
#61 ·
gentlehound9 said:And what about that permanent ban you were making such a huge, dramatic scene about just the other day? 🤣

pssssssst—we might finally see an end to this ban-happy era, and a permanent one at that. 👋 👋 😍
swiftcrane96 swiftcrane96 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2012
#62 ·
Steven Reed said:pssssssst—we might finally see an end to this ban-happy era, and a permanent one at that. 👋 👋 😍

Personally, I think there were at least two former mods who were basically on life support by now. 😬
brightjackal13 brightjackal13 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jan 2013
#63 ·
swiftcrane96, don't even start with the trolling. 😉 👋
Steven Reed Steven Reed Regular
354 messages
joined Dec 2014
#64 ·
swiftcrane96 said:Personally, I think there were at least two former mods who were basically on life support by now. 😬

those were the old guard—you’d be the first active one😍
maybe you could moderate some local subreddit or something🤔 see? See? Now that's an idea👋
I'm heading out for a bit—feeling social and ready to chat—though I doubt rustydrifter10 would appreciate anything other than a points tally😬
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#65 ·
Steven Reed said:those were the old guard—you’d be the first active one😍
maybe you could moderate some local subreddit or something🤔 see? See? Now that's an idea👋
I'm heading out for a bit—feeling social and ready to chat—though I doubt rustydrifter10 would appreciate anything other than a points tally😬

You're probably right about that.
Everyone else: you're thinking clearly.


😁
swiftcrane96 swiftcrane96 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2012
#66 ·
brightjackal13 said:swiftcrane96, don't even start with the trolling. 😉 👋

I was actually staying pretty much on topic until wiredmason10 dragged me straight into troll paradise.
wiredmason10 wiredmason10 Member
15 messages
joined Aug 2010
#67 ·
Here is a suggestion for future moderators (assuming we actually get any future moderators). You should open a dedicated thread for feedback, critiques, and suggestions. The garbage content seems to be getting stuck in those few existing threads, and I think there is a lot of untapped potential here. At one point (back in early December, if I recall correctly 🤔), things were actually quite lively.
Walter Watson30 Walter Watson30 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Feb 2014
#68 ·
Presidents get elected faster than the moderators on Trash.

I mean it—I’m actually speechless, which is pretty rare for me.☕
gentlehound9 gentlehound9 Active Member
68 messages
joined Oct 2010
#69 ·
wiredmason10, I sent a private message to both moderators and Tyndall over two months ago asking if I could start a thread for suggestions on the forum. They told me they had to touch base first.
About a month ago, I followed up to see if they’d finally reached an agreement. Nope.

You wouldn't believe how difficult it is for them to decide whether or not someone is allowed to open a single thread.
Frank Gonzalez65 Frank Gonzalez65 Member
14 messages
joined Jan 2012
#70 ·
Just start a New Thread so maybe people can finally reach an agreement. 😉
By the way, I end up reading more garbage than I actually write (even though I once earned a tiny bit of credit toward a profile picture 🙂), but seriously, someone over there needs to get their act together. From photos of minors and random dressed-up girls who have nothing to do with the trash, to full-on personal info, you can find it all without any trouble... but it’s just not okay.🙄
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#71 ·
Frank Gonzalez65 said:Just start a New Thread so maybe people can finally reach an agreement. 😉
By the way, I end up reading more garbage than I actually write (even though I once earned a tiny bit of credit toward a profile picture 🙂), but seriously, someone over there needs to get their act together. From photos of minors and random dressed-up girls who have nothing to do with the trash, to full-on personal info, you can find it all without any trouble... but it’s just not okay.🙄

Usually, those kinds of threads are opened by the moderators or someone working directly with them. Every once in a while, someone might take the initiative to start one and the mods just let it slide, but honestly, I wouldn't recommend you try that right now.
brightjackal13 brightjackal13 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jan 2013
#72 ·
Now they’ll let us stew on this topic for a few days—just enough time for everyone to drop a handful of pointless comments. Then, someone will inevitably post a few red-flagged nonsense threads over on Trash... and then, boom, they'll lock the whole thing down again. :baba Vanga: 😍
analoglynx23 analoglynx23 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2008
#73 ·
👋

I’m loving this; have any of you ever actually heard of the concept of self-managed socialism? The big slogan back then was "Factories to the workers!", or if we want to transpose that to this specific situation, "Garbage to the Garbage Forum Users." 😁

When I recently hopped back on and saw what this subforum has turned into—honestly, it kind of killed my desire to even bother posting here.
And look, don't go complaining about the mods. When I stepped away, I left them a subforum that wasn't exactly buzzing, but at least there were some ground rules in place. Maybe my mistake was failing to emphasize that when people start acting out, a mod needs to step in, hand out a few virtual slaps, move posts to where they actually belong, and then just sit back with a cold beer and a smile while reading thank-you notes from the ladies. It’s easy to get too cozy in that kind of laid-back atmosphere, and eventually, you just stop reacting—your reflexes get slow. Combine that with some personal stuff going on in my own life, and well, the results speak for themselves.

But then again... what massive contribution was there to moderate in this pile of garbage anyway? Just days of whining about spammers padding their post counts—stuff that should have been moved from the main garbage section over to Chatropic—or constant bellyaching about who’s feeling sick today and who isn't? Honestly, I made up for months of lecturing by spending an hour and a half skimming through posts, and it’s not like I stumbled onto anything fascinating; there's really nothing to say about how much value the users actually bring to this subforum. So, if you ask me, the real issue with Trash isn't a few images larger than 640p or a couple of unmoderated posts; it's the total lack of quality content.

Not to get too heavy here, but Trash needs maintenance from both sides—the moderation broom (or the sweeping brush, depending on how often you sweep) and the users who actually write decent or, well, less-decent posts. That’s why I think bringing on two new female moderators without actually getting people to engage on the site would just be moving air from one empty room to another. Everyone has their excuses for why they aren't posting, and the latest excuse is that the mods are inactive. Wouldn't it be a twist if things flipped and the mods were the ones everyone relied on for quality content?!?
Just write something, join the conversation, and honestly, even a local high school football coach could successfully moderate you guys.
brightjackal13 brightjackal13 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jan 2013
#74 ·
Your post is right up there with those "things were better back in the good old days" ramblings.

I especially love this part:
when I left, I handed over a subforum that wasn't exactly booming, but at least there were some basic rules of conduct in place. maybe my mistake was not being blunt enough about the fact that when the crew starts acting out, a mod needs to hand out a few virtual slaps—keep things organized, put posts where they actually belong, and then sit back with a cold beer and a smile while reading the thank-you notes from grateful forum users and their even more grateful assets.

Ivo, is that you? 😲

Anyway, not to drone on too long—if things had been moderated properly from the jump, we wouldn't be here. It’s like letting a kid get away with small tantrums until you eventually end up with an absolute brat. Something like that. 😍

EDIT_A This "Trash Forum User" comment—wtf? Are moderators not forum users? 🤔
steelskipper5 steelskipper5 Active Member
176 messages
joined Feb 2010
#75 ·
analoglynx23 said:👋

I’m loving this; have any of you ever actually heard of the concept of self-managed socialism? The big slogan back then was "Factories to the workers!", or if we want to transpose that to this specific situation, "Garbage to the Garbage Forum Users." 😁

When I recently hopped back on and saw what this subforum has turned into—honestly, it kind of killed my desire to even bother posting here.
And look, don't go complaining about the mods. When I stepped away, I left them a subforum that wasn't exactly buzzing, but at least there were some ground rules in place. Maybe my mistake was failing to emphasize that when people start acting out, a mod needs to step in, hand out a few virtual slaps, move posts to where they actually belong, and then just sit back with a cold beer and a smile while reading thank-you notes from the ladies. It’s easy to get too cozy in that kind of laid-back atmosphere, and eventually, you just stop reacting—your reflexes get slow. Combine that with some personal stuff going on in my own life, and well, the results speak for themselves.

But then again... what massive contribution was there to moderate in this pile of garbage anyway? Just days of whining about spammers padding their post counts—stuff that should have been moved from the main garbage section over to Chatropic—or constant bellyaching about who’s feeling sick today and who isn't? Honestly, I made up for months of lecturing by spending an hour and a half skimming through posts, and it’s not like I stumbled onto anything fascinating; there's really nothing to say about how much value the users actually bring to this subforum. So, if you ask me, the real issue with Trash isn't a few images larger than 640p or a couple of unmoderated posts; it's the total lack of quality content.

Not to get too heavy here, but Trash needs maintenance from both sides—the moderation broom (or the sweeping brush, depending on how often you sweep) and the users who actually write decent or, well, less-decent posts. That’s why I think bringing on two new female moderators without actually getting people to engage on the site would just be moving air from one empty room to another. Everyone has their excuses for why they aren't posting, and the latest excuse is that the mods are inactive. Wouldn't it be a twist if things flipped and the mods were the ones everyone relied on for quality content?!?
Just write something, join the conversation, and honestly, even a local high school football coach could successfully moderate you guys.

What you’re seeing right here, if you ask me, is just a bunch of users who are also losing interest in contributing. It's different from people like me, though—the ones who checked out a long time ago and stopped reading altogether.
Kyle Martin3 Kyle Martin3 Member
10 messages
joined Jun 2011
#76 ·
Everything seen before 🙄

I don't see what the issue is with clicking a few buttons to grant someone permission to clean up that PDF. It really isn't that difficult, is it?
analoglynx23 analoglynx23 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2008
#77 ·
brightjackal13 said:Your post is right up there with those "things were better back in the good old days" ramblings.

I especially love this part:
when I left, I handed over a subforum that wasn't exactly booming, but at least there were some basic rules of conduct in place. maybe my mistake was not being blunt enough about the fact that when the crew starts acting out, a mod needs to hand out a few virtual slaps—keep things organized, put posts where they actually belong, and then sit back with a cold beer and a smile while reading the thank-you notes from grateful forum users and their even more grateful assets.

Ivo, is that you? 😲

Anyway, not to drone on too long—if things had been moderated properly from the jump, we wouldn't be here. It’s like letting a kid get away with small tantrums until you eventually end up with an absolute brat. Something like that. 😍

EDIT_A This "Trash Forum User" comment—wtf? Are moderators not forum users? 🤔

They aren't; I mean, everyone knows moderators are basically demi-gods living up on Olympus, but since their internet connection is a bit sluggish up there due to the altitude, they have to descend down to the mortal realm just to moderate.

And honestly, your comparison to an underdeveloped mess is spot on—I’d just add the fact that this particular underdeveloped (or, if we're using the local slang, "hyperactive") mess is a direct product of your keyboard, among other things.😉
Look, I’m not making excuses for the mods—myself included—but let's be real: what kind of moderation would actually get people to engage? Would we need to hand out green cards and lollipops to the "good kids," rewarding them every time they manage to grace the Trash with a post?

Statements like "we asked/thought/intended to, but we didn't see any government incentive or lifetime achievement award, so we didn't follow through on what we asked/thought/intended" are just ridiculous.
Should a new thread be opened to kickstart the PDF? Then go ahead and open one; last time I checked, there isn't an army of horny gargoyles hiding behind the "New Thread" icon waiting to jump you with boiled, lubricated hybrid corn stalks from gentlegull93 (just imagine that for a second—trust me, you'll be weirded out by that mental image later).

It's the same deal here; if you want to be a mod, then say it loud and clear: "The current mods suck, chop off their heads and put me in charge because I know I can do it better." And hey, if that's your vibe, you've got my full support.😉 But there's really no point in dragging this out into two massive volumes—or in forum terms, two separate threads—without ever reaching a single concrete conclusion.
Kyle Martin3 Kyle Martin3 Member
10 messages
joined Jun 2011
#78 ·
@ analoglynx23 - we're talking apples and oranges here 😕
The current moderation team isn't performing well. I suggest appointing either Edward Howard46 or brightjackal13 as a moderator.

:magic words spoken: 🙂
Steven Reed Steven Reed Regular
354 messages
joined Dec 2014
#79 ·
analoglynx23 said:They aren't; I mean, everyone knows moderators are basically demi-gods living up on Olympus, but since their internet connection is a bit sluggish up there due to the altitude, they have to descend down to the mortal realm just to moderate.

And honestly, your comparison to an underdeveloped mess is spot on—I’d just add the fact that this particular underdeveloped (or, if we're using the local slang, "hyperactive") mess is a direct product of your keyboard, among other things.😉
Look, I’m not making excuses for the mods—myself included—but let's be real: what kind of moderation would actually get people to engage? Would we need to hand out green cards and lollipops to the "good kids," rewarding them every time they manage to grace the Trash with a post?

Statements like "we asked/thought/intended to, but we didn't see any government incentive or lifetime achievement award, so we didn't follow through on what we asked/thought/intended" are just ridiculous.
Should a new thread be opened to kickstart the PDF? Then go ahead and open one; last time I checked, there isn't an army of horny gargoyles hiding behind the "New Thread" icon waiting to jump you with boiled, lubricated hybrid corn stalks from gentlegull93 (just imagine that for a second—trust me, you'll be weirded out by that mental image later).

It's the same deal here; if you want to be a mod, then say it loud and clear: "The current mods suck, chop off their heads and put me in charge because I know I can do it better." And hey, if that's your vibe, you've got my full support.😉 But there's really no point in dragging this out into two massive volumes—or in forum terms, two separate threads—without ever reaching a single concrete conclusion.

I suppose I partially agree with that post—partially, at least—because while users might set the direction of a single sub-forum, we all know the mods hold the steering wheel (or, more precisely, they direct the flow of conversation). Still, this feels like total garbage to me.
You, me, and everyone else knows the drill: the endless cycle of "Me, me, me! Pick me for mod! I want power! I'll make an impact!" 🤣 It’s laughable. The admins and the existing mod team handle the appointments; some user's solo initiative to grab a title is just ridiculous—honestly, I laugh until I cry every time I see someone actually try to take this seriously 😍.
We've seen these attempts on older threads before, but I haven't seen anything like it on this one or the previous ones. 🤷
All I see is the group asking for one active mod for this section—because let's be real, this isn't exactly a bustling metropolis that needs five mods working in shifts. 😍
We just need one person who won't butcher the vibe—this crew is great, they aren't trash even when they act up—someone who will resize those massive images that stretch across the whole screen (and maybe send a quick DM to new users instead of immediately throwing a red card; I haven't even seen that happen on much larger forums when it comes to newbies). We need someone who will jump into a thread when things get too rowdy to steer people back to the topic, and who will occasionally start a new thread rather than acting like a pure janitor.
So? When are you coming back? 😍
analoglynx23 analoglynx23 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2008
#80 ·
Steven Reed said:I suppose I partially agree with that post—partially, at least—because while users might set the direction of a single sub-forum, we all know the mods hold the steering wheel (or, more precisely, they direct the flow of conversation). Still, this feels like total garbage to me.
You, me, and everyone else knows the drill: the endless cycle of "Me, me, me! Pick me for mod! I want power! I'll make an impact!" 🤣 It’s laughable. The admins and the existing mod team handle the appointments; some user's solo initiative to grab a title is just ridiculous—honestly, I laugh until I cry every time I see someone actually try to take this seriously 😍.
We've seen these attempts on older threads before, but I haven't seen anything like it on this one or the previous ones. 🤷
All I see is the group asking for one active mod for this section—because let's be real, this isn't exactly a bustling metropolis that needs five mods working in shifts. 😍
We just need one person who won't butcher the vibe—this crew is great, they aren't trash even when they act up—someone who will resize those massive images that stretch across the whole screen (and maybe send a quick DM to new users instead of immediately throwing a red card; I haven't even seen that happen on much larger forums when it comes to newbies). We need someone who will jump into a thread when things get too rowdy to steer people back to the topic, and who will occasionally start a new thread rather than acting like a pure janitor.
So? When are you coming back? 😍

Never; honestly, my personal take on that PDF—as much as I might actually like it and despite all those hazy, half-baked posts scattered through it—is ceterum censeo garbage esse delendam; it basically just ate itself alive, and there isn't any helping it at this point.

The only thing I really want to say is that even if the Head Moderator was in his absolute prime, he couldn't save Garbage if the users themselves don't step up and breathe some life back into the PDF.🙂

rustydrifter10, throw me one more ticket so we can get moving... we've got a long drive ahead of us! 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads