stormytinker4 said:I read the studies ages ago—not just those specific ones, but every single one out there! You really ought to sit down, go back to the basics, and start with the first link I provided and work your way up from there. You spend this entire time arguing with me without having actually clicked on a single link I’ve sent! How can you even attempt to debate this? It’s like trying to critique a movie without actually watching it! And honestly, why on earth would you send me a Wikipedia link written by random internet users? 😁... Is that supposed to be a credible source?? And I have no idea what you mean by section three... does it actually claim that a papaya is the same thing as a paw paw??? Let me try explaining this one more time—papaya is *Carica papaya*, while Paw Paw is *Asimina triloba*. It's like comparing an apple to a pear. I hope you finally see the distinction and realize that Paw Paw and papaya aren't even remotely similar, let alone the same plant..
You keep acting like you're the only one who earned expertise and wisdom through the agony of your mother's illness and helping others, but then you dismiss everyone else's lived experience as nothing more than hearsay. You don't hold a monopoly on suffering, grief, or the desire to help; I went through all of that with my dad, and I'm still going through it, just like many others here. Once I provide you with actual, legitimate sources—not some crowdsourced Wikipedia page!!—so you can educate yourself, since you clearly care, you turn around and give *me* a Wikipedia link and insist they're the same thing 😁... Education isn't your private property, and the rest of us—regular people—spend our whole lives learning things too 🙂.. I wouldn't dare step into a debate about something I wasn't informed on, but apparently, that doesn't stop you from lecturing others on how they should suffer, how they should learn, what they should read, where they should look, and so on. That is the fundamental difference between us: I only engage when I am well-informed, as you can plainly see, whereas you feel entitled to toss advice at anyone just because your father had lung cancer and you happen to be helping other cancer patients right now. I truly respect everything you do and the help you provide, but I'll say it again: you don't own this. Other people have the experience, the knowledge, and the heart to help, so please, just allow someone else to post something that might actually assist someone without jumping down their throat calling them names or dismissing them as uneducated... If I understood correctly, the whole point of this forum is to help the sick through advice, links, and shared experiences. I think I've said my piece. Honestly, I'm sorry I even have to write this, but I have to, because it’s not that you're right, it's that you aren't right at all! I'm done with this topic, and my one bit of friendly advice to you is to actually read up on the things you choose to argue about... (and preferably something better than Wikipedia)..
🤔
I'm no academic, but I've been reading through this post, your previous posts, and my responses to you, and I genuinely cannot fathom what triggered such a rude, abrasive reaction from you. 🤷
Right on the first page, you laid out your findings regarding paw paw and those "documented" cases where people in terminal stages, off chemo, consuming paw paw and flaxseeds, etc., supposedly recovered...
So, someone asks what paw paw actually is, you drop a link, then the moderator demands actual clinical human trials to back up your claims, so you start dumping a mountain of studies about paw paw. Then I asked you to please just distinguish between the in vitro stuff, the in vivo stuff, and the actual human clinical trials, and you sent me three studies—none of which were conducted on humans. After that, I tried to explain how conventional medicine follows strict, standardized protocols to ensure something is scientifically proven and recognized as an official treatment... honestly, I feel bad if you can't wrap your head around that, but I didn't make those rules up.🤷
The bottom line is, this whole mess happened because you haven't grasped that this forum operates under rules strictly tied to conventional medicine. What you’re preaching here belongs in a PDF for alternative medicine or some holistic wellness blog.
And regarding Wikipedia...😂 I provided that link for a reason, but clearly, you missed my point. Fine, papaya is obviously a completely different species from the paw paw you were talking about—my bad, a massive oversight on my part.🙂
In any case, I want to apologize if I inadvertently insulted your feelings or your intelligence; that truly wasn't my intention.
I wish you the best.🙂
@everyoneI'm done engaging on this topic because it has spiraled completely off-track and turned into pure spam.