CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Limitless (2011)

Limitless (2011)

Started by Lisa Alvarez67 · · 👁 9 views · 88 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Lisa Alvarez67brightseal3bolddrifter16Taylor Baker8redjackal15Edward Price6Jacob Fox6Benjamin Young5nimblemarlin6ambertinker41Lawrence Booth2mistyangler86Brian Brooks14hollowdrifter3James Harris34wiredranger30Scott Gonzalez9Chloe Anderson75swiftstag23Samuel Walker7Bradley Nelson2Ashley Nguyen44mistycrane19northerntrucker2 …
Austin Rodriguez5 Austin Rodriguez5 Member
25 messages
joined Feb 2017
#61 ·
Who killed Verna? 🙂

Actually, it’s a really interesting movie—definitely one of the better ones I've seen lately.
Arthur Hill2 Arthur Hill2 Member
20 messages
joined Jul 2009
#62 ·
Morgan Wood77 said:SPOILER:

I'm kind of wondering how Eddie actually dealt with the whole pill situation? Like, did they figure out the formula and fix the side effects, or did he just find something that provides a permanent fix? I'm also curious about how he handled those three murders in his apartment—I didn't quite follow the part about the previous tenant. And what about that bit with the hands in the safe? I guess he probably assumed someone would try to break in since both his old place and the one from Verna got hit.

ABOUT THE MOVIE:

It was a fun watch, though I guess the trailer might have looked even better than the actual movie, even if they didn't cram everything into the teaser, which was a good call. It’s probably one of the better movies I've seen this year, and I honestly felt pretty anxious right along with 🙂. I don't really see the point in making a sequel, personally. 9/10.

SPOILER:

Since Stan used to own a gun shop, everyone assumed the attackers were just disgruntled customers.

Verna was actually killed by that henchman who attacked eddie's girlfriend—basically, he was an employee of Adelman who was desperate for more NTZ.


A solid piece of work, likely sitting somewhere in that typical range on IMDb.
Sandra White10 Sandra White10 Member
26 messages
joined Oct 2015
#63 ·
I watched it. There were certain sequences that absolutely blew me away, though I have to admit there were moments where the performance felt a bit over-the-top—almost too much melodrama for my taste—but overall? I think he captured that character perfectly. 😁
Michael Ortiz68 Michael Ortiz68 Regular
264 messages
joined Oct 2018
#64 ·
You can't really expect anything groundbreaking from the basic premise, but you at least hope for some entertainment value.
The issue is that with movies like this, the tension and fun should be ramping up as you get closer to the credits, but instead, it’s the exact opposite—the movie just gets progressively stupider. It feels like the director completely lost the plot halfway through and had no clue how to actually steer the story toward a coherent ending. 🤷
wearyviper25 wearyviper25 Member
16 messages
joined Aug 2010
#65 ·
Gives you plenty to chew on. The cast, the soundtrack, the concept—everything just works. I didn't find myself checking my watch once while watching this. 😁
Chris Harris94 Chris Harris94 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jul 2011
#66 ·
That was one hell of a movie... honestly, it makes me want to get my hands on one of those tablets myself :🙂))
Sandra White10 Sandra White10 Member
26 messages
joined Oct 2015
#67 ·
Anyway, it’s a fascinating premise and honestly a brilliant concept for a movie, though I can't help but feel the execution fell a bit short of its potential.
Joshua Hughes2 Joshua Hughes2 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Feb 2012
#68 ·
I haven't had a chance to catch up on every single post here, but I just finished the movie and now I'm sitting here wondering... I didn't quite wrap my head around the ending, and honestly, I don't really have the energy to sit through it a second time. Did he actually stop taking his pills at the end?
boldrider88 boldrider88 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2011
#69 ·
Joshua Hughes2 said:I haven't had a chance to catch up on every single post here, but I just finished the movie and now I'm sitting here wondering... I didn't quite wrap my head around the ending, and honestly, I don't really have the energy to sit through it a second time. Did he actually stop taking his pills at the end?

Nah, he kept taking them (and making them)
Joshua Hughes2 Joshua Hughes2 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Feb 2012
#70 ·
boldrider88 said:Nah, he kept taking them (and making them)

So, if he's just taking them constantly now, you're telling me there aren't any side effects at all?
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#71 ·
Joshua Hughes2 said:So, if he's just taking them constantly now, you're telling me there aren't any side effects at all?

Well, apparently he found a way to dodge those effects entirely.
Karen Ward2 Karen Ward2 Member
34 messages
joined Mar 2009
#72 ·
Sophia Thomas7 said:Well, apparently he found a way to dodge those effects entirely.

Yeah, we were actually chatting about it last night. He mentioned everything is fine—just dealing with some sinus pressure if he overdoes it, but nothing serious.
Roger Scott45 Roger Scott45 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Apr 2012
#73 ·
boldrider88 said:Nah, he kept taking them (and making them)

instead, they refined them and made them better
Brian Martinez7 Brian Martinez7 Member
13 messages
joined Jul 2011
#74 ·
Karen Ward2 said:Yeah, we were actually chatting about it last night. He mentioned everything is fine—just dealing with some sinus pressure if he overdoes it, but nothing serious.

But man, he also told me his stomach is basically a disaster zone right now, like he's dealing with crappy bathroom issues every other day.😬

That movie was awesome, honestly one of the best things I've seen in a long time.🙏
Joseph Ross7 Joseph Ross7 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Feb 2012
#75 ·
swiftstag23 said:Interesting. A fun, high-energy flick. They did butcher the ending, though. When Robert De Niro shows up at his office to squeeze him, Bradley Cooper puts on this terrified face—like he’s panicking because everything just fell apart. Then—spoiler alert—he walks down to the car and tells Robert De Niro that he actually owns more factories, he figured it all out, he's fixing the pill to stop the side effects, and he's totally in control. Why the panicked look in the office then? That beat was unnecessary. For a movie like this, they could have gone a different route; it feels a bit too much like a "happy end" for this genre. Just my two cents. And one more thing: who actually killed the security guards and sent him their hands? Was it the money lender or the guy working for Atwood? Also, how does he know exactly what's going to happen to put those hands in the safe with the middle finger? If you're going to make an unrealistic movie, don't go so far off the rails that nothing makes sense anymore. In the end, he gets the fame, the cash, and the girl. A total happy end. 🙂

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

That’s exactly the point, though. It’s designed so you think de Niro totally crushed him and that's how the movie ends. After everything he went through, he’s going to "lose" it all, and then—boom. He played de Niro, he played us, and it's a complete reversal. The movie is great, and I guess you can't expect him to just lose everything right at the finish line, or wait until he sees a car crash coming. I think the ending works for the film as a whole. If they aren't planning a sequel, they don't need to wrap it up with some massive woow effect or leave it hanging like Inception. Usually, those dramatic endings just end up being annoying.

Ashley Nguyen44 said:Honestly, I hated it. It felt like some cheap, watered-down version of the original Sky 🤷

The writer was completely unconvincing, and honestly, Robert De Niro’s role was way too short.
Plus, that whole relationship he has with that woman? Totally underdeveloped.
Thank god I just watched it online.

That’s all from me. 🙂

I watched Vanilla Sky and remember feeling like time was dragging so slow; it was hard to follow certain parts. With this one, time actually flies by. You don't get that feeling where you're confused or wondering if you even understand what's happening, because you're just totally sucked into it. 🍿
brightseal3 brightseal3 Member
31 messages
joined Nov 2020
#76 ·
Personally, I’d say this was one of the absolute best films released back in 2011.
Paul Parker2 Paul Parker2 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Mar 2013
#77 ·
Total masterpiece!! I caught this in theaters and then immediately went back for a second viewing once it hit DirecTV. It was just too good to pass up. Such a gripping concept, an incredible cast (especially 😍 Bradley), and a killer plot—honestly, I can't find a single thing to nitpick. You seriously need to see this!
_________________
xoxo Sienna
http://fashion-sienna.blogspot.com/
Christian Cook6 Christian Cook6 Member
39 messages
joined Sep 2021
#78 ·
I’m not usually a big fan of Bradley, but he actually kills it in this one.
Honestly, the whole movie flew by—felt like it was only thirty minutes long. One of the better ones out there. 👍
Lawrence Richardson13 Lawrence Richardson13 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Mar 2012
#79 ·
Yeah, it was a great movie.
Edward Ortiz77 Edward Ortiz77 Member
37 messages
joined Aug 2015
#80 ·
I used to avoid this movie because I can't stand Bradley Cooper's attempts at acting, nor can I stomach how much Robert de Niro has let himself go, but I finally decided to give it a shot today. Honestly, what can I say? The plot is somewhat engaging and functional during the opening act—where the core idea feels decent enough—but then it steadily loses steam until it hits an ending that I personally found repulsive due to its sheer naivety. They never actually explain how he managed to keep producing tablets while simultaneously functioning on them. The film is riddled with logical gaps and gets particularly messy once you bring in that guy who’s supposed to sign the contract (Atwood?) who turns out to be using the tablets too... no, I can't even finish that thought. The presence of Bradley Cooper and a Robert de Niro who sells out his acting legacy far too easily is only tolerable if you're looking for ninety minutes of mindless entertainment to switch your brain off. For me, it's about a 6/10.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads