#61 ·
Research like this honestly makes my skin crawl. They claim a 50% reduction in risk, but they conveniently skip over the details—was it because those men were having less sex, or is it actually just because the exposure site is less vulnerable to the virus?
Either way, would you really gamble with HIV if there was a 50% chance of catching it? Instead of fussing about circumcision for people in sub-Saharan Africa, they could have just handed out condoms, which offer over 90% protection.
Either way, would you really gamble with HIV if there was a 50% chance of catching it? Instead of fussing about circumcision for people in sub-Saharan Africa, they could have just handed out condoms, which offer over 90% protection.