#541 ·
Let's be honest here: they showed up for the money, not because of Michael Schumacher, Jean Todt, or anyone else. Ferrari has always been able to bring the biggest check to the table, and they always will.
Started by Michael Lee4 · · 👁 18 views · 573 replies
Jonathan Booth5 said:Let's be honest here: they showed up for the money, not because of Michael Schumacher, Jean Todt, or anyone else. Ferrari has always been able to bring the biggest check to the table, and they always will.
silvercobra68 said:The absolute worst part is how people imagine it went down; they think Michael Schumacher just woke up one morning and decided, "Who am I kidding, why am I even bothering with Benetton?" He supposedly grabbed Ross Brawn and Brawn's associate under one arm, took them by the hand, and marched straight to Maranello. They picture him knocking on the door and saying, "Open up the gates to the estate, it's me and my crew of experts." As if we could just fix decades of accumulated problems overnight. That’s exactly how people visualize Michael Schumacher leaving for Ferrari.
It’s just not realistic. It's not like Lewis Hamilton woke up one day and declared he needed the best boss, the best driver, the best strategist, the best designer, and a V10 all at once. That simply isn't how things work. But sure, let's pretend Michael Schumacher just woke up and made it happen. Yeah, right.
placidsurfer9 said:Of course it wasn't like that. He went after the money and he knew exactly what kind of car he’d be sitting in the following season. But honestly, he made the most of everything, and nobody can deny that... He put himself in that position, and he's the reason why—especially those who hate him—people end up micromanaging things within the team. I mean, no other driver has ever earned that level of trust from their team... but whatever, the whole Schumacher saga is its own thing and probably doesn't belong here...
silvercobra68 said:aaaaaaaaaaa
You don't get it at all. Absolutely nothing.
what kind of car he'll be driving next season —I'm not even talking about the car, I'm talking about the personnel, for crying out loud.
silvercobra68 said:aaaaaaaaaaa
You don't get it at all. Absolutely nothing.
what kind of car he'll be driving next season —I'm not even talking about the car, I'm talking about the personnel, for crying out loud.
stormyviper11 said:Look, I am talking about the car. Back in 1995, Ferrari had one win and ten podiums. They were convincingly the third-best team, trailing quite a bit behind the top two, but every single one of their drivers scored more points individually than the fourth-place team did in total. So, jumping from being part of the top tier to becoming the third-string team is basically the exact same thing as Button's move from Brawn to McLaren this year... which isn't exactly being viewed as some insane move for a champion at his peak just looking for a new challenge...
And how people see Ferrari today before the arrival of the savior is like they were sitting at the bottom of the grid barely making it out of qualifying... ☕ Fundamentally speaking, things had already started falling into place after that rough start to the decade, and they just needed to keep that upward momentum going. If they had someone else as their lead driver, they probably would have pulled off a win every now and then, almost certainly, but the real question is whether they could actually turn that into a consistent thing.
wiredtiger8 said:You've got it wrong.
What "preferential treatment" are you talking about regarding Michael Schumacher? Others didn't get that either.
Other drivers could put in millions of kilometers and test from dawn till dusk—sleeping in the car, then hitting the gym for a few hours... every single day. But they didn't.
Honestly, nobody worked as hard in Formula 1 before Michael Schumacher.
So what now?
All that effort finally paid off at the end of his career...
And now people want to devalue all that work and those millions upon millions of testing kilometers. I guess we’re following that logic where hard work isn't appreciated... or maybe that old saying about how the man who works the hardest just gets more chores.
Your stance surprises me... you should at least recognize the value of hard work and total dedication to a profession (at least, that's my impression from your posts so far).
And in the USA, hard work is supposed to count for something, right?
silvercobra68 said:In case nobody noticed, I am debating stormyviper11 here, trying to dismantle his theory that it goes Schumacher > Alonso > Kimi > Hamilton.
To all the rest of you jumping in with "but Hamilton is younger" or "Kimi was just unlucky with the car"—please, I'm asking nicely, just stay out of this discussion. I promised Sepi I wouldn't get insulting anymore, but even I have my limits. Please, do me and Sepi a favor and give us some space. Thanks. God bless!
wiredtiger8 said:@stormybadger8...
...look, I’m not even talking about how things look today—I’m comparing this to how the sport functioned about 15 years ago. Back then, everyone actually had the freedom to test whenever they damn well pleased, it wasn't just some exclusive privilege reserved for Michael Schumacher.
And honestly? No one else was putting in nearly as many hours as he was.
That’s my whole point right there.
By the way, if you ask me, this current testing ban is one of the absolute biggest pieces of nonsense we've seen... and I'm not just saying that because it happens to be inconvenient for Schumacher at the moment.
silvercobra68 said:I think we can finally settle all those heated debates about who the greatest driver ever is with this one
This guy is the GOAT—ten times better than Senna, Prost, Michael Schumacher, and Fernando Alonso combined
Lionel Regal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IATNfTWvM9c
stormybadger8 said:So, when are you actually going to start that new thread?😬
Come on, just open it already, please. 🙂
If you’re too lazy, Stinger can take over. He’s not half bad himself.😬