Anthony Kim18 said:Look, wouldn't it be fairer if every single country in the world got its own option, even if 99% of them ended up with zero votes?
Usually, even in real statistics, the options with tiny numbers of votes are either ignored or lumped together.
That's why I just grouped them all under "others."
It doesn't really matter; at the end of the day, this is your poll. 🙂 You set the rules however you think is best. I was just jumping into the conversation... honestly, I love it when people debate national cinemas like this, even without a formal poll.
Personally, my heart belongs to France. My top three directors are all French—Jean Renoir, Henri-Georges Cluzot, and Jacques Tati—so I'm happy to cast my vote there. 😬 In my view, French cinema has managed to stay at the "top" longer than most when you weigh quality against quantity; they’ve produced more original movements and directors than almost anyone else. They were somewhat of a late bloomer compared to, say, German cinema, but while the German-speaking world essentially scattered across the globe (think Lubitch, Lang, Emmerich, Murnau, Wilder...), the French tend to stay pretty true to their own roots. That said, I’ve struggled to sit through much French film over the last 30 years or so. A Jean-Pierre Jeunet film? Honestly, it was a struggle... though I suppose it's "auteur" driven, which is probably what matters most.
Someone mentioned how similar American and British cinema can feel: 🙂
Historically, the British have fought a bloody battle against American dominance, made even harder by the fact that they share a language. In reality, Americans indirectly cut them down at the root back in the 1920s. Panicked about their domestic industry being completely wiped out, the British passed the Film Law (around 1927) which mandated a certain quota of British films in theaters across the UK. It turned out to be a double-edged sword; in a rush to meet those quotas, studios started churning out absolute garbage. These were the infamous "quota quickies," which the British are still pretty embarrassed about today. Since then, they've been cutting at the heels of American film, though there is a school of thought that thinks it’s great when British movies are made to mimic Hollywood perfectly—like "Weddings and a Funeral" and stuff like that. Though everyone admits that’s basically the only way they turn a real profit.
Regardless, I think the British have a few cinematic gems they can actually brag about: that specific brand of British comedy rooted in vaudeville—back in the 1930s, they were making films that haven't been matched since (just look at "Oh Mr. Porter!")—and that wave of social realism from the late 50s and 60s. That era gave us legends like Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. And I can't forget the unmatched duo of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, or the entire horror institution built by Hammer... the British definitely have things to show for themselves. 😍