CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006)

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006)

Started by redowl90 · · 👁 9 views · 103 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants redowl90Noah WardAChris Hall47Hannah Perez3Linda Hughes88Gary Kelly8Richard Hernandez13David Price5Arthur GrayJose Lopez15Brian WilliamsHenry Garciarapidviper54Hannah Thompson2Brandon CookDaniel Chase83northerncrane4Charles HughesRyan Gomez4silentpilot6Jonathan Thomas4cosmicpuma122Donna Green6 …
Hannah Perez3 Hannah Perez3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jul 2006
#21 ·
redowl90 said:Jerry Bruckheimer is a cinematic BOG!

The man can take absolute garbage and turn it into a massive blockbuster... he's proven that more times than I can count...
Of course, when I say "blockbuster," I don't mean the movie is actually good or, heaven forbid, holds any artistic value. I’m strictly talking about the box office numbers... Basically, the guy has this knack for making people reach into their pockets and drop $17 on total junk... I guess that's an impressive skill in its own way...

He’s definitely a god-tier producer, no doubt about that! But at the same time, he might still be the biggest copy-paster in history... you can believe both things at once, I suppose...😎

Richard Hernandez13 said:The Monkey Island series was partially inspired by the Pirates of the Caribbean ride, and Monkey Island 2 features a number of tributes to it, particularly a scene with a guard dog in a prison being lured by a bone and Disneyland style underground tunnels and "e-tickets" in the closing scenes.

Sure, it draws from that Disney pirate aesthetic, but I don't think it's really a case of simple copy-pasting. Every part of the game feels pretty creative and original to me, I guess...
Brian Williams Brian Williams Member
38 messages
joined Dec 2006
#22 ·
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest is absolute garbage!!!!!!!!!!!! 👎 👎 👎 👎Gore Verbinski could have done so much better than THIS 😱 👎
redowl90 redowl90 RegularOP
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#23 ·
Hannah Perez3 said:Of course he's a producer powerhouse, obviously—that's common knowledge! But he’s still the worst copy-paster in history... those two things aren't mutually exclusive.

But if he really is just a copy-paster, then he's the BEST one out there, because those recycled films are pulling in billions at the box office...
Hannah Perez3 Hannah Perez3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jul 2006
#24 ·
Maybe redowl90 is onto something... I mean, Jerry is probably the greatest copy-paster in history... though honestly, most of his films could probably be used in mental institutions instead of performing lobotomies...🙂

The only ones with any actual substance are those Pirates movies...😉
Jose Lopez15 Jose Lopez15 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jul 2006
#25 ·
I just rewatched Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest for the 30th time—honestly, I'm more hyped for the sequel than ever.
I can't wait for 👍
Arthur Gray Arthur Gray Member
13 messages
joined Jan 2003
#26 ·
I caught the premiere, and honestly? It was nothing special. The movie could probably pass as okay, but there were definitely things that just didn't click for me. Look, they took a bunch of legends and myths and mashed them together into this big spectacle, but then they went and made everything way more complicated than it needed to be... For God's sake. I guess I'm still curious about the sequel though...
Henry Garcia Henry Garcia Newcomer
9 messages
joined Jul 2006
#27 ·
I absolutely loved the first Pirates of the Caribbean film, and honestly, I’m counting down the days until the sequel hits theaters here in the States... I have a feeling it's going to be great since that whole genre is right up my alley. Now, all I can do is sit tight and wait to see if it actually manages to top an already solid movie.🙂
Linda Hughes88 Linda Hughes88 Active Member
89 messages
joined Jun 2006
#28 ·
I can't really say I was blown away by the movie. I haven't even seen one of them before, and honestly, I live for pirate flicks...
Just like how those skeletons in the first film didn't really sit right with me, you know, like the undead types and all that, these weirdos on the "Dutch" ship just didn't click either. I'm just a sucker for that classic pirate vibe. You know, islands, treasure, a chest full of gold... nothing too supernatural or crazy...
Even the dialogue wasn't exactly top-tier. If Depp had just landed one witty line instead of having to carry the whole thing on his acting alone, the whole thing would have looked way better...
It feels like this flick was made for kids, because the humor is totally on that level. It’s basically like watching Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner or some cartoon villain... and the action scenes feel more like a choreographed dance or a circus act, like that sword fight on the windmill halfway across the island...😬
It's such a shame, because they really could have done so much better with this material...
rapidviper54 rapidviper54 Active Member
64 messages
joined Jul 2010
#29 ·
Honestly, you guys have way too high expectations...

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest is two hours of pure entertainment. You won't be sitting around pondering its deep philosophical meaning once the credits roll—but you'll definitely have a blast during those two hours.
Linda Hughes88 Linda Hughes88 Active Member
89 messages
joined Jun 2006
#30 ·
rapidviper54 said:Man, you guys have some seriously high expectations...

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest is just two hours of pure, unadulterated fun. You aren't exactly going to be sitting there pondering its deep philosophical meanings once the credits roll, but man, those two hours are a total blast...

I don't know, they aren't even that fun... at least not to me...
Gary Kelly8 Gary Kelly8 Member
37 messages
joined Apr 2006
#31 ·
rapidviper54 said:I think you guys might be setting the bar a little too high...

Look, Pirates is just two hours of pure, unadulterated fun. You aren't going to be sitting there pondering its deep philosophical meanings once the credits roll, but man, those two hours? A total blast.

Two hours of pure fun... well, considering the movie actually runs for two and a HALF hours, that means they just took an extra thirty minutes of pure boredom and sprinkled it throughout the whole thing—just enough to drag the entire experience down. 😬
The "high expectations" I had were really just based on what the First Film did for the crew; honestly, it was incomparably more entertaining than this "sequel."
Hannah Thompson2 Hannah Thompson2 Active Member
113 messages
joined Jul 2005
#32 ·
Honestly, a pretty terrible movie. One part was decent enough, but the rest? Just awful.

First off—it’s incredibly boring. The pacing is glacial, and the whole thing is just bogged down by unnecessary, drawn-out dialogue. Second—it isn't funny at all. They clearly tried, though; there are constant attempts at humor where you're *supposed* to laugh, but it feels like something out of a kids' cartoon. What’s even more pathetic is watching half the theater laughing at these totally predictable gags—you know, the kind where someone trips and the music cues up... yeah, that. Third—it’s way too long. Fourth—totally predictable. And fifth—there's no actual ending, just a setup for a third installment that I have zero intention of seeing after this disaster.

If I have to find a silver lining, the special effects were good—but I guess that’s expected given how much money they threw at it.
Brandon Cook Brandon Cook Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jul 2006
#33 ·
I mean, honestly? The first one was way better... there were just too many weird characters in the sequel, way too much sci-fi nonsense going on
Daniel Chase83 Daniel Chase83 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Oct 2008
#34 ·
July 27th. I'm going for it, no matter what happens.😁
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#35 ·
Occasionally entertaining nonsense.
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#36 ·
I think I was actually planning on seeing it... I shot some footage of this during the summer during that Gibson apocalypse (or maybe it was the apocalypse 🤔 😬), but it looks like nothing's happening with it before Christmas..
Henry Garcia Henry Garcia Newcomer
9 messages
joined Jul 2006
#37 ·
I just got back from the premiere, and man, it was FANTASTIC. I absolutely loved it. Now I'm just sitting here wondering if they’ll actually manage to save Jack Sparrow in the third one... JACK SPARROW RULES
Hannah Thompson2 Hannah Thompson2 Active Member
113 messages
joined Jul 2005
#38 ·
Henry Garcia said:I caught the premiere, and honestly, it was great—I loved it. Now I’m just sitting here wondering if they'll actually manage to save Jack in the third one... JACK SPARROW RULES


did you find it funny?
Charles Hughes Charles Hughes Newcomer
4 messages
joined Aug 2006
#39 ·
What kind of criticism is this? Did you guys not find that musical number hilarious, where they're swinging from one cliff to another inside a wooden cage? And didn't that scene with the female kraken at the end just tug at your heartstrings? You people are losing it... 🙂
redowl90 redowl90 RegularOP
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#40 ·
Charles Hughes said:Wasn't that musical part funny, where they're stuck in the wooden cage swinging from one cliff to another?

I'm not sure I see the joke there. 😕

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads