Richard Hernandez13
Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
Well, there you have it... everything has finally wrapped up, and it all went down under a gorgeous sunset. : )
Here’s my first thought: I think Jessica Nguyen85 mentioned that the term revolution carries several different meanings, and one of them is actually "turning over" (which is exactly what the word revolution means etymologically). I feel like that’s precisely the point of the movie—the "wheel" turned and landed right back where it started. Sort of.
WATCH OUT!!! HUGE SPOILERS AHEAD
First off, here is what didn't quite land for me.
The pacing is just... off. The drama feels almost like a flat line. That’s always the struggle with these kinds of trilogies; every single film that follows a linear path needs its own three-act structure, yet they also have to function as one massive three-act epic. In other words, each sequel has to perfectly balance being the buildup, the climax, and the payoff. Trying to sync all those moving parts is incredibly difficult, so I don't hold the Wachowskis too much blame for that.
Now, for what I actually enjoyed.
There isn't a "Matrix within the Matrix," did I mention that? 😁
Okay, all jokes aside now…
Heh... the directors didn't really try to explicitly explain how things ended. Honestly, I was hoping they’d leave it vague so we could all come up with our own interpretations of what we saw. Though, looking back, a lot of my friends were totally lost by the ending—and that includes both the people who loved it and the ones who hated it... so now I'm feeling a little confused myself; is it really that hard to follow? I won't lay out my own theory just yet because I’m genuinely curious to hear what you guys make of it.
Unlike some other folks, I didn't necessarily see Neo as a Jesus figure (even if there are definitely elements that point toward that interpretation); maybe it's just because I'm an atheist 😁. The core philosophy of this trilogy is rooted in Gnosticism; it's sort of like a spiritual buffet of religious philosophies, so I suppose everyone finds the flavor that resonates most with them.
I don't think you can truly understand Neo without Agent Smith—because when the Oracle says, "He is you," it strikes me as one of those Eastern philosophical takes on good and evil. It feels very different from the more simplified American Judeo-Christian framework of God as absolute good versus the Devil as absolute evil. But hey, that's just my take, and like I said, we all see what we want to see.
Anyway, I won't keep bothering you all any longer—that's all from me for now. 😁