Psychiatry and Me: A forum for those serious about these disorders

ADDICTION

Cognitive Impairment and Alcoholism Recovery

Brain damage is a frequent and potentially serious byproduct of long-term, heavy alcohol use. Even light to moderate drinking can negatively impact cognitive functions—essentially the mental processes used to receive, store, recall, and apply information (1).
The permanent cognitive deficits caused by chronic alcoholism can lead to diminished work capacity in adults, while in younger populations, such as adolescents, they can interfere with learning and academic performance (2).
A small but significant percentage of the most severe alcoholics may develop a devastating, irreversible form of brain damage known as Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome, a disorder where a patient is unable to retain new information for more than a few seconds (3).

Cognitive impairment might also stall recovery from alcoholism, though research hasn't definitively proven this link yet. For instance, Morgenstern and Bates (4) looked into whether deficits in learning and planning abilities—which are core strategies for treatment—impacted successful recovery. They found that impairment wasn't a particularly reliable predictor of poor treatment outcomes. On the flip side, evidence suggests that brain damage, whether stemming from current or past alcoholism, could contribute to the ongoing development and progression of addiction (5).

Developing practical strategies to tackle the complex mix of alcoholism and cognitive impairment requires a solid understanding of how cognitive functions work and how they interact with structural and functional abnormalities in the brain.

Cognition and Alcohol

Most individuals struggling with alcoholism show mild to moderate deficiencies in intellectual functions (6), along with reduced brain volume and localized changes in neuronal activity. The most common cognitive impairments seen in alcoholics involve visuospatial skills and certain complex cognitive functions (7). Visuospatial functions include perceiving and remembering the relative positions of objects in 2D and 3D space. Real-world examples of using this function include driving a car or assembling furniture based on diagrams. More advanced functions involve the abstract reasoning needed to organize a plan, initiate an action, and pivot if that plan isn't working (2).

On standard intelligence tests, most alcoholics perform just as well as non-alcoholics. However, they tend to score lower on neuropsychological tests that measure specific cognitive functions (8). For example, an alcoholic who remains abstinent after treatment might seem perfectly fine when filling out office paperwork—a task involving multiple brain regions. Yet, that same person might struggle to design an entirely different data entry system, which is a task tied to higher-level cognitive functions.

When is too much alcohol too much?

The exact relationship between how long someone has been drinking and the onset of cognitive issues isn't quite clear. Some researchers propose a theory that cognitive abilities decline in direct proportion to the severity and duration of an individual's alcohol abuse (6, 9). Other researchers suggest that cognitive impairment can only be clearly demonstrated in those who have been heavy drinkers consistently for ten years or more (8, 10). Long-term, light-to-moderate drinkers also fall into this category, showing cognitive deficits comparable to those found in detoxed alcoholics (8). While more research is needed to pin down exactly how alcohol consumption links to cognitive damage, some deficits can manifest even in people who aren't considered heavy drinkers.

Monitoring structural and functional brain abnormalities.

Most structural and functional brain abnormalities are identified through non-invasive imaging techniques, which give us a look at the living brain while keeping risks to a minimum. For structural imaging, we rely on tools like CT scans and MRI to create detailed digital maps of living tissue. On the functional side, techniques such as PET scans and MR spectroscopy allow scientists to study cellular activity by monitoring blood flow and energy metabolism.

Structural imaging techniques consistently show that the brains of alcoholics are smaller than those of non-alcoholics, displaying lower tissue density (11, 12). This loss of brain volume is most noticeable in two specific areas: the cerebral cortex in the frontal lobe—which we consider the hub for higher mental functions (7, 12, 13)—and the cerebellum, which handles much of our movement, balance, and various learning processes (14). Functional imaging studies back these findings up, revealing altered brain activity across both the cortex and the cerebellum in individuals with severe alcoholism (15). On top of that, functional imaging is often sensitive enough to pick up abnormalities before structural scans can, or even before significant cognitive issues actually manifest. This makes functional imaging particularly useful for spotting the early stages of cognitive decline (15).

Understanding the basics of cognitive impairment.

Accurately measuring cognitive abilities is a massive hurdle. With the technology we have today, it’s just not possible to link those specific abilities to particular brain irregularities (16). Because research results often clash, experts have had to develop more sophisticated ways to measure cognitive function. Beatty et al. (9) suggested that widespread, diffuse brain dysfunction can actually stem from damage to multiple areas—each regulating its own unique, yet interconnected, function. Similarly, disrupting the network of neurons that synchronizes activity across many regions can cause significant brain impairment even before any localized damage occurs (9).

Is the damage reversible?

Certain cognitive impairments caused by alcohol can actually be reversed, provided there is strict abstinence (17). Adults who have recently completed detox often show mild but noticeable deficits in specific areas—mainly problem-solving, short-term memory, and visuospatial skills (18). However, if those in rehab stick to sobriety, brain function tends to recover over several months to a year (19). This recovery includes improvements in working memory, visuospatial functioning, and attention. It’s also accompanied by a significant increase in brain volume compared to treated individuals who eventually relapsed (18).

Rewiring brain connections.

The fact that alcohol-related brain functions can reverse itself might actually stem from the brain reorganizing its own key networks. Some researchers have even proposed that this kind of reorganization could be a major factor in successful alcoholism recovery. Using advanced imaging techniques, Pfefferbaum et al. studied brain activity in participants with cognitive impairment due to alcohol during various cognitive testing sessions. What they discovered was fascinating: even though these individuals showed abnormal brain activity patterns compared to a control group, they were still able to complete tasks just as effectively. This suggests that the brains of those struggling with alcohol may functionally reorganize themselves—essentially rerouting tasks from damaged areas to alternative neural systems. This idea—that patients with cognitive impairments use different neural pathways than healthy individuals to achieve the same results—was also hinted at in a study involving patients undergoing 12-step treatment programs. For adolescents, this functional reorganization might be a significant advantage in the recovery process, simply because their brains are still developing and actively building out their neural networks.

Cognitive functions and alcoholism treatment

We don't fully grasp the exact role cognitive functions play in how successful alcoholism treatment actually is. Using structural and functional imaging, along with more specialized cognitive testing, can give researchers a clearer look at the subtle link between alcohol-induced cognitive impairment and the recovery process. In the meantime, we can draw some conclusions from existing research to help explain how these cognitive functions impact treatment:

continued/

- It’s thought that cognitive impairment from alcohol use might impact how effectively someone can recover, even if we haven't established a definitive link yet. One theory suggests that patients with cognitive deficits struggle to process the information shared during therapy, making it hard to fully engage with the program, which likely leads to higher failure rates. Another perspective argues that while cognitive damage doesn't directly block recovery, it does influence other variables that contribute to success (22). Focusing on those factors—like better nutrition, creating opportunities for success, carefully assessing comorbid mental or medical conditions, and using strategies to help patients break out of long-term social isolation—might actually be more effective than just focusing solely on alcohol abstinence.

- Other types of brain damage related to alcohol can mimic the symptoms seen in alcohol-induced cognitive impairment. Clinicians need to stay mindful that regardless of the underlying cause, any brain injury can hinder a patient's ability to get the full benefit of alcoholism treatment strategies.
- Cognitive impairment tends to be most severe during the first week of abstinence. This can make it difficult for some individuals to absorb the knowledge and skills taught in specific sessions, which are vital components of many treatment programs (22, 23). For instance, one study found that patients tested shortly after entering a program were unable to recall treatment information presented in a film they had just watched (4). As time passes and cognitive functions improve, patients generally find much more value in the information provided through individual or group therapy, educational programs, and 12-step recovery models.

Moderate alcohol consumption.

Defining "moderate alcohol consumption" is tricky because everyone seems to have a different take on what that actually means. People often confuse moderate drinking with "social drinking"—those habits that your friends or coworkers find acceptable within a group setting. But even social drinking can lead to issues if you aren't careful. To me, moderate consumption should probably be defined as drinking that doesn't cause problems, either for the individual or for society at large. Since there are clearly both pros and cons to moderate alcohol use, let’s dive a bit deeper into those two sides of the coin.

It would be helpful if the definition of "moderate drinking" included specific numerical limits for what counts as "safe." But using quantitative metrics to define moderation is tricky because alcohol doesn't affect everyone the same way; its impact varies wildly from person to person. The pattern of drinking is just as critical when looking at alcohol-related issues. To put it more clearly, while epidemiological data usually focuses on the "average number of drinks per week," there is a massive difference between having one drink early in the morning versus having several during a night out on a Saturday (1).

Despite how complicated it is to define and track alcoholism, there are actually numerical definitions for moderate drinking. For instance, certain government agency guidelines here in the United States...
The World Health Organization defines moderate drinking as no more than one drink per day for women and up to two for men. A standard drink is roughly 12 grams of pure alcohol—which usually looks like a 12-ounce beer, a 5-ounce glass of wine, or a 1.5-ounce shot of spirits.

These guidelines exclude certain groups who should strictly avoid alcohol: pregnant women or those trying to conceive; anyone planning to drive or engage in activities requiring coordination and skill; individuals currently taking medication; people undergoing treatment for alcoholism; and anyone under the age of 18 (2). While official manuals don't explicitly list them as contraindications, various medical conditions—such as peptic ulcers—should also be taken into account.

The reason we have separate guidelines for men and women comes down to research showing that women tend to experience higher intoxication levels than men after consuming the same amount of alcohol (4). Part of this is due to significant differences in how stomach enzymes function; in men, these enzymes break down alcohol before it even hits the bloodstream at a rate about four times faster than in women (5). On top of that, women generally have a higher proportion of body fat and less water content compared to men. Since alcohol dissolves in water rather than fat, any given dose ends up more concentrated in a woman's bodily fluids than in a man's (6).

Since body fat percentage tends to climb as we get older, Dufour et al. suggest that older adults stick to a limit of just one drink per day (7).

Stick to moderate alcohol consumption.

The physiological perks of moderate drinking. A review of the literature (8) suggests that lower levels of alcohol consumption can actually help reduce stress, while fostering feelings of relaxation and ease. It may also help dial down tension, anxiety, and self-consciousness. In older adults, there's evidence that moderate drinking can boost appetite, promote regular bowel function, and improve overall mood (7).

It’s used for the cardiovascular system. There's actually plenty of evidence suggesting that moderate alcohol consumption can lower the risk of death from coronary artery disease. This effect has been shown in several older epidemiological studies (9). More recently, Boffetta and Garfinkel (10) discovered that white Americans who reported consuming fewer than three drinks a day back in 1959 faced a lower risk of mortality over the following 12 years, compared to men who reported total abstinence. These findings were primarily driven by a reduction in the frequency of heart disease. In a similar study tracking various ethnic groups, De Labry et al. (11) found that overall mortality was lowest among men consuming less than three drinks per day during a 12-year period.

Research involving women has yielded similar findings. Stampfer et al. (12) looked at data from middle-aged women and determined that consuming roughly one drink per day lowers the risk of coronary heart disease. Using a random population sample, Razay et al. (13) found that drinking up to two drinks a day is linked to lower cardiovascular risk factors in women. For postmenopausal women, the apparent protective effect of alcohol might be partly explained by alcohol-induced increases in blood estrogen levels (14).

Some researchers have suggested that moderate drinking doesn't actually offer any protection against coronary heart disease. Their argument is that the higher mortality rates seen among abstainers might just be because that group includes people who quit drinking specifically due to poor health. Essentially, those who stop drinking because they're already sick could skew the data, making moderate drinkers look like they live longer by comparison. However, studies that specifically account for those who quit drinking for health reasons don't really support that conclusion. Simply grouping sick former drinkers with all other abstainers doesn't fully explain why moderate drinking appears to have a protective effect against heart disease.

The risks of moderate drinking.

There are risks that can easily overshadow any perceived benefits of moderate drinking. Research indicates that adverse effects can still crop up even at relatively low levels of consumption (1).

Stroke. Looking through epidemiological studies, there's evidence suggesting that moderate alcohol consumption actually bumps up the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, even though it simultaneously lowers the risk of ischemic stroke caused by blocked blood vessels (21).

Car accidents. While there's some debate about whether very low blood alcohol levels pose a risk, it’s well-documented that impairment starts at just 0.05% BAC. That impairment tends to spiral quickly as the concentration rises (22). For an 80 kg man, just two drinks can push him right to that 0.05% mark.

Drug interactions. Alcohol can react poorly with over 100 different medications (23). Its effects are especially amplified when combined with drugs that depress the central nervous system—think sedatives, sleeping pills, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, anti-anxiety meds, or certain painkillers. If you've had a few drinks and are also taking one of those, driving becomes incredibly dangerous (24). For those dealing with advanced heart failure, alcohol doesn't just risk worsening the underlying condition; it can actually interfere with how life-saving heart medications work (25).

Cancer. While most evidence points to an increased risk for certain cancers primarily among heavy drinkers, moderate alcohol consumption might have a weak link to breast cancer in women. In one study (26), women who had three to nine drinks per week faced roughly a 50% higher probability of developing breast cancer compared to those drinking fewer than three per week. Data regarding the connection between alcohol intake and colorectal cancer remains controversial, though one study suggests there could be a slight correlation between consuming one or more drinks a day and that specific cancer (27).

Birth defects. A few recent studies have been looking into the fetal risks tied to consuming small amounts of alcohol. In one study (28), children whose mothers reported an average intake of 2–3 drinks per day were smaller in weight, length, and head circumference. These kids also showed a higher number of minor physical anomalies during routine checkups throughout their first three years of life. Additionally, mothers who reported drinking small amounts—around 2 drinks a day—during pregnancy were linked to lower IQ scores in their children by age seven (29).

Whether moderate alcohol consumption actually harms a fetus is still a debated topic. The main issue is that we rely on mothers to report their own intake, which is subjective and isn't always accurate (30). However, animal studies offer more concrete evidence regarding the risks of even small amounts of alcohol. For instance, when mother monkeys were given low weekly doses of alcohol, researchers observed abnormalities in the central nervous system. This occurred at maternal blood alcohol concentrations of just 2.5 percent (31). Similarly, low prenatal doses have been shown to trigger biochemical and physiological changes in the brains of rats (32, 33).

Moving toward heavier alcohol consumption. People currently in recovery, or those coming from families where alcoholism is a recurring issue, might struggle to maintain a habit of moderate drinking (2). Once someone transitions from moderate use to severe alcoholism, the risk of facing significant social and medical complications skyrockets (34).

References:

Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome refers to a cluster of symptoms that can occur in individuals who stop drinking after long-term, heavy alcohol consumption. Mild cases often involve tremors, seizures, and hallucinations, typically surfacing 6 to 48 hours after the last drink. A more severe manifestation, delirium tremens, involves profound confusion, hallucinations, and intense autonomic hyperactivity, usually appearing between 48 and 96 hours post-consumption. Estimates regarding the frequency of severe complications vary. Regardless of how common these severe outcomes are, recent evidence emphasizes the importance of treating anyone suffering from alcohol withdrawal syndrome.
In a classic study that shaped our understanding of alcohol withdrawal for years, Isbell et al. (1955) found that alcohol-related seizures occurred only after someone stopped drinking. More recent studies have largely focused on seizure tracking; Ng. et al. (1988) challenged Isbell's concept, reporting that the risk of a first seizure is actually linked to current alcohol intake rather than just withdrawal. Based on retrospective data from patients who experienced seizures, they concluded there is a causal link between alcohol consumption and seizures that depends on the dosage taken. However, newer neurophysiological findings actually support Isbell’s interpretation of withdrawal.

Within the central nervous system, ethanol (at concentrations high enough to cause intoxication) interferes with the processes that signal certain nerve cells to activate or become excited (Hoffman et al. 1989; Lovinger et al. 1989). It also affects the processes that tell certain nerve cells to remain inhibited (Suzdak et al. 1986). Additionally, ethanol acts as a non-specific biochemical inhibitor of central nervous system activity. During withdrawal, the central nervous system experiences the opposite effects: excitatory processes ramp up while inhibitory processes decrease (Morrow et al. 1988). These shifts can lead to an overactive central nervous system once alcohol consumption stops.

Researchers have measured this hyper-activation in patients (Linnoila et al. 1987). Even patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome can experience sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity and increased production of adrenal hormones, specifically cortisol and norepinephrine. Both of these hormones can be toxic to nerve cells. Furthermore, cortisol can specifically damage hippocampal neurons (Sapolsky et al. 1986)—a part of the brain believed to be vital for memory and affect control. Repeatedly untreated alcohol withdrawal can lead to direct damage to the hippocampus.

Ballenger and post (1978) conducted a retrospective review of studies that led them to conclude that repeated, inadequately treated withdrawal episodes can trigger future withdrawals with even more serious complications.

In reviews concerning the pharmacological treatment of alcohol intoxication, withdrawal, and addiction, Liskow and Goodwin (1987) concluded that benzodiazepines are the drug of choice for alcohol withdrawal syndrome—for example, long-acting benzodiazepines like chlordiazepoxide and diazepam, or short-acting ones such as oxazepam and lorazepam.

Physicians have traditionally used benzodiazepines by administering reduced doses during the withdrawal period. Rosenbloom (1988) recommends this approach, suggesting the use of medium half-life benzodiazepines (like lorazepam), or even those with shorter half-lives (like midazolam) because these drugs don't linger in the system, making it easier to tailor dosages to individual patients. However, Sellers et al. (1983) introduced a different way of doing things. At the start of treatment, diazepam doses are given every 1–2 hours until the withdrawal syndrome subsides. Most often, further treatment isn't even necessary because diazepam has a long half-life and produces a psychoactive metabolite (desmethyldiazepam) with an even longer half-life. This method, known as the "loading strategy," simplifies treatment, provides protection against seizures, and eliminates the possibility of patients behaving in ways meant to solicit extra medication.

Other medications, such as the beta-blocker propranolol (Sellers et al. 1977), the combination of the beta-blocker atenolol and oxazepam (Kraus et al. 1985), and the alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, have been tested and shown to ease certain symptoms of withdrawal syndrome. However, there isn't clear evidence regarding their effectiveness in preventing recurring episodes (Liskow and Goodwin 1987). Potential drugs that might prove useful in the future include calcium channel blockers (Koppi et al. 1987) and carbamazepine, which are currently undergoing evaluation (Butler & Messiha 1986).

Most clinicians rely on medication to manage alcohol withdrawal symptoms. That said, Whitefield et al. (1978) reported successful detoxification achieved without drugs in a group of individuals with uncomplicated alcoholism. This approach focused on screening and providing strong social support during the withdrawal phase. The study authors noted that "non-drug" detoxification requires less medical staff, shortens the detox period, and removes the influence of sedatives on a patient's awareness regarding their need to participate in a recovery program.

Several researchers have developed scales to assess the severity of alcohol withdrawal: "the Total Severity Assessment and Selected Severity Assessment" (Gross et al. 1973), "the Abstinence Symptom Evaluation Scale" (Knott et al. 1981), and "the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale [CIWA]" (Shaw et al. 1981). Originally designed as research tools to measure treatment efficacy, these scales are now used in clinical practice as well. Foy et al. (1988) demonstrated that a modified version of the CIWA can serve as a helpful "guide" for treatment and for predicting a patient's risk of developing more severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Such guides can be quite useful when monitoring appropriate medication dosages. Still, these assessment methods aren't perfect; occasionally, a patient will experience much harsher reactions than what the "guides" predict. Using these guides should never replace the clinical judgment of professional medical staff.

A study by Hayashida et al. (1989) compared inpatient and outpatient patients during the detoxification process. The research indicated that outpatient detoxification is an "effective, safe, and inexpensive treatment method for mild to moderate forms of alcohol withdrawal syndrome." However, the data also suggests that inpatient detoxification is more effective: during a one-month follow-up, those treated as inpatients reported significantly greater improvement in controlling their drinking, even though they were identified as being at higher risk than the outpatient group at the time of admission. Interestingly, this difference disappeared after a six-month follow-up period. One point the study doesn't emphasize is that while outpatient detox might be cheaper for some, it remains unclear how much undetected serious comorbidities—which might go unnoticed outside a hospital setting—could lead to severe and costly complications later on.

(Research findings up to 1990)

Alcohol and tobacco

A lot of research has backed up what most of us probably assume just by watching people every day: smokers tend to drink, and drinkers often smoke. In fact, those who consume the most alcohol are frequently the heaviest smokers too. This overlap between alcohol and tobacco use is actually a massive public health issue. One study followed people being treated for alcoholism and other substance addictions and found that out of 845 subjects monitored, 222 passed away over the following 12 years; one-third of those deaths were linked to alcohol, while one case was tied to tobacco (1).

The co-occurrence of alcohol and tobacco use

Between 80% and 95% of people struggling with alcoholism smoke cigarettes (2), which is three times higher than the rate seen in the general population. About 70% of alcoholics are heavy smokers (meaning they go through more than a pack a day), compared to just 10% of the general public (3). Interestingly, drinking tends to influence smoking more strongly than smoking influences alcoholism. That said, smokers still face a 1.32 times higher risk of consuming alcohol compared to non-smokers (4).

Most adults who use alcohol or tobacco first come into contact with them during puberty or early adolescence (5). Among alcoholics who also smoke, cigarette use typically starts a few years before alcoholism sets in, though the data isn't perfectly consistent (6). Teens who start smoking are three times more likely to start drinking (7), and smokers are ten times more likely to develop alcoholism than non-smokers (6).

Why are alcohol and tobacco used together?

The reasons why alcohol and tobacco are often paired up can be split into two main categories that aren't mutually exclusive: either one substance enhances the effects of the other, or one helps mask the unpleasant side effects of the other. These interactions can change how a person builds a tolerance to substances, as described below. (There is a third possibility—that one substance might alter the metabolism of the other by changing how it is absorbed, distributed, or eliminated from the body—but that hasn't been definitively confirmed yet (8)).

"Reinforcement." The concept of reinforcement refers to the psychological process where a behavior—like using addictive substances—becomes a habit. A key part of this "reinforcement" happens when nerve cells release a chemical messenger called the neurotransmitter dopamine into a small area of the brain known as the nucleus accumbens following substance use (9). Nicotine is the primary factor from tobacco that drives this reinforcement process. Once it hits the brain, nicotine activates a group of proteins called nicotinic receptors. These proteins, located on the surface of brain cells, normally regulate various physiological functions, some of which may be responsible for the reinforcement mechanism. Ultimately, nicotine triggers the release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens region (5). Consuming alcohol also leads to dopamine release, though the exact way alcohol does this isn't entirely clear yet (10,11).

Tolerance. Tolerance is when you become less sensitive to the effects of a chemical substance, meaning you need higher doses to achieve the same result. Long-term nicotine use in animals can create a tolerance to certain effects of alcohol "reinforcement," while chronic alcohol use creates a tolerance to certain effects of nicotine (8). This kind of cross-tolerance can lead to increased consumption of both substances as people try to chase the same high they used to get with smaller amounts. Additionally, cross-tolerance can make side effects easier to trigger. For example, smokers might reduce or quit smoking if they feel its side effects (like an increased heart rate or "jitters"). However, the sedative effect of alcohol can mask the harmful effects of nicotine, leading someone to continue smoking at the same or even higher doses (12). Conversely, the stimulating effect of nicotine can mask the decreased alertness caused by alcohol consumption (8).

Animal studies offer some interesting evidence regarding these interactions. For instance, it appears that alcohol causes mice to lose physical coordination by inhibiting nicotinic receptors in the cerebellum—the part of the brain responsible for movement and balance. Interestingly, nicotine intake seems to clear up these impairments and restore coordination (13,14). Additionally, alcohol reduces the effectiveness of vasopressin, a hormone that likely plays a role in memory processes. Vasopressin is also linked to how the body develops an alcohol tolerance (15). Nicotine helps normalize vasopressin function in the brain, which may help mitigate damage to memory and other cognitive functions (11).

What's the actual risk of developing cancer from alcohol and tobacco use?

Smoking and heavy drinking are major risk factors for cardiovascular disease, certain lung conditions, and various types of cancer. For smokers who also consume significant amounts of alcohol, the risk of developing oral, throat, or esophageal cancer isn't just additive—it’s much higher than the sum of the two individual risks combined (2). To put that into perspective, compared to someone who neither smokes nor drinks, the relative risk of oral and throat cancer jumps sevenfold for smokers, sixfold for drinkers, and skyrockets to 38 times higher for those who do both (16).

How exactly do alcohol and tobacco increase cancer risk?

When you light up a cigarette, high temperatures trigger chemical reactions that produce around 4,000 different substances. This cocktail of compounds, commonly known as tar, enters the lungs through inhalation. From there, the bloodstream carries individual tar components throughout the entire body. Certain enzyme systems—specifically the microsomal enzymes in the liver—work to convert some of these tar ingredients into chemicals capable of causing cancer. It’s also worth noting that long-term alcohol consumption can activate these same microsomal enzymes, significantly boosting their activity and further increasing the cancer risk associated with smoking.

Microsomal enzymes aren't exclusive to the liver; they're also present in the lungs and the digestive tract—the primary entry points for tobacco smoke. The esophagus is particularly vulnerable here, mainly because it lacks robust defense mechanisms (20). We've seen in lab studies that alcohol can ramp up the risk of esophageal cancer in animals when they're simultaneously exposed to certain tar components, which lines up perfectly with earlier observations mentioned in the text (18, 19).

Finally, people struggling with alcohol addiction often show deficiencies in vitamin A and zinc—substances that have been proven to play a protective role against cancer (20).

Treating addiction in patients who also smoke.

Until fairly recently, addiction specialists treating alcoholism didn't really push patients to quit smoking. The prevailing thought was that it might add an extra layer of risk that could jeopardize the entire process of getting sober (21).

Research hasn't really backed up these assumptions. One study tracked patients in a rehab facility going through a standard smoking cessation program (6). For comparison, they looked at a group of alcoholics who went through the same alcohol rehab but didn't get any help quitting smoking. A year after treatment, the results showed that quitting smoking had zero impact on abstinence from alcohol or other drugs. That said, 12% of the first group successfully quit smoking, while nobody in the comparison group managed to kick the habit.

In another study, patients who took part in an extra nicotine weaning program alongside their main alcohol or drug rehab showed at least a temporary drop in smoking rates and felt more motivated to cut back (22). Interestingly, people who managed to quit drinking without any formal rehab program also happened to stop smoking at the exact same time (6,23).

Following the lead of other medical institutions, many alcohol rehab clinics have now banned smoking altogether. Initial data and early findings suggest that implementing such a policy is actually doable under these specific circumstances (24). That said, we still need more studies to confirm everything.

A common hurdle in alcohol detoxification programs is the issue of secret smoking—people sneaking cigarettes when they think no one is looking, which unfortunately includes both patients and staff. To address this, experts suggest tailoring smoking cessation protocols to mirror alcohol recovery models, such as the 12-step approach (2). It’s also worth noting that nicotine replacement therapy often needs to be more intensive for those struggling with alcoholism, as alcohol consumption can build up a tolerance to nicotine's effects (25, 26).

Generally speaking, smokers dealing with alcohol addiction who also have a history of depressive disorders face much tougher odds when trying to quit smoking compared to those without such a history (27). For some, smoking might actually act as a buffer against depressive episodes, meaning that quitting could potentially trigger more intense bouts of depression (28). Additionally, using tobacco or alcohol can activate microsomal enzymes, which may lower the effectiveness of certain antidepressants (17). Because of this, it is vital to monitor blood drug concentrations in patients with heavy alcohol and tobacco use (5).

Drugs and Addiction

Definition

Drugs encompass any substance capable of inducing addiction, the production, distribution, and use of which are prohibited by law in most countries. This includes items such as:
- cannabis
- heroin
- LSD (diethylamine lysergamide)
- Ecstasy (MDMA - methylenedioxy-methamphetamine)
- cocaine
- ...

Substances that are legally manufactured and used in medicine also count as drugs if they are obtained illegally for non-medical use—for example, morphine, codeine, amphetamines, cocaine, or certain types of sedatives.
Even common household products like gasoline or acetone can be classified as drugs if they are used for intoxication.

Drug Abuse
Drug abuse refers to the non-medical application of these substances, leading to physical or mental health damage, as well as disruptions to social functioning (such as family issues, workplace problems, or legal trouble).

Addiction

Drug addiction involves an uncontrollable craving for a substance, an intense drive to acquire and use it at any cost, and a tendency to increase dosages as the addiction progresses. Beyond the danger to the individual user, addiction poses a threat to their family and society as a whole.
Addiction can be psychological, physical, or a combination of both.
Physical addiction involves changes in how the body functions due to long-term drug use. Once use stops, these changes manifest through various symptoms depending on the specific substance. A physically addicted person’s body maintains its new equilibrium only if the drug remains constantly present.
Psychological addiction is an altered state where a person feels a powerful need to continually use a drug just to maintain a sense of mental well-being or pleasure.
Cocaine, cannabis, and certain hallucinogens primarily cause psychological addiction. Other substances (opiates, amphetamines, certain sedatives, etc.) cause both psychological and physical addiction, whereas pure physical addiction is quite rare.

Drug Tolerance
Drug tolerance is a state reached after prolonged use where the body requires higher doses to achieve the same effects. For substances with similar properties and mechanisms of action, cross-tolerance can occur.

Withdrawal Syndrome
Withdrawal syndrome is the set of symptoms that emerge after stopping drug use. These syndromes vary significantly depending on the substance involved.

Causes of Drug Abuse
The spread of drug abuse can be viewed from several angles. It is a consequence of expanding international crime and increased production and supply, as well as shifts in quality of life and the heightened demands modern society places on individuals.

At-Risk Groups

While drug abuse exists across all age groups, adolescents represent a particularly vulnerable demographic. Factors contributing to this include new ways of partying, social trends, positive attitudes toward drugs, materialistic philosophies, hedonistic lifestyles, and the impulsive nature of adolescence. Feelings of inferiority, low self-esteem, poor social circumstances within the family, and a lack of parental attention or affection all increase the likelihood of an adolescent turning to drugs.

User Categories
People who use drugs can generally be divided into two groups: the first consists of "functional users" who use substances for stimulation or relaxation to help them navigate the competitive race for material success (career advancement and wealth) in modern society. The second group includes those who use drugs to escape reality because they feel incapable of managing life, unsuccessful, or disrespected.
An increasing segment of the population in developed nations shows a tendency to use psychoactive substances to improve work performance, while an equally growing number work specifically to afford the consumption of certain drugs.

Addiction Statistics
When looking at addiction numbers, we have to take everything with a grain of salt. Data is usually gathered indirectly—through registered patients at medical institutions, overdose fatalities, or recorded criminal activity. It's generally estimated that heroin addiction doesn't exceed 0.5% of the total population, though the number of people using heroin or other drugs recreationally is significantly higher.

Categorizing Users
Users are typically split into two groups: those with problematic addictions and recreational users. The largest group consists of people using derivatives of Indian cannabis (like marijuana or hashish). In many major American cities, residents will try these substances at least once in their lives; in certain parts of the US, up to 50% of young people have tried them. In urban areas, about 3% to 10% of the population uses these drugs on a weekly basis.

Synthetic Drugs
In the early nineties, the US saw a surge in the consumption of synthetic stimulants, particularly amphetamine derivatives—most notably MDMA, commonly known as Ecstasy.

Addiction in America

Back in 1994, it was estimated that there were roughly 6,000 illegal drug addicts in the US, along with another 35,000 people who weren't technically addicts but used illegal drugs at least once a week. Following periods of instability and sudden political or economic shifts, the US has seen a sharp rise in drug use since 1991, especially regarding marijuana. By 1994, the number of addicts enrolled in methadone substitution programs had climbed to about 1,200. Meanwhile, in major cities like New York, there was a significant spike in Ecstasy use starting in 1993—a trend closely tied to the rise of techno music and the rave scene.

Gender Distribution
Statistically, addiction is four times more common among men than women.

Drug addiction rehabilitation

Successful drug rehab really boils down to two things: getting through initial detox and having the family's full support. It’s vital to help the individual set realistic goals and get them involved in counseling and education programs; that’s how you actually build the motivation needed for abstinence. At the end of the day, long-term commitment to building a new life without drugs is the only way to prevent relapse.

Spotting an addict

The first step is identifying someone who might be struggling, which isn't always easy—especially if they are financially stable or if we're looking at a patient misusing prescription medications.
We need to spend enough time with anyone suspected of having a problem, particularly those who constantly complain about pain or make frequent trips to the doctor for prescriptions and various medications. It’s also crucial to talk to all the medical professionals the person has seen, as well as their inner circle—family, friends, spouses, or even coworkers. Knowing if there were behavioral issues dating back to childhood can also be a huge clue.
Blood and urine tests can confirm our suspicions, along with physical exams that might reveal injection marks.

Facing the addict

Once we've identified the issue, the next move is the confrontation. This means letting them know we are aware of the addiction while simultaneously offering support and motivating them toward rehab. If they complain about health issues, it helps to point out that these problems stem directly from drug misuse, using that as extra motivation to stay clean. It’s important to leave the door open, though. If they aren't ready to cooperate right now, don't burn the bridge; they might come to us later when they are finally ready. We should provide information on treatment options and various support organizations to both the individual and their family.

Education and motivation

Rehab depends heavily on educating the person about their own responsibility to improve their life and, by extension, the lives of those close to them. Motivation grows when people understand the medical and psychological consequences of continuing their addiction. We also need to help the individual and their family navigate a drug-free lifestyle, especially in situations where access to drugs is tied to their environment, like certain jobs or social circles. Encouraging participation in support groups and organizations is key, especially since many active members are former addicts themselves, which provides great encouragement for newcomers. There are formal paths available too, such as clinics, residential communities, and long-term methadone therapy. We need to walk them through all these possibilities. Generally, people on methadone maintenance or in therapeutic communities show fewer legal and social issues and better ability to work. The prognosis is best for those who are employed, have higher education levels, and stick with treatment for at least two months. It's worth noting that healthcare professionals, like doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, often require a different approach to treatment.

Methadone maintenance

Using methadone or methadel acetate should only happen alongside proper education and counseling. The goal here isn't necessarily to "cure" the addiction in the traditional sense, but rather to transition the person to a legally available, safer substitute. These medications are taken orally and last longer in the system, meaning they only need to be taken once a day. The idea is to help individuals who haven't been able to maintain abstinence through other methods. Ultimately, this process aims to help them function better at home and work, reduce legal trouble, and improve overall health.

What is methadone?

Methadone is a long-acting opioid similar to heroin. Before starting, any underlying psychiatric disorders must be ruled out. Maintenance doses can be low (30-40 mg/day), though outcomes are often better with higher doses (100-120 mg/day). While results vary, evidence suggests that higher doses lead to better treatment adherence, fewer legal issues, and less returning to street drugs. With higher doses, up to 75% of patients can abstain from heroin for six months or longer. Methadone is typically administered once daily, with weekend doses provided for the patient to take with them. Long-acting substances like methadel acetate can be given in smaller doses (20-30 mg) three times a week. After a maintenance period (usually 6-12 months, but potentially longer), a physician should work with the patient to gradually taper the dose, usually by about 5% per week.
In large amounts, methadone (much like marijuana and heroin) causes testosterone levels to drop.

Opioid antagonists

Opioid antagonist medications work by competing with heroin and other opioids for those opioid receptors—the specific sites where drugs bind within the body—thereby reducing the drug's effects. When used over an extended period to block the "high" experienced by an addict, these medications can serve as part of a comprehensive therapeutic approach that includes counseling and support.
Cyclizine was the first drug tested in this group, but its ability to block effects is weak and it comes with numerous side effects.
Naloxone is excellent and doesn't have nearly as many side effects, but it wears off quickly—usually in two to three hours—so it isn't useful as a long-term therapy.
Naltrexone is the most widely used option; it stays active for about 24 hours with minimal side effects. There are no known withdrawal symptoms if someone stops taking it. Before starting naltrexone, patients need to be "clean" from opioids for at least five days. They also need to undergo a full exam and a challenge test with 0.4 - 0.8 mg of short-acting naloxone so the doctor can ensure the patient can tolerate the long-acting naltrexone. Interestingly, patients often show significant resistance to this treatment despite its clear advantages.

Non-substitution programs

Most rehab houses and centers for opioid addiction utilize a communal therapeutic approach. Care typically lasts up to one year while the individual is transitioned out of the street environment and prepared for a "new life" within a group setting. Here, members—including former addicts in leadership roles—often challenge participants to help them gain insight into successful lifestyles, with the goal of more effectively managing life's problems.
To treat all addiction disorders, it’s safe to say that counseling approaches emphasizing behavioral therapy and relatively straightforward psychotherapeutic methods lead to significantly positive outcomes. Many of these approaches focus on better coping mechanisms for stressful situations, increased understanding of personal traits, improving cognitive styles, and confronting problems head-on.
Certain procedures are still being researched, such as acupuncture and brain stimulation. Efforts to reduce the consequences of opioid addiction also include syringe exchange programs.

The Oedipus Complex

A young woman was incredibly distressed because her fiancé had just seen a clinical psychologist, and the results were pretty grim.
She turned to her mother: "I'm not sure if our marriage is going to work, Mom. The psychologist says my fiancé has an Oedipus complex!"
The mother replied: "Don't listen to that nonsense. I've known your fiancé for a long time, and I know everything will be fine. Just look at how much he loves his mother!"

All jokes aside—what actually is the Oedipus complex?
Essentially, the Oedipus complex describes the attraction a child feels toward their opposite-sex parent and the resulting hostility or rivalry toward their same-sex parent (the competitor). The child feels jealous of the same-sex parent and wants to displace them to take their place.
This typically surfaces during the phallic stage of psychosexual development, roughly between ages three and five. In a healthy development, this is resolved as the child gradually identifies with the same-sex parent and moves away from sexual interest in the opposite-sex parent.
Most people outgrow this phase, though it isn't a universal rule. Some individuals with certain mental health conditions may still struggle with a strong Oedipus complex as adults.
According to Freud, the primary driver for resolving the Oedipus complex is the fear of punishment from the father.
Freud, who coined the term, believed in his theory of personality that the Oedipus complex serves as the foundation for the superego and the core of all human relationships. In his view, everyone experiences this complex. Many psychiatrists in our culture recognize the significance of Oedipal ties in personality development, though they might view the affection for the opposite-sex parent or the antagonism toward the same-sex parent less as literal sexual rivalry and more as a rejection of parental authority. Interestingly, anthropologists sometimes question whether this complex even exists in non-Western societies, suggesting it may be a byproduct of specific social environments rather than a universal human trait.
An unresolved Oedipus complex can lead to neurosis, which often manifests in how a person relates to others.

Why Oedipus?
In Greek mythology, Oedipus was the son of Laius, the King of Thebes, and his wife, Jocasta. A prophecy foretold that Laius would be killed by his own son, so he abandoned Oedipus in the mountains. However, a shepherd rescued the infant and took him to the King of Corinth, who adopted him. Once grown, Oedipus heard the same prophecy about killing his father and marrying his mother, so he fled Corinth, believing his adoptive parents were his biological ones. On his journey toward Thebes, he encountered Laius at a crossroads; they argued, and Oedipus ended up killing him. Continuing toward Thebes, he faced the Sphinx, which was terrorizing the area by killing anyone who couldn't solve its riddles. Oedipus solved the riddle perfectly, causing the Sphinx to perish. The citizens of Thebes hailed him as king and gave him Jocasta, the widowed queen, as his wife. The prophecy was fulfilled.
From this incestuous union, two sons, Polnik and Eteocles, and two daughters, Antigone and Izmena, were born.
When a plague struck Thebes, a prophet declared it would only end once the killer of King Laius was found and expelled. Through an investigation—famously depicted by Sophocles in *Oedipus Rex*—Oedipus uncovers the truth and, in his agony, blinds himself. According to Homer, Oedipus continued to rule Thebes until he was killed in battle, though a more common version suggests he was exiled by Creon, Jocasta's brother, leading to a civil war between his sons. In Sophocles' version, it is his loyal daughter, Antigone, who guides Oedipus through his later wanderings.

Freud’s Psychosexual Theories and the Oedipus Complex
Freud argued that all human behavior is driven by the pursuit of pleasure. He believed this motivation is channeled through two primary instincts: sexuality (Eros) and aggression (Thanatos). According to his theory, both stem from an internal psychic energy he called the libido. These instincts are expressed through three psychic structures. First is the Id, the only structure present at birth, which houses our raw impulses and the entirety of the libido. Shortly after birth, part of the Id evolves into the Ego, whose job is to mediate those primal desires with reality. Finally, the Superego develops—this is the internal reflection of parental values and moral standards (upbringing). The Superego acts as a conscience on both conscious and unconscious levels. Freud suggested personality develops through five stages, centered around three initial erogenous zones that serve as a child's primary source of satisfaction. Those stages are:
- Oral stage: pleasure centers around the mouth through sucking, swallowing, biting, and chewing.
- Anal stage: gratification comes from releasing, and later, retaining, bowel movements.
- Phallic stage: pleasure is derived from manipulating the phallus—the penis or clitoris.
During the phallic stage, the Oedipus complex emerges and eventually resolves. Freud viewed this complex as a pivotal moment in human development. It kicks off when a boy directs his sexual libido toward his mother while directing aggressive libido toward his father, whom he sees as a rival for her affection. Essentially, the boy wants the father out of the picture to secure his mother's undivided attention. Resolution happens when the boy develops a castration complex—the fear that his father might respond to his aggression by removing his penis. As part of a healthy resolution, the boy detaches the libido (both sexual and aggressive) he previously directed at his parents.
The next step involves identifying with the parents—primarily the father, and to a lesser extent, the mother. This identification is what helps shape the superego. Finally, all memories of the complex are repressed, and the child enters a period of relative sexual and aggressive quiet called the latency stage.
For girls, the Oedipus complex follows a similar pattern, though it’s often referred to as the Electra complex.
Like boys, girls initially want to possess their mother and eliminate their father. Resolution begins when a girl discovers she lacks a penis, which triggers feelings of jealousy. She then redirects her sexual libido away from her mother and her aggressive libido away from her father (though, much like boys, traces of both feelings usually linger—we never truly stop loving our mothers or competing with our fathers). To compensate for the loss of the penis, she may direct her sexual libido toward her father and develop resentment toward her mother, viewing her as the one responsible for the loss.
Resolution for a girl concludes with the same type of identification seen in boys—mostly with the same-sex parent (the mother) and less so with the father. She also represses these memories as she moves into the latency stage.

Consequences of an unresolved Oedipus complex
If the Oedipus complex isn't resolved, the child fails to mentally separate from their parents. This can impact their psychosexual development, how they interact with their parents and opposite-sex partners, career choices, and the emergence of neuroses or mental health disorders.
Fixation during the phallic stage can lead to a phallic character, marked by impulsivity, stubbornness, excessive self-confidence, narcissism, and conceit. Due to an unresolved Oedipus complex, individuals often struggle with or fear intimacy and love, making long-term relationships difficult. This inability to establish intimacy frequently leads to promiscuity. Freud suggested this fixation could be a root of homosexuality, noting that such individuals often feel insecure regarding their sexual identity. They may also develop disordered or socially unconventional sexual behaviors.
Because of its influence on personality development, these individuals often struggle with authority figures, becoming either overly dominant or excessively submissive. They may also be prone to self-harm.
They often gravitate toward careers where the body, physical appearance, sexuality, or authority figures play a central role—think modeling, military service, sex work, or law enforcement.

So, who was Freud?
Sigmund Freud, born Sigismund Schlomo Freud on May 6, 1856, in what was then part of the Austro-Canadian Empire (near modern-day Czech Republic), was the son of a merchant. His mother was his father's second wife, and he had two half-brothers about twenty years his senior. The family moved to Vienna when he was four, where they stayed until the German occupation in 1938, despite him often mentioning how much he disliked the city. While the Freud family was of Jewish descent, our dear Sigmund was a staunch atheist. A bright and driven student, Freud enrolled in medical school in 1873. He was drawn to science and neurophysiological research, but since high-level scientific roles were largely reserved for the ultra-wealthy back then, and he needed to support his family, Freud turned to private practice in neurology and married in 1886. He specialized in treating various forms of neurasthenia and neurotic patients. Initially, he used hypnosis to treat hysterical and neurotic patients, though he eventually moved away from it. He discovered that if he encouraged patients to relax (usually on a couch) and speak freely about whatever came to mind—a technique known as free association—they would open up. He would then analyze these memories and statements to determine which past traumatic events were driving their current struggles. In 1895, he analyzed dreams for the first time, and in 1900, he published his masterpiece, *The Interpretation of Dreams*, introducing the public to the mysteries of the unconscious. In 1901, he released *The Psychopathology of Everyday Life*, explaining how slips of the tongue and forgetfulness aren't random accidents but reflections of a "dynamic unconscious." By 1905, he was publishing theories on how sexual drives most strongly shape a person and that sexuality is present from childhood. His most famous theory remains the Oedipus complex, described in November 1897, which posits that children (specifically boys) experience sexual attraction toward their mother and jealousy or hatred toward their father. He later developed a parallel theory for girls.

/nastavak

continued/

In 1902, Freud became a professor at the University of Vienna. He began gathering followers for his theories—a group of experts who would meet at his home, sipping drinks and smoking expensive cigars while developing an entirely new science.
By 1906, he had 17 students, a number that grew quickly. They went on to establish the Psychoanalytic Society, sparking the creation of similar groups in other cities.
Some of these scientists and proponents of Freudian theory used his core principles to develop their own unique directions for psychoanalysis following World War I. Most notably, the renowned Viennese physician and socialist Alfred Adler revitalized Freud’s central idea regarding the drive-based connection between sexuality and aggression through his optimistic "Individual psychology." Meanwhile, the world-famous Zurich therapist Carl Gustav Jung founded analytical psychotherapy, centering his work on human emotions within the expanded "self."
In 1923, at age 67, he was diagnosed with pharyngeal cancer, a consequence of years of heavy smoking. Over the next 16 years, he underwent 30 surgeries and relied on morphine to manage his pain until his death. By 1933, the power of the Nazis in Germany was rising, and they began burning Freud's books. In March 1938, after Hitler took power, Freud's passport was confiscated in Vienna, but his international fame and influence convinced the occupiers to let him go. He fled with his wife to London, where he passed away on September 23, 1939.
While some praise him excessively and others dismiss him due to his provocative thoughts, most agree he was one of the greatest scientists of the last century. This isn't just because of his impact on psychological and psychiatric practice, but because of how he fundamentally changed how people in the West view themselves and their lives.
His teachings became widely accepted, and his treatment models have been utilized in America for decades. Psychoanalysis was introduced here as a therapeutic method by Freud's student, Professor Stephan Betleheim. Since the late 1920s, various psychiatric clinics and mental health centers across the US have successfully used these methods to treat psychosis, neurotic disorders, PTSD, and other mental illnesses.

Conclusion
An unresolved Oedipus complex in adulthood can lead to various functional issues, neuroses, and mental disorders. Once these struggles begin to diminish your quality of life, it's important to reach out to a professional, such as a psychiatrist. Psychoanalysis, the method pioneered by Freud, is just one of many effective therapeutic options. The most important step is acknowledging the problem to yourself and others, and seeking help without feeling any shame.

Disturbances of Consciousness

Quantitative Disturbances of Consciousness

Somnolence
Somnolence is the mildest quantitative disturbance of consciousness. Someone in a state of somnolence appears sleepy, apathetic, or sluggish. While they can still perceive stimuli, it usually requires something quite intense to get through to them. It's hard for them to focus on any specific object or event, and they often feel disoriented regarding time and space.

Sopor
A patient in a soporous state responds much more slowly to external stimuli. It’s incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to establish verbal contact with them. During a state of sopor, the flow of consciousness is disrupted, leading to amnesia or leaving the patient with only fragmented memories of the period.

Coma
Coma represents the most severe quantitative disturbance of consciousness. In its deepest stages, patients won't respond to any stimuli at all. Even basic myotatic reflexes and pupillary responses to light are absent.
The continuity of consciousness is completely severed.

Qualitative Disturbances of Consciousness

Confusional-Oneiroid State
The term "oneiroid" comes from the Greek word *oneiros*, meaning dream, because this state shares many characteristics with dreaming.
It’s defined by the patient’s lack of orientation. They seem muddled and confused, struggling to recognize people or objects around them. They might wander off frequently and carry a heavy sense of insecurity and uncertainty. This can lead to fluid, disorganized, and fleeting ideas about relationships. Patients tend to be highly suggestible, with unstable affect and impaired critical thinking.
The confusional-oneiroid state is a qualitative disturbance of consciousness that usually stems from organic pathological changes, though it can sometimes surface as a reaction to high-stress situations.

Delirium
Delirium is the primary syndrome associated with acute brain syndromes—essentially a disturbance that occurs alongside an organic disorder.
Delirium syndrome consists of several core symptoms: disorientation regarding time, space, oneself (auto-psychic), and others (allo-psychic). This is followed by sensory illusions and hallucinations, which are typically unpleasant, causing fear as a reaction to these terrifying perceptions. Psychomotor agitation often follows, resulting from intoxication or a reaction to those disturbing illusions and hallucinations.
The patient's attention and perception are completely compromised. There is typically amnesia covering the entire duration of the delirious state.

Twilight States
A twilight state is a type of consciousness disturbance where awareness of the surroundings and objects remains intact, but the sense of "self" is lost. Because internal psychic functions are mostly normal, the patient doesn't necessarily stand out to those around them. In fact, they may even perform certain actions or strike up conversations.
However, the individual cannot "see" themselves; they don't know what they are doing or why. Consciousness is severely narrowed, and mental life shifts to the lower layers of the personality. This state often hits quickly and disappears just as suddenly. Epilepsy is a common cause.

Somnambulism
Somnambulism, or sleepwalking, is characterized by a loss of control over motor activity. This happens when consciousness is altered by sleep, yet motor activity returns to an "active" state before consciousness fully "re-activates."
Sleepwalking can be a manifestation of epileptic damage, but it can also emerge as a conversion syndrome related to neurosis.

Fugue
This term comes from the Latin word *fuga*, meaning flight. It refers to a disturbance of consciousness where, true to its name, the patient "wanders off" without any obvious trigger. Fugue states occur in both epilepsy and conversion neuroses.

Hypnotic State
This is a state characterized by a narrowing of consciousness induced by someone using various hypnotic methods. The effects of hypnosis vary, meaning different types of hypnosis differ based on the depth of the "hypnotic sleep."
Hypnosis can be used as a tool to uncover hidden intrapsychic conflicts.

Quantitative memory disorders

It’s almost impossible to imagine our inner lives without memory. Honestly, would there even be an inner life at all without it? Without memory, we lose the continuity needed for healthy personality development, our sense of time and space, and the ability to recognize situations or experiences we've already lived through...

Memory is the psychological function that allows us to call up past experiences into our consciousness and relive them. The basic "algorithm" of how memory works involves three main stages: encoding, storage, and retrieval. Memory disorders generally fall into two categories: quantitative and qualitative.

Quantitative memory disorders

Hypermnesia
Hypermnesia is defined as an enhanced ability to remember specific events, information, and so on. This heightened recall is often tied to emotionally charged states—whether those memories are pleasant or unpleasant. We’ve all likely wished we could just forget certain awkward or painful moments from our own lives, but it’s usually the intense emotions attached to them that make forgetting so difficult.
Hypermnesia can occur during epileptic auras, delirious states, or high-stress situations—specifically those where a person's integrity feels threatened. It can also show up during manic episodes or as a result of using certain drugs, such as hallucinogens.

Hypomnesia
Hypomnesia refers to a diminished ability to remember. This can stem from organic damage to the central nervous system, in which case it typically presents alongside other symptoms like diminished attention, disorientation, or changes in a person's psychological profile. If the hypomnesia is selective—meaning the person struggles to remember only specific objects, topics, or people—the cause is likely psychogenic.

Lacunar amnesia
This disorder is characterized by fragmented, "choppy" memories. The patient only remembers isolated details of an event rather than the whole picture. This is more commonly seen in cases involving vascular diseases (including those affecting the brain) or during delirious states where levels of consciousness fluctuate.

Retrograde amnesia
The term amnesia essentially means a lack of memory or the inability to remember. Retrograde amnesia specifically refers to the period of time *before* the event that caused the amnesia. Causes can include poisoning, head trauma, or brain tissue bleeding resulting from a stroke.

Anterograde amnesia
Anterograde amnesia refers to the period following a critical event. After a person regains consciousness following something like poisoning, a head injury, or a stroke, they find themselves unable to form or recall new memories from that point forward.

Attention and Attention Disorders

Attention is a psychological function defined by two core components used for description and assessment. The first component involves directing and concentrating psychic energy toward a specific object—like a person or an event. This is known as tenacity. The second crucial function is the ability to shift our focus from one object to another, referred to as vigilance.

Hypervigilance
This disorder involves excessive alertness, characterized by an exaggerated shifting of attention (psychic energy) from one stimulus to the next. It’s commonly seen in manic states as well as in certain patients dealing with anxiety.

Hypovigilance
In this state, a patient finds it difficult, slow, or taxing to move their attention from one subject to another. This can stem from diminished psychic activity or being preoccupied with specific psycho-pathological experiences. It generally appears alongside various CNS impairments or depressive states.

Hypertenacity
This refers to the phenomenon of intense, singular focus on just one thing. We see this type of disturbance in patients with depression, as well as some patients with schizophrenia.

Hypotenacity
Hypotenacity, or a reduced capacity to focus on and maintain attention on a single subject, is often linked to hypervigilance disorders. Essentially, the inability to hold focus on an object is frequently a byproduct of highly pronounced shifts in attention from one thing to another. Consequently, this is most common in manic patients and those with various organic-functional CNS impairments.

With that excerpt from the medical textbook, I thought I had covered
plenty of the questions being raised—and still being raised—over on the "HEALTH TOPIC" thread.

One issue is simply that people seem too lazy to look through what’s already been written regarding their concerns.

We aren't all built the same, though. I’m certain that over the next six months, I’ll end up reading about stress, anxiety, panic attacks, and😳 other psychiatric issues dozens of times... when all anyone really needs to do is check the existing posts or just use the SEARCH function.

I’ve actually been criticized before for "over-pasting," given that anyone can find the info themselves... but when things get practical, people tend to act differently.

Best regards, everyone.

🙂 😉 😎

Bumped for the question; nervous breakdown

Do you know that song?

Time is on my side! YES it is! Timeeee is on my side Yes it is! 😁