Violations of the Constitution and laws of the USA regarding feminism topics

Daniel Ward87 said:Can you send over the links to those specific posts? Only the Politics mods can see which ones were actually flagged. We can't really do anything based on guesswork. Also, keep in mind it's vacation season, so the mod team is moving a little slower than usual.

dustyranger64 (No text provided to rewrite.)
It’s entirely possible that certain types of misogyny and chauvinism just go completely unpunished around here—not that anyone’s actually surprised.

But look, every coin has two sides—so we really ought to consider that when certain arguments are thrown out there, say in the form of... The latest research coming out of California State University’s psychology department—well, if you can call it that—is officially in.So, if you actually want to challenge a study like that—you know, be a grown-up about it—you’d probably try to dismantle the methodology or poke holes in the actual arguments—instead of just throwing shade at California State University. Just another misogynistic site.

Sometimes—if you’re dealing with an opponent who’s actually losing a debate—they’ll just brush off your perfectly valid points by claiming they're coming from some "feminazi" echo chamber—all without ever actually addressing the logic itself. Typical.
Not exactly the most productive way to tackle serious topics—if that's even what we're doing here.
Just saying.

Not everything is exactly according to the FBI's playbook—not by a long shot.

Alex Barnes8 said:Is that clear enough, I guess?

placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.

placidorca16 said:
Who even brought that up? What does that have to do with insults directed at women within the "feminism" thread?🙄

placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.

placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.

dustyranger64 said:Now if only people would actually read my post with some common sense and realize I wasn't calling anyone a "feminazi"—man, where does it end?

Erm... not really.

It's not about the specific topic. It's about the overall vibe from the people hanging out in every single feminism thread on this board. It helps provide context!

That's called a comparison. By that logic, someone who dismisses a scientific link by calling it a "misogynistic site" isn't an "opponent" either—they're just something else.

So, zero ability to read between the lines instead of just taking things literally, huh? Such a shame.

Anyway, I'll leave the moderating to the pros. Sorry for the interruption!

Alex Barnes8 said:Is that clear enough, I guess?

placidorca16 said:So, in your book, comparing women to being inferior, less intelligent, or less capable than men is perfectly fine?😲🙄

As for that link—I have to wonder what kind of "scientific" site provides interpretations without citing the actual original sources. It's all just guesswork at that point.

dustyranger64 said:Goodness gracious, Jesus. 🤦 🤦 🤦

Michelle Alvarez8 said:It is now! Based on how you first put it—it really felt like it was actually illegal, which, let's be honest, is miles away from what you just linked.😉

placidorca16 said:So, in your book, comparing women to being inferior, less intelligent, or less capable than men is perfectly fine?😲🙄

As for that link—I have to wonder what kind of "scientific" site provides interpretations without citing the actual original sources. It's all just guesswork at that point.

placidorca16 said:There’s just zero proof that women are inferior—honestly, they often show way more capability than men, don't you think?

Alex Barnes8 said:I suppose it makes sense that calling a specific group Nazis would be prohibited and punishable by law.

It’s like if you were allowed to spread rumors that a certain group of people are actually pedophiles, thieves, or murderers.
I mean, obviously, you can't do that... I guess Axmi can 🤣

slycrane94 said:So, newspapers run by believers (and pedophiles) are complaining about being called believers and pedophiles? I’m sure that’ll change everything on this forum. If you don't want people calling you a pedophile, maybe stop messing with children.
It’s the same logic: if you don't want to be called a feminazi, don't complain about women being degraded and men being insulted in the same breath.

Maybe there’s some feminist publication out there where you can write a pathetic little op-ed about how people treat you. If it worked for the church, maybe it’ll work for you. Then you can just swap articles with each other and watch the chaos unfold.

Michelle Alvarez8 said:I don't know—maybe you, those feminists, and Nica just don't get that we aren't calling people Nazis? It’s purely an allusion to how brainwashed and blindly obsessed people can be with an ideology. Since Nazis are basically the most recognizable bunch of fanatics out there, it’s totally logical to slap that nazi suffix onto any group of blind, zealous, stubborn followers of *any* cause. Including feminism.

P.S. That "I don't know" was sarcasm.

dustyranger64 said:I think we should actually ban the term Grammar Naza on this forum. Honestly, whenever someone calls me that, I feel like they're comparing me to some kind of genocidal maniac or a literal Nazi. It's a lot!

placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.

Michelle Alvarez8 said:I don't know—maybe you, those feminists, and Nica just don't get that we aren't calling people Nazis? It’s purely an allusion to how brainwashed and blindly obsessed people can be with an ideology. Since Nazis are basically the most recognizable bunch of fanatics out there, it’s totally logical to slap that nazi suffix onto any group of blind, zealous, stubborn followers of *any* cause. Including feminism.

P.S. That "I don't know" was sarcasm.

Casey Bennett said:I have read through every single one of those linked posts, and frankly, I cannot fathom why you think they deserve any kind of sanction. These people expressed their views on gender relations and feminism quite politely, cultured, and without resorting to ad hominem attacks. They are entitled to their opinions, are they not?

The fact that their perspective offends you personally isn't anyone else's problem—it's yours alone. You are on a public forum. If you can't handle the reality that there are people here who don't share your worldview, then you’ve completely misunderstood how this medium works.

Do you think they're wrong? Then challenge them. Dismantle their logic with actual counterarguments instead of just throwing a tantrum. It’s simple... and quite un-feminist of you. 😉

Michelle Alvarez8 said:Wait, are you actually being serious right now?

Even Robert La Follette would be getting dizzy from a spin like that! 😵

Even Robert La Follette would get dizzy from this kind of spin. 😵

Alex Barnes8 said:Did Anderlon send you here to stir the pot during pickle season?

If so, he should probably find someone else.
Because what you're doing is transparent and pretty bad.

Your advocacy isn't any better, either.
Poor soul you're trying to help. ☕

Alex Barnes8 said:Regarding feminism—especially here in America—those idiots probably couldn't spot those issues anywhere if they weren't already hallucinating them out of pure fear.

placidorca16 said:So, in your book, comparing women to being inferior, less intelligent, or less capable than men is perfectly fine?😲🙄

As for that link—I have to wonder what kind of "scientific" site provides interpretations without citing the actual original sources. It's all just guesswork at that point.