Violations of the Constitution and laws of the USA regarding feminism topics

placidorca16 said:Dear moderators,
It’s honestly wild how several threads regarding feminism—currently active over in Politics (specifically those regarding "feminist protection of domestic abusers" and various "feminism" discussions)—are completely ignoring blatant sexism, misogyny, and direct violations of the Constitution and federal laws, not to mention international standards. A few users (the original poster, along with felix, bongo, and others, plus the thread starter) are basically just insulting women and their capabilities in general—spreading outright lies about female intelligence and skill as if they were "facts," despite having zero evidence to back any of it up. It's baffling that the mods aren't stepping in, especially since these posts have already been reported.
Does this mean the owners of this forum also endorse the misogyny, sexism, and falsehoods being directed at women?
I’m looking for an official statement from the administration here—this isn't just a breach of forum rules, it’s a violation of the Constitution and the laws of the USA, as well as the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.

Alex Barnes8 said:Even if placidorca16 happens to be aggressive, so what?
I guess why would aggression even be an issue within feminism?
Why is that such a bad thing to you people?

Given the kind of scum feminists have had to deal with, maybe they’re actually being too soft.

How exactly would you fight for your own rights, or anyone else's?
Just acting nonchalant, relaxed, and stress-free? 😁

Alex Barnes8 said:Even if placidorca16 happens to be aggressive, so what?
I guess why would aggression even be an issue within feminism?
Why is that such a bad thing to you people?

Given the kind of scum feminists have had to deal with, maybe they’re actually being too soft.

How exactly would you fight for your own rights, or anyone else's?
Just acting nonchalant, relaxed, and stress-free? 😁

Kyle Ward said:Look, if you actually believe you're right about something, you don't need aggressive rhetoric. Solid, fact-based arguments are enough. But that's clearly not happening here. They just quote some random articles about gender equality from the Constitution of the USA, but the connection to these quota-driven posts is so weak even Milan wouldn't notice it. It all boils down to the classic move of getting worked up over nothing and throwing around empty buzzwords.

But hey, why don't you tell us, "soldier"—what exactly are you and your Brigadier fighting for here? What rights are you defending? Do you have the right to vote? Yeah, you do. Are these ridiculous threads being deleted? No, they aren't. In fact, the moderators—with their chronic inactivity and blatant favoritism—are basically encouraging the constant spread of these mindless feminist propaganda pamphlets.

So, what rights are you actually fighting for when you already possess all of them? From everything I can gather here, it seems like the only thing you're really fighting for is the artificial implantation of a uterus into every man, just so we can finally be "capable" like you.

Close this thread. 🙄

placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.

Thomas Morgan67 said:I just stumbled upon this supposedly "brilliant" thread and your futile attempt to wage this endless crusade.

To give you an idea, Thomas Morgan67 also stated this:

.

I have said plenty of other things on this forum, and there are users and moderators alike who have been following my posts for quite some time. Because of that, your attempt to lump me in with people who view women as intellectually inferior is about as successful as Mr. Bean's driving skills.

Beyond trying to blackmail the moderation team—perfidiously threatening to punish anyone who doesn't share your worldview by hiding behind a misunderstood interpretation of the law that actually favors your opponents more than you—you simply aren't capable of making a concrete point. In fact, you never have.

Democracy allows you to ramble, just as freedom guarantees the right to an opinion. However, neither of those gives you a private pass to shame people, spread lies about other users, twist facts, or threaten and blackmail the entire community just to shut down threads you don't like.

I personally don't care for the bloodthirsty cheering for the invasion of Syria, but I don't go running to the authorities or drag anyone's name through the mud under some false banner of "righteousness."

Grow up!

Your actions have done more damage to feminism than all the enforcement posts combined.

If people realized that you don't represent feminism, but rather "feminism" itself, you would be swept into the scrapheap of forum history in a heartbeat. That’s where you belong.

I sincerely hope you stop dragging my username through this forum with your delusions and twisting my words. I truly hope that, once and for all, I am finished dealing with your "personality."

Best regards!

Chloe Lewis4 said:Look, the guys insulting women here can only do it anonymously because they're complete cowards who don't have the guts to show their faces. Their main goal is just to bully others into thinking they're losers. I know millions of types like them in real life, and I avoid them at all costs because they have a toxic influence and shame not just men, but the entire human race. Usually, when these types try that crap at home, they get slapped by their wives and spend the next week hiding under the covers😁. As for the forum owner, he either supports it or he simply doesn't give a damn. You're forgetting that you live in America, where it's absolute anarchy. Good luck waiting for an official statement from the administration.😁

Kyle Ward said:I honestly have no clue why this thread hasn't been locked yet. This person—who is basically the textbook definition of a stereotypical feminist (go ahead, report me to the moderators, Sarnavka, and of course, mommy 😍)—doesn't even know what she wants. Honestly, she doesn't even know what she *doesn't* want.

She’s busy calling everyone else out for sexism, while her entire discourse boils down to just trashing anyone who holds an opinion other than her own. She preaches about equality, yet refuses to grant any kind of equality to anyone else. She started this whole topic acting like it was some manifesto for female intelligence, only for her "ultimate" argument for superiority over us "clueless men" to end up being nothing more than the physiological fact that she has a uterus?!!?

Let me repeat it once more, in case anyone missed the sheer idiocy of the arguments above: WOMEN ARE MORE CAPABLE THAN MEN BECAUSE THEY HAVE A UTERUS.

And if I were to say, for example, that I think men are more capable because we can lift weights using our anatomy, I’d be branded a chauvinistic moron immediately.

I mean, if this isn't a blatant case of trolling wrapped in a few nerdy phrases—which, let's be real, she probably picked up during some six-month gender roles seminar in Canada—then I don't know what is.
And what's worse? The moderators actually took the bait instead of slapping her with a ban for this manic trolling until March 15th, 2056.

Men fertilize you. I guess that's a greater capability compared to women. Women can't even be compared to men in this regard. The fact of men fertilizing women is more than evident, I hope everyone realizes that.
There. That's the level of your discussion. So, what now? Are we going to debate which gender is more capable based on breast size? 🙂
Please, just stop. Seriously. For your own sake. In these last few posts, you've done more damage to the "feminist movement" than a single vulgar, chauvinistic outburst from someone like Vuco or Royce could do in three lifetimes.

Peter Phillips32 said:So, look, I mean, here I am again, just... me. Honestly, I've been sitting here thinking, and I figured, why not? I'm just gonna dive right into this, even if I end up tripping over my own feet halfway through. It's kind of my thing, isn't it? Just rambling along while trying to make sense of everything, though let's be real, "making sense" might be asking a bit much from someone like me. Anyway, so, I'm basically saying that this time around... Literally uneducated. Look, I honestly have no clue what you're getting at here, because you haven't actually laid out a single thing on this thread. Do you seriously think I’m supposed to sit here and dig through your entire post history just to figure out where you stand? That’s a bit much, don't you think? So, let me ask you straight: what exactly is this list of "abilities" you've assigned to men versus women? What specific traits are you using to claim we can be equalized, and what other random qualities are you planning to toss into that arbitrary bucket just so you can go ahead and declare women more capable than men?

What exactly do you mean by these "moralistic pressures" you keep harping on about?🤷

See, that’s exactly what you’re doing in that quote up there. You're basically handing me this half-baked answer where you slowly twist the context around until I'm forced to agree with you just so I don't end up looking like some total monster, you know? It’s like you're trying to corner me into accepting your own views as the only ones that matter by using this weird, heavy-handed moral high ground to pressure me.

Look, I’m still waiting on you to actually say something meaningful about free speech—specifically regarding the rights of people who don't fall in line with your worldview—and what the actual legal precedent looks like under the Constitution and laws of the USA. You're dodging the question. And while we're at it, you still haven't cleared up that murky, nonsense logic of yours where you try to equate male and female capabilities by claiming women are somehow more capable. If that's the case, why don't you just come out and say it? What exactly is this supposed "fundamental purpose" of being more capable that you're hinting at? Just lay it out.

ps.
Look, if you’re going to insist on bundling childbirth and general reproductive health into one big category—which, by the way, means you're counting way more than just the actual act of giving birth—then fine, I guess I can play that game. If we're being that broad, then I can just grab the concept of "strength" in its entirety and start listing every single specific example of power out there. I mean, just look at how many different strength-based disciplines they cram into the Olympic Games, let alone everywhere else. It’s a total reach, but hey, if we're stretching definitions, let's go all the way.

edit (just adding this here because I don't want to lose the thread of what I was saying above)

So, if you're gonna hide behind the Constitution and legal precedents, why bother even bringing them up? It makes zero sense. You haven't actually explained how the law or any legal practice has anything to do with freedom of speech when it comes to feminism—especially since you’re out here actively suing people just because you don't like what they have to say. It's a total contradiction.

That is exactly what you're doing in the quote above. You're giving half-answers where you subtly shift the context I'm supposed to agree with—otherwise, I'm the bad guy—basically forcing me to accept your views through some kind of moral coercion.

I'll say it again: you still haven't said anything about free speech for those who disagree with you or what the legal precedent is regarding that. And you still need to explain this murky equalization of male and female abilities where women are supposedly "more capable"—would love to finally hear what the ultimate purpose of women being more capable actually is.

ps.
If you get to include both childbirth and general reproductive capabilities (which implies much more than just giving birth), then I can just bring up general strength and list individual examples of superior strength—just look at how many weightlifting disciplines there are in the Olympic Games, let alone elsewhere.
edit (adding this since I don't want to mess with the context above)

If that's the case, why bother bringing up the Constitution and laws of the USA or legal precedent at all? You can't explain how law and legal practice actually relate to feminism's version of free speech—especially when you're busy suing people for what they say.

Michelle Alvarez8 said:Wait, wasn't that actually your own post about inferior men that I was quoting? 😵

Charles Wells71 said:placidorca16 Look, here’s some straight talk from a feminist who doesn't usually clog up the feminism threads but had to fight tooth and nail just to get a seat at the table in real life. I’ve read through everything you flagged as offensive or punishable, and honestly? I don't see anything worth banning. You really need to chill out and just get on board with the rest of us here.
Does it actually bother you when someone claims women aren't as smart as men? So what! Unless they can back it up with actual studies, they aren't smarter than me. Besides, do you seriously think you can just police what people think? People have the right to be wrong, even if their takes are totally out of touch. Sure, we can call that kind of talk backward, but it's still part of our social reality. What do you actually gain by forcing these things to be banned? Maybe a "more progressive" forum, sure, but it won't make anyone more realistic!
So just relax—you aren't going to turn every single person into a progressive woman. There will always be guys who think they were born superior and that women are just weaker beings in every possible way. You shouldn't waste your energy fighting them; just deal with them in real life, put them in their place, and move on.
Anyway, that's my two cents. Hope you take it to heart.😉

Michelle Alvarez8 said:I can't believe people actually fall for that—seriously, how does anyone buy into such nonsense? Isn't it wild how easily some folks get swayed?

👋

placidorca16 said:Look, I respect your opinion and your right to have it. But if I wanted advice like that, I wouldn't have started this thread. A feminist, obviously, comes in all varieties.

Michelle Alvarez8 said:Of course this isn't proof that men are inferior to women. It just proves you're hooking up with anyone and everyone—to the point where you can't even keep track of yourself anymore! 😁

Charles Wells71 said:Can you just admit you're wrong when you go hunting for people to get banned over posts like those? That’s all I’m wondering...
And yeah, I'm with you there—there are definitely all kinds of feminists out there.

placidorca16 said:I already answered that—not looking to make a broken record here. But, honestly, it’s not your job to decide whether I’m right or wrong on my own behalf.

placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.