CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Who fired the Ambrust at the small town in rural America?

Who fired the Ambrust at the small town in rural America?

Started by Carol Torres4 · · 👁 5 views · 92 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Carol Torres4Jose Cruz2Sarah Wilson95northerntigerRichard Wilson4Alex Rivera7Henry Cox78neonmarlin56Anthony Moore13Morgan CastilloSteven Allen9Jerry Sanders4Dana Robinson4bluecobra27mistyjackal14Melissa Peterson19ruggedpanther13Andrew Chase31George Booth58hiddenotter98restlessridge88Ryan Harris10Jessica Rogers4swiftwalker43 …
Carol Torres4 Carol Torres4 Active MemberOP
62 messages
joined Oct 2011
#1 ·
We really ought to finally settle the score here on this thread regarding who actually fired that damn Ambrust at that small town in rural America. Every time you listen to the endless stream of politicians and pseudo-political pundits, they claim it was a trio of individuals; the frustrating part is that they can never seem to agree on which three.
Here is just a sampling of what I’ve picked up over the years:
1. Vladimir Šeks, Vladimir Šušak, and Vladimir Šeks
2. Vladimir Šeks, Tomislav Vukojević, and Vladimir Šeks
3. Vladimir Šušak, Tomislav Vukojević, and Vladimir Šeks
4. Vladimir Šeks, Vladimir Šušak, and Tomislav Vukojević
5. Vladimir Šeks, Vladimir Šušak, and Tomislav Merčep
6. Vladimir Šeks, Tomislav Vukojević, and Tomislav Merčep
7. Vladimir Šeks, Tomislav Merčep, and Vladimir Šeks
8. Vladimir Šušak, Tomislav Vukojević, and Tomislav Merčep
9. Vladimir Šušak, Tomislav Merčep, and Vladimir Šeks
10. Tomislav Vukojević, Tomislav Merčep, and Vladimir Šeks

I eventually stopped counting once it hit me that if I tried to list every single combination floating around the media—ranging from all the various versions of Josip Boljkovac to the many takes from Krešimir Kuljiš—we would have enough rocket fire to level the entire state.

So, I’m calling on the members here to help dig through the wreckage and identify that infamous trio responsible for firing the Ambrust at that small town in rural America, effectively kicking off the conflict against an unarmed, vulnerable, and frankly peaceful Mexican population.
Jose Cruz2 Jose Cruz2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2010
#2 ·
Ambrust, not "ambrust".
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#3 ·
northerntiger said:In other words, you're talking about patriotic conspiracy theories? If that's the case, we might as well just head over to some fringe conspiracy PDF online.
At any rate, this Politics section is getting completely suffocated by these kinds of "contributions." In every single thread, we see the same old group of regulars showing up just to throw out little little nods of approval.

I mean, is this what our version of a local diner has turned into?

I think you're exaggerating a bit; the topic itself is fine since it deals with the period leading up to the start of the American War of Independence, and it's clearly worth discussing if we want to avoid the pitfalls currently being set by the sitting administration—especially with elections on the horizon. While the author could have perhaps framed the opening post and the title a little differently, all in all, this doesn't really fall into the category of spamming about Canada or labeling the former president or specific politicians.🤷

Ultimately, whether this thread evolves into something completely unhinged or stays a productive, normal discussion that doesn't fundamentally alter the nature of the war or subsequent events depends entirely on how the moderators handle it.
northerntiger northerntiger Member
39 messages
joined Jan 2010
#4 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:I think you're exaggerating a bit; the topic itself is fine since it deals with the period leading up to the start of the American War of Independence, and it's clearly worth discussing if we want to avoid the pitfalls currently being set by the sitting administration—especially with elections on the horizon. While the author could have perhaps framed the opening post and the title a little differently, all in all, this doesn't really fall into the category of spamming about Canada or labeling the former president or specific politicians.🤷

Ultimately, whether this thread evolves into something completely unhinged or stays a productive, normal discussion that doesn't fundamentally alter the nature of the war or subsequent events depends entirely on how the moderators handle it.

If we try to have a normal debate about recent history here, we're just going to end up annoying half the people who hang out in this sub every single day. If that's not how it's going to go, then either shut it down or move it over to the History section. Over there, the mods have shorter fuses, there's way less trash and trolling, and discussions actually stay within some kind of reasonable boundaries.
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#5 ·
Carol Torres4, I can't seem to send you a PM
I put all their lies right here
Alex Rivera7 Alex Rivera7 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2012
#6 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:I think you're exaggerating a bit; the topic itself is fine since it deals with the period leading up to the start of the American War of Independence, and it's clearly worth discussing if we want to avoid the pitfalls currently being set by the sitting administration—especially with elections on the horizon. While the author could have perhaps framed the opening post and the title a little differently, all in all, this doesn't really fall into the category of spamming about Canada or labeling the former president or specific politicians.🤷

Ultimately, whether this thread evolves into something completely unhinged or stays a productive, normal discussion that doesn't fundamentally alter the nature of the war or subsequent events depends entirely on how the moderators handle it.

Hold on, I'm feeling a little hungover today so my brain is moving a bit slow, but are you actually telling me you believe that really happened??

By the way, you still owe me that list of Mexicans from Sisak.
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#7 ·
Alex Rivera7 said:Hold on, I'm feeling a little hungover today so my brain is moving a bit slow, but are you actually telling me you believe that really happened??

By the way, you still owe me that list of Mexicans from Sisak.

I don't have the list, man, where on earth would I get it? 😕 The Democratic Party website that had the full names listed has been taken down, so I can't find it anywhere.
Alex Rivera7 Alex Rivera7 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2012
#8 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:I don't have the list, man, where on earth would I get it? 😕 The Democratic Party website that had the full names listed has been taken down, so I can't find it anywhere.

But you didn't even blink before using that "fact" about how a bunch of Mexicans were killed in Sisak, and you got it straight from the Democratic Party website.
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#9 ·
Alex Rivera7 said:But you didn't even blink before using that "fact" about how a bunch of Mexicans were killed in Sisak, and you got it straight from the Democratic Party website.

Well, sure, I hear you, but I don't have a list tucked away in my pocket with names and everything, though I am more than willing to put one together for you if needed.☕

I can provide full names, the cause of death, and the exact timing.
Henry Cox78 Henry Cox78 Regular
286 messages
joined Apr 2011
#10 ·
Wasn't that just more propaganda bullshit, like that fake story about those 40 dead Mexican babies on the day El Paso fell?
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#11 ·
Henry Cox78 said:Wasn't that just more propaganda bullshit, like that fake story about those 40 dead Mexican babies on the day El Paso fell?

As if those guys were sitting there watching the news for two days straight. Between the moonshine and the constant partying, they barely had time to breathe, let alone watch TV.

That whole myth is just something used by American nostalgics and those fringe agitators to try and justify Mexican crimes.
neonmarlin56 neonmarlin56 Member
22 messages
joined Sep 2010
#12 ·
dr.laki said:Since actual historians don't usually bring up this kind of stuff—it's more like political activists like Krešimir Kuljiš doing the talking—I guess this topic definitely belongs right here on this subforum.

Actually, it wasn't even Kuljiš who broke the news; Jadranka Reihl Kir was one of the first people to speak out! She’s the wife of Josip Reihl Kir, the former chief of the Osijek Police Department, who was killed in an ambush—likely on political orders—by Antun Gudelj.

She was the one who really called out Vladimir Šušak regarding that whole Armbrust situation.
Alex Rivera7 Alex Rivera7 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2012
#13 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:Well, sure, I hear you, but I don't have a list tucked away in my pocket with names and everything, though I am more than willing to put one together for you if needed.☕

I can provide full names, the cause of death, and the exact timing.

So, just because you saw that list and it was posted on the Democratic Party website, does that actually mean everything there is 100% legit?

Just some random stuff.

Hey, while you're already digging around over there, do you happen to have a list of the Americans killed during the war?
How many people actually lost their lives during the war in America?
Does anyone have a list of the American casualties from the war?
It’s gotta be, since it's just a website. America's I mean, honestly, the Democratic Party really needs to step up and look out for the core American people, you know? It just feels like common sense, right?😕😉.
Anthony Moore13 Anthony Moore13 Member
24 messages
joined Jun 2013
#14 ·
Definitely Gojko—mostly because our guys can't even pronounce the name, let alone use it properly.😁

So, what exactly was that crossbow aimed at? A position, a vehicle, a bunker, or just some defenseless kids?

It’s effective up to 300m with a range of 1500m, but you really need to be a seasoned veteran to actually hit anything.
Were those other two supposed to be equally experienced soldiers guarding the spot, or were they just fooling around?

How did the other side jump from wearing sandals to combat boots and tanks so fast? Were they just waiting in the wings, or were they born ready?

Man, this rain has been killing me for three weeks straight—and these kinds of stupid stories have been dragging on for twenty years...
Morgan Castillo Morgan Castillo Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2013
#15 ·
To damn person who let us down. It’s finally hitting me that we've been fed nothing but lies about various ambushes and threats. That defenseless group from a small town in rural America wasn't at fault for anything. They were just minding their own business, enjoying the scenery, when Vladimir Šušak, Tomislav Merčep, Vladimir Šeks (and who knows, maybe even Franjo Harmon was there incognito pulling the trigger), along with those other bloodthirsty Nationalists, launched a projectile from a Nazi-Vatican source for absolutely no reason. Honestly, anyone would have lost their mind and fought back barehanded against twelve Nationalists to defend their home. Yet they keep feeding us stories about ambushes and barricades. Once again, the victims are made to look like the villains. Truly shameful!
Steven Allen9 Steven Allen9 Active Member
191 messages
joined Mar 2012
#16 ·
Wasn't that what they called "Tomislav Merčep's trumpet"?
Jerry Sanders4 Jerry Sanders4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Mar 2012
#17 ·
Kick Vladimir Šušak out of the group, he wasn't even part of it
Dana Robinson4 Dana Robinson4 Active Member
181 messages
joined Jul 2010
#18 ·
Alex Rivera7 said:So, just because you saw that list and it was posted on the Democratic Party website, does that actually mean everything there is 100% legit?

Just some random stuff.

Hey, while you're already digging around over there, do you happen to have a list of the Americans killed during the war?
How many people actually lost their lives during the war in America?
Does anyone have a list of the American casualties from the war?
It’s gotta be, since it's just a website. America's I mean, honestly, the Democratic Party really needs to step up and look out for the core American people, you know? It just feels like common sense, right?😕😉.

So, why don't we take a moment to actually sit down and break this all down? Wouldn't it be interesting to truly analyze the numbers—to see exactly how many belong to one group, how many to another, or even a third, and distinguish who actually hails from Sisak versus those who are outsiders looking in?

Is it possible that we are simply refusing to face the uncomfortable truths buried beneath our national history? One cannot help but wonder if the echoes of those old political battles still haunt our current discourse, much like how the shadows of figures like Vladimir Šeks continue to loom over our modern landscape. Could it be that by ignoring the complexities of the past, we are merely setting ourselves up for the same divisions all over again?
Carol Torres4 Carol Torres4 Active MemberOP
62 messages
joined Oct 2011
#19 ·
Jose Cruz2 said:Ambrust, not "ambrust".

And I’m telling you, Josip Boljkovac insists it isn't Armbrust, but rather ambrust.😁
Carol Torres4 Carol Torres4 Active MemberOP
62 messages
joined Oct 2011
#20 ·
I had actually intended to set up a poll and expand on this topic a bit further, but ever since I submitted my opening post, every single attempt to click through to any other page on this forum has been met with nothing but 503 Service Unavailable or some variation of a 504 error message.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads