CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Started by Dana Martin95 · · 👁 31 views · 1.4K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dana Martin95vividraven79Zachary Anderson20Jack Collins58Emily Smith6velvetmason14Eric Lopez79Sean Palmer67Anthony Bennett6Daniel Cook2Kate Jackson2Charles Fox10darkhawk30feralpilot0Rebecca Ward2Richard LopezTimothy Stewart4George DiazRobin Jones2Nicholas Bailey3crimsonwolf26Sean Nelson6fadedranger162amberjackal68 …
Anthony Bennett6 Anthony Bennett6 Active Member
102 messages
joined Feb 2008
#461 ·
What a strike this turned out to be in just five minutes...



The workers seem pretty happy with themselves; they basically spent the whole day hanging out in the garage instead of actually working...

Even the union rep is thrilled... he got fired, so now he can finally relax at home while waiting for his next move...

The only thing missing was someone spinning a record and handing out drinks!
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#462 ·
Damage control at its finest.

They’re trying to spin the shortest strike in history as some massive victory for the workers, even though Whitmer hasn't given them an inch more than what was already on the table months ago. 🤣

And here’s the kicker: if Whitmer actually did "win" against the strikers, the people of San Diego are the ones who will end up footing the bill through higher costs down the road. 🙏

These spins feel like they were cooked up deep in the bowels of The Center, where bots just flood the forums. Compared to Sell California, even Christmas Free Weekly starts looking like a bastion of objective journalism...

But hey, I’m glad someone finally called out this "seven-hour strike." Cheers.

A hundred-dollar walkout or a strike against the government? We asked San Diegans what they thought about this little "uprising," and here is what’s really getting under their skin.
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#463 ·
Free asses at the tavern along with her journalists
So Martin Prvan wants the City of San Francisco to gift Mari from the shelter an apartment—funny enough, Prvan already owns a place over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Why can't Prvan just let her crash with him?
He rents his place out, so the City should just give Mari a spot for free
Just to get her off the streets

Quinn:
Prvan's Studio
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, San Francisco, USA
https://www.booking.com/hotel/hr/apa....html#tab-main
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#464 ·
Eric Lopez79 said:Free asses at the tavern along with her journalists
So Martin Prvan wants the City of San Francisco to gift Mari from the shelter an apartment—funny enough, Prvan already owns a place over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Why can't Prvan just let her crash with him?
He rents his place out, so the City should just give Mari a spot for free
Just to get her off the streets

Quinn:
Prvan's Studio
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, San Francisco, USA
https://www.booking.com/hotel/hr/apa....html#tab-main

🤣

It's hard to believe this is the same humanitarian from Sell California, Martin Prvan—the big critic of Puljkov.

That would imply Prvan is a massive hypocrite, complaining about Mar Tanjug's situation while she uses a place that isn't hers, all while Prvan rents his gorgeous apartment for $150 a night during peak season and suggests Puljkov should host her instead.

It seems impossible that this is the same Martin Prvan, the man who supposedly fights for the little guy and the elderly. It just doesn't add up... ☕
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#465 ·
The City of San Francisco is currently trying to evict a teacher from her 130-square-foot studio. Her reaction is pretty raw; she’s basically asking, "What on earth did I do to someone from the Midwest to make my entire life fall apart like this?"

Quinn:
The City of San Francisco is looking to relocate Ivana Pezo from her current living quarters to the "Brodosplitov" Single Men's Home. It’s a bit of an absurd situation, really—Pezo is a musician and English teacher who relies on that tiny 13-square-meter space at 81 El Paso Street as her only actual home. I guess the city thinks moving her around is a simple enough task, but when you're dealing with someone's only roof, it feels like they're being somewhat dismissive of the reality on the ground.

She explains that she wasn't able to sign the lease for her small unit during the final months of 2021, which was the deadline set by the City. Apparently, she spent that time trying to negotiate for an adjacent unit of the same size, but that fell through. To make matters worse, she ended up catching COVID toward the end of the year. Once she finally recovered in January 2022, officials at the Banovina office informed her they wouldn't even sign a contract for the original 13 square meters she had already been occupying. Left with essentially no other options, she decided to sue the City of San Francisco to force the completion of the rental agreement.

Around Christmas Eve, I caught COVID, and by the beginning of January 2022, once I finally recovered, I headed off to sign my contract. I was told then that the terms had been withdrawn at the end of the previous year, and shortly thereafter, I received an eviction notice. In a state of total desperation, I reached out to Željko Kerum, trying to emphasize that I truly have no other housing options; even though my mother and brother live in the same building, there’s simply no room for me to move in with them. Eventually, I managed to get in touch with Ivan Leka, who helped arrange a meeting at City Hall with Deputy Mayor Antonij Kuzmanić. At that point, I was genuinely convinced we could resolve this misunderstanding, especially since I’ve always been an honest tenant and a reliable payer—a fact my neighbors also vouched for when they stepped up to support me. I decided to attend the meeting alone, which, looking back, was probably a mistake. I was met there by all the top officials, including Željko Kerum, who was incredibly zealous and vocal about her desire to evict me as quickly as possible—as Pezo noted in an authorized statement—and she continued:

I tried to explain that I had decided against taking the larger space and fully intended to sign the contract on schedule. However, I ended up falling ill—just like so many others back then—so I submitted medical documentation to back up my claim. From what I could gather by their reactions, Deputy Mayor Kuzmanić and Ivan Leka didn't seem to have much of an issue with the explanation. But Željko Kerum managed to shut the whole thing down with just a single shake of his head. It was enough to get a negative response from the Deputy Mayor, who eventually just shrugged his shoulders and said, "I'm sorry, ma'am, but I can't cause trouble for my subordinates, and I simply cannot open Pandora's Box."

I walked out of the Banovina building in tears, though I don't think any of them were particularly moved by my state. It didn't take long to realize what they’re actually up to: they want to swap out my front door for one of those heavy-duty armored ones, essentially forcing me out of my own room. I reached out to my lawyer, and he assured me that they can't just kick me out legally like that—there's definitely enough ground here to file a lawsuit.

She claims she redirected her credit just to scrape together enough funds to file a lawsuit—basically a desperate attempt to prevent them from kicking her out before the legal situation can actually be settled.  

The City sent her an updated bill for her 2023 rent, and predictably, the rates have been hiked up.

"My rent for 2023 was sitting at about $28, but then this new, special little rate arrived just for me—$139 a month for a tiny 140-square-foot studio. Naturally, tucked away in the corner of the notice, you’ll find the signature of Mrs. Željko Kerum. I honestly have no idea what I could have possibly done to that woman to make the rug get pulled out from under me so suddenly," Ivana Pezo remarked in an official statement.

Željko Kerum, who heads up the Department of Municipal Property Management, has finally issued a response to the claims made by Ivana Pezo:
The City of San Francisco actually holds ownership of that building—you know, the one serving as a Single Men's Home—after receiving it as a donation from the US government.

Since none of the residents in that particular building actually had any formal legal standing at the time, the San Francisco City Council stepped in on December 18, 2020. They passed a resolution mandating that individual fixed-term lease agreements be drawn up for ten years, which would include a requirement to pay rent in the amount of... $33/room.

Since the legal requirement to hold a public bidding process wasn't met, the official stance taken was to simply "legalize" the situation as it currently exists. In other words, there won't be any direct redistribution of the remaining rooms among the building's residents.

In this specific instance, Ivana Pezo was found to be occupying a single room on the first floor of the building.

By the deadline (October 22, 2021), Ivana Pezo submitted a request to the City of San Francisco to finalize a lease agreement. However, she made sure to mention her need for more living space, citing a supposed "right to larger accommodations" and suggesting she be granted two rooms—the ones previously occupied by a tenant who recently passed away in the building.

The request from Ivana Pezo for alternative rooms was denied. That said, on November 22, 2021, a resolution was passed to execute a lease for the specific room Ivana Pezo was actually using ("Official Gazette of the City of San Francisco," No. 63/21). This was personally delivered to Ivana Pezo on December 14, 2021. It might be worth noting that she was notified via telephone as early as December 9, 2021, regarding her ability to proceed with the lease. To be clear, all lease agreements, without exception, were set for a fixed term of 10 years, effective January 1, 2022.

I guess Ivana Pezo verbally declined to sign the lease, apparently dissatisfied because her demand for different rooms wasn't met.

Furthermore, Ivana Pezo hasn't provided any evidence to show why she was unable to finalize the lease, nor did she report any such issues to the appropriate administrative authorities.

Given all of this, on January 17, 2022, the Mayor issued a resolution to rescind the previous decision to enter into the lease agreement for the room in the building—the Single Men's Home ("Official Gazette of the City of San Francisco," No. 3/22).
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#466 ·
The endless nonsense from the elites in Sell California just keeps going... If you happen to be a privileged nobody who used political connections to grab things that weren't yours, just reach out to Sell California and they'll take care of you. 🤣 Everyone else? You're on your own. Figure it out yourselves.

It looks like this Pezo was dragging her feet for months instead of just signing the contract. Or maybe she was just waiting to see if she could squeeze out an extra room? Unbelievable.
When things started going south, she started blaming the pandemic, yet she couldn't even produce a doctor's note to back it up. Typical.

Now she’s paying for a room with a bathroom in San Francisco $323. Wow, they’re really "robbing" her... After all those years of paying peanuts while everyone else was struggling to find housing or an apartment.

I remember how people used to travel around during Christmas and New Year's to sing and make money; it wasn't exactly a lockdown situation then.
https://inicijativa.biz/blog/upoznaj...bene-zvijezde/

In the American music scene, Ivana Pezo is known as “Billie Joan.” While she isn't teaching English at our local school in San Francisco, she performs all over the US.
Richard Lopez Richard Lopez Active Member
90 messages
joined Jul 2025
#467 ·
[No content provided to rewrite.]
Emily Smith6 said:The City of San Francisco is currently trying to evict a teacher from her 130-square-foot studio. Her reaction is pretty raw; she’s basically asking, "What on earth did I do to someone from the Midwest to make my entire life fall apart like this?"

Quinn:
The City of San Francisco is looking to relocate Ivana Pezo from her current living quarters to the "Brodosplitov" Single Men's Home. It’s a bit of an absurd situation, really—Pezo is a musician and English teacher who relies on that tiny 13-square-meter space at 81 El Paso Street as her only actual home. I guess the city thinks moving her around is a simple enough task, but when you're dealing with someone's only roof, it feels like they're being somewhat dismissive of the reality on the ground.

She explains that she wasn't able to sign the lease for her small unit during the final months of 2021, which was the deadline set by the City. Apparently, she spent that time trying to negotiate for an adjacent unit of the same size, but that fell through. To make matters worse, she ended up catching COVID toward the end of the year. Once she finally recovered in January 2022, officials at the Banovina office informed her they wouldn't even sign a contract for the original 13 square meters she had already been occupying. Left with essentially no other options, she decided to sue the City of San Francisco to force the completion of the rental agreement.

Around Christmas Eve, I caught COVID, and by the beginning of January 2022, once I finally recovered, I headed off to sign my contract. I was told then that the terms had been withdrawn at the end of the previous year, and shortly thereafter, I received an eviction notice. In a state of total desperation, I reached out to Željko Kerum, trying to emphasize that I truly have no other housing options; even though my mother and brother live in the same building, there’s simply no room for me to move in with them. Eventually, I managed to get in touch with Ivan Leka, who helped arrange a meeting at City Hall with Deputy Mayor Antonij Kuzmanić. At that point, I was genuinely convinced we could resolve this misunderstanding, especially since I’ve always been an honest tenant and a reliable payer—a fact my neighbors also vouched for when they stepped up to support me. I decided to attend the meeting alone, which, looking back, was probably a mistake. I was met there by all the top officials, including Željko Kerum, who was incredibly zealous and vocal about her desire to evict me as quickly as possible—as Pezo noted in an authorized statement—and she continued:

I tried to explain that I had decided against taking the larger space and fully intended to sign the contract on schedule. However, I ended up falling ill—just like so many others back then—so I submitted medical documentation to back up my claim. From what I could gather by their reactions, Deputy Mayor Kuzmanić and Ivan Leka didn't seem to have much of an issue with the explanation. But Željko Kerum managed to shut the whole thing down with just a single shake of his head. It was enough to get a negative response from the Deputy Mayor, who eventually just shrugged his shoulders and said, "I'm sorry, ma'am, but I can't cause trouble for my subordinates, and I simply cannot open Pandora's Box."

I walked out of the Banovina building in tears, though I don't think any of them were particularly moved by my state. It didn't take long to realize what they’re actually up to: they want to swap out my front door for one of those heavy-duty armored ones, essentially forcing me out of my own room. I reached out to my lawyer, and he assured me that they can't just kick me out legally like that—there's definitely enough ground here to file a lawsuit.

She claims she redirected her credit just to scrape together enough funds to file a lawsuit—basically a desperate attempt to prevent them from kicking her out before the legal situation can actually be settled.  

The City sent her an updated bill for her 2023 rent, and predictably, the rates have been hiked up.

"My rent for 2023 was sitting at about $28, but then this new, special little rate arrived just for me—$139 a month for a tiny 140-square-foot studio. Naturally, tucked away in the corner of the notice, you’ll find the signature of Mrs. Željko Kerum. I honestly have no idea what I could have possibly done to that woman to make the rug get pulled out from under me so suddenly," Ivana Pezo remarked in an official statement.

Željko Kerum, who heads up the Department of Municipal Property Management, has finally issued a response to the claims made by Ivana Pezo:
The City of San Francisco actually holds ownership of that building—you know, the one serving as a Single Men's Home—after receiving it as a donation from the US government.

Since none of the residents in that particular building actually had any formal legal standing at the time, the San Francisco City Council stepped in on December 18, 2020. They passed a resolution mandating that individual fixed-term lease agreements be drawn up for ten years, which would include a requirement to pay rent in the amount of... $33/room.

Since the legal requirement to hold a public bidding process wasn't met, the official stance taken was to simply "legalize" the situation as it currently exists. In other words, there won't be any direct redistribution of the remaining rooms among the building's residents.

In this specific instance, Ivana Pezo was found to be occupying a single room on the first floor of the building.

By the deadline (October 22, 2021), Ivana Pezo submitted a request to the City of San Francisco to finalize a lease agreement. However, she made sure to mention her need for more living space, citing a supposed "right to larger accommodations" and suggesting she be granted two rooms—the ones previously occupied by a tenant who recently passed away in the building.

The request from Ivana Pezo for alternative rooms was denied. That said, on November 22, 2021, a resolution was passed to execute a lease for the specific room Ivana Pezo was actually using ("Official Gazette of the City of San Francisco," No. 63/21). This was personally delivered to Ivana Pezo on December 14, 2021. It might be worth noting that she was notified via telephone as early as December 9, 2021, regarding her ability to proceed with the lease. To be clear, all lease agreements, without exception, were set for a fixed term of 10 years, effective January 1, 2022.

I guess Ivana Pezo verbally declined to sign the lease, apparently dissatisfied because her demand for different rooms wasn't met.

Furthermore, Ivana Pezo hasn't provided any evidence to show why she was unable to finalize the lease, nor did she report any such issues to the appropriate administrative authorities.

Given all of this, on January 17, 2022, the Mayor issued a resolution to rescind the previous decision to enter into the lease agreement for the room in the building—the Single Men's Home ("Official Gazette of the City of San Francisco," No. 3/22).

Wait, she's just some young girl. In a work relationship...
There's family too (mom and my brother, but they aren't getting a spot either)... 😁)
She didn't sign because she refused to, but now they're blaming the city like it's some kind of crime just because they're pushing her out of the only home she has left... 🙏
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#468 ·
Richard Lopez said:[No content provided to rewrite.]

Wait, she's just some young girl. In a work relationship...
There's family too (mom and my brother, but they aren't getting a spot either)... 😁)
She didn't sign because she refused to, but now they're blaming the city like it's some kind of crime just because they're pushing her out of the only home she has left... 🙏

Reading this makes you want to slap yourself just to make sure you aren't dreaming.

You honestly can't tell who's more delusional. Is it Pezo, making a fool of herself with these shady tactics, or a frustrated Sell California turning into Slobodan Weekly by spinning these "heartfelt" little tales just because Justin Trudeau wouldn't pay off the extortion?🤔
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#469 ·
velvetmason14 said:Damage control at its finest.

They’re trying to spin the shortest strike in history as some massive victory for the workers, even though Whitmer hasn't given them an inch more than what was already on the table months ago. 🤣

And here’s the kicker: if Whitmer actually did "win" against the strikers, the people of San Diego are the ones who will end up footing the bill through higher costs down the road. 🙏

These spins feel like they were cooked up deep in the bowels of The Center, where bots just flood the forums. Compared to Sell California, even Christmas Free Weekly starts looking like a bastion of objective journalism...

But hey, I’m glad someone finally called out this "seven-hour strike." Cheers.

A hundred-dollar walkout or a strike against the government? We asked San Diegans what they thought about this little "uprising," and here is what’s really getting under their skin.

How exactly did Justin Trudeau defeat the strikers? A real victory would have been if he didn't have to give them anything at all—not that he should have had to, since they are obviously overpaid compared to everyone else in America. Ivana Pezo basically lured them into accepting wages that haven't needed to grow for an entire decade... And who do you think is paying that extra $100? Do you honestly think they'll find those savings through some "internal reorganization of Sanitation" 😁? And regarding your little gloating session, I don't care if anyone actually believes these trash collectors are the smartest employees in all our municipal agencies, such that nobody else will feel the need to strike now. Not after they saw how much these guys make while striking and still getting an immediate raise... 🙄
Dana Martin95 Dana Martin95 Active MemberOP
102 messages
joined Jul 2025
#470 ·
Richard Lopez said:[No content provided to rewrite.]

Wait, she's just some young girl. In a work relationship...
There's family too (mom and my brother, but they aren't getting a spot either)... 😁)
She didn't sign because she refused to, but now they're blaming the city like it's some kind of crime just because they're pushing her out of the only home she has left... 🙏

an American woman in her mid-30s... how is she supposed to live in 130 square feet? 🤔
Richard Lopez Richard Lopez Active Member
90 messages
joined Jul 2025
#471 ·
Quote:>
velvetmason14 says:
Reading this makes you want to slap yourself because it’s hard to believe this actually happens.

You can't tell who's crazier. Is it Pezo, dragging her own reputation through the mud with these shady deals, or a frustrated Sell California turning into Slobodan Weekly with all these "warm and fuzzy" stories just because Justin Trudeau refused to pay protection money? 🤔>
Yeah, right. Like she isn't some charity case. How did she even qualify for that and get it? 🤔

And now she’s whining about losing her footing... imagine that. 😁 Just imagine.
I mean, who wouldn't want a room in the city for $33, which is how she even met the criteria in the first place? I'd take a cheap city apartment too—perfect for crashing after a long day so you don't have to drive home, or having a spot to escape the house, study, or work, especially if you work from home. 🙂

Sell California is being peddled like Republican Party spin—only for people who don't know the details or bother reading anything past the headline. ;they "don't know":

They even went out of their way to throw in an old photo from an archive session. You can clearly see she's wearing different clothes, but the pose is identical: cafe, coffee, cigarette, ear-to-ear grin.
It's like they cooked up a scandal on multiple levels on purpose. They don't care about Mara at all; they just want to be against Trudeau.
Richard Lopez Richard Lopez Active Member
90 messages
joined Jul 2025
#472 ·
Dana Martin95 said:an American woman in her mid-30s... how is she supposed to live in 130 square feet? 🤔

Clearly she needed an extra bedroom!!! 🤣

She couldn't care less. People are out here losing their minds over square footage, rent, renovations, and utility bills, while she just happily funneled her cash into other stuff.

She even diverted her mortgage funds just to have enough left over to sue the city 😁
It’s obvious she was obsessed with making sure she didn't pay more than $33 a month.
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#473 ·
velvetmason14 said:🤣

It's hard to believe this is the same humanitarian from Sell California, Martin Prvan—the big critic of Puljkov.

That would imply Prvan is a massive hypocrite, complaining about Mar Tanjug's situation while she uses a place that isn't hers, all while Prvan rents his gorgeous apartment for $150 a night during peak season and suggests Puljkov should host her instead.

It seems impossible that this is the same Martin Prvan, the man who supposedly fights for the little guy and the elderly. It just doesn't add up... ☕

Yeah, it's definitely him, obviously.
The judge is loaded so he's just messing around.
I've seen him around—young kid, pretty sharp.
Man, why doesn't he just rent out that nice apartment to himself? It'd be great if Mari could stay there.
Drew Johnson2 Drew Johnson2 Active Member
116 messages
joined Jan 2018
#474 ·
Are we all just collectively losing our minds in this city, where we're either shelling out $2,500 for rent or dropping $800,000 on a tiny condo... I mean, seriously, is everyone actually this delusional? It doesn't matter if you're twenty or sixty, or if you have a PhD from Stanford or nothing at all... it seems like every single person is just blindly throwing themselves into these ridiculous local social welfare schemes...
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#475 ·
Mortal Kombat said:It’s pure frustration. It feels like everything Eric Adams and his administration do in San Francisco is completely ignored.

If one specific media outlet or an opposition party can just dictate terms to the Mayor and influence everything happening in San Francisco, then we have to conclude the local government is totally ineffective and should probably just resign tonight.

Calm down everyone, the strike was settled a long time ago. 😉

Other issues are being handled too—things that seemed impossible before—and get this, they're doing it all by the book. 😲

Sell California is reporting this after a lot of struggle. Good grief, what a time to be alive. 🤣

Breaking News for a Cultured San Francisco: the city's oldest bookstore is reopening, and a major market player is moving into the space!
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#476 ·
velvetmason14 said:Calm down everyone, the strike was settled a long time ago. 😉

Other issues are being handled too—things that seemed impossible before—and get this, they're doing it all by the book. 😲

Sell California is reporting this after a lot of struggle. Good grief, what a time to be alive. 🤣

Breaking News for a Cultured San Francisco: the city's oldest bookstore is reopening, and a major market player is moving into the space!

What "unthinkable" things are we even talking about? 🍿
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#477 ·
Zachary Anderson20 said:What "unthinkable" things are we even talking about? 🍿

You clear out those illegal pop-up shops in downtown San Francisco. You get rid of Katić and his shady political appointees. You force them all to play by the rules. Everything stays strictly legal, and you have Morpurgo running things—the same Morpurgo that the incompetent Opara spent years complaining about. 🙂

It isn't polite to edit people's posts... and it’s even worse to miss the point entirely. 😉
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#478 ·
velvetmason14 said:You clear out those illegal pop-up shops in downtown San Francisco. You get rid of Katić and his shady political appointees. You force them all to play by the rules. Everything stays strictly legal, and you have Morpurgo running things—the same Morpurgo that the incompetent Opara spent years complaining about. 🙂

It isn't polite to edit people's posts... and it’s even worse to miss the point entirely. 😉

Yeah, total Renaissance moves right there.
vividraven79 vividraven79 Active Member
178 messages
joined May 2024
#479 ·
Exactly... any time someone actually gets things right, people just shrug and say, "Eh, anyone could have done that," completely ignoring the fact that nobody else has even tried to fix it for the last twenty years.
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#480 ·
vividraven79 said:Exactly... any time someone actually gets things right, people just shrug and say, "Eh, anyone could have done that," completely ignoring the fact that nobody else has even tried to fix it for the last twenty years.

Look, the municipal ordinance is actually solid. That's all there is to it. But let’s not forget those special events that somehow got a shady green light to bypass the rules of that same nightlife regulation right in the middle of Times Square.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads