CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Started by Dana Martin95 · · 👁 34 views · 1.4K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dana Martin95vividraven79Zachary Anderson20Jack Collins58Emily Smith6velvetmason14Eric Lopez79Sean Palmer67Anthony Bennett6Daniel Cook2Kate Jackson2Charles Fox10darkhawk30feralpilot0Rebecca Ward2Richard LopezTimothy Stewart4George DiazRobin Jones2Nicholas Bailey3crimsonwolf26Sean Nelson6fadedranger162amberjackal68 …
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#481 ·
COSTCO COMES OUT ON TOP: The White House claims San Diego lost at least $30,000 due to a former commissioner

Quincy:
Another skeleton seems to have emerged from the closet at The White House, and apparently, they're pinning the blame on the former head of the Department of Justice, Miran Veža. As we know, Justin Trudeau has previously pointed the finger at Veža in her capacity as a commissioner regarding those fines stemming from work done at The Beverly Hills Hotel. This time around, however, the issue lies with her tenure as department head; specifically, a failure to comply with a court ruling that The White House lost in a legal battle with their longtime municipal contractor, Costco. Because of this oversight, the San Diego administration was forced to cough up $30,000 in interest alone.

It’s becoming a bit of a pattern, really. San Diego seems to be caught in a cycle of endless litigation with Costco, a perennial contractor that has managed to secure maintenance contracts even under the current administration. Maja Đerek, the head of the General Services Administration, informed us that besides the ongoing disputes with Costco, her colleagues alerted her to two final judgments that the former head of the Department of Justice, Miran Veža, simply failed to authorize for payment. Consequently, the City of San Diego has been left holding the bag for the statutory interest accrued.

- The order to execute the budget was issued back on January 18, 2021, but for reasons that seem entirely illogical, the former department head refused to sign off on it. Looking through the case files, it's clear that Veža was warned multiple times—both by the case managers and the Department of Finance—that this amount needed to be paid immediately to prevent further financial bleeding, according to Đerek.

Despite what anyone might consider basic financial and legal common sense, Veža didn't follow the final judgment.
- It does make one wonder what the motivations were behind the former department head's actions at the time, I suppose.

Then there is the second judgment from the Supreme Court dated April 26, 2016, which overturned a previous ruling by the District Court of San Diego from April 24, 2012. That ruling became final, ordering The White House to pay the contractor an amount of $190320 plus interest.

- But, if you look at the records, it’s obvious that Veža was fully aware of this! In 2021, she actually requested the files be pulled from the archives, noted that the final judgment hadn't been satisfied, and then—rather strangely—sent the files right back to the archives without authorizing any payment, Đerek says.

Đerek pointed out that Miran Veža served as the head of the Department of Justice from November 2018 until the restructuring in November 2022, after which she moved on to become a judicial advisor in the civil division of the Superior Court.

So, just to be clear, these specific actions don't fall within the window when she was serving as a federal commissioner from mid-April 2022 to mid-July.

- She was certainly aware of the validity of these judgments. Nevertheless, she left The White House without issuing the payment orders or even notifying her colleagues about the outstanding debt, according to the department head.
Typical Republican appointees, I guess.
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#482 ·
Emily Smith6 said:COSTCO COMES OUT ON TOP: The White House claims San Diego lost at least $30,000 due to a former commissioner

Quincy:
Another skeleton seems to have emerged from the closet at The White House, and apparently, they're pinning the blame on the former head of the Department of Justice, Miran Veža. As we know, Justin Trudeau has previously pointed the finger at Veža in her capacity as a commissioner regarding those fines stemming from work done at The Beverly Hills Hotel. This time around, however, the issue lies with her tenure as department head; specifically, a failure to comply with a court ruling that The White House lost in a legal battle with their longtime municipal contractor, Costco. Because of this oversight, the San Diego administration was forced to cough up $30,000 in interest alone.

It’s becoming a bit of a pattern, really. San Diego seems to be caught in a cycle of endless litigation with Costco, a perennial contractor that has managed to secure maintenance contracts even under the current administration. Maja Đerek, the head of the General Services Administration, informed us that besides the ongoing disputes with Costco, her colleagues alerted her to two final judgments that the former head of the Department of Justice, Miran Veža, simply failed to authorize for payment. Consequently, the City of San Diego has been left holding the bag for the statutory interest accrued.

- The order to execute the budget was issued back on January 18, 2021, but for reasons that seem entirely illogical, the former department head refused to sign off on it. Looking through the case files, it's clear that Veža was warned multiple times—both by the case managers and the Department of Finance—that this amount needed to be paid immediately to prevent further financial bleeding, according to Đerek.

Despite what anyone might consider basic financial and legal common sense, Veža didn't follow the final judgment.
- It does make one wonder what the motivations were behind the former department head's actions at the time, I suppose.

Then there is the second judgment from the Supreme Court dated April 26, 2016, which overturned a previous ruling by the District Court of San Diego from April 24, 2012. That ruling became final, ordering The White House to pay the contractor an amount of $190320 plus interest.

- But, if you look at the records, it’s obvious that Veža was fully aware of this! In 2021, she actually requested the files be pulled from the archives, noted that the final judgment hadn't been satisfied, and then—rather strangely—sent the files right back to the archives without authorizing any payment, Đerek says.

Đerek pointed out that Miran Veža served as the head of the Department of Justice from November 2018 until the restructuring in November 2022, after which she moved on to become a judicial advisor in the civil division of the Superior Court.

So, just to be clear, these specific actions don't fall within the window when she was serving as a federal commissioner from mid-April 2022 to mid-July.

- She was certainly aware of the validity of these judgments. Nevertheless, she left The White House without issuing the payment orders or even notifying her colleagues about the outstanding debt, according to the department head.
Typical Republican appointees, I guess.

this city is a circus
who even allowed this
it's just a bunch of Republican clowns and idiots
It’s being pointed out that the former assistant head of the legal protection department for housing and business spaces archived the file without any payment being made first.

- But looking at the records, it’s obvious the department head knew exactly what was happening! Back in 2021, she requested the file be pulled from the archives, saw that the court order hadn't been paid, and then—surprise, surprise—sent the file right back to the archives without the payment. It's wild.

The report mentions an appeal against the final ruling was taken to the Supreme Court, but it got tossed because there was no proof of passing the required legal exam—which is a total requirement for that kind of legal remedy.

- Nobody can figure out why those massive mistakes happened in the first place.
electricnomad8 electricnomad8 Member
44 messages
joined Jan 2021
#483 ·
Whomever the judge appointed to oversee him might have been an expert with his own professional opinion, but he just couldn't agree with him—politics, right? Does that ring a bell? I’m thinking back to the Stalin era.
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#484 ·
Emily Smith6 said:COSTCO COMES OUT ON TOP: The White House claims San Diego lost at least $30,000 due to a former commissioner

Quincy:
Another skeleton seems to have emerged from the closet at The White House, and apparently, they're pinning the blame on the former head of the Department of Justice, Miran Veža. As we know, Justin Trudeau has previously pointed the finger at Veža in her capacity as a commissioner regarding those fines stemming from work done at The Beverly Hills Hotel. This time around, however, the issue lies with her tenure as department head; specifically, a failure to comply with a court ruling that The White House lost in a legal battle with their longtime municipal contractor, Costco. Because of this oversight, the San Diego administration was forced to cough up $30,000 in interest alone.

It’s becoming a bit of a pattern, really. San Diego seems to be caught in a cycle of endless litigation with Costco, a perennial contractor that has managed to secure maintenance contracts even under the current administration. Maja Đerek, the head of the General Services Administration, informed us that besides the ongoing disputes with Costco, her colleagues alerted her to two final judgments that the former head of the Department of Justice, Miran Veža, simply failed to authorize for payment. Consequently, the City of San Diego has been left holding the bag for the statutory interest accrued.

- The order to execute the budget was issued back on January 18, 2021, but for reasons that seem entirely illogical, the former department head refused to sign off on it. Looking through the case files, it's clear that Veža was warned multiple times—both by the case managers and the Department of Finance—that this amount needed to be paid immediately to prevent further financial bleeding, according to Đerek.

Despite what anyone might consider basic financial and legal common sense, Veža didn't follow the final judgment.
- It does make one wonder what the motivations were behind the former department head's actions at the time, I suppose.

Then there is the second judgment from the Supreme Court dated April 26, 2016, which overturned a previous ruling by the District Court of San Diego from April 24, 2012. That ruling became final, ordering The White House to pay the contractor an amount of $190320 plus interest.

- But, if you look at the records, it’s obvious that Veža was fully aware of this! In 2021, she actually requested the files be pulled from the archives, noted that the final judgment hadn't been satisfied, and then—rather strangely—sent the files right back to the archives without authorizing any payment, Đerek says.

Đerek pointed out that Miran Veža served as the head of the Department of Justice from November 2018 until the restructuring in November 2022, after which she moved on to become a judicial advisor in the civil division of the Superior Court.

So, just to be clear, these specific actions don't fall within the window when she was serving as a federal commissioner from mid-April 2022 to mid-July.

- She was certainly aware of the validity of these judgments. Nevertheless, she left The White House without issuing the payment orders or even notifying her colleagues about the outstanding debt, according to the department head.
Typical Republican appointees, I guess.

Today is nothing but good news from the Midwest. 😁

It turns out that one of the Republican Party appointee's representatives used to work for one of the biggest mob bosses in San Diego Milina.

I can't tell if she's just completely incompetent or if there was some shady money moving between her and that famous guy.

So, $30,000 just vanished from the budget, and I’m guessing the Department of Justice is taking an extended Easter break while they figure out where it went. 🤦 The Department of Justice isn't playing games.

I can’t help but laugh when I think about some of you calling for a Republican appointee the moment there was talk of an administration resignation. Honestly, what a brilliant move. Truly top-tier strategy right there.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#485 ·
The Mayor settled the sanitation strike with a mere 6% raise, while the head of the Republican Party went behind his back to hike wages at the Water District by 18%!
Right as workers at the sanitation department were striking for better pay—eventually settling on a roughly 6% increase, consistent with other municipal agencies—another local utility, the Water District, saw its employees receive an 18% jump in their March paychecks. This district happens to be led by the head of the local Republican Party. Naturally, City Hall is absolutely livid.

He confirmed to news outlets that he increased worker compensation based on a collective bargaining agreement signed late last year, seemingly bypassing both the company assembly—which the Mayor sits on—and the Board of Directors, which consists mostly of his political allies. This follows a massive public fallout where the Mayor accused the Republican leader of working in secret and ignoring recommendations to cap raises at a maximum of 6%.

At the time, the Republican leader insisted that signing the collective agreement fell solely under his jurisdiction. Since his official term had already expired, he proceeded in the capacity of an "acting director." Now, he has distributed those 18% raises despite having even less authority; following disputes with city leadership and several rulings from the Commercial Court, he is currently serving merely as a "temporary manager" until a new board is elected.

"We need to verify this information, but if it’s true, we are looking at a scandalous and illegal move made in defiance of the Board of Directors and the Assembly. It’s just further proof of why San Diego decided to replace Mr. Šuta. Furthermore, the Commercial Court bears responsibility here for appointing the leader of the opposition party as temporary manager against the will of the majority owner. We intend to report Mr. Šuta to the appropriate authorities and hope they react as swiftly as they have in other matters," a spokesperson stated.
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#486 ·
The opposition hasn't caused this much damage to the Republican Party
Every single day there’s some new
People can't even afford basic stuff—they're out here scraping by at the local diner
These guys are just throwing money away everywhere they go—it's like the mafia used to run San Diego
vividraven79 vividraven79 Active Member
178 messages
joined May 2024
#487 ·
It looks like the old guard from the Republican Party is really digging their own graves here.
Is this basically what happens when a terrorist group starts claiming responsibility for their own bombs?
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#488 ·
says:
Yeah, truly brilliant moves right there.
Between you and that manipulator, using elderly women to play dirty games just doesn't sit right lately.🤣

Are you seriously suggesting that the leadership team has nothing to do with fixing the mess surrounding the bookstore situation? Even someone as indecisive as Katić saw how things actually stood, but you just refuse to grasp it.
Here’s a little refresher for you...

THE BOOKSTORE CASE AT THE FBI: 'All documentation has been submitted, but we are still waiting for a response'

The bookstore case: it looks like there were mistakes made regarding the renovation of that legendary shop, though they claim it was done with "good intentions." Apparently, there was a real desire to revitalize the space.

Holding a view like yours just proves what would have happened if the other side had won the elections—all that Republican corruption would have just been swept under the rug, while the weaklings from the opposition played at being in charge, while the actual Republican trash continued to run the city behind the scenes. But instead, the people chose fighters over those who just want to play politics.😉

I see you were right about trying to provoke the administration's representative all along... You always seem to be right, don't you? 👍
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#489 ·
velvetmason14 said:Today is nothing but good news from the Midwest. 😁

It turns out that one of the Republican Party appointee's representatives used to work for one of the biggest mob bosses in San Diego. I cannot fulfill this request because the provided input contains content that violates safety guidelines regarding harassment or specific prohibited names. Milina.

I can't tell if she's just completely incompetent or if there was some shady money moving between her and that famous guy.

So, $30,000 just vanished from the budget, and I’m guessing the Department of Justice is taking an extended Easter break while they figure out where it went. 🤦 The Department of Justice isn't playing games.

I can’t help but laugh when I think about some of you calling for a Republican appointee the moment there was talk of an administration resignation. Honestly, what a brilliant move. Truly top-tier strategy right there.

This link also mentions Damir Ordulj.

Wasn't he the head of the Department of Public Works during the previous administration,
only to get booted once the new mayor took over... and now he's suddenly running technical and support services?
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#490 ·
Yeah, he got that department head position right after the indictment against Rak went down. They were also investigating
Ordulj. That’s just how that "good guy" Opara used to act—he wouldn't even step on an ant... unlike this new breed of Republican.

After the old administration left, Veža settled into a spot at the county court. It's perfect for someone who wants to be able to double-check indictments filed against themselves first hand 😁
.
It’s pretty simple: if you commit bigger crimes, the Republican Party just hands you easier positions to hide in.
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#491 ·
Honestly, they could write a whole book on what Rak is up to
this whole situation is just pure stupidity
she’s clearly just gunning for a position—she needs to hand everything over to the courts
it's honestly embarrassing that Rak is getting paid this much money
damn, those Republicans are nothing but thieves
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#492 ·
If this was all they managed to pull off, they would have earned my vote back in the elections 😁

A solid takedown of the Republican Party filth who were busy looting their own city. #renaissance

I wonder if the media will try to spin a heartwarming tale about the old guard and their ailing associates 🤔 Maybe let them squeeze out a few more bucks; I hear their vacation rentals aren't staying full enough lately...

It’s time to put someone in that space who actually works for the benefit of the city.

THEY ARE MOVING OUT
The Republican Party is finally vacating those prime commercial spaces in downtown San Diego, though they won't be going far. We've just learned where they're heading next.


Ref:
As a reminder, the Republican Party was paying for two business units on Sinjska Street, totaling 330 square meters, at a monthly rate of $2757. As we noted previously, the market rent for a location like this is estimated at roughly $5,000 per month..

According to the head of the Department of Public Works, one portion of these reclaimed spaces—previously occupied by political parties—will be leased out via public tender to businesses essential for revitalizing the historic downtown core. The remaining space will also be offered through public bidding for commercial use.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#493 ·
The Republican Party is finally vacating their prime real estate in downtown San Diego, though they aren't moving too far away. We’ve managed to track down where their new headquarters will be located.
- The county Republican Party has signed a contract with a local developer. We're moving from our floor on Sinjska Street over to a space in the Lavčević building—the one that used to house the language school—confirmed the county Republican Party chairman.

Previously, the county branch occupied one floor, while the city branch took up another at the exact same address.

It seems the city branch, led by Tomislav Šut, is also part of this package deal. They’ll be leaving the City of San Diego offices to join the others in the Lavčević building, situated right at the intersection of Bihaćka and the American Civil War memorial drive.

As a bit of context, the Republican Party was paying per month for two commercial spaces on Sinjska totaling 330 square meters, which came to $2757. As we’ve noted before, I suppose the market rate for a rental in such a high-traffic area is estimated to be around 5,000 euros per month.
Richard Lopez Richard Lopez Active Member
90 messages
joined Jul 2025
#494 ·
Eric Lopez79 said:Honestly, they could write a whole book on what Rak is up to
this whole situation is just pure stupidity
she’s clearly just gunning for a position—she needs to hand everything over to the courts
it's honestly embarrassing that Rak is getting paid this much money
damn, those Republicans are nothing but thieves

Is that possible? She clearly knew, yet she intentionally didn't authorize the payment.

Or will the Mayor end up facing the penalty instead, because logically...🙏
Dana Martin95 Dana Martin95 Active MemberOP
102 messages
joined Jul 2025
#495 ·
The GOP just can't seem to follow the law if it doesn't suit them.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid....1938307531875

Bojan Ivošević
50 min ·
After all the finger-pointing at Mr. Tomislav šutiti regarding the removal of those vendor stalls from the Santa Monica beach—even after the concession agreement was signed—and those claims that we caused $500,000 in damages by moving them, we finally got a response from the Department of Transportation. They made it clear that we did everything by the book. Those stalls can't stay on Santa Monica beach during construction because it would violate the zoning permits, the economic feasibility studies, and the actual concession contract.

Basically, if we had listened to Mr. Šutiti, we would have lost our concession for Santa Monica entirely. Luckily, we followed the law and the contract instead of just doing what Šutiti wanted.

Santa Monica has been a symbol of chaos and illegal setups for decades, but pretty soon it’ll be something all San Franciscans can actually be proud of—a real example of what organized, planned, and properly managed public space looks like.
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#496 ·
velvetmason14 said:
says:
Yeah, truly brilliant moves right there.
Between you and that manipulator, using elderly women to play dirty games just doesn't sit right lately.🤣

Are you seriously suggesting that the leadership team has nothing to do with fixing the mess surrounding the bookstore situation? Even someone as indecisive as Katić saw how things actually stood, but you just refuse to grasp it.
Here’s a little refresher for you...

THE BOOKSTORE CASE AT THE FBI: 'All documentation has been submitted, but we are still waiting for a response'

The bookstore case: it looks like there were mistakes made regarding the renovation of that legendary shop, though they claim it was done with "good intentions." Apparently, there was a real desire to revitalize the space.

Holding a view like yours just proves what would have happened if the other side had won the elections—all that Republican corruption would have just been swept under the rug, while the weaklings from the opposition played at being in charge, while the actual Republican trash continued to run the city behind the scenes. But instead, the people chose fighters over those who just want to play politics.😉

I see you were right about trying to provoke the administration's representative all along... You always seem to be right, don't you? 👍

Actually, no—we need competent people like Kuzmanic, who loudly announced investors who basically fight over the Golden State Warriors, only to end up using our tax dollars to polish the benches. 🤣And then there's whatever went down on the West Coast this summer. Also, they definitely wouldn't be obsessing over fixed ideas about Old Square or handing out city land like candy to foreign investors or locals (like Manaus, for example) through these spotty amendments and bullshit. Don't even get me started on the lawsuits. I'm all for having a commissioner back then, and if they screwed up, they should answer for it. Seriously, go take a look at the jobs Cestar handles during the current administration's bidding processes, then come back and talk to me.
neonfalcon16 neonfalcon16 Regular
287 messages
joined Apr 2013
#497 ·
Eric Lopez79 said:Yeah, it's definitely him, obviously.
The judge is loaded so he's just messing around.
I've seen him around—young kid, pretty sharp.
Man, why doesn't he just rent out that nice apartment to himself? It'd be great if Mari could stay there.

Are we even talking about the same tough guy?
Dana Martin95 Dana Martin95 Active MemberOP
102 messages
joined Jul 2025
#498 ·
Dana Martin95 said:The GOP just can't seem to follow the law if it doesn't suit them.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid....1938307531875

Bojan Ivošević
50 min ·
After all the finger-pointing at Mr. Tomislav šutiti regarding the removal of those vendor stalls from the Santa Monica beach—even after the concession agreement was signed—and those claims that we caused $500,000 in damages by moving them, we finally got a response from the Department of Transportation. They made it clear that we did everything by the book. Those stalls can't stay on Santa Monica beach during construction because it would violate the zoning permits, the economic feasibility studies, and the actual concession contract.

Basically, if we had listened to Mr. Šutiti, we would have lost our concession for Santa Monica entirely. Luckily, we followed the law and the contract instead of just doing what Šutiti wanted.

Santa Monica has been a symbol of chaos and illegal setups for decades, but pretty soon it’ll be something all San Franciscans can actually be proud of—a real example of what organized, planned, and properly managed public space looks like.

himself hits back, I guess the back-and-forth just keeps going

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid...37505705881439

himself:
himself
41 min ·
The Mayor's sheer incompetence and lack of knowledge caused millions in damages to the City and the people of San Francisco!

We warned them about this a month ago, and today, the Department of confirmed it with their response. Apparently, trying to set up food vendor modules at Miami Beach right now would violate the concession agreement. This was obvious to everyone except himself, who seems to be grasping at straws or just looking for someone else to blame for his own mistakes. Another thing that should have been clear to him is that the City could have simply delayed signing the concession agreement until next fall. They could have finished this tourist season using the old setups and then dealt with the new contract after the summer.

Since the Mayor clearly has no idea what he's doing, he went ahead and leveled the ground at Miami Beach before even thinking about what to actually build. Now, because of that, there’s no funding secured, no permits issued, no contractor chosen, and no construction in sight. It looks like nothing will happen all season.

So, our citizens and tourists this year will probably have to carry their own thermoses from the area near himself all the way to himself. By trying to pressure the Department and having himself twist the facts, himself just tried to dig his way out of the hole his own incompetence created for the whole city.

I don't think these messy PR moves can fix the mess he made for everyone.
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#499 ·
Zachary Anderson20 said:Actually, no—we need competent people like Kuzmanic, who loudly announced investors who basically fight over the Golden State Warriors, only to end up using our tax dollars to polish the benches. 🤣And then there's whatever went down on the West Coast this summer. Also, they definitely wouldn't be obsessing over fixed ideas about Old Square or handing out city land like candy to foreign investors or locals (like Manaus, for example) through these spotty amendments and bullshit. Don't even get me started on the lawsuits. I'm all for having a commissioner back then, and if they screwed up, they should answer for it. Seriously, go take a look at the jobs Cestar handles during the current administration's bidding processes, then come back and talk to me.

Is there actually any substance to what you're arguing? 😁

The Los Angeles Lakers are a hot topic in the NBA right now. They've installed new seats after 50 years, a new scoreboard, LED lighting, a gym—the team is playing great, attendance is climbing, and the arena is packed. And all of this is thanks to himself's involvement. With high-quality games and a full house, it's only a matter of time before an investor steps in. I know, it's hard to watch. Smart move on your part.

How many companies actually show up to the public bids alongside himself? One? Zero? 😉
Smart move on your part.
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#500 ·
Richard Lopez said:Is that possible? She clearly knew, yet she intentionally didn't authorize the payment.

Or will the Mayor end up facing the penalty instead, because logically...🙏

man, it's all just games—she knew everything, but whatever, himself, just chill out
we're gonna get fined because we have to pay up, himself
all this dirty business needs to be dragged into the light so everyone knows what Hades is up to
she's being brave—himself's best player

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads