CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Started by Dana Martin95 · · 👁 68 views · 1.4K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dana Martin95vividraven79Zachary Anderson20Jack Collins58Emily Smith6velvetmason14Eric Lopez79Sean Palmer67Anthony Bennett6Daniel Cook2Kate Jackson2Charles Fox10darkhawk30feralpilot0Rebecca Ward2Richard LopezTimothy Stewart4George DiazRobin Jones2Nicholas Bailey3crimsonwolf26Sean Nelson6fadedranger162amberjackal68 …
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#781 ·
velvetmason14 said:There are two main points here.

Of course you’d expect bottom-feeders to play dirty and try to paint you as heartless. That’s just their nature. The way to handle it is to be careful with how you communicate publicly—don't give them any ammunition to turn your own mistakes against you. Lately, the leadership has been dropping the ball, especially the media pundits. Having all three of them head out to a junior conference in Geneva while they're busy spinning some sentimental sob story is just plain foolish.

The second thing is that you shut critics up with concrete results, not just talk. To do that, you need competent people who actually know their stuff and aren't part of the old-school political machine. If you want that, you need fresh talent, rather than having half your department heads halfway through their term being nothing more than hand-picked cronies from the local billionaire's circle.🤦 This is another mistake because there's too much reliance on pure PR—constant mentions of the Republican Party, populist Facebook posts... It’s all optics, but there are far too few actual results, projects, or new faces to show for it.

Someone made a good point earlier: if they didn't have that one standout female staffer who actually works her ass off and delivers, they wouldn't have anything to brag about lately, aside from that garbage strike they handled perfectly.

Oh, really? That whole "Republican Party or nothing" routine is already played out, and we're heading toward elections...? Man... just terrible timing.. 😁
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#782 ·
Republican official gets a new mandate for another 4 years 🤦

Forget all that Geneva nonsense and those Facebook posts... This is just pure amateur hour.

Next thing you know, they’ll be claiming there weren't any better options available, or using this to "prove" that hiring isn't based on political connections. 😵

NEW MANDATE: Christopher Wray keeps his seat at the golden gates, despite being "targeted" by Eric Adams' party four years ago

Christopher Wray is a member of the Republican Party, and back then, Peter Schorić was the one pushing for her selection.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#783 ·
VIDEO Watch the clash between Bozeman and Spider-Man—things just got personal

IS THE COALITION CRACKING? A massive showdown between Ed Garvey and Davor Matijević! Bozeman made a dramatic exit, while Puljak completely lost his cool. "They’re trying to sabotage us!"

The proposal to exempt construction work at the Small Mall didn't pass. The City Council members voted in favor of the works instead. Tempers haven't cooled down since the spat with Bozeman, and now Mayor Ed Garvey has taken aim at the Democratic Party's Davor Matijević.

Immediately after the decision failed, Bozeman spoke up, claiming the opposition has unified and blaming the Democratic Party for the current traffic chaos, citing their decision to sell off the garage back in 2003.

- He's insulting all of us collectively, then throwing a tantrum like a child and walking out. Why aren't we allowed to respond if you've permitted him to act this way? - Matijević asked.

Mayor Ed Garvey launched a fierce verbal assault on Matijević. He actually arrived at the session a little early.
- Because you're nothing more than a common merchant who aligns with the Republican Party on every single vote meant to undermine us! - Puljak snapped, clearly losing his patience.

Visibly shocked, Matijević shot back just as hard.
- Why does this affect you personally? Unless, of course, you've struck a deal with the investor? I'm glad you're finally admitting that this hits home because they're touching the Best in Parking deal you negotiated for the Zvončac area.

"And so you went off to make deals," Puljko countered.

Bozeman jumped back into the fray to have the last word:
- Just give the citizens back the garage you sold off!
Eric Lopez79 Eric Lopez79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Mar 2023
#784 ·
LIVE: BOZEMAN VS SPIDER-MAN 'I'm not dealing with these county hooligans today; Don't be rude—it wasn't me who put a girl in the front row!'

so little Leona is actually Bojan Ivošević's girl
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#785 ·
Eric Lopez79 said:
LIVE: BOZEMAN VS SPIDER-MAN 'I'm not dealing with these county hooligans today; Don't be rude—it wasn't me who put a girl in the front row!'

so little Leona is actually Bojan Ivošević's girl

Yeah.
And honestly, they're all pathetic together, including the Small Mall crowd and us stuck dealing with them. What a total disaster.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#786 ·
Bojan Ivošević
https://web.facebook.com/bojan.ivose...Xuw6cv1ZAfGD7l

Back in 2003, the Democratic Party-led administration sold off a planned garage space as part of the building permits at the start of El Paso Street.
In 2015 and 2016, the Democratic Party was perfectly fine granting permits for summer operations.
Fast forward to 2023, and suddenly the Democratic Party is blocking those same summer operations.
I suppose the only real difference between 2015 and 2023 is that the Mayor isn't from the Democratic Party anymore.
The issues facing the citizens regarding GK Lučac-Manuš at this location won't be resolved during this term, thanks to the Democratic Party and the opposition; and once the District Court gets involved, the situation will likely just get even messier.
Not long after that, they basically threw up their hands regarding another private investment right next to a tourist zone—one that doesn't even serve a public interest like a garage under public usage regulations does. Back then, the Democratic Party didn't seem to have any issues with summer construction or special exceptions. I wonder why that is?
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#787 ·
Emily Smith6 said:Bojan Ivošević
https://web.facebook.com/bojan.ivose...Xuw6cv1ZAfGD7l

Back in 2003, the Democratic Party-led administration sold off a planned garage space as part of the building permits at the start of El Paso Street.
In 2015 and 2016, the Democratic Party was perfectly fine granting permits for summer operations.
Fast forward to 2023, and suddenly the Democratic Party is blocking those same summer operations.
I suppose the only real difference between 2015 and 2023 is that the Mayor isn't from the Democratic Party anymore.
The issues facing the citizens regarding GK Lučac-Manuš at this location won't be resolved during this term, thanks to the Democratic Party and the opposition; and once the District Court gets involved, the situation will likely just get even messier.
Not long after that, they basically threw up their hands regarding another private investment right next to a tourist zone—one that doesn't even serve a public interest like a garage under public usage regulations does. Back then, the Democratic Party didn't seem to have any issues with summer construction or special exceptions. I wonder why that is?

Honestly, this guy clearly doesn't have a clue. Or maybe he does and he's just being lazy? First off, the Manus district is actually named after that well. So, all those massive parking garages they're dreaming about digging up could easily backfire on them. Second, I’ve already vented about this, so I really don't feel like repeating myself. Up until now, the City should have just shut down construction because the 20-year term expired and returned everything to public property. Instead, they're handing out favors left and right to any random developer looking to wash their hands of things. Who even cares who did what twenty years ago?! The current administration could have easily turned this around to benefit the public interest and the City, rather than catering to a bunch of corporate suits who want to "develop the market" or whatever other bullshit they're peddling.
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#788 ·
Zachary Anderson20 said:Honestly, this guy clearly doesn't have a clue. Or maybe he does and he's just being lazy? First off, the Manus district is actually named after that well. So, all those massive parking garages they're dreaming about digging up could easily backfire on them. Second, I’ve already vented about this, so I really don't feel like repeating myself. Up until now, the City should have just shut down construction because the 20-year term expired and returned everything to public property. Instead, they're handing out favors left and right to any random developer looking to wash their hands of things. Who even cares who did what twenty years ago?! The current administration could have easily turned this around to benefit the public interest and the City, rather than catering to a bunch of corporate suits who want to "develop the market" or whatever other bullshit they're peddling.

Gamorrice, that whole 20-year expiration thing you're talking about only matters if the contract didn't say otherwise!

The article clearly states they signed a contract without a construction deadline—there were plenty of other pieces mentioning there was no set timeframe in the agreement.
That's how the Coalition thought it would all go...
There's basically no difference between those two parties—they're just looking out for each other.
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#789 ·
Man, did Bozeman totally lose it today...

He goes on about how everything is being handled with integrity, and then that kid with special needs, Spider-Man, shuts him down by pointing out he just used his Grgićka position to snag a cushy office job. And Bozeman? He just sits there in dead silence. 🤦

Ed Garvey really needs to start shaking things up; you can't run a City solely on PR. As for Bozeman, he should probably just pipe down because he’s been doing more harm than good lately. It’s time to bring in some fresh blood instead of clinging to those Republicans. We need more projects and actual results. They should lean on Kuzmanić more and give Đerek full autonomy, since she actually knows what she’s doing...

But honestly, who’s actually listening to a pathetic little Malac anyway...
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#790 ·
Kate Jackson2 said:Gamorrice, that whole 20-year expiration thing you're talking about only matters if the contract didn't say otherwise!

The article clearly states they signed a contract without a construction deadline—there were plenty of other pieces mentioning there was no set timeframe in the agreement.
That's how the Coalition thought it would all go...
There's basically no difference between those two parties—they're just looking out for each other.

Seriously, go back and read it again. Then you can see exactly what the Bonacic family was demanding from the City. And if you really want to dig into what's missing—like, say, a deadline—then check the ISPU records. You'll see there's been an investor change, which is exactly what should have happened. There's more garbage in this whole mess than there is in Karepovac. I’m honestly baffled why Puljak is pushing so hard for these "Renaissance" investors after everything that went down. Long story short: the City has a golden opportunity to take control of its own property and manage it for the public good, instead of some hideous hybrid of a shopping mall and a hotel. As for public parking? That's a given.
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#791 ·
Here’s our national champion... He’s recovered and back to performing new shows. But damn, he lost that little city apartment he had, so now he’s out on the street.

Maybe if he gave up the cigarettes, the booze, and the junk food, his health would actually improve. Poor guy couldn't save enough for a place to live—all his money went toward motorcycles and women...

How much does a national champion even make? Maybe 13 or 14 grand? You're just a burden to yourself and God!

Ivica Čikeš
Exclusive: The opera ace returns after falling ill mid-performance. "My health is better. But they took my city apartment away."
Sean Palmer67 Sean Palmer67 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2023
#792 ·
Kate Jackson2 said:Gamorrice, that whole 20-year expiration thing you're talking about only matters if the contract didn't say otherwise!

The article clearly states they signed a contract without a construction deadline—there were plenty of other pieces mentioning there was no set timeframe in the agreement.
That's how the Coalition thought it would all go...
There's basically no difference between those two parties—they're just looking out for each other.

They said today that the real issue is what property law dictates—basically, the owner, which in this case is the City, can demand the termination of building rights after 20 years. And yeah, I just double-checked, so that has nothing to do with the actual construction timeline.
It honestly baffles me why these people are handing such a huge win to these frauds instead of actually protecting the City's interests. The whole thing smells fishy—maybe Puljak is just waiting for some bulldozers to show up since he can't get anything moving through official channels.
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#793 ·
What a load of absolute nonsense being spewed today in defense of those family businesses... I mean, seriously? Bojan and his girl are clearly just a couple in love... It’s honestly enough to make you gag!
George Diaz George Diaz Member
10 messages
joined Mar 2023
#794 ·
SO, WE’RE PUTTING A GIRL IN CHARGE OF PUBLIC WORKS NOW?
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahhahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahahahaha, I can't even deal with myself right now,
thinking about who the hell I actually voted for, 🤦
Anthony Bennett6 Anthony Bennett6 Active Member
102 messages
joined Feb 2008
#795 ·
If Coco Gauff stays silent about what Eric Adams said instead of pushing the Democratic Party to split the coalition, she’s just acting like any other political hack. If the Democrats don't take up the proposal, she should just resign immediately... honestly, she can just go strut her stuff over at Nancy Pelosi's place.

It’s entirely possible Eric Adams did this on purpose just to trigger some early elections...

Bo is standing there like a coiled spring, just waiting for those two extra months of vacation to kick in.

She keeps talking about building grandstands around the city so we can get a better view of the circus, but she already started that whole thing with the skyscraper... you can see every little corner of the city from up there!
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#796 ·
George Diaz said:SO, WE’RE PUTTING A GIRL IN CHARGE OF PUBLIC WORKS NOW?
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahhahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahahahaha, I can't even deal with myself right now,
thinking about who the hell I actually voted for, 🤦

Just another disappointed voter here.🤣

I bet you next there's going to be more complaining about this...

Come on, man, try being a little more creative with your arguments.
George Diaz George Diaz Member
10 messages
joined Mar 2023
#797 ·
My bad, let me rephrase that...
I’m just so incredibly proud that I cast my vote just to give him the chance to
cram his girlfriend into that head of public works position?

Happy now?
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#798 ·
Sean Palmer67 said:They said today that the real issue is what property law dictates—basically, the owner, which in this case is the City, can demand the termination of building rights after 20 years. And yeah, I just double-checked, so that has nothing to do with the actual construction timeline.
It honestly baffles me why these people are handing such a huge win to these frauds instead of actually protecting the City's interests. The whole thing smells fishy—maybe Puljak is just waiting for some bulldozers to show up since he can't get anything moving through official channels.

Nobody’s arguing that you *can* request it.

The real question is whether you'll actually win once you file the claim—especially since you already signed and accepted the contract
that specifically states there is no construction deadline. You agreed to those terms, and now you're just changing your mind.

Property law only kicks in if the contract doesn't specify otherwise—and in this case, it does.
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#799 ·
George Diaz said:My bad, let me rephrase that...
I’m just so incredibly proud that I cast my vote just to give him the chance to
cram his girlfriend into that head of public works position?

Happy now?

Well said!

And honestly, even if they appointed her without any qualifications, it’d still be better than that ADZ-ESDP-RUMKE coalition
that crammed thousands of incompetent hacks into office!
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#800 ·
Kate Jackson2 said:Nobody’s arguing that you *can* request it.

The real question is whether you'll actually win once you file the claim—especially since you already signed and accepted the contract
that specifically states there is no construction deadline. You agreed to those terms, and now you're just changing your mind.

Property law only kicks in if the contract doesn't specify otherwise—and in this case, it does.

And have you seen how many disputes and messy transactions are listed on the title report?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads