CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco

Started by Dana Martin95 · · 👁 67 views · 1.4K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dana Martin95vividraven79Zachary Anderson20Jack Collins58Emily Smith6velvetmason14Eric Lopez79Sean Palmer67Anthony Bennett6Daniel Cook2Kate Jackson2Charles Fox10darkhawk30feralpilot0Rebecca Ward2Richard LopezTimothy Stewart4George DiazRobin Jones2Nicholas Bailey3crimsonwolf26Sean Nelson6fadedranger162amberjackal68 …
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#801 ·
George Diaz said:SO, WE’RE PUTTING A GIRL IN CHARGE OF PUBLIC WORKS NOW?
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahhahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahahahaha, I can't even deal with myself right now,
thinking about who the hell I actually voted for, 🤦

No worries, people are laughing at you too.

Nicholas King joined back in June 2021, got activated in December 2022, and looking at his entire history—all nineteen posts—it’s nothing but constant bashing toward the local administration. Seriously, maybe try having some variety? Otherwise, I guess nobody is even going to understand what you're trying to get at... 🤦
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#802 ·
IVICA PULJAK ON A TURBULENT DAY IN THE MIDWEST: 'It’s symptomatic to me that the Democratic Party and the Republican Party always strike a deal when they need to screw over the mayor'

'The result of what happened yesterday is that the 500-space garage will be delayed by a year. And such a garage in the city center was desperately needed, especially once the local district court begins operations nearby.

It saddens me that the Democratic Party and the Republican Party teamed up out of pure spite. Not because they actually care about anyone else. Taking care of citizens means solving their problems, and the parking issue is the single biggest infrastructure headache in San Diego—it needs to be fixed immediately. That’s why this is so disheartening; it’s just not right for petty grudges to unite and derail the momentum of building this garage.

The easiest thing to do would be to say we won't take any action and let everything stay exactly as it was, bowing to every bit of pressure. But that isn't how we want to operate. I believe this needs to be completed as soon as possible, and we should work with those who actually want to solve this problem alongside us. I hope that in the future, we won't see this kind of obstructionism regarding garage construction. If there is anything that shouldn't be obstructed, it’s garages and parking. That really is the core issue here.

"To me, it is symptomatic that the Republican Party and the Democratic Party always find common ground whenever they need to undermine the mayor," stated Ivica Puljak.

I don't quite follow Puljko; he attacks the Democratic Party for not voting exactly how he dictates, yet at the same time, he constantly attacks the Republican Party for raising their hands in Congress just because their leader tells them to. The Democratic Party has its own opinions; if they aren't happy with something, they can just end the coalition.

Matijević confirmed there are communication issues with Puljko: 'We will always stand on the side of the citizens, even at the cost of his verbal aggression'

'I have grown accustomed to this style of communication from Mr. Puljko. He insulted us last time when we stood by the residents of Spinuta, and he insulted us again this time when we stood by the residents of the Lučac-Manuš district. Yesterday, the Democratic Party chose to stand with our fellow citizens, and that is a choice we will never question. I truly don't care about private interests, nor do I want to speculate why Ivica Puljko took this personally. Let him explain himself, but in recent days, I haven't seen a single resident of Lučac saying it’s in their best interest to have five levels of excavation happening in the middle of summer right in the heart of the city.'

'We are facing some challenges. Our last meeting was three months ago at our request. I asked to meet last week, and he didn't respond. There are certain communication hurdles, which is understandable given his somewhat... unique temperament. However, our personal relationship with Ivica Puljko will not stop us from supporting everything that is good and in the interest of the City of San Diego. Even if we disagree with something—even if it means enduring verbal abuse from him, which he has done on several occasions—we will never cave to his pressure. We will always stand with the people, even if it leads to scenes like yesterday. He was given a mandate, and we want him to deliver on his promises, but he cannot strip us of our right to disagree on certain matters,' Matijević concluded.

A MESSAGE FROM THE LUČAC-MANUŠ DISTRICT: 'It’s simply not true when Mayor Ivica Puljak claims we failed to weigh in on the Small Mall construction during the summer.'

The residents of the Lučac-Manuš district are pushing back against these construction projects because they weren't actually planned or prepared properly; there isn't even a traffic impact study, which is legally required. But honestly, the worst part is that people living in the surrounding buildings are going to lose any sense of peace due to all the digging and heavy earthmoving operations.

'Another falsehood being peddled is that this garage will somehow solve the infrastructure issues in this part of town. We were never actually informed about how many spaces would be available to the public or under what specific conditions.

Furthermore, there have been multiple architectural competitions held for this specific site, yet we haven't seen anything regarding the final design of the center or how it aligns with the winning proposal. I struggle to see what "public interest" is being served here, especially when, after all the urban planning nonsense that plagued San Diego back in 2023, someone actually thinks they can pull the same stunts.

Ivica Puljak is losing support in key neighborhoods—first in Spinut, and now in Lučac-Manuš. His communication with the citizens is just frankly terrible.
velvetmason14 velvetmason14 Regular
319 messages
joined May 2023
#803 ·
That’s what happens when you fail to bring in new blood and instead cling to a bunch of old-timers who have served every administration but don't actually know how to do the job.

Then, when people like that inevitably mess up, you end up with someone who has a medical background acting as a PR guru to handle all the crisis management. And this is the result...

Instead of getting rid of incompetent fools and hiring fresh talent to break through that stagnation, just let the PR pros focus on what they’re actually good at—dreaming up catchy slogans. That’s all there is to it...

"Simple as that," Banožić would say.🙂
Zachary Anderson20 Zachary Anderson20 Active Member
135 messages
joined Mar 2023
#804 ·
And he literally votes right alongside the Republican Party just minutes before the big announcement, pushing to keep that person in charge of the golden gates. But the second the Democratic Party does anything, especially when the residents of his own district make it clear they don't want the construction work? Suddenly, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party are all teaming up against him. Jebateled, is he even listening to himself?!
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#805 ·
Zachary Anderson20 said:And have you seen how many disputes and messy transactions are listed on the title report?

That’s completely irrelevant... I can walk into a local district court and claim money from you—requesting a lien on your property—even if we aren't even related.
The lien stays put until the court rules in my favor.

If you were a corporation, you could still manage the assets normally even with a lien on them.
If you sold the property, whatever cash you got would have to be split with me based on the percentage I requested through the courts—assuming the judge actually sides with me. If they side with you, I just eat the legal fees and get nothing.
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#806 ·
Edit of the previous post: "I can show up at the local district court and tell them you owe me money..."
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#807 ·
For those of you hanging out on Reddit today, feel free to hit me up with whatever questions are on your mind. I should be available for about 10 - 20 hours or so.
https://www.reddit.com/r/america/com..._grada_splita/
Dana Martin95 Dana Martin95 Active MemberOP
102 messages
joined Jul 2025
#808 ·
Emily Smith6 said:For those of you hanging out on Reddit today, feel free to hit me up with whatever questions are on your mind. I should be available for about 10 - 20 hours or so.
https://www.reddit.com/r/america/com..._grada_splita/

Just a couple of responses from Ivica.

Ivica Puljak
ivicapuljak profile picture

Chat
•
It's been about two hours. I think.
We really have to vote them out first. If we manage to pass those two mandates that cut off their access to public funds, the Republican Party might just fall apart—since they're basically only held together by greed. I guess we have some pretty serious plans for the next Congressional elections, and we'll be sharing them with everyone soon. We know how to beat the Republicans, and now we actually have experience knowing what comes after the win. We're ready for whatever happens, and we're going all the way.

We'll be rolling out our plan for Poljud and the surrounding areas in about 10 days or so. Stay tuned :-).

The old town area will be included in the comprehensive plan too, I guess. There'll probably be more details on that soon.
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#809 ·
velvetmason14 said:Just another disappointed voter here.🤣

I bet you next there's going to be more complaining about this...

Come on, man, try being a little more creative with your arguments.

Of course I won't say the same thing... I've been saying all along that you shouldn't hand the keys of this city over to some puffed-up nerd who has zero days of experience in the actual private sector. Are you seriously expecting someone who's lived his entire life on a government paycheck—someone completely detached from reality—to actually run a city? Seriously? If, for instance, Donald Trump had been out there grinding through the summer to secure deals for those investors, what would you even be whining about right now? Huh?
Sean Palmer67 Sean Palmer67 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2023
#810 ·
Dana Martin95 said:Just a couple of responses from Ivica.

Ivica Puljak
ivicapuljak profile picture

Chat
•
It's been about two hours. I think.
We really have to vote them out first. If we manage to pass those two mandates that cut off their access to public funds, the Republican Party might just fall apart—since they're basically only held together by greed. I guess we have some pretty serious plans for the next Congressional elections, and we'll be sharing them with everyone soon. We know how to beat the Republicans, and now we actually have experience knowing what comes after the win. We're ready for whatever happens, and we're going all the way.

We'll be rolling out our plan for Poljud and the surrounding areas in about 10 days or so. Stay tuned :-).

The old town area will be included in the comprehensive plan too, I guess. There'll probably be more details on that soon.

Honestly, these responses on Reddit are such a scam—he spent half this term just hanging out in Golden Gate Park, handing out beans and taking selfies with his party buddies. This stuff was clearly written by some PR firm or maybe even AI using that annoying, nerdy tone. It’s all just smoke and mirrors again.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#811 ·
I’m Ed Garvey, the Mayor of San Francisco. Feel free to ask me anything.

I suppose I should start by addressing the recent comments circulating online. It seems like there’s quite a bit of chatter regarding this matter, though much of it feels somewhat unmoored from reality. If you look closely at the arguments being presented, they often rely on a rather shaky foundation, which I guess makes them easy to dismiss if you aren't looking for a fight. It’s interesting, really—how quickly a conversation can spiral when people prioritize being loud over being accurate. I suspect that if we actually took a moment to sit down and parse through the actual data instead of just reacting to the headlines, we might find a more nuanced middle ground. But then again, maybe that's asking too much of the current discourse. One could argue that the nuance is exactly what's missing, leaving us with this fragmented view of the situation. I don't know; perhaps I'm being overly cynical, but it certainly feels that way sometimes.
How exactly does one intend to restore public trust in our state institutions—particularly the judiciary? It seems like an uphill battle, doesn't it? I guess we have to start by asking if there’s even a viable roadmap for fixing the deep-seated skepticism people feel toward the courts. Maybe it starts with transparency, though I suspect that's easier said than done when the system feels so insulated. I'd be curious to hear what everyone thinks the first step should be.
To start, I think we should implement the management model we’ve adopted here in San Francisco on a national scale across America. Essentially, that means putting an end to rigged job openings. No more political appointments, no more nepotism, no more "old boy networks," and certainly no more handing out jobs to buddies just because they helped out during an election. Since we rolled this model out in San Francisco, we’ve realized it isn't perfect—it definitely has its flaws—but it is lightyears ahead of the Republican Party’s approach of using public positions as rewards for party loyalty. Most of the issues we face are systemic. For one, we often don't get enough applicants because the level of responsibility for these high-level public service roles is immense, while the actual salaries remain quite low. Secondly, even when people do apply, there’s no guarantee they are the absolute best in the entire country for the role; we simply select the most qualified candidates from the pool of those who actually show up. Still, this model is already yielding results in San Francisco. My relationship with the heads of our municipal agencies—people who were selected through fair, open competition—is strictly professional. These are individuals to whom we don't owe a paycheck in exchange for campaign donations or votes. This framework needs to be scaled up to cover all of America. Even after the Republican Party eventually loses power, and even if a new administration implements legitimate, merit-based hiring processes, it will still take years to fully restore public trust in our institutions. Right now, those institutions are flooded with political appointees who are practically untouchable due to existing legal protections. It's going to take some time to fix, but the essential first step is ensuring public job postings aren't predetermined. I should mention, we in San Francisco are the only ones in the country who haven't enforced political quotas when hiring directors for our city agencies. We are truly the only ones. And honestly, that is something I am proud of.

I find myself weighing whether it makes more sense to pursue a coalition with the liberal factions during the upcoming federal elections, or if running an independent campaign might be the more prudent path forward. It’s a difficult calculation to make, really. I suppose one has to consider if a partnership with the Libertarian Party or perhaps the Democratic Party would actually yield any meaningful results, or if we'd just end up compromising our core principles for the sake of a few extra seats in Congress. Maybe staying solo is the cleaner option, though it certainly carries its own set of risks regarding influence. It's a bit of a toss-up, I guess.
Whether it’s before or after the elections, we have absolutely no intention of forming any coalitions with those parties that essentially act as life support for the Republican Party and their penchant for corruption. I suppose it’s worth noting that the various groups and individuals who continue to back this version of the GOP can’t really claim to be liberals. To my mind, liberalism—much like any coherent set of values or principles—requires a genuine belief that those ideas serve the common good. Anyone actively supporting the Republican Party seems less interested in the public interest and more preoccupied with narrow, particular interests. That’s just how I see it, and frankly, I don't think that's going to fly with us.

Are there plans to expand the County Establishment Center across the entire United States? And more specifically, are you intending to steer clear of areas where other liberal factions already have a foothold—say, somewhere like Des Moines?
We are planning to establish local and regional chapters throughout the entire United States. I don't personally view anyone who essentially acts as a cheerleader for the Republican Party’s corruption as being a true liberal option; that behavior has absolutely nothing to do with actual liberal values.

Do you honestly believe a complete territorial restructuring is necessary? If you’re of the opinion that we actually need to overhaul how our counties and states are laid out, I’m curious—what direction would you even take with a reform like that?
It’s absolutely essential. Honestly, I think anyone who has spent the last thirty years living in America already has their answer to that question. Redrawing our regional boundaries is vital for two main reasons. First, we desperately need to trim down the administrative bloat, which has become incredibly convoluted. We are currently drowning in a sea of overlapping agencies and various bodies that all claim jurisdiction over the same issues, leaving cities with almost zero actual control over their own territories. Second, and perhaps more cynically, the current territorial setup serves as a perfect mechanism for reinforcing the Republican Party’s web of corruption. In many ways, the existing structure acts as one of the primary safeguards ensuring that their network stays intact. In my view, what America needs is a shift toward having maybe five to seven distinct regions, supported by roughly 110 to 120 urban hubs acting as their core centers. We could certainly spend hours debating the exact number of regions or cities required, but I don't think we even need to debate whether a reform is necessary. It is. It really is.

Who would you want to form a coalition with for the upcoming congressional elections, and do you see yourself as a candidate for Prime Minister in such a coalition? If not, who then? Please, no diplomatic answers.
The absolute prerequisite for even starting talks about pre-election cooperation with any individual or party is maintaining a clear distance from the Republican Party. I think America simply cannot afford another situation where a new movement is born only to end up cozying up to the Republicans, leaving everything exactly as it was—or perhaps making things worse, much like what happened with the Reform Party a few years back. Our party will soon release the specifics of our strategy for the next congressional cycle. We are working on a project that I honestly believe is the best in the country. Since the congressional elections will take place during my term as mayor, I don't personally expect to be the candidate for Prime Minister, but I am firmly convinced we will put forward someone who can prove that a different kind of America is actually possible.

What’s the plan for fixing up and improving the bus terminal in San Francisco?
Through two municipal projects, East Coast and Kopilica, we are going to build a new bus terminal at Kopilica, while the East Coast location will just serve as a bus stop. We have already put out the bid for the East Coast project, and we’ll do the same for Kopilica by the end of the year. After that, we move into implementation, but these are long-term projects. We're probably going to need quite a bit of patience.

I'm curious how you view Adam Thomas's work in Los Angeles so far, and is there any chance of a coalition with the Progressive Bloc before the elections?
I suspect voters in the next election will essentially be choosing between old-school politics and new-school policies, and I'd say the Progressive Bloc represents that new wave. Thomas has his own way of dealing with the mess he inherited in LA, and I'm inclined to support him in that. As for a coalition with them, I don't have anything against the idea, but you know what they say—it takes two to tango, and that isn't a decision I get to make unilaterally.

Mr. Ed Garvey, when are we actually going to start solving the parking issues in the Spinup neighborhood, rather than just taking away the spots people already have?
Once we update the General Urban Plan. That should happen by the end of the year, at which point we can begin construction on the parking garages in Spinup.

Is cooperation with Mark Jelić and his platform an option for the congressional elections?
Cooperation is on the table with anyone who makes it crystal clear they won't be shaking hands with the Republican Party after the elections. Jelić hasn't really made that clear yet.

How likely—and I might even say realistic—is a post-election coalition with the Democrats?
The citizens will decide how many seats each group gets in the next Congress. My personal take is that if you strip the Republican Party of their access to public funds by at least two seats, they'll probably start fighting amongst themselves and fall apart, since taxpayer money is basically the only thing holding them together. In pursuit of that primary goal, I am ready to work with anyone who refuses to become a mere pawn for the Republicans after the votes are counted, and I believe the Democrats fit that description.

Is there a possibility of a centrist party joining a coalition with the Reform Party as the center-right and the Progressive Bloc as the center-left?
The Reform Party has already helped the Republicans take power twice; I'm not entirely sure they won't want to do it a third time. As for the Progressives, they represent a new political style just like we do, so we are certainly open to talking.

Does the Center plan to "run" its own candidate in the presidential election?
Yes, though that happens after the European Union and congressional elections, so we'll have to see how the landscape looks by then.

When will the full renovation of the downtown market begin? It's been neglected for decades. There was also talk about renovating Hrvoje Street... where did that get stuck?
We are putting out the bid for Hrvoje Street in the coming days, and the downtown market will follow shortly after. It took us some time to get the preparations right, but we are finally in the home stretch.
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#812 ·
Emily Smith6 said:I’m Ed Garvey, the Mayor of San Francisco. Feel free to ask me anything.

I suppose I should start by addressing the recent comments circulating online. It seems like there’s quite a bit of chatter regarding this matter, though much of it feels somewhat unmoored from reality. If you look closely at the arguments being presented, they often rely on a rather shaky foundation, which I guess makes them easy to dismiss if you aren't looking for a fight. It’s interesting, really—how quickly a conversation can spiral when people prioritize being loud over being accurate. I suspect that if we actually took a moment to sit down and parse through the actual data instead of just reacting to the headlines, we might find a more nuanced middle ground. But then again, maybe that's asking too much of the current discourse. One could argue that the nuance is exactly what's missing, leaving us with this fragmented view of the situation. I don't know; perhaps I'm being overly cynical, but it certainly feels that way sometimes.
How exactly does one intend to restore public trust in our state institutions—particularly the judiciary? It seems like an uphill battle, doesn't it? I guess we have to start by asking if there’s even a viable roadmap for fixing the deep-seated skepticism people feel toward the courts. Maybe it starts with transparency, though I suspect that's easier said than done when the system feels so insulated. I'd be curious to hear what everyone thinks the first step should be.
To start, I think we should implement the management model we’ve adopted here in San Francisco on a national scale across America. Essentially, that means putting an end to rigged job openings. No more political appointments, no more nepotism, no more "old boy networks," and certainly no more handing out jobs to buddies just because they helped out during an election. Since we rolled this model out in San Francisco, we’ve realized it isn't perfect—it definitely has its flaws—but it is lightyears ahead of the Republican Party’s approach of using public positions as rewards for party loyalty. Most of the issues we face are systemic. For one, we often don't get enough applicants because the level of responsibility for these high-level public service roles is immense, while the actual salaries remain quite low. Secondly, even when people do apply, there’s no guarantee they are the absolute best in the entire country for the role; we simply select the most qualified candidates from the pool of those who actually show up. Still, this model is already yielding results in San Francisco. My relationship with the heads of our municipal agencies—people who were selected through fair, open competition—is strictly professional. These are individuals to whom we don't owe a paycheck in exchange for campaign donations or votes. This framework needs to be scaled up to cover all of America. Even after the Republican Party eventually loses power, and even if a new administration implements legitimate, merit-based hiring processes, it will still take years to fully restore public trust in our institutions. Right now, those institutions are flooded with political appointees who are practically untouchable due to existing legal protections. It's going to take some time to fix, but the essential first step is ensuring public job postings aren't predetermined. I should mention, we in San Francisco are the only ones in the country who haven't enforced political quotas when hiring directors for our city agencies. We are truly the only ones. And honestly, that is something I am proud of.

I find myself weighing whether it makes more sense to pursue a coalition with the liberal factions during the upcoming federal elections, or if running an independent campaign might be the more prudent path forward. It’s a difficult calculation to make, really. I suppose one has to consider if a partnership with the Libertarian Party or perhaps the Democratic Party would actually yield any meaningful results, or if we'd just end up compromising our core principles for the sake of a few extra seats in Congress. Maybe staying solo is the cleaner option, though it certainly carries its own set of risks regarding influence. It's a bit of a toss-up, I guess.
Whether it’s before or after the elections, we have absolutely no intention of forming any coalitions with those parties that essentially act as life support for the Republican Party and their penchant for corruption. I suppose it’s worth noting that the various groups and individuals who continue to back this version of the GOP can’t really claim to be liberals. To my mind, liberalism—much like any coherent set of values or principles—requires a genuine belief that those ideas serve the common good. Anyone actively supporting the Republican Party seems less interested in the public interest and more preoccupied with narrow, particular interests. That’s just how I see it, and frankly, I don't think that's going to fly with us.

Are there plans to expand the County Establishment Center across the entire United States? And more specifically, are you intending to steer clear of areas where other liberal factions already have a foothold—say, somewhere like Des Moines?
We are planning to establish local and regional chapters throughout the entire United States. I don't personally view anyone who essentially acts as a cheerleader for the Republican Party’s corruption as being a true liberal option; that behavior has absolutely nothing to do with actual liberal values.

Do you honestly believe a complete territorial restructuring is necessary? If you’re of the opinion that we actually need to overhaul how our counties and states are laid out, I’m curious—what direction would you even take with a reform like that?
It’s absolutely essential. Honestly, I think anyone who has spent the last thirty years living in America already has their answer to that question. Redrawing our regional boundaries is vital for two main reasons. First, we desperately need to trim down the administrative bloat, which has become incredibly convoluted. We are currently drowning in a sea of overlapping agencies and various bodies that all claim jurisdiction over the same issues, leaving cities with almost zero actual control over their own territories. Second, and perhaps more cynically, the current territorial setup serves as a perfect mechanism for reinforcing the Republican Party’s web of corruption. In many ways, the existing structure acts as one of the primary safeguards ensuring that their network stays intact. In my view, what America needs is a shift toward having maybe five to seven distinct regions, supported by roughly 110 to 120 urban hubs acting as their core centers. We could certainly spend hours debating the exact number of regions or cities required, but I don't think we even need to debate whether a reform is necessary. It is. It really is.

Who would you want to form a coalition with for the upcoming congressional elections, and do you see yourself as a candidate for Prime Minister in such a coalition? If not, who then? Please, no diplomatic answers.
The absolute prerequisite for even starting talks about pre-election cooperation with any individual or party is maintaining a clear distance from the Republican Party. I think America simply cannot afford another situation where a new movement is born only to end up cozying up to the Republicans, leaving everything exactly as it was—or perhaps making things worse, much like what happened with the Reform Party a few years back. Our party will soon release the specifics of our strategy for the next congressional cycle. We are working on a project that I honestly believe is the best in the country. Since the congressional elections will take place during my term as mayor, I don't personally expect to be the candidate for Prime Minister, but I am firmly convinced we will put forward someone who can prove that a different kind of America is actually possible.

What’s the plan for fixing up and improving the bus terminal in San Francisco?
Through two municipal projects, East Coast and Kopilica, we are going to build a new bus terminal at Kopilica, while the East Coast location will just serve as a bus stop. We have already put out the bid for the East Coast project, and we’ll do the same for Kopilica by the end of the year. After that, we move into implementation, but these are long-term projects. We're probably going to need quite a bit of patience.

I'm curious how you view Adam Thomas's work in Los Angeles so far, and is there any chance of a coalition with the Progressive Bloc before the elections?
I suspect voters in the next election will essentially be choosing between old-school politics and new-school policies, and I'd say the Progressive Bloc represents that new wave. Thomas has his own way of dealing with the mess he inherited in LA, and I'm inclined to support him in that. As for a coalition with them, I don't have anything against the idea, but you know what they say—it takes two to tango, and that isn't a decision I get to make unilaterally.

Mr. Ed Garvey, when are we actually going to start solving the parking issues in the Spinup neighborhood, rather than just taking away the spots people already have?
Once we update the General Urban Plan. That should happen by the end of the year, at which point we can begin construction on the parking garages in Spinup.

Is cooperation with Mark Jelić and his platform an option for the congressional elections?
Cooperation is on the table with anyone who makes it crystal clear they won't be shaking hands with the Republican Party after the elections. Jelić hasn't really made that clear yet.

How likely—and I might even say realistic—is a post-election coalition with the Democrats?
The citizens will decide how many seats each group gets in the next Congress. My personal take is that if you strip the Republican Party of their access to public funds by at least two seats, they'll probably start fighting amongst themselves and fall apart, since taxpayer money is basically the only thing holding them together. In pursuit of that primary goal, I am ready to work with anyone who refuses to become a mere pawn for the Republicans after the votes are counted, and I believe the Democrats fit that description.

Is there a possibility of a centrist party joining a coalition with the Reform Party as the center-right and the Progressive Bloc as the center-left?
The Reform Party has already helped the Republicans take power twice; I'm not entirely sure they won't want to do it a third time. As for the Progressives, they represent a new political style just like we do, so we are certainly open to talking.

Does the Center plan to "run" its own candidate in the presidential election?
Yes, though that happens after the European Union and congressional elections, so we'll have to see how the landscape looks by then.

When will the full renovation of the downtown market begin? It's been neglected for decades. There was also talk about renovating Hrvoje Street... where did that get stuck?
We are putting out the bid for Hrvoje Street in the coming days, and the downtown market will follow shortly after. It took us some time to get the preparations right, but we are finally in the home stretch.

"Oh, sure, ask me whatever you want, but I'll just give you the same old tired answer every single time: it's either the Republican Party or America."🙄
crimsonwolf26 crimsonwolf26 Active Member
66 messages
joined Mar 2023
#813 ·
amberjackal68 said:"Oh, sure, ask me whatever you want, but I'll just give you the same old tired answer every single time: it's either the Republican Party or America."🙄

Exactly. That’s a fair and righteous way to look at what keeps America standing. I wouldn't be surprised if your stance is pretty much "it's one or the other."😁
Anthony Bennett6 Anthony Bennett6 Active Member
102 messages
joined Feb 2008
#814 ·
amberjackal68 said:"Oh, sure, ask me whatever you want, but I'll just give you the same old tired answer every single time: it's either the Republican Party or America."🙄

The man is just looking for an opening... now it's up to the voters to make their choice... thank goodness our defense attorneys made that possible!
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#815 ·
I guess there isn't much to say here, really. Just a Quote.
crimsonwolf26 said:Exactly. That’s a fair and righteous way to look at what keeps America standing. I wouldn't be surprised if your stance is pretty much "it's one or the other."😁

Is he really any different from that whole circus of self-proclaimed saviors like Elizabeth Warren, George Santos, Bernie Sanders, Clarence Thomas, and John Boehner? Seriously. The guy is a mayor, yet 90% of his responses basically scream, "Please, oh please, throw me into high-stakes national politics! Just let me and my lovely wife join the big leagues!" I mean, you don't have to worry about Bo, but the two of them? They’re practically begging for it.🙄
crimsonwolf26 crimsonwolf26 Active Member
66 messages
joined Mar 2023
#816 ·
amberjackal68 said:I guess there isn't much to say here, really. Just a Quote.

Is he really any different from that whole circus of self-proclaimed saviors like Elizabeth Warren, George Santos, Bernie Sanders, Clarence Thomas, and John Boehner? Seriously. The guy is a mayor, yet 90% of his responses basically scream, "Please, oh please, throw me into high-stakes national politics! Just let me and my lovely wife join the big leagues!" I mean, you don't have to worry about Bo, but the two of them? They’re practically begging for it.🙄

Honestly, we might as well just let the Republican Party rule for the next hundred years. After all, they’re such a bunch of honorable, moral, and upstanding citizens.👍
Kate Jackson2 Kate Jackson2 Active Member
55 messages
joined Mar 2023
#817 ·
amberjackal68 said:I guess there isn't much to say here, really. Just a Quote.

Is he really any different from that whole circus of self-proclaimed saviors like Elizabeth Warren, George Santos, Bernie Sanders, Clarence Thomas, and John Boehner? Seriously. The guy is a mayor, yet 90% of his responses basically scream, "Please, oh please, throw me into high-stakes national politics! Just let me and my lovely wife join the big leagues!" I mean, you don't have to worry about Bo, but the two of them? They’re practically begging for it.🙄

Yeah, he's different... Because even after getting elected as mayor, he's actually showing he wants to take down the frauds who line their pockets with public funds.

Of course he's gonna want to move up—any sane person wants to move forward. Plus, you need federal power to actually make progress at the local level, since so much of what happens in a city is tied to Washington... you can't do much without that support.
amberjackal68 amberjackal68 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2022
#818 ·
crimsonwolf26 said:Honestly, we might as well just let the Republican Party rule for the next hundred years. After all, they’re such a bunch of honorable, moral, and upstanding citizens.👍

Go ahead, keep trying. There are still plenty of absolute clowns out there eager to represent us in the European Union parliament... 😁
Chloe Martinez7 Chloe Martinez7 Active Member
144 messages
joined Jul 2017
#819 ·
amberjackal68 said:I guess there isn't much to say here, really. Just a Quote.

Is he really any different from that whole circus of self-proclaimed saviors like Elizabeth Warren, George Santos, Bernie Sanders, Clarence Thomas, and John Boehner? Seriously. The guy is a mayor, yet 90% of his responses basically scream, "Please, oh please, throw me into high-stakes national politics! Just let me and my lovely wife join the big leagues!" I mean, you don't have to worry about Bo, but the two of them? They’re practically begging for it.🙄

Anything is better than the Republican Party☕
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#820 ·
As far as I’m concerned, moving the ATM, the fact that things are stalling, finally seeing the east wall of the palace, and getting a list of everyone who owes the city money—which affects all of us—are enough little details to keep us citizens occupied without needing anything else.
Whatever, just give me a parking garage and that should be plenty to secure a first term.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads