CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Arming Ukraine

Arming Ukraine

Started by Ashley Ramirez4 · · 👁 13 views · 831 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Ashley Ramirez4silentsurfer3Hannah Williams8velvetcyclist95Kevin Hughes2Paul Patel95Jeremy Peterson4Tyler Jones6Jessica Morris6Richard Wilson4Rachel Barrett8Larry Newman4rowdytiger13nimbleharbor10Linda Harris59silverotter72Joseph Clark37John Perez13Carl Lee27Andrew Miller102driftingtinkerDouglas Perez3bluemason3Richard Cooper3 …
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#101 ·
The Spanish C90-CR anti-tank system has finally arrived

https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status...C98ZPCoNQpAAAA

Also, some Belgian FN FNC 5.56x45mm rifles just showed up in Ukraine alongside the "Foreign Legion" crews

https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status...C96bW_ntQpAAAA
Adam Lee13 Adam Lee13 Active Member
105 messages
joined Nov 2022
#102 ·
The first batch of NLAWs just hit Kharkiv.... things are about to get a hell of a lot more complicated for Russia...

, Saab is out here saying you don't even need those massive anti-tank ditches spread across the battlefield anymore just to stop an armored push. Apparently, you can train guys to use an NLAW in like, an hour, then just scatter them all over the field to sit and wait for tanks and other heavy armor to roll by.

Really hoping they made it to Mykolaiv, Chernihiv, Sumy, and Zaporizhzhia too...
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#103 ·
So, get this—Poland just made the call to donate 28 MiG jets to Ukraine. The plan is basically for them to hand the planes over to the Americans first, who will then pass them along directly to the Ukrainians.
And they aren't stopping there either; they’re actually calling on the rest of the crew, specifically Slovakia and Bulgaria, to step up and follow suit.

https://www.gov.pl/web/diplomacy/sta...nes-to-ukraine
Timothy Nelson5 Timothy Nelson5 Active Member
232 messages
joined Oct 2018
#104 ·
If this pace of arming them keeps up for another month, I guess Ukraine might just end up with an aircraft carrier too...

🍿
Nathan Mitchell3 Nathan Mitchell3 Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2019
#105 ·
USA rejects Polish plan involving MiG jets: It's simply unfeasible and carries too much risk

It seemed pretty obvious to me that they couldn't even agree among themselves, let alone figure out the logistics and delivery...
Timothy Nelson5 Timothy Nelson5 Active Member
232 messages
joined Oct 2018
#106 ·
Nathan Mitchell3 said:USA rejects Polish plan involving MiG jets: It's simply unfeasible and carries too much risk

It seemed pretty obvious to me that they couldn't even agree among themselves, let alone figure out the logistics and delivery...

Are you absolutely certain those MiGs—well, at least some of them—aren't already en route to Ukraine...

🍿
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#107 ·
So far, the UK has sent over 3,615 NLAWs—well, at least that’s the number they’re officially acknowledging. And get this, the Javelin deliveries are supposed to be starting pretty soon too.
It's just like the Starstreak, which, from what I can gather, should really be sitting right at the top of the pack when you're looking at the whole MANPADS category.

https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/stat...41861181517826
mistyotter35 mistyotter35 Active Member
113 messages
joined Mar 2013
#108 ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:Are you absolutely certain those MiGs—well, at least some of them—aren't already en route to Ukraine...

🍿

I suppose for NATO, the real issue isn't necessarily sending planes to Ukraine, but rather the complications of launching combat missions directly from NATO bases.
Joseph Clark37 Joseph Clark37 Active Member
238 messages
joined Feb 2020
#109 ·
Carl Lee27 said:So far, the UK has sent over 3,615 NLAWs—well, at least that’s the number they’re officially acknowledging. And get this, the Javelin deliveries are supposed to be starting pretty soon too.
It's just like the Starstreak, which, from what I can gather, should really be sitting right at the top of the pack when you're looking at the whole MANPADS category.

https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/stat...41861181517826

There will still be plenty of heavy Russian paratroopers over Ukraine... 🙂
Walter Baker2 Walter Baker2 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Feb 2020
#110 ·
mistyotter35 said:I suppose for NATO, the real issue isn't necessarily sending planes to Ukraine, but rather the complications of launching combat missions directly from NATO bases.

Does Lviv just lack an airfield or a highway, apparently?
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#111 ·
Walter Baker2 said:Does Lviv just lack an airfield or a highway, apparently?

Then where are they gonna go overnight?

You really should've had this plan ready before the invasion started, not after the fact...
bluemason3 bluemason3 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jun 2016
#112 ·
Some people are arguing this won't actually change much on the ground. Their logic? Even the gear they already have isn't being used to its full potential because they just don't have enough air superiority. So, they see this as more of a PR stunt than a tactical win.
Purely a PR move. 🤔
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#113 ·
bluemason3 said:Some people are arguing this won't actually change much on the ground. Their logic? Even the gear they already have isn't being used to its full potential because they just don't have enough air superiority. So, they see this as more of a PR stunt than a tactical win.
Purely a PR move. 🤔

But honestly, if those Starstreaks show up in time, it might just speed up the tally of Sukhoi and Mil aircraft that decided to perform an "emergency landing." 😬
slyfox43 slyfox43 Regular
292 messages
joined May 2023
#114 ·
Milov’s obsession with the MIL-ov. 😁
Timothy Nelson5 Timothy Nelson5 Active Member
232 messages
joined Oct 2018
#115 ·
bluemason3 said:Some people are arguing this won't actually change much on the ground. Their logic? Even the gear they already have isn't being used to its full potential because they just don't have enough air superiority. So, they see this as more of a PR stunt than a tactical win.
Purely a PR move. 🤔

All this talk about those Mig aircraft... honestly, it feels more like a distraction technique to pull focus away from things, or maybe just a way to mess with Russia's head, rather than anything that would actually give Ukraine a decisive edge right now.

If you look at it logically:

1. It's essentially a signal to Russia that there's a faction within NATO willing to send whatever weaponry is requested.
Maybe that way, Russia might eventually find it easier to tolerate these massive shipments of lighter weaponry. At the highest political levels, I suppose they don't quite grasp that such gear can be much more lethal against their invasion forces than a single squadron of MiG-29s.

Russia will likely view the fact that these jets haven't been delivered to Ukraine (at least not openly or in bulk) as a sort of victory for their diplomacy and threats. They'll probably feel like they've succeeded, while also realizing that all this light weapon stuff doesn't actually stop them much.

2. Showing that NATO is ready to step up by sending this kind of hardware might convince Russian leadership to scale back airstrikes and cruise missile attacks on western Ukraine, specifically in areas closer to the borders of NATO member states.
It’s simple logic, I guess—if the border countries feel less threatened, they might push less for the heavier, more sophisticated weapon systems to be sent to Ukraine.

3. Those planes might actually just complicate air defense, especially since units are being mass-distributed Stingers, Arrows, Wasps, and eventually Starstreaks...
Ukraine still has some operational S-300 batteries, and when you factor in their likely real-time connection with AWACS, it makes flying at higher altitudes pretty dangerous for the Russian Air Force. That system could potentially be coordinated with the Ukrainian MiG-29.
But then again, it would be incredibly difficult to prevent someone armed with a Stinger from accidentally targeting their own planes, since they're trained to see only the enemy in the sky.
So, in my opinion, it would probably make more sense to send extra missiles for the S-300s, maybe some mobile short-to-medium range systems... and try to get those captured Pantsirs and Tunguskas back in working order...
rowdytiger13 rowdytiger13 Regular
378 messages
joined Oct 2018
#116 ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:All this talk about those Mig aircraft... honestly, it feels more like a distraction technique to pull focus away from things, or maybe just a way to mess with Russia's head, rather than anything that would actually give Ukraine a decisive edge right now.

If you look at it logically:

1. It's essentially a signal to Russia that there's a faction within NATO willing to send whatever weaponry is requested.
Maybe that way, Russia might eventually find it easier to tolerate these massive shipments of lighter weaponry. At the highest political levels, I suppose they don't quite grasp that such gear can be much more lethal against their invasion forces than a single squadron of MiG-29s.

Russia will likely view the fact that these jets haven't been delivered to Ukraine (at least not openly or in bulk) as a sort of victory for their diplomacy and threats. They'll probably feel like they've succeeded, while also realizing that all this light weapon stuff doesn't actually stop them much.

2. Showing that NATO is ready to step up by sending this kind of hardware might convince Russian leadership to scale back airstrikes and cruise missile attacks on western Ukraine, specifically in areas closer to the borders of NATO member states.
It’s simple logic, I guess—if the border countries feel less threatened, they might push less for the heavier, more sophisticated weapon systems to be sent to Ukraine.

3. Those planes might actually just complicate air defense, especially since units are being mass-distributed Stingers, Arrows, Wasps, and eventually Starstreaks...
Ukraine still has some operational S-300 batteries, and when you factor in their likely real-time connection with AWACS, it makes flying at higher altitudes pretty dangerous for the Russian Air Force. That system could potentially be coordinated with the Ukrainian MiG-29.
But then again, it would be incredibly difficult to prevent someone armed with a Stinger from accidentally targeting their own planes, since they're trained to see only the enemy in the sky.
So, in my opinion, it would probably make more sense to send extra missiles for the S-300s, maybe some mobile short-to-medium range systems... and try to get those captured Pantsirs and Tunguskas back in working order...

Yeah, that holds water, because after certain representatives started complaining about the delays in Mig deliveries, the Americans announced they'd ramp up the shipment of things like Javelins instead.
Harris went to Poland and is heading to Romania next, likely to iron things out in person since she mentioned resolving disagreements through direct conversation rather than just over the phone.
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#117 ·
Like we were just talking about earlier, there’s apparently some serious movement behind the scenes to find a way to get a few more S-300s or maybe even other old-school Soviet gear over to Ukraine.

Quote: Washington—The Pentagon is exploring ways to shore up Ukraine’s air defenses by facilitating The transfer of Soviet-designed antiaircraft equipment , according to U. S. and European officials.

The U.S. is currently crunching the numbers to figure out which specific air-defense setups would actually do the trick, and honestly, those Soviet-made systems—especially the mobile units—are looking like the smartest play right now since the Ukrainians wouldn't need nearly as much intensive training to get them up and running, according to one official at the Pentagon.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/u-s...ne-11646933998
slyfox43 slyfox43 Regular
292 messages
joined May 2023
#118 ·
I hear there’s some stock sitting around in Syria that isn't seeing any action lately... 🕺
Timothy Nelson5 Timothy Nelson5 Active Member
232 messages
joined Oct 2018
#119 ·


Ukraine War - Combat Footage from Kyiv Area gives Closer look AT Armament of Ukrainian AT Squads

It’s a decent little clip, I suppose. It shows a small group of American soldiers engaged in combat near Kyiv, pretty much decked out with every kind of anti-tank launcher you can imagine...
Sam Alvarez4 Sam Alvarez4 Regular
303 messages
joined Sep 2014
#120 ·
I touched on this just a few days ago.

Regarding Borell's interview yesterday in Versailles: she discussed arming Ukraine and how they're coordinating everything through Brussels.

The requests from Ukraine are clear—they need heavy weaponry, specifically anti-tank missiles, and plenty of fuel too.

To manage this, Borell has a dedicated team of 200 officers pulled from all over Europe to sync up Ukraine's needs with what various nations can actually provide...
The group is led by a French admiral and an Italian general.

The whole operation is funded via EU funds.

"In Brussels, my department maintains a military staff. We have a French admiral and an Italian general leading a team of 200 officers from across the European militaries to handle this work. They bridge the gap between supply and demand. The member states provide the hardware, and we cover the costs."

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads