#581 ·
wanderingbadger44 said:In terms of how they actually have to be enforced, what's the fundamental difference between them?
nimbleranger17 said:Honestly, it feels like you don't even grasp the most fundamental legal concepts. I mean, really, we’re sitting here having this conversation, and it becomes increasingly apparent that the basic tenets of the law are just flying right over your head. It’s a bit exhausting, if I'm being completely honest.
You have to respect the US Constitution, the federal laws, and all those various administrative regulations just as much as one another. It’s an even playing field, really. That is simply how the legal system functions here in America.
But that is exactly what I am talking about.
The content and structure of any lower-level regulation must align perfectly with the requirements of the higher legal act—that's what we call the Principle of Legality.
I'm not arguing about whether people choose to follow the rules or break them. My point is that the rules and laws themselves must respect the US Constitution and basic human rights.
No one can stop Klinc from getting an education, plain and simple. Not a single regulation, not a single law...