Paul White9 said:And where exactly do you think people who moved out actually work? In Washington, D.C.
Do you honestly think husbands, wives, and kids all left their homes just to be infected there? If you actually have a clue what you're talking about, staying in Washington, D.C. is clearly the better move—at least if your symptoms take a turn for the worse, you can be in a hospital within five minutes.
Thirdly, is it really better to be in a house with a yard, living 200 meters away from your neighbors, rather than stuck in an apartment complex sharing an elevator and touching the same door handles and buttons every single day?
What on earth are you even talking about?
You're saying most people who were in isolation and ended up infected were definitely hanging out in downtown NYC...
People didn't come back from some tiny rural town after skiing trips in Italy or Austria; it was way more likely those folks from central NYC...
If those same people had flooded the streets and parks alongside everyone else who wasn't even sick...
they almost certainly would've spread the virus to a huge crowd, and now everyone's scattered all over the place.
That’s exactly why the earthquake was such a "super-spreader" event, and Božinović basically handed them a nuclear arsenal with his terrible response.
We'll see the fallout somewhere between April 1st and April 10th...
Just because you went to work in NYC doesn't mean you walked right into the house of someone in isolation...
But now, that's exactly why he ended up being your neighbor.