shadowcrane91 said:My kids are definitely taking religion classes since they're an option. I want them learning about the faith I'm raising them in from someone who actually knows the theology better than I do...
Plus, I’m a believer—not just a "paper Catholic" like half the people out there—and since I’m raising my kids in this faith, it’s a no-brainer that they take the class...
I get the feeling we’re the only nation that seems "ashamed" of its faith and wants to hush it up or rip it out by the roots...
In almost every other religion, faith holds a massive place in life and education, yet in Christianity, it’s treated like it's some kind of nuisance...
We are a Catholic country, and minorities should adapt to us, not the other way around...
But here's the kicker—even the big-time Catholics in this country seem bothered by Catholic symbols...
Look, if you aren't Catholic, I get why it might bug you... but seriously, you're living in this country, just deal with it...
What I don't get is why it bothers CATHOLICS too...
Real Catholics probably don't care... it's mostly those people who just love bragging about being Catholic or Christian on paper...
If we are truly a Catholic nation that shouldn't feel any shame regarding its faith—as you suggest above—then wouldn't it follow that minorities should be the ones to adapt? This leads me to wonder: following the model of certain Islamic states in the Middle East, do you believe religion ought to become an integral part of our formal social and legal framework? In other words, are you suggesting we should abandon secularism altogether? If we did, would that effectively silence all opposition to placing crosses in public schools and government buildings? And really, looking at the big picture, do we actually gain anything positive from maintaining a secular society?
As for everything else, I firmly believe that almost anyone who truly cares about providing their children with a meaningful religious upbringing should favor church-based instruction over what is offered in public schools. Schools offer a certain level of convenience, certainly; it requires zero extra effort from a parent to manage their schedule when the curriculum is already built into the school day. But much like opting for fast food just because it’s easy, this approach lacks substance. For a practicing believer, what actual spiritual value can be gained from a standardized school religious program? It simply doesn't compare.
The reasons that immediately come to mind:
Is mandatory religious education in schools truly serving any purpose? When you frame faith as a requirement, you immediately trigger resistance in a child. It becomes a chore rather than a choice. In our experience, church-led religious studies were never an obligation; instead, they served as a wonderful, enriching extracurricular activity for those of us who attended. Why force the issue when engagement comes from genuine interest?
Does the inherent sanctity of a church building not play a profound role in how a student perceives the lessons taught by their catechist? It seems to me that the atmosphere itself lends weight to the word.
When religious studies is forced into the same rigid schedule as math or history, it loses its essence. It gets reduced to just another checkbox on a syllabus—something students feel they simply have to "get through." From a student's perspective, it becomes just as hollow and pointless as any other mandatory elective that lacks real-world relevance. Why should it be any different? If it’s treated like a chore rather than an exploration of faith, how can we expect them to care?
Assigning grades to work submitted by individuals outside the traditional school system often triggers significant backlash. I’ve personally witnessed several instances where students were essentially bullied into abandoning critical thinking by frustrated instructors. This usually happened when students started asking uncomfortable questions rooted in scientific facts they had picked up in other classes. In those cases, there was often an implicit threat: either stay quiet and remain passive, or risk having a poor grade in religion tank your chances of getting into a decent high school.
To wrap this up:
Is a church really a better environment than a school for learning religious doctrine? I would argue that it is. To those who remain skeptical, I might suggest trying both and seeing for yourselves.
Forcing children into religious education classes creates a sense of resentment, much like any other form of compulsion. To avoid this friction, the most logical step would be to remove religion from the core academic curriculum entirely—essentially taking it off the official grading roster. Instead, if these classes are to exist at all, they should be scheduled during the final hours of the school day. If it remains part of the school environment, let it function as an extracurricular activity, much like a model building club or a choir program.
- We ought to be giving people a real choice here; religious studies should be an option again, whether that's in public schools or through local churches.
I’m sure there are plenty of other points to raise, but I simply don't have the time right now... 👋