CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Economy › Banking, Insurance & Loans › Nosy banks

Nosy banks

Started by urbanhawk85 · · 👁 36 views · 1.3K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants urbanhawk85bluebadger14Charles Ramos7placidmaker6Ashley Ramirez4Kevin CoxSarah Morris57mellowraven8Rebecca Green7Jerry Williams53George CookJose Miller3Gerald Palmer66Sam Ruiz60Brian Moore12Chris Chase5Michelle EvansDavid Parker44silverhawk9Susan JamesKaren Doyle72Dana Robinson4copperdrifter5Anthony Martin64 …
Ryan Gomez4 Ryan Gomez4 Active Member
112 messages
joined Feb 2013
#321 ·
velvetfalcon44 said:All these endless regulations are just a slow march toward total individual control—it’s pretty obvious if you look closely. At this rate, we might as well just have them implant microchips right now so they can seize our bank accounts and hand us a tiny allowance just enough to cover the bare essentials while they pull all the strings behind the scenes.

Honestly, if they can pull it off, let them. But right now, I’ve got this new digital ID and I can’t find a single smart card reader anywhere to actually use it, so I’m stuck answering stupid questions everywhere I go.
George Lewis9 George Lewis9 Active Member
66 messages
joined Mar 2018
#322 ·
feraljackal2 feraljackal2 Active Member
67 messages
joined Aug 2013
#323 ·
hiddenviper13 said:No biggie. This whole thing is basically just going to be one giant game of X's and O's.

Maybe I'll just set it up somewhere else entirely, like over in Canada or something. 😁

Broken links again. Honestly, the American Bankers Association is just... well, you know how it goes. Last one. Just a heads-up, there’s a website out there where folks can actually go to get the facts and stay in the loop. Useful stuff, really.

Terrorism. It’s one of those heavy, jagged words that just hangs in the air, isn't it? You see it in the news cycles, scrolling through headlines that feel like they're designed to make your stomach drop, and it’s easy to get lost in the sheer scale of it all. It feels massive, like an unstoppable tide. But when you really sit with it, it’s more complicated than just a headline. It’s about how it shifts everything—how it changes the way we look at a crowded subway station in Chicago or a busy plaza in New York. It’s that subtle, nagging sense of unease that creeps in, making you second-guess a simple walk down a city street. It’s less about the singular events and more about that slow erosion of feeling safe in your own skin. It’s a strange, uncomfortable thing to navigate. 🙂

None of this has anything to do with banks. Honestly, we should just kick them all to the curb and be done with it. 👍

If you were in Sweden, you’d likely need to show proof of rent payments—assuming you have a lease or own the place—before they even look at your "questionnaire."

I highly doubt anyone is actually scrutinizing my answers, but putting an "X" there would just flag me for extra review, wouldn't it? It makes it look like I'm hiding something. Since all my money was earned honestly, I have zero reason to lie. On the flip side, I don't want some agency using this app to call me back and harass me over those "X" marks. I wasted about thirty minutes on this—well, mostly I just annoyed my colleague because I jumped on this during work hours—but at least it's settled once and for all.
Laura Chavez93 Laura Chavez93 Regular
285 messages
joined Dec 2015
#324 ·
Essentially, nobody faced any repercussions unless they flat-out refused to complete the surveys,
did they suggest his request would be denied simply because he walked into a Chase branch—or worse, threaten to freeze his accounts?
If that’s actually the case, I can certainly feel more comfortable speaking my mind when they call next time...😈
Harold Evans4 Harold Evans4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Mar 2015
#325 ·
From what I’ve gathered, Chase is the biggest offender when it comes to those annoying surveys. Honestly, I haven’t even dealt with that once, and I’ve been banking with them for maybe 6 or 7 years now. Sure, they’ll occasionally hit you up asking if you want some "ultra premium" credit card or try to push some quick personal loans on you, but beyond that? I’ve never had any issues regarding my data privacy.
placidmaker6 placidmaker6 Active Member
130 messages
joined Feb 2020
#326 ·
hiddenviper13 said:wiredlynx28, it’s probably for the best you didn't mention how easy it is to just carry cash around out there. Makes banks feel pretty much obsolete, doesn't it? 👋

Where exactly?
Sarah Ruiz42 Sarah Ruiz42 Active Member
52 messages
joined Jan 2007
#327 ·
I don't even know where to start with this one. It’s honestly ridiculous. You see people acting like they have some kind of authority when they clearly don't have a clue what's actually happening on the ground here in the States. It's all just noise at this point. I'm sick of the constant back-and-forth that leads absolutely nowhere. Every time I log on, it's more of the same nonsense. Get a grip!
wiredlynx28 said:Feel free to just email your bank directly to request whatever data you need; they'll provide all the specific info you're looking for. 👍
As for how things work behind the scenes, I wouldn't know—that's not my department—but I've certainly heard plenty of rumors.
Everyone’s experience varies. I've worked both at teller windows and in management offices, and I've even completed training programs across various countries for banks within our group, including Germany and Ita. Every setup has its own pros and cons.
In some places, people find it baffling. For instance, when everyone here was making such a massive scene over those Swiss franc loans, the media reported on it, but the commenters were basically saying Americans don't realize they actually have to pay back the credit they willingly took out. Even now, you see dissatisfaction from the EU Commission and certain nations regarding currency conversions. As for claims of being pressured into these deals? That's just nonsense.
And just to be clear, I'm not working under any kind of pressure or anything like that; in fact, I'm quite happy with my career. I'm just saying, everyone sees things differently.

I’m about to get some half-witted letter written in "diplomatic tone" claiming this is all for my own good. They’ll claim the bank is just "upgrading services" to make customers even happier or whatever other bullshit they want to feed us. It's nothing but a pile of lies and pure garbage.

wiredlynx28 said:Feel free to just email your bank directly to request whatever data you need; they'll provide all the specific info you're looking for. 👍
As for how things work behind the scenes, I wouldn't know—that's not my department—but I've certainly heard plenty of rumors.
Everyone’s experience varies. I've worked both at teller windows and in management offices, and I've even completed training programs across various countries for banks within our group, including Germany and Ita. Every setup has its own pros and cons.
In some places, people find it baffling. For instance, when everyone here was making such a massive scene over those Swiss franc loans, the media reported on it, but the commenters were basically saying Americans don't realize they actually have to pay back the credit they willingly took out. Even now, you see dissatisfaction from the EU Commission and certain nations regarding currency conversions. As for claims of being pressured into these deals? That's just nonsense.
And just to be clear, I'm not working under any kind of pressure or anything like that; in fact, I'm quite happy with my career. I'm just saying, everyone sees things differently.

Look, things went absolutely sideways in a lot of places, even over in Switzerland. The franc spiked so hard it basically crippled their economy overnight—everything became way too expensive and completely uncompetitive. And don't even get me started on those Swiss-denominated loans; that was a massive national crisis in several countries. Most governments jumped on it immediately, treating it like the top-tier political and economic emergency it actually was. But here? Not a chance. With our bunch of paid-off, old-school establishment sheep who love pretending they live in a democracy while acting like it's 1950, it was just another excuse. Our Prime Minister stood there delivering those arrogant, mindless, and frankly idiotic little speeches about "support," acting like he was actually doing something. It’s pathetic.

It’s pure stupidity to take out a loan just so you can default on it. I’m obviously not talking about someone like Trump or that political elite circle around Zokiev’s brother—those guys can pull millions out of thin air without meeting a single requirement, even while they're practically broke personally. Or look at old man Luke, who's over 70 and somehow scores half a million for a house when he hasn't met the age requirements for a mortgage in a decade. Meanwhile, regular Americans are sitting there counting down the months until retirement, praying they have enough time left to actually pay back what they owe!

Look, all we’re asking for is some basic, elementary decency. I want a fair deal where the bank doesn't just flip the script whenever they feel like it, unilaterally changing terms on us while I'm stuck playing by their rules and following every single clause to the letter. It's a joke. And don't even get me started on how they package up straight-up theft in shiny gift wrap. They know exactly what they're doing—it’s criminal—but as long as there's a chance to squeeze more profit out of people, they don't care about the ethics. This isn't even a theory; this shady behavior has been proven over and over again in court through actual legal rulings! So, please, spare me that nonsense about "ignorant citizens" trying to scam the bank by not paying. That’s a total lie.


wiredlynx28 said:Feel free to just email your bank directly to request whatever data you need; they'll provide all the specific info you're looking for. 👍
As for how things work behind the scenes, I wouldn't know—that's not my department—but I've certainly heard plenty of rumors.
Everyone’s experience varies. I've worked both at teller windows and in management offices, and I've even completed training programs across various countries for banks within our group, including Germany and Ita. Every setup has its own pros and cons.
In some places, people find it baffling. For instance, when everyone here was making such a massive scene over those Swiss franc loans, the media reported on it, but the commenters were basically saying Americans don't realize they actually have to pay back the credit they willingly took out. Even now, you see dissatisfaction from the EU Commission and certain nations regarding currency conversions. As for claims of being pressured into these deals? That's just nonsense.
And just to be clear, I'm not working under any kind of pressure or anything like that; in fact, I'm quite happy with my career. I'm just saying, everyone sees things differently.

Look, the EU Commission doesn't work for the people. They work for their own little inner circles of interest. Just because they’re throwing a fit now doesn't mean their outrage is actually justified, fair, or even legal. Where was all this righteous indignation when they were busy lining their pockets whenever it suited them? They sure weren't complaining then. And don't even get me started on that piece of work Bohacek. He’s out here crying foul because the banks saw their profits dip by a few hundred million, even though those institutions are still sitting on billions of dollars in profit. It’s pathetic. Honestly, someone should give him a good smack upside the head to help him realize his looting isn't the center of the universe. The best thing we could do is just ignore that famous Hub—which, let's be real, is nothing more than a glorified trade guild. Who does he think he is? Why are we even listening to him? He's just the head of some bankers' club. If they want to sit around at their private dinners and whine about how hard life is, fine. But they shouldn't be forcing their greed down our throats like it's the most important thing in existence!

wiredlynx28 said:Feel free to just email your bank directly to request whatever data you need; they'll provide all the specific info you're looking for. 👍
As for how things work behind the scenes, I wouldn't know—that's not my department—but I've certainly heard plenty of rumors.
Everyone’s experience varies. I've worked both at teller windows and in management offices, and I've even completed training programs across various countries for banks within our group, including Germany and Ita. Every setup has its own pros and cons.
In some places, people find it baffling. For instance, when everyone here was making such a massive scene over those Swiss franc loans, the media reported on it, but the commenters were basically saying Americans don't realize they actually have to pay back the credit they willingly took out. Even now, you see dissatisfaction from the EU Commission and certain nations regarding currency conversions. As for claims of being pressured into these deals? That's just nonsense.
And just to be clear, I'm not working under any kind of pressure or anything like that; in fact, I'm quite happy with my career. I'm just saying, everyone sees things differently.

Here you go again, playing the part of your typical, spineless little banking drone. It’s like you just switch off your brain, toss common sense out the window, and abandon any shred of fairness or integrity. Instead, you just hit play on that pre-recorded loop of nonsense about how "wonderful" the bank is and how much they do for us. You act like we’re just some ungrateful peasants who can't possibly grasp how much they're doing for us. Give me a break.

Hundreds of thousands of people from that Frank association? They must be absolute morons. And honestly, it’s not just them—it’s the courts and the public in other countries too. It’s like they're waiting for some big-shot banker to sit them down and explain what the "real truth" is. Give me a break. Seriously, get a grip on reality.

wiredlynx28 said:Feel free to just email your bank directly to request whatever data you need; they'll provide all the specific info you're looking for. 👍
As for how things work behind the scenes, I wouldn't know—that's not my department—but I've certainly heard plenty of rumors.
Everyone’s experience varies. I've worked both at teller windows and in management offices, and I've even completed training programs across various countries for banks within our group, including Germany and Ita. Every setup has its own pros and cons.
In some places, people find it baffling. For instance, when everyone here was making such a massive scene over those Swiss franc loans, the media reported on it, but the commenters were basically saying Americans don't realize they actually have to pay back the credit they willingly took out. Even now, you see dissatisfaction from the EU Commission and certain nations regarding currency conversions. As for claims of being pressured into these deals? That's just nonsense.
And just to be clear, I'm not working under any kind of pressure or anything like that; in fact, I'm quite happy with my career. I'm just saying, everyone sees things differently.

Look, if you’re running a branch—even just a single local office—and you’re actually happy with the paycheck, then sure, I’d be thrilled too. In this economy, a manager's salary is pretty solid. But if you aren't constantly under the gun? Man, I don't know. I personally know a few female branch managers around here who deal with such insane pressure that they have constant headaches. And honestly, I didn't even have to ask them how they were doing to see the stress written all over their faces.

Laura Chavez93 said:It’s a lie—and frankly, in Slovakia, they take it to an even more subtle level... they actually factor the negative amounts directly into the permitted limit. 🙂 So, you essentially have to run the math in your head—calculating exactly how much you can actually afford to lift without slipping into the red... say you have... $333 Your account shows a $500 overdraft limit—so whether you’re at an ATM or talking to a teller at Chase, they’ll tell you the exact same thing... you can withdraw it. $500 🙄
And if you happen to slip into a negative balance—well, they’ll hit you with some pretty steep interest rates on that amount...
Of course... ☕
The banks there operate with the same level of corruption we see back home—except, quite likely, they wouldn't even dream of pulling such stunts in their own domestic markets... they only seem to think this kind of nonsense is acceptable when it's happening in Eastern Europe.

Hell yeah! Absolutely!


wiredlynx28 said:Here is an example:

The account packages over at Chase are pretty straightforward—you’ve got the basic tier sitting around $15 a month. $33It’s $40 a month for the Gold tier and $80 for Premium.
Zaba's RBA packages? They’re all priced lower than what you'd find in a standard bank package over in Switzerland.
Bank of America - standard checking account: $8 monthly fee plus an annual service charge.
Bank of America —$2.25 Monthly.
HypoVereinsbank in Germany—you're looking at a €7.90 monthly maintenance fee, plus roughly €5 just to get a card issued, and that doesn't even account for the other various service charges.
Look at Nordea in Sweden. A standard account will run you about $45 plus a 2% fee—minimum $20 if you're looking to tap into an overdraft. As for loans, you're looking at annual interest rates ranging from 15% to 26%.

It’s also worth noting the fees for cards and various other services that aren't covered by the standard monthly account maintenance fee. Furthermore, keep in mind that there are daily limits on card usage—both for cash withdrawals and point-of-sale purchases—which are scaled according to your salary and total income.

The unemployment benefits over here are hitting twice what they pay back home, and that’s even though the average income in those countries is at least five times higher! It makes zero sense. I have a buddy who’s a Swiss citizen—well, let's just say he's from a high-income place—and he was pulling $4,000 a month in unemployment for two straight years. He actually quit his job after working there for over 20 years because he wanted to switch careers. He used that time to breathe and finally get his own private business off the ground, which he actually launched last month. Talk about a safety net!

Look, unemployment benefits are sitting at 4,000 Swiss francs, so what percentage of someone's income is actually being eaten up by account fees? If you look at it relatively—through the lens of actual purchasing power—banking packages here in the States are freaking overpriced for absolutely NOTHING. It’s not like it takes any effort for a computer to save my account number for decades... it's the same story with online banking. You use it or you don't, it costs the bank zero extra effort on their servers. If you want anything specific or smart, they demand extra fees... :klap:

hiddenviper13 said:When you’re looking at interest rates, it’s really all about how they actually calculate the math, not just the number they throw at you. Seriously, go watch that one mathematician's video—every banker out there conveniently leaves that part out of the conversation!

I was telling my colleagues this stuff over twenty years ago, back when those first easy-access loans hit the market and people were getting approved left and right without any real scrutiny... everything was being cleared. We all had debts at five different banks, and we were acting as guarantors for our buddies at seven more. No big deal, right?...

Back then, banks were playing dirty, grabbing capital and shipping it overseas. Then, suddenly, they started acting all high and mighty about "law and order," introducing blacklists, regulatory hurdles, a million different conditions, etc.—and then the banks ran dry because it became obvious a massive chunk of clients had zero creditworthiness left. The money stopped moving, so what then? If they can't get you through the front door, they go through the side door. On one hand, the banks act like paragons of legality and formal agreements (they still play that part today), but on the other, they use their agencies and insurance arms to plaster billboards everywhere promising "quick loans" and claiming "blacklists and overdrafts aren't a problem" (and they still do it!)... So, people call the number on the billboard, and an insurance agency for some massive bank (like Allianz or Chase) answers. A woman tells you, "Come down to our office on the second floor of that building, and we'll sort everything out." And just like that, the exact same bank that rejected you at the front door is pitching you money through the side door. As long as the guys in the "banking agreement" circle aren't unhappy, they're happy. That's how banks screw us, how they screw each other, and how they screw the government while pretending "America is this beautiful, orderly land where the law is respected"... everyone's just being fake and dishonest!

And regarding interest rates: when a colleague told me the rate was "small, smaller than elsewhere," I just said—"Fine then, calculate the monthly payment...!"... Nobody knew how to do it, and I proved it easily enough. I took the interest—both the nominal and the APR—and applied them to the same amount and term at two different banks. The monthly payments were different, sometimes significantly so (back then, we're talking a decent chunk of change per month in difference!!)... That's why when I'm looking at a loan, I only ask one thing: "What is my monthly payment?" Because that's a number I can actually fight with, and it's the only thing that matters to me—how much cash am I losing every month!

Everything else is irrelevant. I don't know what's buried in that total, nor how the bank calculates the math, or what's baked into that installment, or how they structure it. 99.99% of people have no clue, and honestly, most bank employees don't even know themselves because it's all buried inside some proprietary software with a mountain of parameters that even the bankers don't grasp. So, I don't waste my breath arguing about interest percentages.

I remember the first car loans, too. One bank swooped in with loans around 9.x%; that was a psychological "breakdown" moment because people thought anything under 10% was a steal. Meanwhile, there was that one bank backing Renault, selling them at a yearly rate of 17.xx%... do I really need to say that the monthly payments and all the other totals—for the exact same starting price and term—were actually lower than those "breakdown" rates?
Alexander Thompson Alexander Thompson Active Member
185 messages
joined Apr 2018
#328 ·
9009 (The user provided only the word said:", which means "says:" in American. Since there is no actual content to rewrite, I cannot perform the transformation. Please provide the full text you wish for me to re-craft.)
voditeljica1 — honestly, good call on keeping quiet about how you can just grab cash on the street out there. If people realized that, banks would be pretty much obsolete, I guess. 👋

placidmaker6 said:Where exactly?

Working some off-the-books construction gigs—getting paid cash on the spot every day. 😬...
quietmason8 quietmason8 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2015
#329 ·
Precisely. Even the big banks were handed a proposal for debt forgiveness on a silver platter. It’s just one evil deed compensating for another. This whole situation is a blatant violation of the Constitution, plain and simple.
Timothy Kim9 Timothy Kim9 Active Member
100 messages
joined Jun 2007
#330 ·
Reading this moderator1, I gotta say—Chase isn't exactly making any big moves either...
Laura Chavez93 Laura Chavez93 Regular
285 messages
joined Dec 2015
#331 ·
Since she hasn't bothered to address a single one of my questions—not even one—I truly pity anyone currently dealing with Chase 👎
...
hiddenviper13 hiddenviper13 Member
30 messages
joined Mar 2018
#332 ·
placidmaker6 said:Where exactly?

Austria, and probably a few other places too.😁

Chase is just out here playing the privatization game for pure profit.
Sarah Ruiz42 Sarah Ruiz42 Active Member
52 messages
joined Jan 2007
#333 ·
Laura Chavez93 said:Since she hasn't bothered to address a single one of my questions—not even one—I truly pity anyone currently dealing with Chase 👎
...

My son started working almost two years ago. He was with Chase, then left after about eighteen months.

These scumbags don't care that he’s got a job, earns money, and keeps his cash with them even though he's under 21—but the second it comes to creditworthiness or anything else, suddenly he's too young. So, once he hit 21, he told those losers to get lost. That's how much they care about being fair or having an honest relationship. When they need you, they're all over you; when the client needs them, they're useless. Just typical predatory loan sharks. Honestly, they act just like their owners. Don't let Rom blame me for saying it.
Laura Chavez93 Laura Chavez93 Regular
285 messages
joined Dec 2015
#334 ·
Sarah Ruiz42 said:My son started working almost two years ago. He was with Chase, then left after about eighteen months.

These scumbags don't care that he’s got a job, earns money, and keeps his cash with them even though he's under 21—but the second it comes to creditworthiness or anything else, suddenly he's too young. So, once he hit 21, he told those losers to get lost. That's how much they care about being fair or having an honest relationship. When they need you, they're all over you; when the client needs them, they're useless. Just typical predatory loan sharks. Honestly, they act just like their owners. Don't let Rom blame me for saying it.

It holds true, though this parasitic class is incredibly well-connected—once you target one of them, the rest circle the wagons to protect their own. It’s all part of the same racket, a legalized form of theft... I doubt things are any different at Chase or any other major institution out there.
This whole business with the surveys and questionnaires is a perfect illustration. It isn't just one rogue bank deciding to act this way; it’s an industry-wide trend. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if the banks themselves lobbied to get those "anti-terrorism and money laundering" laws passed through Congress, just to grant themselves access to private client data they otherwise couldn't touch...
Sarah Ruiz42 Sarah Ruiz42 Active Member
52 messages
joined Jan 2007
#335 ·
Probably not. Actually, I'm pretty sure it isn't.

That's exactly why I'm opening a business account somewhere overseas for my future ventures. 👍
Laura Chavez93 Laura Chavez93 Regular
285 messages
joined Dec 2015
#336 ·
What kind of logic leads them to assume account holders are terrorists or career criminals right out of the gate 🤦—or that people simply take out loans with the sole intention of defrauding the bank?
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#337 ·
So I called the cops and they told me straight up that banks don't have any right to grill you about where you work or how many kids you've got

The folks over at the Privacy Commission gave me the exact same answer
rowdypilot19 rowdypilot19 Active Member
143 messages
joined Jan 2018
#338 ·
Of course they aren't allowed to, though, I mean, if you’re getting your paycheck through them, they already know exactly where you work. It's kind of the same thing with kids too; it's easy for them to figure out stuff since they have Social Security numbers and everything, so they can probably dig up extra details without much effort at all, I guess.

It really seems like they only want this for the sake of advertising. 👎
David Garcia21 David Garcia21 Active Member
69 messages
joined May 2010
#339 ·
If nobody else has bothered to copy this over yet, here’s the excerpt from the federal anti-terrorism and money laundering statutes.

Section 3. EXECUTING THE PARTY'S DUE DILIGENCE PROTOCOL
Data collection by obligated parties.
Article 16.
When performing enhanced due diligence on a client, anyone covered under Section 4, Paragraph 2 of this Act is required to gather the following data:
1. Full name, home address, date of birth, place of birth, Social Security number, and the type, number, and issuing authority of your ID. For the following individuals:
This applies to individuals, legal guardians, sole proprietors, or anyone running their own business who enters into a contract or completes a transaction.

Cross everything else out.

But hey, there's also this other clause that says:
The Secretary of the Treasury has the authority to set new rules requiring taxpayers to hand over extra data for deep-dive audits and to keep the IRS informed.

So, what exactly did our brilliant Secretary mandate? You can find the full list right here—though, personally, I don't see any extra data being collected. 🤷).
Check out the legal guidelines and regulations over at the US Treasury website.

Regarding Fatka, if you don't have any actual ties to the US, the conversation ends right there. It’s a one-second job. Unless you’re acting suspicious—like trying too hard with an American accent or calling yourself Bush—there's nothing more to say.
George Lewis9 George Lewis9 Active Member
66 messages
joined Mar 2018
#340 ·
Yeah, what’s the deal with the USA? I got asked the same thing back home and over in Sweden—people asking if I have any business dealings or income tied up in the States. Honestly, which upcoming economic powerhouse is going to decide to start blackmailing the European Union next by demanding they audit their citizens' foreign income?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads