redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
That’s clear enough, but it doesn't do a single thing to address anyone else's problems.
"Quote:"
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
Success is usually just whatever happens to be trendy at the moment. It’s about what looks desirable right now, which doesn't mean it's actually useful or even true. On a personal level, it really just comes down to your own psychological foundation—whether the work you're doing actually matters to the world, or if it's just an illusion, which, let's face it, is how most people play it.
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
From where I'm sitting, this just looks like your specific perspective—driven by those particular motives you mentioned earlier—that led you to jump into this thread.
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
It sounds like you either knew him personally, which would explain why you're so certain, or you’re an expert in his field calling him out for being unstable—if we're being polite about it—or just plain eccentric.
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
The "otherworldly" side of things is just a fundamental part of human consciousness—it’s what happens when we hit the ceiling of our own intellect and realize how limited our reasoning actually is. And let's be clear: Tesla didn't just dream this up out of thin air.
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
It’s not just about spinning your wheels in place—that’s exactly why we’re even having this conversation. You can't get there through sheer willpower alone. Real breakthroughs happen when consciousness transcends that mental "cage." Think about all those massive scientific leaps made before we even had the tools to measure them. Those weren't products of trial and error or brute-force logic; they were moments of pure, intuitive insight. It’s like a meditative state where the brain finally stops grinding away at the noise, allowing information to flow directly into your awareness. It’s an internal vision, almost spatial, triggered by whatever you're deeply focused on.
Here’s the thing: we don't actually "invent" the principles of nature inside our heads. Those laws aren't just figments of our imagination; they are the active forces driving everything we see in reality. Our brains aren't capable of pure fantasy. Think of the brain not as a creative engine, but as an operational hub for thought within consciousness. It acts as a central station for processing conclusions and storing memory, but the brain itself isn't doing the thinking. Instead, it's consciousness that does the heavy lifting, taking in inputs not just through our five senses, but through deeper layers of the nervous system that operate far beneath our conscious awareness.
Because of how my nervous system is wired, I’ve been having precognitive dreams for years. My intuition isn't some mystical superpower; it’s actually just a byproduct of how I live. For the last 20 years, I’ve made it my life's work to stay balanced. I’m living proof that if you actually put in the effort, you can achieve incredible mental and physical health, total stability, and a perfectly tuned nervous system. Because I’ve cultivated that harmony, my brain is sensitive enough to pick up on subtle impulses that most people completely miss. I become aware of things happening around me that aren't tied to my five senses or whatever task is currently occupying my conscious mind.
Most people miss out on their full potential, even though they have everything it takes to reach it. It’s a shame, really. The reason is simple: they're too distracted by the noise of life. They scatter their mental and physical energy trying to chase every passing whim and unfulfilled desire. But the biggest drain is how people handle psychological hurdles—what most call "problems." Instead of facing them, people try to run away from these emotional states. This avoidance just fuels more negative thoughts and toxic mental loops, which only deepens the struggle. It becomes a vicious cycle where avoiding the issue actually creates more real-world consequences, eventually leading to chronic health issues down the road. It’s like trying to fix a leak by covering the floor with towels instead of just tightening the valve.
For enlightened people, this carries a lot more weight. But when you deal with those rare, brilliant minds who have reached that level? You start seeing actual "miracles"—not in some mystical sense, but in the way they simply perceive and process reality itself.
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
Exactly. We don't actually interact with nature itself; we just deal with our own mental constructs of it. It’s the same issue when we fall into the trap of thinking our personal experience is the only ultimate truth. That whole cycle of a deterministic mind—believing something is impossible simply because we can't conceive of it—is a fiction. And honestly, that kind of mental rigidity is exactly what trips people up and keeps them from functioning properly.
If I claim to have certain abilities that almost nobody in my immediate circle possesses, people usually jump to one of four conclusions: I’m crazy, I’m abnormal, I’m making it up, or I’m delusional. But honestly? That kind of logic is just a mental trap—a fiction built on over-relying on theoretical determinism. At the end of the day, it isn't really about whether you believe me or not; there's no real point in arguing over belief. It all comes down to a simple assumption: deciding whether something is actually possible or if it's fundamentally impossible.
Look, I know this works because I’ve lived it. Meanwhile, someone else isn't just guessing—they're flat-out claiming it's impossible based on a total misconception. I'm not sure if you follow my logic here, but it's essentially a mental loop in that direction.
redbear2 said:Exactly. If it didn't, they would have just kept it to themselves.
I don't really know what constitutes success in your eyes—what the criteria even are—so I can't quite grasp why you're using other people's comments as a benchmark, trying to turn them into proof that they're wrong by reflecting their own logic back at them. It seems like we're talking about two different things here.
I don't see how that matters. Whatever someone manages to achieve, it's their achievement. Period.
From what I can gather from this thread and the other comments, nobody is actually suggesting that personal effort is being undervalued. Quite the opposite.
You don't need to say it outright. We're talking about rationalizing one's own failures.
On the other hand, when looking specifically at Tesla, he explained his experience quite broadly himself.
Tesla wasn't exactly a saint, especially during the later stages of his life.
My argument is that a true contribution to the advancement of the human race is directly linked to the otherworldly (which isn't some distant realm, but an immanent entity, something Tesla himself confirmed).
Why bother with that side of things if it doesn't impact the human race?
Ideas aren't mere inventions or products of human imagination. They are principles that exist and are simply rediscovered. They aren't uncovered through the mental process of conceptualizing reality with thought, but rather through the process of clearing the mind—because thoughts alone wouldn't grant access to them.
I don't follow. Even if the mind is cleared, if something isn't accessible to it, it can't be known.
This isn't about attributing "effort" to someone or something; it's a natural phenomenon. Anything else is just the classic human fiction regarding what reality actually is (an illusion).
A natural phenomenon?
So the stuff you're claiming is reality isn't a fiction? How does that work? Are you the chosen one sent to tell everyone else the truth about the state of things?
Fair enough.
If you take two people with identical talent, the one who puts in the work—the one who grinds, studies, and actually tries to improve—is obviously going to outpace the lazy one who refuses to grow.
Okay.
But raw talent itself isn't something you earn through effort. You're born with it. No amount of hard work changes that fact.
Show me the proof.
Look at it this way: you can't just work your way into being Nikola Tesla. You can't become a genius inventor just by studying harder. You either have it or you don't. And nobody decides that—not the individual, not the parents. It’s decided by a higher power.
I didn't realize biology was considered a "higher power." People tend to wrap mysteries in mysticism whenever they don't understand how something works.
Even Tesla admitted his inventions weren't really "his." He claimed he received them as visions and sketches that just appeared to him. Who sent those sketches to Tesla? They didn't exactly mail themselves, did they? Just a thought. Cheers.
I've read theories suggesting that brilliant, innovative ideas often seem to arrive "out of nowhere." But really, it's just the byproduct of deep, conscious thought. What the brain needs is time and the right environment to let the subconscious bridge gaps between seemingly unrelated concepts. That's when the most creative solutions surface. Usually, it happens during mindless tasks like showering or taking a walk. When you focus too intensely on a single point, you actually block those connections. That's why the "lightbulb moment" usually hits you while you're sitting in a bathroom stall.
Insights regarding the fundamental principles of existence are much more likely to be found in spiritual literature than in science. In the classic sense of the conventional materialist paradigm, science doesn't just fail to provide answers—it often offers incredibly narrow insights limited strictly by its own methodology and subject matter (matter itself). When science does offer hypotheses, they are merely tailored to that restricted scope, which practically leads people straight into error. If you're actually interested in this, I can point you toward some resources.
