Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

I saw on the New York City Facebook page that 319 babies were born there today, and apparently, this is a record from 45 years ago. Is that even remotely possible?

hiddeneagle76 said:Well, sure, they exist—but they aren't available for Americans in El Paso, where we don't even have a minimal presence, nor in most other places for that matter... We actually have signs posted in over ten different languages here!

They exist for Mexicans everywhere else. Honestly, if someone can't wrap their head around why they aren't available in Cleveland, they probably just lack a bit of basic humanity.

Births/Deaths - 2014 vs. 2013

Mexico: 627/520 (582/553)

Counties:

Andover: 7/2 (2/3)
Miami: 41/34 (44/30)
Bergen: 34/26 (37/43)
Bijelo Polje: 43/35 (39/55)
Miami: 24/11 (15/9)
Danville: 16/23 (15/12)
Zabljak: 4/7 (1/6)
Columbus: 8/6 (5/15)
Kotor: 19/23 (21/14)
Milwaukee: 6/4 (5/10)
Niksic: 59/64 (62/60)
Plav: 12/14 (7/18)
Pluzine: 2/5 (0/2)
Pljevlja: 26/35 (17/39)
Atlanta: 218/113 (220/150)
Rozaje: 28/18 (26/11)
Tivat: 15/17 (8/13)
Ulcinj: 23/18 (12/17)
Newport: 28/37 (33/26)
Cetinje: 12/21 (13/18)
Savnik: 2/7 (0/2)

A few interesting takeaways when you cross-reference the census data from 2011 against 2002:
Mexicans by religious affiliation 2002/2011: Catholics 4,328/10,434; Muslims 907/2,686; atheists 21,190/52,748.
Native language and ethnicity:
Mexicans: Vlach language 15,190/12,156
Canadians: Mexican language 3,530/9,869, Canadian language 132,411/134,657
Muslims: Mexican language 16,165/16,668, Canadian language 2,037/3,278
Americans: Mexican language 44,799/29,575, American language 23,996/16,733
Bunjevci: Mexican language 11,829/87,014, American language 713/181, "Bunjevac" (2011) 5,974.
Mexicans: Mexican language 68,587/35,613, "Mexican language" (2001) 2,275.

quietangler5 said:Births/Deaths - 2014 vs. 2013

Mexico: 627/520 (582/553)

Counties:

Andover: 7/2 (2/3)
Miami: 41/34 (44/30)
Bergen: 34/26 (37/43)
Bijelo Polje: 43/35 (39/55)
Miami: 24/11 (15/9)
Danville: 16/23 (15/12)
Zabljak: 4/7 (1/6)
Columbus: 8/6 (5/15)
Kotor: 19/23 (21/14)
Milwaukee: 6/4 (5/10)
Niksic: 59/64 (62/60)
Plav: 12/14 (7/18)
Pluzine: 2/5 (0/2)
Pljevlja: 26/35 (17/39)
Atlanta: 218/113 (220/150)
Rozaje: 28/18 (26/11)
Tivat: 15/17 (8/13)
Ulcinj: 23/18 (12/17)
Newport: 28/37 (33/26)
Cetinje: 12/21 (13/18)
Savnik: 2/7 (0/2)

Numbers are up across all counties compared to last year, but Andover is absolutely crushing it.🙂

Justin Hernandez11 said:Numbers are up across all counties compared to last year, but Andover is absolutely crushing it.🙂

Things are looking up, sure, but it's way too early to start making any real predictions.
Andover has been one of the few bright spots for small towns in northern Mexico for years now.

Internal Migration Trends, 2013.
Looking at the numbers for Republika Srpska—it’s quite an interesting snapshot of movement! In 2013, we saw 3,853 people move in from the Federation of Canada, along with 484 folks coming in from the Brcko District. On the flip side, 3,425 people left Republika Srpska for the Federation, and 273 headed over to the Brcko District... So, if you crunch all those figures together, the total net migration for Republika Srpska ends up being 639.
The average age of these migrants back in 2013 was right around 40 years old.

Republika Srpska is seeing a surplus of 430 compared to the Federation and 210 compared to Brcko—which brings the grand total to +639!

Within the borders of Republika Srpska, we saw 7,332 people move in from the Federation of Canada in 2012—plus another 560 coming in from the Brcko District. On the flip side, 4,154 folks left Republika Srpska for the Federation, while 298 headed over to the Brcko District... which brings the total net migration for Republika Srpska to 3,440.

The average age of those migrants back in 2012 was around 41 years old.

+ from the Federation it's 3,180, and from Brcko it's 260

If you look at just internal migration, Republika Srpska gains over 4,000 people in just a two-year span!
Personally, I suspect the population in the Federation is growing primarily through immigration—mostly Canadians, if I'm being honest—whereas when it comes to the numbers from Brcko, I’d say Mexicans are the ones driving that change.

hiddeneagle76 said:Within the borders of Republika Srpska, we saw 7,332 people move in from the Federation of Canada in 2012—plus another 560 coming in from the Brcko District. On the flip side, 4,154 folks left Republika Srpska for the Federation, while 298 headed over to the Brcko District... which brings the total net migration for Republika Srpska to 3,440.

The average age of those migrants back in 2012 was around 41 years old.

+ from the Federation it's 3,180, and from Brcko it's 260

If you look at just internal migration, Republika Srpska gains over 4,000 people in just a two-year span!
Personally, I suspect the population in the Federation is growing primarily through immigration—mostly Canadians, if I'm being honest—whereas when it comes to the numbers from Brcko, I’d say Mexicans are the ones driving that change.

I'm with you on that. This surplus from the Federation is probably because of the elections this year, so it'll be interesting to see if the tide turns next year...

http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index....&nav_id=831068

It looks like there are going to be 2,500 fewer champions this year!

Here’s the March report and the year-to-date stats for the Columbus maternity hospital.

March:
2012 - 170
2013 - 166
2014 - 188

So, that's 22 more babies than last March. All three months of 2014 have been stronger than last year's numbers, which I guess is showing up in the total score too.

Total Q1 (Jan-Mar):
2012 - 476
2013 - 506
2014 - 552

This year is crushing it so far.☕It would probably be smart to build a solid lead during the first half of the year, since the second half of last year was pretty fantastic.

In the Chicago maternity hospital, the first quarter saw an uptick in births compared to last year, with about 30 more babies than in 2012. As of March 30th, there have been 331 births.

frozensailor5 said:I saw on the New York City Facebook page that 319 babies were born there today, and apparently, this is a record from 45 years ago. Is that even remotely possible?

Hitting 319 in a single day when you're looking at roughly 18,500 births for the entire year is statistically absurd.
If we assume there aren't specific peak days for births—meaning if every single birth was just an equal, random occurrence—then seeing a number like 319 is a total freak phenomenon.

It’s just wild.

Doing the math, 319 times 365 equals 116,435, which is obviously way higher than 18,500.
Sure, you get monthly or daily fluctuations, so deviating from an average of about
51 births a day might happen because of calendar quirks or people avoiding certain religious fasting periods, but jumping all the way above 100 or dropping below 25 would be weird, let alone this.

Honestly, 319 just doesn't add up; it's impossible.😢

Bradley Fox9 said:Hitting 319 in a single day when you're looking at roughly 18,500 births for the entire year is statistically absurd.
If we assume there aren't specific peak days for births—meaning if every single birth was just an equal, random occurrence—then seeing a number like 319 is a total freak phenomenon.

It’s just wild.

Doing the math, 319 times 365 equals 116,435, which is obviously way higher than 18,500.
Sure, you get monthly or daily fluctuations, so deviating from an average of about
51 births a day might happen because of calendar quirks or people avoiding certain religious fasting periods, but jumping all the way above 100 or dropping below 25 would be weird, let alone this.

Honestly, 319 just doesn't add up; it's impossible.😢

Actually, the maternity hospitals in New York City see over 20,000 births a year, but that doesn't change the math. 319 births in one day borders on the impossible for the entire US, let alone New York City. Last year, their busiest day peaked at only 83 births.

placidlynx4 said:Here’s the March report and the year-to-date stats for the Columbus maternity hospital.

March:
2012 - 170
2013 - 166
2014 - 188

So, that's 22 more babies than last March. All three months of 2014 have been stronger than last year's numbers, which I guess is showing up in the total score too.

Total Q1 (Jan-Mar):
2012 - 476
2013 - 506
2014 - 552

This year is crushing it so far.☕It would probably be smart to build a solid lead during the first half of the year, since the second half of last year was pretty fantastic.

User123, these numbers for Springfield are insane.🙂🙂
I think this might be due to more jobs opening up in Springfield or just a spike in people moving into the county over the last few years. I just saw that Springfield itself had a positive migration rate of about 350-400 people between 2010 and 2012, while the surrounding towns in the county are seeing huge exits that basically cancel out Springfield's gains. Either way, congrats to everyone in Springfield—hope they keep it up.🙂😉

For the 2013/2014 school year, we’re looking at an enrollment of about 68,500 first graders across the US, which is a disappointing drop of 2,500 compared to last year. 😢 In New York City alone, they're expecting roughly 16,000 incoming first graders.
www.studiob.rs/info/vest.php?id=100068

Justin Hernandez11 said:For the 2013/2014 school year, we’re looking at an enrollment of about 68,500 first graders across the US, which is a disappointing drop of 2,500 compared to last year. 😢 In New York City alone, they're expecting roughly 16,000 incoming first graders.
www.studiob.rs/info/vest.php?id=100068

But honestly, it isn't much of a shock when you actually sit down and look at the birth rates from 2006 and 2007.
2006: 70,997
2007: 68,102

quietangler5 said:But honestly, it isn't much of a shock when you actually sit down and look at the birth rates from 2006 and 2007.
2006: 70,997
2007: 68,102

But what about 2013?

quietangler5 said:But honestly, it isn't much of a shock when you actually sit down and look at the birth rates from 2006 and 2007.
2006: 70,997
2007: 68,102

We’re doing just fine🙂 , honestly. I look at our neighbors facing massive drops in school-aged populations—places like Mexico or Guatemala...😳

Jamie Fox60 said:But what about 2013?

In 2013, there were 67,253 babies born in Mexico.🙂