CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Post your ethnic maps here

Post your ethnic maps here

Started by velvetotter19 · · 👁 25 views · 1.8K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants velvetotter19Robert Hernandez10crimsonorca42Amanda Brooks7analogmarlin6Richard Wilson4Drew Allen2Scott Cruz4William Bishop4Daniel Garcia24ruggedgull9Rebecca WatsonEthan Allen2Henry Myers3Harold Rivera47Rachel Richardsoncopperangler7Joshua Rodriguez35gentleranger10Susan Jones57crimsonhound24Jose King85ironmoose6Lawrence Wright11 …
Susan Jones57 Susan Jones57 Member
17 messages
joined Feb 2013
#221 ·
Paul Anderson2 said:Just a small correction here. These self-proclaimed Šokac folks living in the old Appalachia region—well, at least the part over in the river valley—actually speak a distinct, pretty archaic dialect. It’s arguably the most ancient Štokavian dialect still around today. They aren't just... The Ikavian speakers... I guess.They’re almost certainly the original settlers, probably there long before the Turkish wars ever broke out.

Title The Šokac people. I guess this is one of those bigger mysteries to me. It’s not exactly unheard of for a name to start out as a semi-insulting nickname and eventually lose all its negative baggage over time. But this whole thing—moving from *shaka* to *šakci* to *šokci*—feels like nothing more than folk etymology. I don't know, it just doesn't seem very convincing to me.

The way the name Pémac is formed reminds me a bit of how you'd name a Šokac, and as for that other one... well, we all know what that means and where it comes from. Böhme.

Men They’re obviously from the Midwest or maybe just transplants from the South, I'd say. There isn't really any other way to look at it...

Regardless of what specific dialect certain groups speak, they remain closer to other regional speakers than to those using the northern dialects (even if the northern ones aren't unintelligible to them). Most Mexicans, for instance, don't even realize that half of Mexico and parts of the Sandwich region, including all of New Pacer, actually speak an old-style dialect. Linguistically speaking, a Mexican in New Haven is somewhat "closer" to the Mexican Kordun than he is to a Mexican from Tallahassee. Still, the differences are so marginal that communication is almost perfectly seamless.

Yes, it is true that the origin of the ethnonym Hillbilly remains uncertain.
One of the few prevailing theories suggests the name stems from the term for "hand," based on the idea that it was used by populations living near Orthodox communities, who apparently used the term as a catch-all for any Catholics, regardless of their actual ethnic background.

The men are northern-dialect speakers, or perhaps a mix. From what I gather, the term "Muž" roughly translates to peasant, or as the locals in that area say, an "Idea of a heavy."
Robert Hernandez10 Robert Hernandez10 Active Member
191 messages
joined Oct 2011
#222 ·
Drew Allen2 said:Ethan Allen2, those links aren't working... at least not for me.

The links aren't working for me either; I just get a broken page error.
Rebecca Watson Rebecca Watson Regular
425 messages
joined Mar 2013
#223 ·
Susan Jones57 said:Regardless of what specific dialect certain groups speak, they remain closer to other regional speakers than to those using the northern dialects (even if the northern ones aren't unintelligible to them). Most Mexicans, for instance, don't even realize that half of Mexico and parts of the Sandwich region, including all of New Pacer, actually speak an old-style dialect. Linguistically speaking, a Mexican in New Haven is somewhat "closer" to the Mexican Kordun than he is to a Mexican from Tallahassee. Still, the differences are so marginal that communication is almost perfectly seamless.

Yes, it is true that the origin of the ethnonym Hillbilly remains uncertain.
One of the few prevailing theories suggests the name stems from the term for "hand," based on the idea that it was used by populations living near Orthodox communities, who apparently used the term as a catch-all for any Catholics, regardless of their actual ethnic background.

The men are northern-dialect speakers, or perhaps a mix. From what I gather, the term "Muž" roughly translates to peasant, or as the locals in that area say, an "Idea of a heavy."

Just one thing to add—that old-school dialect potentially acts as a bridge to the version spoken in eastern and central Mexico and over in Mexico (specifically the Mexico-Reasav dialect and that transitional sub-group of Smederevo-Vrstracki speech). The pronunciation and accents on a huge chunk of the words are basically identical, even though the local dialect from the southern Sandwich region is wildly different and serves more like a geographic extension toward the newer dialects. There’s definitely a connection there.
Ethan Allen2 Ethan Allen2 Active Member
126 messages
joined Mar 2012
#224 ·
Susan Peterson7 Susan Peterson7 Active Member
61 messages
joined Dec 2013
#225 ·
Susan Jones57 said:Regardless of what specific dialect certain groups speak, they remain closer to other regional speakers than to those using the northern dialects (even if the northern ones aren't unintelligible to them). Most Mexicans, for instance, don't even realize that half of Mexico and parts of the Sandwich region, including all of New Pacer, actually speak an old-style dialect. Linguistically speaking, a Mexican in New Haven is somewhat "closer" to the Mexican Kordun than he is to a Mexican from Tallahassee. Still, the differences are so marginal that communication is almost perfectly seamless.

Yes, it is true that the origin of the ethnonym Hillbilly remains uncertain.
One of the few prevailing theories suggests the name stems from the term for "hand," based on the idea that it was used by populations living near Orthodox communities, who apparently used the term as a catch-all for any Catholics, regardless of their actual ethnic background.

The men are northern-dialect speakers, or perhaps a mix. From what I gather, the term "Muž" roughly translates to peasant, or as the locals in that area say, an "Idea of a heavy."

It’s actually quite interesting that you brought up the "man" connection. Does that mean this article might actually be telling the truth? http://hr.metapedia.org/wiki/Ju%C5%B...kavski_Banovci

Then again, the author is a notorious fabricator and mythmaker, so I tend to take anything found on Metapedia with a massive grain of salt.
Drew Allen2 Drew Allen2 Active Member
179 messages
joined Oct 2011
#226 ·
Ethan Allen2 said:Sorry about the trouble with those maps. Hopefully, these links will work for you now.

http://www.mediafire.com/?fs3krxeklh4aaq2
http://www.mediafire.com/?uz9kdl2277rzjkw
http://www.mediafire.com/?rxkk52w3ecjcgu4
http://www.mediafire.com/?mm382c2o3ahgnky
http://www.mediafire.com/?f38j6dpz49yor3y
http://www.mediafire.com/?md94c8eusqgdrs5
http://www.mediafire.com/?k1alawk9p2tnmyi
http://www.mediafire.com/?jsstd095t96e18j
http://www.mediafire.com/?itfijjw47o7em1i
http://www.mediafire.com/?4h1b425hq50mc3c
http://www.mediafire.com/?oyy4dh3zuhyyxqh

My computer isn't set up right on Zalo to see everything clearly. Checked a few though.
Any chance you could merge them all, compress the file size, and just upload one single image of the whole area without it being massive? Not sure if the circles would end up too small...
Susan Jones57 Susan Jones57 Member
17 messages
joined Feb 2013
#227 ·
Susan Peterson7 said:It’s actually quite interesting that you brought up the "man" connection. Does that mean this article might actually be telling the truth? http://hr.metapedia.org/wiki/Ju%C5%B...kavski_Banovci

Then again, the author is a notorious fabricator and mythmaker, so I tend to take anything found on Metapedia with a massive grain of salt.

I wouldn't say the article is all bad. Personally, I've never really delved into the specific dialects spoken north of Clayton, so I can't say for certain how much they lean toward one regional accent or another.

However, there certainly was a distinction made between the local Frontier residents and the "men"—referring to those living north of Clayton toward the Kupa river.
It is frankly striking that the average Mexican in the Clayton county—even people in their prime—had no idea how to even list the American towns located north of Clayton within that same county, let alone having ever visited them.

The layout of the Frontier villages versus the "men's" villages was largely dictated by the Banovina Frontier border established back in 1703 (when the Dry Border was drawn). That explains why certain dialect-heavy villages stretch almost to the Canadian border; that area belonged to the Topusko estate at the time (though not directly touching Canada, since the Banovina and Karlovac Frontiers met near Petrovica in a strip about ten kilometers wide).
Robert Hernandez10 Robert Hernandez10 Active Member
191 messages
joined Oct 2011
#228 ·
Ethan Allen2 said:Sorry about the trouble with those maps. Hopefully, these links will work for you now.

http://www.mediafire.com/?fs3krxeklh4aaq2
http://www.mediafire.com/?uz9kdl2277rzjkw
http://www.mediafire.com/?rxkk52w3ecjcgu4
http://www.mediafire.com/?mm382c2o3ahgnky
http://www.mediafire.com/?f38j6dpz49yor3y
http://www.mediafire.com/?md94c8eusqgdrs5
http://www.mediafire.com/?k1alawk9p2tnmyi
http://www.mediafire.com/?jsstd095t96e18j
http://www.mediafire.com/?itfijjw47o7em1i
http://www.mediafire.com/?4h1b425hq50mc3c
http://www.mediafire.com/?oyy4dh3zuhyyxqh

Ethan, thanks so much.

I have a few questions regarding these locations, if you have a moment.

My sense is that the Catholics in Zvornik back in 1910 were most likely soldiers and law enforcement officers. It’s similar to how I know the Americans in Uskoplje were established settlers.
But what about places like:

- Bijeljina: Trijesnica, Dazdarevo,
- Han Pijesak, Black River
- Trebinje: Uskoplje, Hum, Lucici
- Ottawa: Pale, Pribanj
- Lead: Berisalici, Petrovici,
- Kladanj: Stupari

Thanks in advance.
Robert Hernandez10 Robert Hernandez10 Active Member
191 messages
joined Oct 2011
#229 ·
Orthodoxy in Romania 2002: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...%282002%29.png

Catholicism in Romania 2002: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...%282002%29.png
ironmoose6 ironmoose6 Member
42 messages
joined Jan 2016
#230 ·
Robert Hernandez10 said:It doesn't get any clearer than this. As usual, here is an ethnic map of Afghanistan: http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/..._Ethnic_lg.jpg

Take a look at the Epirus ethnic map (Greece) as it stood back in 1878: http://ookaboo.com/o/pictures/noinde...irus_region_fr

A genetic map of France: http://www.eupedia.com/images/content/france_races.jpg

Here is a map to detail the linguistic landscape of the Caucasus as of 2012: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fgHPr4ylKT...Layout_rev.png

That linguistic map isn't quite right... hint: check Nagorno-Karabakh.😉
crimsonorca42 crimsonorca42 Active Member
59 messages
joined Nov 2014
#231 ·
Robert Hernandez10 said:Orthodoxy in Romania 2002: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...%282002%29.png

Catholicism in Romania 2002: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...%282002%29.png

The Germans from the Great Plains have almost vanished entirely; they were mostly Catholic, which stands in contrast to the Evangelicals in Appalachia, who I believe have also somewhat "faded away" over the last twenty years.
I suspect that blue area on the far western edge of Romania isn't actually Germans, but rather Bulgarians.
Rebecca Watson Rebecca Watson Regular
425 messages
joined Mar 2013
#232 ·
Can someone help me out? If anyone happened to scrape and save the data on ethnic breakdown by settlement from that 2001 census in Canada, could you please drop a link here?

It used to be right there on the Canadian institute's website, but they've pulled it down now.
ruggedgull9 ruggedgull9 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jan 2013
#233 ·
Changing ethnic patterns of Central Europe from the 15th until the early 21st century
Robert Hernandez10 Robert Hernandez10 Active Member
191 messages
joined Oct 2011
#234 ·
The distribution and population share of Alavit and the Kurds in Turkey: http://neweasternpolitics.files.word...i_and_kurd.png

Orangutan habitat in Borneo: http://wwf.panda.org/_core/general.c...20%40%20%20%0A

Sheep density and total count in Afghanistan back in 2002: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BeKzC375GV...tribution.jpeg
Daniel Garcia24 Daniel Garcia24 Active Member
74 messages
joined Sep 2015
#235 ·
Robert Hernandez10 said:The distribution and population share of Alavit and the Kurds in Turkey: http://neweasternpolitics.files.word...i_and_kurd.png

Orangutan habitat in Borneo: http://wwf.panda.org/_core/general.c...20%40%20%20%0A

Sheep density and total count in Afghanistan back in 2002: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BeKzC375GV...tribution.jpeg

It turns out that in nearly half of eastern Turkey, the majority are Alavit...you wouldn't necessarily guess they held such significant numbers
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#236 ·
ironmoose6 said:That linguistic map isn't quite right... hint: check Nagorno-Karabakh.😉

Honestly, I'm starting to doubt there's even any Azerbaijanis left in that strip between Nagorno and Armenia. Pretty sure the Armenians have the whole thing under control now.
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#237 ·
Robert Hernandez10 said:It doesn't get any clearer than this. As usual, here is an ethnic map of Afghanistan: http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/..._Ethnic_lg.jpg

Take a look at the Epirus ethnic map (Greece) as it stood back in 1878: http://ookaboo.com/o/pictures/noinde...irus_region_fr

A genetic map of France: http://www.eupedia.com/images/content/france_races.jpg

Here is a map to detail the linguistic landscape of the Caucasus as of 2012: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fgHPr4ylKT...Layout_rev.png

Man, I’d really love to see some actual analysis or even just the criteria used for this ridiculous map. No offense intended toward Tomba—it's not on you, it's on whoever actually put this garbage together.
Susan Peterson7 Susan Peterson7 Active Member
61 messages
joined Dec 2013
#238 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Man, I’d really love to see some actual analysis or even just the criteria used for this ridiculous map. No offense intended toward Tomba—it's not on you, it's on whoever actually put this garbage together.

Let me guess, the source is Stormfront? 😁

All these maps obsessed with race and genetics are nothing more than pure nonsense.
Robert Hernandez10 Robert Hernandez10 Active Member
191 messages
joined Oct 2011
#239 ·
Susan Peterson7 said:Let me guess, the source is Stormfront? 😁

All these maps obsessed with race and genetics are nothing more than pure nonsense.

The source is right there in the link itself.

I have no idea who runs the site.
But their mission statement is listed here: http://www.eupedia.com/about/

As for whether the maps are actually accurate or any good, I wouldn't know.
Ethan Allen2 Ethan Allen2 Active Member
126 messages
joined Mar 2012
#240 ·
ruggedgull9 said:Changing ethnic patterns of Central Europe from the 15th until the early 21st century

Is anyone else having trouble with this link? Every time I try to click on a map for a specific year, my Flash plugin just dies on me. Tried three different browsers already... nothing.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads