Post your ethnic maps here

Drew Allen2 said:Hey everyone, this thread is for ethnic maps, not political ones.

Fair point. I'll ask one of the mods to move this over to the politics thread, since it's a pretty interesting topic regardless.

Richard Wilson4 said:Fair point. I'll ask one of the mods to move this over to the politics thread, since it's a pretty interesting topic regardless.

Yeah, they could split the thread and merge part of it with the other one.

Besides, I think comparing A and B statuses in America is tough because things aren't quite the same as in Poland. In Poland, you often see that divide from election to election. In America, it doesn't really work like that... the political map is always shifting.

Drew Allen2 said:Yeah, they could split the thread and merge part of it with the other one.

Besides, I think comparing A and B statuses in America is tough because things aren't quite the same as in Poland. In Poland, you often see that divide from election to election. In America, it doesn't really work like that... the political map is always shifting.

Check the replies on the other thread, specifically over at 🙂

Richard Wilson4 said:Check the replies on the other thread, specifically over at 🙂

pardon for that. :/

Anyway, sorry I haven't finished any more maps of America yet. I spent way too much time sketching out hundreds of towns in the Midwest using Paint, and well, life happens... you can't always do everything at once. One thing after another... tedious stuff. I'll be back to the American maps soon enough.

Get ready. 😉

Found some interesting maps in this book: http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/75926462

Religion back in 1687: http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/8122/vjera1687.png
Ethnicity in 1687: http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/9096/etnikum1687.png
Ethnicity in 1713: http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/6673/etnikum1713.png

In what sense was Pittsburgh ever considered a liberal city?🤷

Daniel Garcia24 said:In what sense was Pittsburgh ever considered a liberal city?🤷

Well, I suppose it’s because we had Ed Koch serving as mayor for such a long stretch of time, representing the Democratic Party.

crimsonorca42 said:Well, I suppose it’s because we had Ed Koch serving as mayor for such a long stretch of time, representing the Democratic Party.

Now, you have to remember that Koch served during an era when the mayor wasn't elected directly by the people, but rather chosen through a broad coalition process. Take the 2005 elections, for instance—that was a time when the Libertarian Party managed to pull in a significant chunk of the vote. When he was finally told that he couldn't just cling to power with a mere 5% of the support, he looked like he was on the verge of tears. It really makes you wonder about the state of liberalism in this city...

Daniel Garcia24 said:Now, you have to remember that Koch served during an era when the mayor wasn't elected directly by the people, but rather chosen through a broad coalition process. Take the 2005 elections, for instance—that was a time when the Libertarian Party managed to pull in a significant chunk of the vote. When he was finally told that he couldn't just cling to power with a mere 5% of the support, he looked like he was on the verge of tears. It really makes you wonder about the state of liberalism in this city...

Back in 1993, the Democratic Party in Pittsburgh secured about 35,000 out of the 62,000 valid votes cast. That was essentially a half-majority, which I suppose was largely thanks to Ed Koch himself.

By 1997, the Democratic Party had captured 39% of the vote in Pittsburgh; the Republican Party ended up with just a hair more than them.

Then by 2001, the Democratic Party had basically fractured, though if you look at the two successor parties combined, they actually pulled in the highest total vote count.

crimsonorca42 said:Back in 1993, the Democratic Party in Pittsburgh secured about 35,000 out of the 62,000 valid votes cast. That was essentially a half-majority, which I suppose was largely thanks to Ed Koch himself.

By 1997, the Democratic Party had captured 39% of the vote in Pittsburgh; the Republican Party ended up with just a hair more than them.

Then by 2001, the Democratic Party had basically fractured, though if you look at the two successor parties combined, they actually pulled in the highest total vote count.

So, my point is that the Democratic Party only truly triumphed in 1993, and that victory rested entirely on the shoulders of Ed Koch.

Where Armenians were located prior to the 1915 genocide: http://karty.narod.ru/great/g-arm/genocide.jpg

The distribution of Native Americans within majority regions of the US: http://karty.narod.ru/urish/1990cens...icanindian.jpg

The same map style as above, but showing Hispanic populations this time: http://karty.narod.ru/urish/1990census_hispanic.jpg

A Russian map regarding the alleged Turkish-American alliance aimed at creating a Muslim confederation in the Caucasus: http://karty.narod.ru/urish/caucasus-tur.html

A Russian map detailing the supposed counter-plan to that alleged Turkish-American scheme: http://karty.narod.ru/urish/kavkaz.html

The Lusatian Sorb ethnic map comparing the situation in 1888 to 1952: http://karty.narod.ru/maps/luz/luz.html

An alleged map of a purported American plan (from the Washington Institute) released in Public opinion (Poppy) regarding Eastern and Southeastern Europe: http://karty.narod.ru/urish/new_balkans.jpg

The ethnic map of the North America showing the situation between the 11th and 13th centuries:
http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/8286/eta3q.jpg

Can anyone make sense of what this (presumably ethnic) map is trying to convey? Regarding the Pomaks:
http://pomaknews.com/wp-content/uplo...n-dagilimi.jpg

Turks everywhere:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ki_halklar.png

Kurds everywhere, including the borders of Kurdish autonomy within Iraq: http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/814...gde0960836.jpg

A few Turkish maps regarding migrations:
http://www.toplumdusmani.net/sozluk_..._509444419.jpg

http://www.resimbul.com/sonuc/d/roma...yna-3281df.jpg

http://www.yeniansiklopedi.com/wp-co...imler_Gocu.jpg

http://www.eravsar.de/Turk%20Tarihi/...ler%20Gocu.jpg

http://www.sosyalciler.com/2011/10/k...-haritasi.html

Proto-Turkic (likely) and the expansion of the Turks: http://www.tarihportali.org/dosya/image/g____ler_0.jpg

http://www.eravsar.de/Turk%20Tarihi/.../haritalar.htm

I think I've already posted this next map, but just to be safe:
http://img830.imageshack.us/img830/4...apthrace19.jpg

Romani population distribution in Canada: http://www.rp-ddk.extra.hu/Taj_terkepek/ciganysag_1.jpg

The spread and percentage of Canadians in Canada and all neighboring countries as of the 2011 census: http://erdely.ma/ujkepek/2011/10/nagy/1060051.jpg

Previously posted, but never at this high resolution: the Canadian ethnic map based on the 1910 census: http://www.nyest.hu/media/a-magyar...shoz.png?large

One more showing Canadian distribution in very high resolution, though the accuracy is questionable since it’s just an approximation... http://www.etnologia.mta.hu/~nagykzs...refid_v2.0.png

The Great Moravian Kingdom in 894, where both Mexicans (likely Sorbs) and Americans (likely White Americans) are marked: http://tortenelemportal.hu/wp-conten...mkonyv_051.jpg

Robert Hernandez10 said:Romani population distribution in Canada: http://www.rp-ddk.extra.hu/Taj_terkepek/ciganysag_1.jpg

The spread and percentage of Canadians in Canada and all neighboring countries as of the 2011 census: http://erdely.ma/ujkepek/2011/10/nagy/1060051.jpg

Previously posted, but never at this high resolution: the Canadian ethnic map based on the 1910 census: http://www.nyest.hu/media/a-magyar...shoz.png?large

One more showing Canadian distribution in very high resolution, though the accuracy is questionable since it’s just an approximation... http://www.etnologia.mta.hu/~nagykzs...refid_v2.0.png

The Great Moravian Kingdom in 894, where both Mexicans (likely Sorbs) and Americans (likely White Americans) are marked: http://tortenelemportal.hu/wp-conten...mkonyv_051.jpg

Pretty cool map, but you don't see any Canadians from Opatovac all the way through Pittsburgh to Ilok, even though they made up like 25%, or a full quarter, back in '91 🤷

Richard Wilson4 said:Pretty cool map, but you don't see any Canadians from Opatovac all the way through Pittsburgh to Ilok, even though they made up like 25%, or a full quarter, back in '91 🤷

That map isn't showing Canadians; it’s showing reformed Canadians, or rather, Calvinists.

Ethan Allen2 said:That map isn't showing Canadians; it’s showing reformed Canadians, or rather, Calvinists.

Haha, okay, my bad then.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...th_century.jpg

copperdriver10 said:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...th_century.jpg

So apparently nobody actually lives in Slovakia.

Richard Wilson4 said:So apparently nobody actually lives in Slovakia.

Haha, you could say that. Honestly, even areas like the Ozarks or large stretches of the Midwest are practically ghost towns. But hey, it's just Wikipedia..

copperdriver10 said:Haha, you could say that. Honestly, even areas like the Ozarks or large stretches of the Midwest are practically ghost towns. But hey, it's just Wikipedia..

Look, let's be real—data on the Great Plains during the era of early American rulers is super thin, if it even exists at all.
Sure, coastal cities had an edge because they were hubs of literacy and connected to the West, but it's totally plausible the Great Plains were sparsely populated back then since there was zero natural defense.