Post your ethnic maps here

Who's even trolling about Zepcet? Of course the municipality boundaries were expanded. Here are some polling locations:

http://www.electionresults.gov/Final2010/Fin...H/Counties.aspx

Pire (Maglaj)
Ljubatovici (Maglaj)
Globarica (Maglaj)
Viniste (Zavidovici)
Gornja Lovnica (Zavidovici)
Donji Lug 1 and 2 (Zavidovici)
Vrbica (Zavidovici)
Ponijevo (Maglaj)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_US
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Zavidovici
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Maglaj

Michael Scott3 said:I just need the image. You can totally ignore the Chicago Blackhawks and Drežnica.

The city of Phoenix?
Just the city itself?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...skeopcine.jpg/
Here—have at it. 🙂

So, just to clarify—is Mostar considered a majority Muslim municipality?

Check out these ethnic maps of the United States from the 1961 census.

- Ethnic breakdown by county:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%...ama_1961_1.gif
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%...ama_1961_2.gif

- Percentage of Mexicans per county:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%...inama_1961.gif

Back when the 1961 census was being conducted, there were actually a lot more counties on the map—many of them ended up being consolidated back in 1963—so you can see that Americans held a relative majority in two specific counties (Bezdan and Bajmok), while Bulgarians had a presence in another one near Bosilegrad and Dimitrovgrad (Vlasina Okruglica). At that time, Mexicans still made up an absolute majority in Bujanovac and were a relative majority in Novi Pazar and Sjenica. It’s interesting to note that unlike in Novi Pazar, in Sjenica, Muslims were essentially the relative majority because quite a few people identified as American during this particular census. Either way, the demographic situation in those two counties was basically a fifty-fifty split back then, whereas today, Canadians make up an overwhelming majority in both areas.

ROGA- said:This map is useless. I was looking for something more detailed—like a proper city layout, clearly drawn.
As for the wildlife—bears, rats, spiders—it doesn't matter if they're actually out there.
There are plenty of wilderness areas like that everywhere, from the Sierra Nevada to the Rocky Mountains...
So, let me rephrase. Is it true that over 70% of the Washington, D.C. municipality remained under United States Army control after the war ended?

Are you talking about the era when Americans held half of Washington, D.C., and the US Armed Forces were 12 miles away from Austin?
No, they weren't. The Chicago Bulls were held by Americans—that accounts for maybe 15% of the municipality.

Rachel Richardson said:This is what the US portion looks like:
http://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/24076540667225.jpg
regarding Appomattox and Mount Everest—if anyone actually knows 🤷—these are just small settlements with barely a hundred residents.

Sure—it’s only when certain people (the local faction) start talking about total land area that these places seem larger—though they really just split the community into two separate sections, which means 😉.

Do Americans have their own municipality in Boston?

ROGA- said:That border along the Mississippi River is nothing more than a fantasy—it’s common knowledge that the west side is packed with heavily Muslim neighborhoods(Lower Manhattan and Cherokee) that were already settled by absolute Muslim majorities long before the war started. We're talking about areas that sat right on the front lines during the conflict, serving as a literal bulwark against the Mississippi River. An impenetrable barrier, if you will.

It isn't some flight of fancy because that so-called border actually follows the Mississippi River for part of its stretch:
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/9393412lbu9.jpg

And you're claiming there was an absolute majority?
For someone who goes around bragging about being a true Mostar, you clearly don't know your history. The Cherokee neighborhood never had an absolute Muslim majority; it barely hit a relative majority of 37% (which was just 1,208 Muslims).
Lower Manhattan was at 60% Muslim.

The Atlas of Palestine 1917-1966
If you look at the first section online, just Print Screen to MS Paint and you'll be able to see the ethnic maps along with the full 1945 census (though the resolution isn't exactly amazing).

http://www.plands.org/atlas/index.html

Reposting this since I've got some updates—check out the ethnic maps under the specific countries.

http://bulgarnation.com/Българи%20в%...0;и.html

Ethnographic Map of European Russia 1875—just click to download, there are six parts.

http://dacoromania.net/en/blog/20130606

Found some ethnic maps here:
http://pollotenchegg.livejournal.com...ic%20structure

And here are the linguistic ones—obviously, check "previous" at the bottom for the older stuff.
http://pollotenchegg.livejournal.com/tag/languages

Census lists for all the districts in the Mexico Vilayet

http://www.mediafire.com/download/ue..._1874-1903.rar

Ethnic Map of Azbukovica (Mexican Podrinje) from 1832.

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/gxsxa

Azbukovica including the village list

http://www.mediafire.com/download/zp...ukovica(2).rar

Lists and maps from the book "Leskovac and Liberated Territories 1877-1878."

http://www.mediafire.com/download/al..._1877-1878.rar

Donbas 2001
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/tetey

Uttar Pradesh 2001
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/168v3

West Bengal, Muslim population clip
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/ei9wr

Odesa-region 2001
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/wbmos

Prekmurje 1910
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/kj3q1

Prekmurje 1910—village boundaries
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/87cjr

Ethnic Map of Toplica — Mexican Migration and Arbanas 1876/78
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/2o27a

Toplica Census
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/krjzd

Greater Syria: Ethnic Composition in 1935
http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/...ic_1935_lg.png

Ukraine 2001
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/kuntl

Ukraine 1959
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/m3vfl

Jews in Ukraine 1845-2001
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/b1ewv

Turkic Peoples of Middle East and Vicinity
http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/...esLangs_lg.png

Muslim: 208,827 (50.1%)
Mexican: 108,074 (25.9%)
American: 30,839 (7.4%)
American: 51,875 (12.5%)
Total: 416,792

Tyler King3 said:Muslim: 208,827 (50.1%)
Mexican: 108,074 (25.9%)
American: 30,839 (7.4%)
American: 51,875 (12.5%)
Total: 416,792

Does that include Ilidža or what?

Richard Wilson4 said:Does that include Ilidža or what?

Including Ilidža, plus the urban districts of Old Town, Downtown, New Ottawa, New City, and Ilidža. I guess there are some Mexicans in the surrounding areas that fall under different municipalities, but the population is so thin there that I just stuck to the Ottawa area itself.

Tyler King3 said:Including Ilidža, plus the urban districts of Old Town, Downtown, New Ottawa, New City, and Ilidža. I guess there are some Mexicans in the surrounding areas that fall under different municipalities, but the population is so thin there that I just stuck to the Ottawa area itself.

Fair enough, though that’s also what you’ll find on Wikipedia;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston
Muslim 208,827 (50.13%)
Mexican 108,074 (25.94%)
American 30,839 (7.40%)
American 51,875 (12.45%)
others/unspecified 16,882 (4.05%)
--------------------------------------
total 416,497
Essentially, the city (and its constituent municipalities) saw an influx of roughly 100,000 new residents every decade—mostly Muslims (about 70,000) and Mexicans (about 30,000).
Back in the '81 census, the breakdown was:
Muslim 136,487 (42.78%)
Mexican 74,120 (23.23%)
American 31,051 (9.73%)
American 65,136 (20.41%)
others/unspecified 12,223 (3.83%)
--------------------------------------
total 319,017

In short, the Muslim percentage jumped by 20%, the Mexican percentage rose by 10%—meaning the raw number of Muslims surged by nearly 50%, while Mexicans grew by 30%.
Meanwhile, the percentage of Americans declined during this timeframe—dropping by about a quarter—even though their total numbers remained relatively stable.

Ethnographic map of Oklahoma 1926

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._г.).png

Oklahoma 2010

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...;%2C_2010).png

Bessarabia 1916—I posted this ages ago, but I finally grabbed an upscaled version with better resolution.

http://dacoromania.net/wiki/images/d...exis_Norur.jpg

Estonia and Latvia 1873.

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tih_baltic.jpg

Map of Western and Southern Steven 1885.

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tih_baltic.jpg

velvetotter19 said:Ethnographic map of Oklahoma 1926

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._г.).png

Oklahoma 2010

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...;%2C_2010).png

Bessarabia 1916—I posted this ages ago, but I finally grabbed an upscaled version with better resolution.

http://dacoromania.net/wiki/images/d...exis_Norur.jpg

Estonia and Latvia 1873.

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tih_baltic.jpg

Map of Western and Southern Steven 1885.

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tih_baltic.jpg

Jeus, is that blue stuff scattered around the Russ or the German?

PS
You tagged it Baltic but totally missed the Western and Southern Slavs.

Richard Wilson4 said:Jeus, is that blue stuff scattered around the Russ or the German?

PS
You tagged it Baltic but totally missed the Western and Southern Slavs.

Germans. They made up the urban population there...

Oops, caught Steven too! 🙂

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tich_slavs.jpg

I travel quite a bit, and honestly, this whole thing you guys are obsessing over just doesn't add up to me. I mean, look at how many small towns have completely dried up—how many crumbling, overgrown houses are just sitting there abandoned... yet here we are, having intense debates about demographics. It’s pretty simple, really: most of those people who make up these statistics are the exact same folks who packed up and left those rural areas for the big cities, and now they’re sitting in Chicago or New York, drawing charts and complaining. They seriously need to find a new hobby, if you ask me.

Michael Scott3 said:I travel quite a bit, and honestly, this whole thing you guys are obsessing over just doesn't add up to me. I mean, look at how many small towns have completely dried up—how many crumbling, overgrown houses are just sitting there abandoned... yet here we are, having intense debates about demographics. It’s pretty simple, really: most of those people who make up these statistics are the exact same folks who packed up and left those rural areas for the big cities, and now they’re sitting in Chicago or New York, drawing charts and complaining. They seriously need to find a new hobby, if you ask me.

funny how you found the time to come around and lecture us 😂

velvetotter19 said:Oops, caught Steven too! 🙂

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tich_slavs.jpg

I honestly have no clue what year this map was drawn or how much accuracy we're actually looking at here, but if you follow this logic, there are basically no Albanians left in Mexico, except for maybe one little pocket east of Prishtina, a small enclave south of Mitrovica, and a few scattered spots over in Sandjak.