Susan Green15 said:A human being is not some hundred-headed monster.
It wasn't ME who took the apple; Adam took it.
It wasn't ME who desired to be wiser than God; it was Adam.
God is punishing me for something someone else did several thousand years ago.
This right here is a textbook example of manipulation and mental gymnastics.
If Adam is a man, then sure, you can argue that "a man desired to be like God because Adam was a man," but it is a completely nonsensical and illogical leap to claim that means I personally chose to be like God just because I am a man.
THIS IS A WORD GAME THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO LOGIC OR COMMON SENSE.
This kind of generalization is the very foundation of racism. You accuse an entire race based on bad experiences with a single individual from that group. That way of thinking is immoral.
It’s like if ONE Native American killed a white person, and you decided that "Native Americans decided to kill white people," so they all must be punished, leading you to wipe out all Native Americans simply because they are Native Americans.
If you were a member of a minority group and one person from that group committed a crime, and everyone in that group—including you—was punished because of it, you would be the first one to jump up and say that it's unjust and that you shouldn't be blamed for something someone else did.
Therefore, the example you provided, combined with the one I provided, demonstrates that believers are hypocritical and two-faced. It is both hypocritical and duplicitous to justify this line of reasoning in one instance while condemning it in another.
Your very existence is the result of decisions made by your ancestors.
From your perspective, all those generations of ancestors made the right calls—they survived life-or-death situations, they were vital, strong, productive, ambitious, brave, cunning, hypocritical... etc.—because, well, you exist.
Maybe if one of your ancestors (let’s call him Adam) had made a different choice, the world would be better, but would YOU even exist in that world?
He made a decision (and desired something), and the consequence is that YOU exist... yet then YOU distance yourself from that decision (or those decisions).
Susan Green15 said:A human being is not some hundred-headed monster.
It wasn't ME who took the apple; Adam took it.
It wasn't ME who desired to be wiser than God; it was Adam.
God is punishing me for something someone else did several thousand years ago.
This right here is a textbook example of manipulation and mental gymnastics.
If Adam is a man, then sure, you can argue that "a man desired to be like God because Adam was a man," but it is a completely nonsensical and illogical leap to claim that means I personally chose to be like God just because I am a man.
THIS IS A WORD GAME THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO LOGIC OR COMMON SENSE.
This kind of generalization is the very foundation of racism. You accuse an entire race based on bad experiences with a single individual from that group. That way of thinking is immoral.
It’s like if ONE Native American killed a white person, and you decided that "Native Americans decided to kill white people," so they all must be punished, leading you to wipe out all Native Americans simply because they are Native Americans.
If you were a member of a minority group and one person from that group committed a crime, and everyone in that group—including you—was punished because of it, you would be the first one to jump up and say that it's unjust and that you shouldn't be blamed for something someone else did.
Therefore, the example you provided, combined with the one I provided, demonstrates that believers are hypocritical and two-faced. It is both hypocritical and duplicitous to justify this line of reasoning in one instance while condemning it in another.
🤷
Honestly, I have no idea what racism has to do with anything I just wrote.
Different races share the same faith, including the one involving Adam and his "sin."
By the way,
One of the foundations of racism is when someone claims or writes (even as an example) that a member of one race killed a member of another.
One person killed another person; they might differ in skin color, eye color, build, Social Security number, or name... but somehow YOU highlighted the racial difference above everything else...
Susan Green15 said:A human being is not some hundred-headed monster.
It wasn't ME who took the apple; Adam took it.
It wasn't ME who desired to be wiser than God; it was Adam.
God is punishing me for something someone else did several thousand years ago.
This right here is a textbook example of manipulation and mental gymnastics.
If Adam is a man, then sure, you can argue that "a man desired to be like God because Adam was a man," but it is a completely nonsensical and illogical leap to claim that means I personally chose to be like God just because I am a man.
THIS IS A WORD GAME THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO LOGIC OR COMMON SENSE.
This kind of generalization is the very foundation of racism. You accuse an entire race based on bad experiences with a single individual from that group. That way of thinking is immoral.
It’s like if ONE Native American killed a white person, and you decided that "Native Americans decided to kill white people," so they all must be punished, leading you to wipe out all Native Americans simply because they are Native Americans.
If you were a member of a minority group and one person from that group committed a crime, and everyone in that group—including you—was punished because of it, you would be the first one to jump up and say that it's unjust and that you shouldn't be blamed for something someone else did.
Therefore, the example you provided, combined with the one I provided, demonstrates that believers are hypocritical and two-faced. It is both hypocritical and duplicitous to justify this line of reasoning in one instance while condemning it in another.
Interesting.
Why on earth would you think I’d be the first one jumping in to cry foul?
Susan Green15 said:A human being is not some hundred-headed monster.
It wasn't ME who took the apple; Adam took it.
It wasn't ME who desired to be wiser than God; it was Adam.
God is punishing me for something someone else did several thousand years ago.
This right here is a textbook example of manipulation and mental gymnastics.
If Adam is a man, then sure, you can argue that "a man desired to be like God because Adam was a man," but it is a completely nonsensical and illogical leap to claim that means I personally chose to be like God just because I am a man.
THIS IS A WORD GAME THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO LOGIC OR COMMON SENSE.
This kind of generalization is the very foundation of racism. You accuse an entire race based on bad experiences with a single individual from that group. That way of thinking is immoral.
It’s like if ONE Native American killed a white person, and you decided that "Native Americans decided to kill white people," so they all must be punished, leading you to wipe out all Native Americans simply because they are Native Americans.
If you were a member of a minority group and one person from that group committed a crime, and everyone in that group—including you—was punished because of it, you would be the first one to jump up and say that it's unjust and that you shouldn't be blamed for something someone else did.
Therefore, the example you provided, combined with the one I provided, demonstrates that believers are hypocritical and two-faced. It is both hypocritical and duplicitous to justify this line of reasoning in one instance while condemning it in another.
Let's get real: almost everyone is a bit two-faced and hypocritical at some point.
Believers know this and don't run from it—they call it sin and try to do better. But atheists (and anyone who identifies as such 😁) aren't exactly immune to being double-standarded or fake either.
It’s part of human nature. Honestly? I’d argue it’s even an evolutionary advantage.
But believing that God is good has absolutely nothing to do with being a hypocrite or having a double standard.
A believer thinks there’s a legitimate reason why things are the way they are.
YOU believe that such a reason simply can't exist.
And that's really all there is to it!
Side note:
I suppose it’s a pretty unsettling "realization" for a rational person to have—that we are surrounded by billions of hypocrites, double-dealers, and immoral people... potential bigots, really, whose minds are just a foggy, shapeless mess of ideas that defy any semblance of logic or common sense.
It's terrifying!