CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Religion › Why doesn't God share His knowledge?

Why doesn't God share His knowledge?

Started by Susan Green15 · · 👁 35 views · 659 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Susan Green15Mark Fostercopperdrifter26Lisa Morales4rowdyraven13Benjamin Taylor6Anthony Perez9wearyowl29Nancy Williams58electriccrane80analogstag29Paul Anderson2hiddenbear3Joseph Ward2Gerald Robertsrapidbear65Ronald Nelson2Zachary Gonzalez8Nancy Wilson2Olivia Kern3blueeagle22Lisa Bailey5electricranger16Kyle White7 …
Ronald Nelson2 Ronald Nelson2 Member
29 messages
joined Feb 2012
#241 ·
analoghound4 said:My crusade against dogma and sheer ignorance has officially reached Master level. I owe you one for that.

If you truly believe you are hearing the voice of God—an assertion you maintain by claiming to have attained some divine enlightenment, blah, blah...—then I suggest it might be time to consult a psychiatrist. With all due respect, auditory hallucinations can be a serious matter. I have read extensively on the subject.🤣

And let me be clear: this isn't an ad hominem attack, nor am I attempting to strike at your character. It is simply absurd to me that in the 21st century, while we sit at the absolute pinnacle of technological advancement, our collective mental state remains stuck somewhere in the Dark Ages.


It’s clear you’ve reached the absolute pinnacle of intelligence. So, please, just step aside and let people with actual substance and sense have a turn to speak.
God "speaks" to us through: actions, everyday occurrences, love, children, peace, kindness... and so much more. It seems you simply don't have the cognitive capacity to grasp that. It's sad, really.
analoghound4 analoghound4 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2012
#242 ·
Ronald Nelson2 said:It’s clear you’ve reached the absolute pinnacle of intelligence. So, please, just step aside and let people with actual substance and sense have a turn to speak.
God "speaks" to us through: actions, everyday occurrences, love, children, peace, kindness... and so much more. It seems you simply don't have the cognitive capacity to grasp that. It's sad, really.

I see you certainly have plenty of capacity, which is a massive advantage! I suppose God gave us a perfect representation of His character when He wiped out 200,000 people in that tsunami all those years ago!🙄

Regarding the bolded part... should I laugh or cry?
Susan Green15 Susan Green15 MemberOP
23 messages
joined Feb 2012
#243 ·
Ronald Nelson2 said:It’s clear you’ve reached the absolute pinnacle of intelligence. So, please, just step aside and let people with actual substance and sense have a turn to speak.
God "speaks" to us through: actions, everyday occurrences, love, children, peace, kindness... and so much more. It seems you simply don't have the cognitive capacity to grasp that. It's sad, really.

And here is yet another example of hypocrisy and double standards—cherry-picking only the "good" things God does while pretending the darker side of existence doesn't exist. Why didn't you mention natural disasters, deaths caused by disease, or anything of that nature? I honestly get the impression that people on this forum who declare themselves believers aren't actually believers; they’re just, how should I put this, provocateurs. It seems to me that true believers tend to shrink away from these topics, closing their eyes and looking away just so they don't have to confront the contradictions and absurdities inherent in their own faith. I truly thought it would be possible to have a decent, logical debate with believers, but instead, they just throw out slogans and empty platitudes. It’s like listening to a politician. They always repeat the same talking points without offering anything concrete; it's all substance-free fluff. I suppose this way of thinking might have worked in the Middle Ages when there was only one book to serve as an information source, but today, given the sheer volume of knowledge, diverse perspectives, and technology available, something just doesn't add up.
analoghound4 analoghound4 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2012
#244 ·
Susan Green15 said:And here is yet another example of hypocrisy and double standards—cherry-picking only the "good" things God does while pretending the darker side of existence doesn't exist. Why didn't you mention natural disasters, deaths caused by disease, or anything of that nature? I honestly get the impression that people on this forum who declare themselves believers aren't actually believers; they’re just, how should I put this, provocateurs. It seems to me that true believers tend to shrink away from these topics, closing their eyes and looking away just so they don't have to confront the contradictions and absurdities inherent in their own faith. I truly thought it would be possible to have a decent, logical debate with believers, but instead, they just throw out slogans and empty platitudes. It’s like listening to a politician. They always repeat the same talking points without offering anything concrete; it's all substance-free fluff. I suppose this way of thinking might have worked in the Middle Ages when there was only one book to serve as an information source, but today, given the sheer volume of knowledge, diverse perspectives, and technology available, something just doesn't add up.

That is precisely my point! I have been attempting to steer their attention toward that very issue. I appreciate you taking the time to compose such a thorough response.😍
bluebison25 bluebison25 Active Member
84 messages
joined Feb 2012
#245 ·
When I think about God and religion, all I see is darkness, chains, and the whip. Yet Ronald Nelson2 won't shut up about how wonderful it all is...
Harold Doyle3 Harold Doyle3 Active Member
216 messages
joined Aug 2006
#246 ·
Susan Green15 said:OKIDOKI

So, from what I can gather, the conclusion is that God simply isn't handing us the knowledge required to save millions from various diseases just so we humans have something to occupy ourselves with—learning, evolving, and growing. In this view, such a God is actually quite benevolent and noble.

On the flip side, if a professional—say, a doctor—withholds knowledge that could prevent people from dying of preventable illnesses, then that individual is nothing short of a criminal.

And yet, a believer who holds both of these premises to be true simultaneously sees absolutely no contradiction in their logic, and they don't consider themselves hypocrites.

I try my absolute hardest to wrap my head around the mindset of believers, but I just cannot grasp that specific mental framework. It’s like trying to navigate through a thick fog of amorphous ideas that are poured out and tangled together in a way that defies all logic and reason. And honestly, you people never provide a concrete answer. You always dodge the point, start rambling about something completely irrelevant, and eventually, every response boils down to some parrot-like repetition: "God is good," "God is noble," "God is almighty," "It's all in the Bible," or "Just open your heart and everything will be explained."

I pose a straightforward question, and there is zero chance of receiving a rational response.
It is nothing but evasion and contradictions.

Don't let the simplicity of a question fool you. Just because someone asks something straightforward doesn't mean the answer will be. Usually, it’s quite the opposite. And when people start dragging out these long-winded, overly complicated explanations? That’s just a fancy way of dodging the point. It’s pure evasion.
A believer doesn't need to go through the exhausting process of making excuses. They aren't obligated to sit there and explain themselves, prove their worth, or offer up some long-winded justification to anyone who asks. It’s just not their job.
Even the believers don't actually have an answer to that question. They just cling to the idea that God is inherently good and noble. They hold onto this belief that there’s some grand reason why the world is such a mess, regardless of what the actual facts are telling us. It's all just faith, really. No logic, just hope.
So, you’re claiming that I’m going out of my way, using every ounce of energy I have, just to try and wrap my head around believers. Honestly? It's a bit much to suggest I'm working that hard. Maybe I am. Maybe I'm not. It’s a heavy topic, isn't it? A lot to unpack. But let's be real—I'm just trying to make sense of things. Sometimes that feels like an uphill battle.
I feel your pain. Honestly, I’ve spent half my life trying to crack the code on how women think, throwing everything I've got at the problem, but I still come up empty-handed. It's like staring at a complex equation where the variables change every five seconds. I just can't wrap my head around that particular logic. Total mystery to me.
I don't doubt their intelligence, their mental stability, or their capacity for rational thought. Not even a little bit.
Maybe one day you'll just throw in the towel too. It happens to the best of us.
If you’re looking for some basic, surface-level answer, go ask Dawkins.

When a decent magician pulls off a trick, everything seems straightforward. Your senses tell you one thing—you saw exactly what happened right in front of your eyes. You can't deny the physical reality of it. But even so, there’s this nagging feeling in the back of your mind. You know, deep down, that you're being played. You know it's an illusion, regardless of whether you have the slightest clue how they actually pulled it off.
Our whole faith is built on one simple idea: the physical laws governing our reality are absolute. They aren't suggestions. They don't bend just because we want them to. They are unbreakable.
Sure, you could argue this isn't some matter of blind faith. It’s more like a hard fact. We have never once detected a single violation of the laws of physics—nature just works the way it works. To me, that makes it a well-founded position rather than just a leap of faith.
Look, I have to admit, claiming that position is absolute is a massive stretch. It’s built on incredibly thin empirical ground. You can't just take a tiny sliver of data and act like you've uncovered some universal truth. It's just not how things work.
We only have a tiny fraction of the actual physical laws at our fingertips. It’s a joke, really. We sit here acting like we've mapped out the entire universe, convinced we've got the blueprint figured out, but we're basically just toddlers playing with blocks in a dark room. Most of what we call "science" is just us squinting through a keyhole, trying to guess what's happening on the other side. We haven't even scratched the surface.
Maybe there’s some deeper set of laws—natural laws we haven't even begun to wrap our heads around yet—that would allow for certain things to happen under specific conditions. Things that, according to every scientific principle currently available to us, are strictly impossible. It's a thought that keeps me up. We think we have the universe figured out, but we're really just scratching the surface of a much larger, much more complex reality.
What exactly governs the laws of nature? I mean, what dictates the rules that rule the universe? And where does that chain actually end? It’s a rabbit hole. If you start pulling on that thread, how deep does it go? What if the entire collection of natural laws is just... infinite? It’s enough to make your head spin.
Then anything is possible.

Here’s a hypothetical scenario where a believer isn't just some walking hypocrite, and where God actually turns out to be good and noble:

Man, it’s the same old story. Humans always want more than just paradise. We look at a perfect situation—something like the Garden of Eden—and we just can't help ourselves. We had to reach for more. It's that ancient, restless urge to be like God, you know? That whole mess with the apple and the serpent... it's baked into our DNA. We crave power we weren't meant to have.

God warned the man that he was looking at a brutal stretch of road—a true Via Dolorosa. It’s a path paved with nothing but suffering, and the kicker is that you have to walk it entirely on your own. You see, you don't become one with God by leaning on someone else's shoulder. You have to face that darkness solo.

...but I guess things are moving along somehow... God hasn't abandoned me—sometimes He sends an "imaginary friend" to play the part of a Child of God and offer some comfort.

I suppose once people finally become like God, they'll be one with Him, just like every single ounce of suffering😢 and joy🙂 encountered along the way.
bluebison25 bluebison25 Active Member
84 messages
joined Feb 2012
#247 ·
You claim to believe that God is good and noble...
But let’s look at this hypothetically. If God exists and everything in this world is the direct result of His actions, then history tells a much darker story. Looking at the reality of our world, it’s impossible to conclude He is anything but indifferent or even malicious. The sheer scale of cruelty inflicted upon humanity—the violence, the theft, the corruption, the endless betrayals—is overwhelming. When you consider that all these atrocities are part of the divine design, there is no way He can be considered good or noble.
rapidbear65 rapidbear65 Active Member
89 messages
joined May 2016
#248 ·
analoghound4 said:My crusade against dogma and sheer ignorance has officially reached Master level. I owe you one for that.

If you truly believe you are hearing the voice of God—an assertion you maintain by claiming to have attained some divine enlightenment, blah, blah...—then I suggest it might be time to consult a psychiatrist. With all due respect, auditory hallucinations can be a serious matter. I have read extensively on the subject.🤣

And let me be clear: this isn't an ad hominem attack, nor am I attempting to strike at your character. It is simply absurd to me that in the 21st century, while we sit at the absolute pinnacle of technological advancement, our collective mental state remains stuck somewhere in the Dark Ages.

Peak technological power??? What are you even talking about?? Technology is just like the steam engine was back then for us. Honestly, most regular people living normal lives don't even realize how far tech has actually gone because it's not part of our daily grind. It stays hidden from us. You, Key, and Rebul actually have a real reason to doubt that God distributes intelligence evenly. But hey, maybe?? maybe you guys are just lucky. They say some people get it high while others get it low... life finds a way to balance things out...
Ronald Nelson2 Ronald Nelson2 Member
29 messages
joined Feb 2012
#249 ·
Susan Green15 said:And here is yet another example of hypocrisy and double standards—cherry-picking only the "good" things God does while pretending the darker side of existence doesn't exist. Why didn't you mention natural disasters, deaths caused by disease, or anything of that nature? I honestly get the impression that people on this forum who declare themselves believers aren't actually believers; they’re just, how should I put this, provocateurs. It seems to me that true believers tend to shrink away from these topics, closing their eyes and looking away just so they don't have to confront the contradictions and absurdities inherent in their own faith. I truly thought it would be possible to have a decent, logical debate with believers, but instead, they just throw out slogans and empty platitudes. It’s like listening to a politician. They always repeat the same talking points without offering anything concrete; it's all substance-free fluff. I suppose this way of thinking might have worked in the Middle Ages when there was only one book to serve as an information source, but today, given the sheer volume of knowledge, diverse perspectives, and technology available, something just doesn't add up.


We aren't seeing eye to eye. It really depends on how you interpret my words. Some people here are just plain rude, and since there are those who actually hold value, I simply respond in the way I see fit. If you're only here to provoke rather than actually discuss faith, why even bother being on a religious forum? Is life really that boring? Maybe find a different hobby. You try to grasp a concept, but then the moment I give you an answer, you resort to this kind of sarcasm that makes me sick. Having culture is an important part of being a person. Do you even know what that means?
bluebison25 bluebison25 Active Member
84 messages
joined Feb 2012
#250 ·
Why do you religious types even bother commenting on matters of science? Your entire existence is built on faith, which is really just a polite way of saying ignorance. You’ve allowed yourselves to swallow dozens of claims without ever bothering to fact-check them. Now, the second we try to put those claims to the test, you all start panicking. Why is that? What's the issue? I’ll say it again: you aren't actually living in faith; you're just pretending to be that devout to look good.
Ronald Nelson2 Ronald Nelson2 Member
29 messages
joined Feb 2012
#251 ·
bluebison25 said:Why do you religious types even bother commenting on matters of science? Your entire existence is built on faith, which is really just a polite way of saying ignorance. You’ve allowed yourselves to swallow dozens of claims without ever bothering to fact-check them. Now, the second we try to put those claims to the test, you all start panicking. Why is that? What's the issue? I’ll say it again: you aren't actually living in faith; you're just pretending to be that devout to look good.


Who are you to judge the depth of my faith?
I'm not panicking at all, so I'm curious as to how you reached that conclusion. For my part, everything I know has been thoroughly vetted.
bluebison25 bluebison25 Active Member
84 messages
joined Feb 2012
#252 ·
Look, I’m not your judge, but it’s pretty obvious your faith is lacking... and don't even get me started on your lack of knowledge.
Ronald Nelson2 Ronald Nelson2 Member
29 messages
joined Feb 2012
#253 ·
bluebison25 said:Look, I’m not your judge, but it’s pretty obvious your faith is lacking... and don't even get me started on your lack of knowledge.

I actually know quite a bit. I wouldn't be posting here if I didn't. You're quick to condemn me, but you don't truly know me—we only exist to each other in this digital space. You have no way of knowing the depth of my faith; only God knows that.
bluebison25 bluebison25 Active Member
84 messages
joined Feb 2012
#254 ·
Online personas can be incredibly revealing. Looking through all these comments, it’s clear that God knows most of you here have absolutely zero clue what you're talking about.
Maria Robinson2 Maria Robinson2 Active Member
158 messages
joined Feb 2012
#255 ·
bluebison25 said:Online personas can be incredibly revealing. Looking through all these comments, it’s clear that God knows most of you here have absolutely zero clue what you're talking about.

... coming from someone who finds it impossible to know God

Why do some people just insist on retreating into their own little dark caves?
There’s no light down there—and certainly no knowledge worth gaining.

And this cynicism... well, it's just unnecessary, and it really brings to mind what Oscar Wilde said:
"A cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing."
Susan Green15 Susan Green15 MemberOP
23 messages
joined Feb 2012
#256 ·
Harold Doyle3 said:Don't let the simplicity of a question fool you. Just because someone asks something straightforward doesn't mean the answer will be. Usually, it’s quite the opposite. And when people start dragging out these long-winded, overly complicated explanations? That’s just a fancy way of dodging the point. It’s pure evasion.
A believer doesn't need to go through the exhausting process of making excuses. They aren't obligated to sit there and explain themselves, prove their worth, or offer up some long-winded justification to anyone who asks. It’s just not their job.
Even the believers don't actually have an answer to that question. They just cling to the idea that God is inherently good and noble. They hold onto this belief that there’s some grand reason why the world is such a mess, regardless of what the actual facts are telling us. It's all just faith, really. No logic, just hope.
So, you’re claiming that I’m going out of my way, using every ounce of energy I have, just to try and wrap my head around believers. Honestly? It's a bit much to suggest I'm working that hard. Maybe I am. Maybe I'm not. It’s a heavy topic, isn't it? A lot to unpack. But let's be real—I'm just trying to make sense of things. Sometimes that feels like an uphill battle.
I feel your pain. Honestly, I’ve spent half my life trying to crack the code on how women think, throwing everything I've got at the problem, but I still come up empty-handed. It's like staring at a complex equation where the variables change every five seconds. I just can't wrap my head around that particular logic. Total mystery to me.
I don't doubt their intelligence, their mental stability, or their capacity for rational thought. Not even a little bit.
Maybe one day you'll just throw in the towel too. It happens to the best of us.
If you’re looking for some basic, surface-level answer, go ask Dawkins.

When a decent magician pulls off a trick, everything seems straightforward. Your senses tell you one thing—you saw exactly what happened right in front of your eyes. You can't deny the physical reality of it. But even so, there’s this nagging feeling in the back of your mind. You know, deep down, that you're being played. You know it's an illusion, regardless of whether you have the slightest clue how they actually pulled it off.
Our whole faith is built on one simple idea: the physical laws governing our reality are absolute. They aren't suggestions. They don't bend just because we want them to. They are unbreakable.
Sure, you could argue this isn't some matter of blind faith. It’s more like a hard fact. We have never once detected a single violation of the laws of physics—nature just works the way it works. To me, that makes it a well-founded position rather than just a leap of faith.
Look, I have to admit, claiming that position is absolute is a massive stretch. It’s built on incredibly thin empirical ground. You can't just take a tiny sliver of data and act like you've uncovered some universal truth. It's just not how things work.
We only have a tiny fraction of the actual physical laws at our fingertips. It’s a joke, really. We sit here acting like we've mapped out the entire universe, convinced we've got the blueprint figured out, but we're basically just toddlers playing with blocks in a dark room. Most of what we call "science" is just us squinting through a keyhole, trying to guess what's happening on the other side. We haven't even scratched the surface.
Maybe there’s some deeper set of laws—natural laws we haven't even begun to wrap our heads around yet—that would allow for certain things to happen under specific conditions. Things that, according to every scientific principle currently available to us, are strictly impossible. It's a thought that keeps me up. We think we have the universe figured out, but we're really just scratching the surface of a much larger, much more complex reality.
What exactly governs the laws of nature? I mean, what dictates the rules that rule the universe? And where does that chain actually end? It’s a rabbit hole. If you start pulling on that thread, how deep does it go? What if the entire collection of natural laws is just... infinite? It’s enough to make your head spin.
Then anything is possible.

Here’s a hypothetical scenario where a believer isn't just some walking hypocrite, and where God actually turns out to be good and noble:

Man, it’s the same old story. Humans always want more than just paradise. We look at a perfect situation—something like the Garden of Eden—and we just can't help ourselves. We had to reach for more. It's that ancient, restless urge to be like God, you know? That whole mess with the apple and the serpent... it's baked into our DNA. We crave power we weren't meant to have.

God warned the man that he was looking at a brutal stretch of road—a true Via Dolorosa. It’s a path paved with nothing but suffering, and the kicker is that you have to walk it entirely on your own. You see, you don't become one with God by leaning on someone else's shoulder. You have to face that darkness solo.

...but I guess things are moving along somehow... God hasn't abandoned me—sometimes He sends an "imaginary friend" to play the part of a Child of God and offer some comfort.

I suppose once people finally become like God, they'll be one with Him, just like every single ounce of suffering😢 and joy🙂 encountered along the way.

A human being is not some hundred-headed monster.
It wasn't ME who took the apple; Adam took it.
It wasn't ME who desired to be wiser than God; it was Adam.
God is punishing me for something someone else did several thousand years ago.
This right here is a textbook example of manipulation and mental gymnastics.
If Adam is a man, then sure, you can argue that "a man desired to be like God because Adam was a man," but it is a completely nonsensical and illogical leap to claim that means I personally chose to be like God just because I am a man.

THIS IS A WORD GAME THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO LOGIC OR COMMON SENSE.

This kind of generalization is the very foundation of racism. You accuse an entire race based on bad experiences with a single individual from that group. That way of thinking is immoral.

It’s like if ONE Native American killed a white person, and you decided that "Native Americans decided to kill white people," so they all must be punished, leading you to wipe out all Native Americans simply because they are Native Americans.

If you were a member of a minority group and one person from that group committed a crime, and everyone in that group—including you—was punished because of it, you would be the first one to jump up and say that it's unjust and that you shouldn't be blamed for something someone else did.

Therefore, the example you provided, combined with the one I provided, demonstrates that believers are hypocritical and two-faced. It is both hypocritical and duplicitous to justify this line of reasoning in one instance while condemning it in another.
Susan Green15 Susan Green15 MemberOP
23 messages
joined Feb 2012
#257 ·
Ronald Nelson2 said:We aren't seeing eye to eye. It really depends on how you interpret my words. Some people here are just plain rude, and since there are those who actually hold value, I simply respond in the way I see fit. If you're only here to provoke rather than actually discuss faith, why even bother being on a religious forum? Is life really that boring? Maybe find a different hobby. You try to grasp a concept, but then the moment I give you an answer, you resort to this kind of sarcasm that makes me sick. Having culture is an important part of being a person. Do you even know what that means?

Look, my point was simply that it feels hypocritical and two-faced to claim:
"God "speaks" to us through: His works, everyday events, love, children, peace, and kindness..."
In other words, you're cherry-picking all the good things God does while intentionally ignoring the evil.

How do you justify listing only the positive attributes while conveniently omitting all the horrors?

Sure, love, children, peace, and kindness exist in this world, but so do hatred, malice, and war. Whether God directly orchestrates those atrocities—as described in the Bible—or allows them to happen through the hands of others, He still "speaks" to us through those dark acts as well.

Attempting to win an argument by suppressing essential facts just to make yourself look right isn't how a real discussion works.
Maria Robinson2 Maria Robinson2 Active Member
158 messages
joined Feb 2012
#258 ·
Susan Green15 said:A human being is not some hundred-headed monster.
It wasn't ME who took the apple; Adam took it.
It wasn't ME who desired to be wiser than God; it was Adam.
God is punishing me for something someone else did several thousand years ago.
This right here is a textbook example of manipulation and mental gymnastics.
If Adam is a man, then sure, you can argue that "a man desired to be like God because Adam was a man," but it is a completely nonsensical and illogical leap to claim that means I personally chose to be like God just because I am a man.

THIS IS A WORD GAME THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONNECTION TO LOGIC OR COMMON SENSE.

This kind of generalization is the very foundation of racism. You accuse an entire race based on bad experiences with a single individual from that group. That way of thinking is immoral.

It’s like if ONE Native American killed a white person, and you decided that "Native Americans decided to kill white people," so they all must be punished, leading you to wipe out all Native Americans simply because they are Native Americans.

If you were a member of a minority group and one person from that group committed a crime, and everyone in that group—including you—was punished because of it, you would be the first one to jump up and say that it's unjust and that you shouldn't be blamed for something someone else did.

Therefore, the example you provided, combined with the one I provided, demonstrates that believers are hypocritical and two-faced. It is both hypocritical and duplicitous to justify this line of reasoning in one instance while condemning it in another.

Why is everyone so obsessed with this apple thing? I guess—maybe—there's just some strange fixation going on.
Who exactly claimed it was an apple?!
He writes "fruit"... so maybe it was a pear, or perhaps some other tenth kind of thing—I guess.

So, Adam married his wife—and because of that, he essentially ruined everything for himself. I guess there’s just no hope left for him at this point.
Well, if we're being honest—since we inherited his genes—then I guess it counts that we’re sinners, too; we basically inherited the sin itself.
I suppose if Adam and Eve had actually had children back in Eden—which is a bit of a stretch, I guess—those kids would have stayed behind, leaving the two of them to face whatever comes next alone.
Since Eve was just created, I guess they hadn't exactly been together for long—so children wouldn't have even been born in Eden yet—which seems to be the only logical conclusion here.

That doesn't necessarily mean people today—even now—are to blame for that sin. I guess the Bible suggests God sees the goodness in people's hearts, and He favors anyone who follows His laws. It seems He lifts those people up when they stumble—giving them His spirit, or energy, so they can keep moving forward in everything that is good.

I guess Adam really did walk right into his own trap—he wanted that all-knowing status like God—but that doesn't mean God lacks any empathy for the rest of us who have zero interest in being divine. We're perfectly fine just being simple, ordinary people on this planet.

The Psalms don't actually say that God punishes people for Adam's mistakes—in fact, I guess it doesn't really mention God punishing anyone at all, per se.
The Bible basically suggests that once a person truly messes up—you know, by breaking the laws God set before them—that's when God turns His face away. He just looks away, I guess, and denies them His spirit—or energy, if you want to be modern about it—and essentially leaves them to fend for themselves in this world.
Why?
I suppose when someone starts consciously breaking the rules and just doing their own thing—well, they should realize that God isn't going to force them back into line—God doesn't really work that way, since everyone is given free will, I guess.
So—it’s essentially just cause and effect driven by one's own desires, I guess.

Another reason why our inherited sinfall doesn't really hold much weight—if you ask me—is that He promised support in this life today, while also guaranteeing a new life in whatever comes next.
So, I guess Adam isn't really the main point here—we could just view him as a guy who was handed everything on a silver platter but failed to look beyond himself—which, frankly, is quite a bit of ego.
The Bible is full of instances where good children rise up after failing fathers, and it seems God always takes notice of that new generation. 🙂
rapidbear65 rapidbear65 Active Member
89 messages
joined May 2016
#259 ·
bluebison25 said:Why do you religious types even bother commenting on matters of science? Your entire existence is built on faith, which is really just a polite way of saying ignorance. You’ve allowed yourselves to swallow dozens of claims without ever bothering to fact-check them. Now, the second we try to put those claims to the test, you all start panicking. Why is that? What's the issue? I’ll say it again: you aren't actually living in faith; you're just pretending to be that devout to look good.

Who?? That panic is coming from how "smart" you think you are. You're really just here for the entertainment. Besides, being a person of faith doesn't mean you can't know science too. If it weren't for the Church, you'd probably be out there studying Arabic and living as a devout Muslim. And if you actually knew how to write, you'd be doing it with some old-school quill and ink. Forget about using a MacBook or an iPad... you'll just be lucky if you get enough cash for some weed.
analoghound4 analoghound4 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2012
#260 ·
rapidbear65 said:Peak technological power??? What are you even talking about?? Technology is just like the steam engine was back then for us. Honestly, most regular people living normal lives don't even realize how far tech has actually gone because it's not part of our daily grind. It stays hidden from us. You, Key, and Rebul actually have a real reason to doubt that God distributes intelligence evenly. But hey, maybe?? maybe you guys are just lucky. They say some people get it high while others get it low... life finds a way to balance things out...

We are witnessing the pinnacle of technology relative to the specific era we inhabit. While it is unlikely that we will colonize Mars or the Moon within our lifetimes, nor will we discover extraterrestrial life on other planets anytime soon, we cannot simply dismiss these theories, as most of them will eventually come to fruition in the future.

But in this age of Facebook, iPods, hybrids, robotics, and high-performance processors... my God... and this has been the trajectory for the last 2,000 years. 🤷 As for the gods prior to that period... I have no desire to go down that path.

posavac....🤣

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads