#1 ·
Lately—well, perhaps "lately" is an understatement, as this has been weighing on me for quite some time now—I have found myself feeling rather stressed. It has led me to wonder: is the fault lying with my environment, or is it simply my own internal reaction to the circumstances that trigger this tension?
It brings to mind a specific period during my high school years—a stretch of several months where I had adopted what one might call an almost relentlessly positive outlook. Back then, I held the conviction that people were fundamentally good at their core; that love, empathy, tolerance, and understanding ought to take precedence over the ego. By this, of course, I am referring primarily to our interpersonal connections. If a conflict arose, or if someone should happen to offend me—whether by design or mere accident—I would simply forgive them in that very moment and let it go.
Over time, however, I drifted away from that mindset toward something more... conventional—a state where the ego plays a far more prominent role. I didn't even notice the transition; I certainly didn't give it much thought at the time. Now, looking back after all these years, it seems to me that during that phase of constant forgiveness, I was significantly more carefree and composed. I moved through a larger social circle, and there was a certain pervasive positivity within my own mind.
One might argue that forgiveness is merely an escape from reality, given that it doesn't actually rectify the external event that caused the initial sting—that bruise to the ego, as it were. But then again, does that truly matter if the act of forgiving allows the individual to feel better and more optimistic? At least, that was certainly my experience when I lived by that particular philosophy.
I find myself curious about how others approach this. Do you weigh your relationships and friendships based on a sense of equilibrium—feeling that both parties must receive an equal measure of benefit? Or is that less important to you than minimizing the sensitivity of your ego and simply forgiving whatever causes friction?
It brings to mind a specific period during my high school years—a stretch of several months where I had adopted what one might call an almost relentlessly positive outlook. Back then, I held the conviction that people were fundamentally good at their core; that love, empathy, tolerance, and understanding ought to take precedence over the ego. By this, of course, I am referring primarily to our interpersonal connections. If a conflict arose, or if someone should happen to offend me—whether by design or mere accident—I would simply forgive them in that very moment and let it go.
Over time, however, I drifted away from that mindset toward something more... conventional—a state where the ego plays a far more prominent role. I didn't even notice the transition; I certainly didn't give it much thought at the time. Now, looking back after all these years, it seems to me that during that phase of constant forgiveness, I was significantly more carefree and composed. I moved through a larger social circle, and there was a certain pervasive positivity within my own mind.
One might argue that forgiveness is merely an escape from reality, given that it doesn't actually rectify the external event that caused the initial sting—that bruise to the ego, as it were. But then again, does that truly matter if the act of forgiving allows the individual to feel better and more optimistic? At least, that was certainly my experience when I lived by that particular philosophy.
I find myself curious about how others approach this. Do you weigh your relationships and friendships based on a sense of equilibrium—feeling that both parties must receive an equal measure of benefit? Or is that less important to you than minimizing the sensitivity of your ego and simply forgiving whatever causes friction?