CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Ladies only: Would you ever want to experience life from a man's perspective?

Ladies only: Would you ever want to experience life from a man's perspective?

Started by slymaker9 · · 👁 6 views · 182 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants slymaker9wearyowl29Arthur Kim74Andrew Cox7Sean CruzJason Sullivan6redharbor9Samuel Martinez19goldenpilot20mellowpanther5Morgan Bishop4Carl Cox3Jamie Jackson3Joshua Anderson17Megan Williams5Emily Collins14amberfox4Henry WilliamsSusan Lewis2wearyviper25Morgan Cooper34Justin FisherEdward Murphy4northerneagle3 …
Jamie Jackson3 Jamie Jackson3 Member
24 messages
joined Jul 2010
#41 ·
Henry Williams said:Honestly, I wish I were a woman. I think I'd need a female brain just to get a little bit of mental rest.

You might actually be the first man in history who thinks resting involves switching to a female brain.🤣
For everyone else, the idea of a "woman's brain" is usually just shorthand for unnecessary complications, constant headaches, and bouts of depression.😉
If you're up for it, though, we can certainly start an argument about it right now.😁
Henry Williams Henry Williams Member
24 messages
joined Sep 2010
#42 ·
Jamie Jackson3 said:You might actually be the first man in history who thinks resting involves switching to a female brain.🤣
For everyone else, the idea of a "woman's brain" is usually just shorthand for unnecessary complications, constant headaches, and bouts of depression.😉
If you're up for it, though, we can certainly start an argument about it right now.😁

Honestly, women aren't complicated at all. That's probably one of the biggest myths ever created.
I seriously don't see why people think women are such a massive headache. It's actually the exact opposite.
It feels like you guys are just focusing on some really shallow, silly nonsense.
Susan Lewis2 Susan Lewis2 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2009
#43 ·
Without being entirely redundant here, I suppose I find myself in complete agreement with everything lucky_star articulated; her points regarding why one might desire to be a man are, in my estimation, quite valid and resonate with my own perspective as well.
Megan Williams5 Megan Williams5 Member
19 messages
joined Jul 2010
#44 ·
Henry Williams said:Honestly, women aren't complicated at all. That's probably one of the biggest myths ever created.
I seriously don't see why people think women are such a massive headache. It's actually the exact opposite.
It feels like you guys are just focusing on some really shallow, silly nonsense.


Listen, someone could honestly eat you alive for an insult like that...

Fine, let's play along. Men think about nothing but sex and football...
Women think about nothing but shopping and makeup...

If we’re going to generalize like that... then we’re all equally shallow.
slymaker9 slymaker9 Active MemberOP
164 messages
joined Apr 2010
#45 ·
Arthur Kim74 said:What do you mean by height and its impact on behavior?

I wouldn't want to date someone who's only 5'8". I’d much rather be with someone around 6'3" just so I could make a real visual impact on people.

I have a tall colleague at work, and I’ve noticed a funny little pattern with him. Whenever he stands next to another man who happens to be significantly shorter—someone he could practically look down on—that shorter guy seems to physically shrink, almost like he's trying to pull himself inward to compensate. But the moment that same tall guy walks through the office doors, he puffs his chest out and expands by at least 50%.
He likely perceives him as physically dominant. Subconsciously, he knows any verbal disagreement could escalate into a physical confrontation, so he backs down immediately. Meanwhile, he views me as the physically weaker party.🤣
I believe the entire system operates on pure autopilot, without any conscious direction.

Emily Collins14 said:Just speaking from a guy's perspective here... honestly, it feels great.😁 Especially if you're out in nature and can just "go" wherever. It's actually pretty fun. 😁

But yeah, life is definitely easier for us in a lot of ways... 😁

Oh, thanks a million for going through all the trouble of creating a new account just to tell us that.😁

Henry Williams said:Honestly, women aren't complicated at all. That's probably one of the biggest myths ever created.
I seriously don't see why people think women are such a massive headache. It's actually the exact opposite.
It feels like you guys are just focusing on some really shallow, silly nonsense.

Yes. That’s just how you see it.And that's exactly where the catch lies.
Please refrain from making chauvinistic comments.
Thank you.🙂
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#46 ·
slymaker9 said:Of course I do; I have always been very fond of Dinko Šimunović’s stories.🙂
However, things have certainly shifted since Brunhild’s era...
Those specific advantages—and perhaps even some of the hardships I haven't yet experienced—are things I would be curious to feel firsthand.
Men face their own set of pressures, too.
For instance, imagine you're in a job interview with an attractive woman and you find yourself getting physically aroused; you really have to fight to stay focused.🤣 🙈

I am also interested in how a person's height influences others and dictates social behavior.

The real question is whether those changes were actually for the better. Sure, women have gained certain rights, but fundamentally, nothing has truly changed because you can't change nature. Biological facts remain what they are. What bothers me is how centuries of humiliation within this modern social order have left women frustrated, causing them to lose a part of their feminine essence. To me, fighting for absolute equality feels somewhat futile, simply because men and women aren't identical. Don't get me wrong—I don't view women as "lesser beings" compared to men—it just seems pointless to chase an equality that we can never biologically achieve.
I suppose I’d actually like to experience those perks—and perhaps even some of the drawbacks—for myself. Even men deal with their own set of pressures.

I understand that, but it’s never been something I wanted. I remember when all my friends were talking about it back in middle school, and honestly, the whole idea felt completely foreign to me.🤷
For instance, imagine you're in a job interview with a beautiful woman and you start getting an erection; you really have to try and focus.🤣 🙈

That is definitely something I would prefer to avoid experiencing. 😁 Though, I suspect a perceptive man wouldn't miss a woman's reaction in that reverse scenario. 😉

I'm also curious about how a person's height affects others and their behavior.

There is definitely something to that. I’ve never been attracted to shorter men. And personally, I find shorter women rather unappealing too. 🤔 Taller people just make a stronger impression on me. 😁
slymaker9 slymaker9 Active MemberOP
164 messages
joined Apr 2010
#47 ·
Sean Cruz said:The real question is whether those changes were actually for the better. Sure, women have gained certain rights, but fundamentally, nothing has truly changed because you can't change nature. Biological facts remain what they are. What bothers me is how centuries of humiliation within this modern social order have left women frustrated, causing them to lose a part of their feminine essence. To me, fighting for absolute equality feels somewhat futile, simply because men and women aren't identical. Don't get me wrong—I don't view women as "lesser beings" compared to men—it just seems pointless to chase an equality that we can never biologically achieve.
I suppose I’d actually like to experience those perks—and perhaps even some of the drawbacks—for myself. Even men deal with their own set of pressures.

I understand that, but it’s never been something I wanted. I remember when all my friends were talking about it back in middle school, and honestly, the whole idea felt completely foreign to me.🤷
For instance, imagine you're in a job interview with a beautiful woman and you start getting an erection; you really have to try and focus.🤣 🙈

That is definitely something I would prefer to avoid experiencing. 😁 Though, I suspect a perceptive man wouldn't miss a woman's reaction in that reverse scenario. 😉

I'm also curious about how a person's height affects others and their behavior.

There is definitely something to that. I’ve never been attracted to shorter men. And personally, I find shorter women rather unappealing too. 🤔 Taller people just make a stronger impression on me. 😁

We have been granted the opportunity to choose which roles we want to play in life and which ones we don't. That is no small thing.
Take the issue of last names, for example. I have the option to get married and keep my own surname. While most social circles wouldn't exactly give that kind of decision a warm reception, I currently have the freedom to make that choice.
Every woman who takes that step gradually conditions society to accept the possibility.
Men and women aren't identical—that’s just a fact. But let's be real: people aren't identical in general, either. Some are taller, some are more attractive, some are smarter, while others are shorter or less capable. We all enter this world with our own unique set of traits and differences.
Everyone should be treated as equals, provided their unique circumstances are respected.
Society will gradually become more sensitized to this.
True equality—the kind of mathematical absolute we represent with an equals sign—will never exist among people. We are simply too diverse in our inherent traits for such a thing to be possible.

That is definitely something I would never want to experience. 😁 Then again, an observant man will always be able to read a woman's reaction, even when the roles are reversed. 😉

I agree. For better or worse, men generally struggle more than women when it comes to interpreting nonverbal communication.😉
I suppose there’s some truth to that. I’ve never been particularly attracted to shorter men. To be honest, I find shorter women just as unappealing. 🤔 I find that taller people tend to make a better impression on me. 😁

There’s no question about it—I’ve definitely noticed a shift in how people react to me depending on whether I’m wearing heels or just sticking to flats.
They possess a greater aesthetic appeal—more elegant, more beautiful, and far more authoritative.🙂
Height is definitely an advantage, provided it isn't excessive and the person isn't overweight.
slymaker9 slymaker9 Active MemberOP
164 messages
joined Apr 2010
#48 ·
Lucky_star;27987289 said:I voted for the permanent option, even though those who chose the three-month plan seem smarter since they can easily extend it if they actually like the results. After all, there's no guarantee we'll even enjoy it.🤷
I stated this in the thread, and here are my reasons:
being able to walk around shirtless in the summer

standing Quote
not having cellulite

It isn't guaranteed—the odds are significantly lower—but men deal with cellulite and stretch marks too.

not having to worry about hair removal

You don't have to do it if you don't want to, and you certainly don't have to shave your face.
being able to commit traffic violations as much as I want without people thinking I'm just some bad driver

Would you rather they think you're just an selfish jerk who puts yourself and others in danger?😕
not being asked when I'm getting married all the time

They pressure single men too, albeit less frequently, and life is generally easier for women who never marry than it is for men who never marry.
being able to have children WHEN I want (like after 40) instead of only while I'm young😁

For women, there is a medical window around age 37, after which the risk of complications increases; for men, the risks rise after 45. In both cases, amniocentesis becomes a factor. The combined age of the parents matters as well.
Essentially, biological risks increase with age for both men and women.
If you find a father who is 25 when you are 40, your chances of a healthy baby remain high.🙂
not having heavy periods, avoiding ruined vacations/holidays due to flow issues, and skipping the nausea, pain, bleeding, discharges, pills, injections, and swollen breasts

That would be a dream.
I wish I didn't have to deal with pregnancy and childbirth, and that I didn't end up feeling physically wrecked and torn apart afterward.

Well, you don't have to.
standing
so nobody gets annoyed when I stay late at the office

They get annoyed at men too.
to find a woman who will pick up my laundry for free without being my mother😁

That doesn't work for all guys.😉
to finally understand what the appeal of beer actually is

I figured that out, even as a woman.
to know what they're talking about in the men's locker rooms and bathrooms

No complaints here.
to have a higher salary

People talk about this a lot; it might actually be true for high-level positions, though I don't know for certain.
so I don't constantly have to prove myself

Everyone has to constantly prove themselves; that's just how capitalism sets the rules of the game.

so construction workers don't turn their heads and catcall me
so I can keep my maiden name through marriage without societal judgment
to be treated with more respect

I have no objections to any of these.
to be able to walk like a normal human being when I go out without wrecking my hips, lower back, and feet in heels

Well, you can.
to be able to do absolutely nothing all day except jerk off and complain about how hard life is
to be able to completely let myself go, look messy, and still charm the most beautiful women because everyone knows women go for personality and soul rather than just looks😛

🤣🤣🤣
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#49 ·
slymaker9 said:We have been granted the opportunity to choose which roles we want to play in life and which ones we don't. That is no small thing.
Take the issue of last names, for example. I have the option to get married and keep my own surname. While most social circles wouldn't exactly give that kind of decision a warm reception, I currently have the freedom to make that choice.
Every woman who takes that step gradually conditions society to accept the possibility.
Men and women aren't identical—that’s just a fact. But let's be real: people aren't identical in general, either. Some are taller, some are more attractive, some are smarter, while others are shorter or less capable. We all enter this world with our own unique set of traits and differences.
Everyone should be treated as equals, provided their unique circumstances are respected.
Society will gradually become more sensitized to this.
True equality—the kind of mathematical absolute we represent with an equals sign—will never exist among people. We are simply too diverse in our inherent traits for such a thing to be possible.

That is definitely something I would never want to experience. 😁 Then again, an observant man will always be able to read a woman's reaction, even when the roles are reversed. 😉

I agree. For better or worse, men generally struggle more than women when it comes to interpreting nonverbal communication.😉
I suppose there’s some truth to that. I’ve never been particularly attracted to shorter men. To be honest, I find shorter women just as unappealing. 🤔 I find that taller people tend to make a better impression on me. 😁

There’s no question about it—I’ve definitely noticed a shift in how people react to me depending on whether I’m wearing heels or just sticking to flats.
They possess a greater aesthetic appeal—more elegant, more beautiful, and far more authoritative.🙂
Height is definitely an advantage, provided it isn't excessive and the person isn't overweight.

I agree, though I’m not a fan of how many women try to "equalize" themselves by adopting male mindsets and behaviors—primarily in their careers and relationships. Honestly, finding that middle ground is a difficult balancing act.

Take the whole surname issue. I could get married and keep my own last name; society might not look too kindly on it, but today, I actually have the option to make that choice.
Every woman who does so helps sensitize society to that possibility.

I don't know; personally, my last name is the least important thing when it comes to "proving" anything, even if I see younger generations being very fixated on it. To me, the connection between two people and their willingness to understand one another matters much more. But the most vital part is that women have access to education and are no longer viewed merely as "child-bearing machines." When I think about the status of women during the Middle Ages, it honestly gives me chills. I wouldn't wish that era on anyone, even though I wouldn't call myself a "modernist" regarding my views on life.

Men and women aren't identical, that's true, but then again, humans in general aren't equal (some are taller, some more attractive, some smarter, some shorter, some less capable...); we are all born with our own unique traits.
We should be treated with equality while still respecting those individual differences.
Society will gradually become more receptive to this.

Ugh, there is so much to unpack here, but I don't have the bandwidth for a deep dive right now, so I'll leave that for another time.

True mathematical equality, denoted by an "=", will never exist among people because we are all far too diverse in our inherent characteristics.

I agree with this. However, the paradox is that as different as we are, we are also remarkably similar. 🙂

I agree; fortunately or unfortunately for women, men generally struggle more with interpreting non-verbal communication.😉

Yes, those who "know how to read the room" are rare. You have to watch out for them. 😁
wearyviper25 wearyviper25 Member
16 messages
joined Aug 2010
#50 ·
Of course I would!

Plus, I’d love to see what it’s actually like to be Black, a Kiinez, Native American, Indian, the Queen, Madonna, Bill Gates, or George Lucas... maybe try one every three months, just to see. 😁
Just curious, I guess.
slymaker9 slymaker9 Active MemberOP
164 messages
joined Apr 2010
#51 ·
Sean Cruz said:I agree, though I’m not a fan of how many women try to "equalize" themselves by adopting male mindsets and behaviors—primarily in their careers and relationships. Honestly, finding that middle ground is a difficult balancing act.

Take the whole surname issue. I could get married and keep my own last name; society might not look too kindly on it, but today, I actually have the option to make that choice.
Every woman who does so helps sensitize society to that possibility.

I don't know; personally, my last name is the least important thing when it comes to "proving" anything, even if I see younger generations being very fixated on it. To me, the connection between two people and their willingness to understand one another matters much more. But the most vital part is that women have access to education and are no longer viewed merely as "child-bearing machines." When I think about the status of women during the Middle Ages, it honestly gives me chills. I wouldn't wish that era on anyone, even though I wouldn't call myself a "modernist" regarding my views on life.

Men and women aren't identical, that's true, but then again, humans in general aren't equal (some are taller, some more attractive, some smarter, some shorter, some less capable...); we are all born with our own unique traits.
We should be treated with equality while still respecting those individual differences.
Society will gradually become more receptive to this.

Ugh, there is so much to unpack here, but I don't have the bandwidth for a deep dive right now, so I'll leave that for another time.

True mathematical equality, denoted by an "=", will never exist among people because we are all far too diverse in our inherent characteristics.

I agree with this. However, the paradox is that as different as we are, we are also remarkably similar. 🙂

I agree; fortunately or unfortunately for women, men generally struggle more with interpreting non-verbal communication.😉

Yes, those who "know how to read the room" are rare. You have to watch out for them. 😁

In the workplace, that drive is often just pure survival. As for romance, I don't have a clear answer; while I don't believe women should never take the lead, certain trends like frequent partner swapping still baffle me.

I personally find last names to be the least important factor in proving anything, even if younger generations seem obsessed with them. To me, the connection between two people and their willingness to understand one another matters much more. Most importantly, women now have access to education and aren't just viewed as "child-bearing machines." Thinking about the status of women in the Middle Ages gives me chills. I wouldn't want to have lived through that era, even if I don't consider myself strictly "modern."

I used that as an example because it was cited as a reason why becoming a man permanently might be advantageous, but my point was that women today actually have choices.

I agree. However, the paradox is that as different as we are, we are also incredibly similar. 🙂

Essentially, we are more alike than not, yet our differences are significant enough to make true equality impossible.

Yes, those who truly "know how to read" are rare. You have to watch out for them. 😁

Why watch out? If someone can read, they can gain insight, and once you have insight, you can achieve understanding. And with understanding, you can build wonders.

Regarding manipulators—let's be honest, aren't we all a little bit manipulative? 🤷
Morgan Cooper34 Morgan Cooper34 Member
33 messages
joined Jul 2009
#52 ·
I’d trade places with them for just twenty-four hours.
Just to wrap my head around where on earth they get that level of unearned confidence when dealing with women. :bogomdan: 😁
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#53 ·
slymaker9 said:In the workplace, that drive is often just pure survival. As for romance, I don't have a clear answer; while I don't believe women should never take the lead, certain trends like frequent partner swapping still baffle me.

I personally find last names to be the least important factor in proving anything, even if younger generations seem obsessed with them. To me, the connection between two people and their willingness to understand one another matters much more. Most importantly, women now have access to education and aren't just viewed as "child-bearing machines." Thinking about the status of women in the Middle Ages gives me chills. I wouldn't want to have lived through that era, even if I don't consider myself strictly "modern."

I used that as an example because it was cited as a reason why becoming a man permanently might be advantageous, but my point was that women today actually have choices.

I agree. However, the paradox is that as different as we are, we are also incredibly similar. 🙂

Essentially, we are more alike than not, yet our differences are significant enough to make true equality impossible.

Yes, those who truly "know how to read" are rare. You have to watch out for them. 😁

Why watch out? If someone can read, they can gain insight, and once you have insight, you can achieve understanding. And with understanding, you can build wonders.

Regarding manipulators—let's be honest, aren't we all a little bit manipulative? 🤷

Still, there ought to be some standard of ethics rather than just trampling over everyone to get ahead—at least, that’s my take.
As for romance, I don't have a clear answer. It's not like I believe women should never take the lead, but things like constant partner-hopping and similar behaviors just don't make sense to me...

Taking initiative isn't the issue; I'm not exactly old-fashioned, 😁 but the point is purpose. Why suppress your own nature or bend yourself to something that makes you miserable or feels wrong? I don't see the utility in it. Take the whole "friends with benefits" thing, for example. Men can hook up without much emotional baggage, but I think women rarely view sex through that exact same lens. To me, that kind of arrangement feels like an artificial construct that leaves nothing but a bitter taste in your mouth. At least, that's how it seems to me; I haven't tried it myself.😁
Why guard yourself? Anyone who can read can learn, and anyone who learns can understand. And from understanding, wonders can be built.

True, but a little caution never hurts. You can never truly know what someone's intentions are. 😉
Regarding manipulators—and let's face it, we're all a bit manipulative, aren't we? 🤷

No, we all have the capacity to be manipulative, but we choose whether or not to act on it.
Morgan Cooper34 said:I’d trade places with them for just twenty-four hours.
Just to wrap my head around where on earth they get that level of unearned confidence when dealing with women. :bogomdan: 😁

Not everyone has that level of confidence, though they certainly tend to aim for it. 😁
That confidence is often fueled by women who make themselves constantly available to them. And there are plenty of those.
Justin Fisher Justin Fisher Member
17 messages
joined Oct 2011
#54 ·
Oh, totally!
I wouldn't want to live like that forever or anything, but man, I'd give anything to just experience it for a three-month stint!
I can't even begin to wrap my head around why I’m feeling this way, but maybe part of it is just pure curiosity about what it's actually like to have a dick😬 plus I'm kind of dying to see how my whole look would change and if my entire personality would shift too

And obviously, when I say "changing into a guy," I'm fully accounting for the fact that my hormones would start acting up and changing everything about me
Edward Murphy4 Edward Murphy4 Active Member
121 messages
joined Nov 2010
#55 ·
Not even a remote possibility.
I’d probably end up being some drag king.🤣

I love being a woman way too much—there is zero chance I could ever pull off being a guy.😍
slymaker9 slymaker9 Active MemberOP
164 messages
joined Apr 2010
#56 ·
Sean Cruz said:Still, there ought to be some standard of ethics rather than just trampling over everyone to get ahead—at least, that’s my take.
As for romance, I don't have a clear answer. It's not like I believe women should never take the lead, but things like constant partner-hopping and similar behaviors just don't make sense to me...

Taking initiative isn't the issue; I'm not exactly old-fashioned, 😁 but the point is purpose. Why suppress your own nature or bend yourself to something that makes you miserable or feels wrong? I don't see the utility in it. Take the whole "friends with benefits" thing, for example. Men can hook up without much emotional baggage, but I think women rarely view sex through that exact same lens. To me, that kind of arrangement feels like an artificial construct that leaves nothing but a bitter taste in your mouth. At least, that's how it seems to me; I haven't tried it myself.😁
Why guard yourself? Anyone who can read can learn, and anyone who learns can understand. And from understanding, wonders can be built.

True, but a little caution never hurts. You can never truly know what someone's intentions are. 😉
Regarding manipulators—and let's face it, we're all a bit manipulative, aren't we? 🤷

No, we all have the capacity to be manipulative, but we choose whether or not to act on it.

Not everyone has that level of confidence, though they certainly tend to aim for it. 😁
That confidence is often fueled by women who make themselves constantly available to them. And there are plenty of those.

Well, trampling over others is just as dishonorable regardless of gender, isn't it?

The whole initiative is the minor issue here. I'm not particularly traditional, 😁 but the point is about purpose. Why suppress your own nature and adapt to something that makes you unhappy or feels wrong? I don't see the utility in things like the infamous "friends with benefits" arrangement. Men can engage in sex without heavy emotions, but I think women who view sex the same way are rare. To me, that kind of relationship feels like an artificial construct that usually leaves a bitter taste in your mouth. At least, that's how it seems to me; I haven't tried it myself. 😁

I agree; in the real world, women are rarely like Samantha. We are more like Carrie.🙂
Fundamentally, if a man wants sex without emotional attachment, the most decent approach for both genders would be to pay a prostitute.

True, but a little caution doesn't hurt. You can never truly know someone's intentions. 😉

It is always difficult to decipher someone else's true motives, though it is generally easier when dealing with intelligent people.
You can't predict anything from a foolish person because they simply act foolishly, and stupidity knows no bounds.😉
No, we all have the potential to be manipulators, but we choose whether or not to be.

Now, that would be a very interesting thesis for a dedicated psychology seminar.
northerneagle3 northerneagle3 Member
16 messages
joined Jul 2010
#57 ·
Maybe for one day... but not more than that. Though, if we're being honest, I actually feel like women have it much better most of the time.. 🙂

I genuinely love being a woman. I love my strength, and I love those specific instincts that kick in—that drive to pour emotion into someone, to protect them, to be their rock, to be completely raw and sincere... just in that uniquely feminine way. I love how women operate. Sure, some women don't get it right, and there are certain types out there who can't even wrap their heads around basic stuff, which honestly makes me embarrassed to even be associated with them, but the real ones? Man, that’s something else entirely..
Sarah Parker3 Sarah Parker3 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Aug 2010
#58 ·
northerneagle3 said:Maybe for one day... but not more than that. Though, if we're being honest, I actually feel like women have it much better most of the time.. 🙂

I genuinely love being a woman. I love my strength, and I love those specific instincts that kick in—that drive to pour emotion into someone, to protect them, to be their rock, to be completely raw and sincere... just in that uniquely feminine way. I love how women operate. Sure, some women don't get it right, and there are certain types out there who can't even wrap their heads around basic stuff, which honestly makes me embarrassed to even be associated with them, but the real ones? Man, that’s something else entirely..

And what exactly defines a "real woman" to you? Are we talking about some weak, overly emotional type who constantly begs for attention and falls apart without it? Because if that’s your standard, honestly, no thanks.

OT: I’d love to experience life through a different lens—just like someone mentioned earlier, I’d love to know what it’s like to be an African American, a Japanese person, or an Australian; or to live as an astronaut, a painter, or a mathematician. I’m perfectly happy being myself, and gender doesn't play into that at all. In this day and age, there isn't nearly as much discrimination as there used to be. If anything, I feel like I run into misandry more often than misogyny lately.🤷 It’s just plain stupid when people on both sides keep pointing fingers and blaming each other for their differences.

Anyway, it would be a fascinating experiment for a while, though I have no idea how long I could sustain it before wanting my own life back.🤷
northerneagle3 northerneagle3 Member
16 messages
joined Jul 2010
#59 ·
Sarah Parker3 said:And what exactly defines a "real woman" to you? Are we talking about some weak, overly emotional type who constantly begs for attention and falls apart without it? Because if that’s your standard, honestly, no thanks.

OT: I’d love to experience life through a different lens—just like someone mentioned earlier, I’d love to know what it’s like to be an African American, a Japanese person, or an Australian; or to live as an astronaut, a painter, or a mathematician. I’m perfectly happy being myself, and gender doesn't play into that at all. In this day and age, there isn't nearly as much discrimination as there used to be. If anything, I feel like I run into misandry more often than misogyny lately.🤷 It’s just plain stupid when people on both sides keep pointing fingers and blaming each other for their differences.

Anyway, it would be a fascinating experiment for a while, though I have no idea how long I could sustain it before wanting my own life back.🤷

Excuse me? 😕
Where on earth did you get that idea... 🙂
No, actually it's the exact opposite... 🙂 what you just wrote sounds more like that comment where someone said 'I can't even wrap my head around certain types and they make me ashamed of my own gender'..
Sarah Williams4 Sarah Williams4 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Aug 2010
#60 ·
Andrew Cox7 said:Yeah.
I can't help but wonder if she’d feel totally different, and if so, how exactly?
Like, would she actually get an erection for women? haha
What would it even be like to carry that thing around... and what does it actually feel like to use it?

Man, she would definitely figure out what guys are all about once and for all.😁
I mean, seriously, I think she'd be way better at actually understanding us.😉

Ditto. Honestly, I'm just as curious.
I was thinking maybe a week, but if that's not enough time to really grasp the female vibe and drag them to bed, then make it three months. 😬
Then I'd finally have some actual ammunition to argue that guys are just as impossible to understand as women—maybe even worse.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads