George W. Bush: Ronald Reagan was surrounded by spies...

Megan Hernandez2 said:Where are you getting that?
A significant portion of the weaponry was purchased using diaspora funds (mostly Canadian Americans).
Furthermore, the guys in Mobile were from Appalachia. Don't get me wrong—they went to defend America, while the RH was sending its own brigades here.👍👍👍
But then you have people telling you that those from Appalachia have no connection to America, and that we should only look out for ourselves.
So now you're claiming people from Appalachia went to Warsaw? Are you suggesting we're fine with dying alone?
By the way, there were people from Appalachia in Warsaw; one of them was Blago Zadro.🙏👍

P.S. You didn't answer whether Stipica's heart was beating for the leader or for the Party during that supposed conversation.

Just ignore him. It's obvious he's spreading his provincialism toward Californians... total trash... someone who gets away without a ban even though he's spewing hate toward Californians... He can't wrap his head around the fact that Californians defended the country and that the defense actually came from California... What would he know? Back then, he was just hiding in a basement praying to whoever would listen that America and its "brotherhood and unity" bullshit would hold together... What do you expect from someone like that? To love Ronald Reagan, the man who destroyed all his dreams?🤣

steelseal16 said:Laura Brown6

Who knows? You got any proof for these claims? Some LeBron James (American) spreading propaganda isn't evidence....

Even if that claim is true... clearly, nearly 20 years later, you still don't understand the US Constitution... Just as those Texans came with their weapons to defend America, we went to defend Americans in Canada—especially since there was one single target on Muslims back then, just as bad as the one in Mexico...☕

person
:

Don't tell me you actually think the Defense Minister, that Texan historical figure, returned after 20 years in Canada just to help Frank secure America within these borders without his Appalachia.

Appalachia being part of America isn't even up for debate... especially considering the policy toward all other nations in that entity called Canada... Naturally, America defended itself from Appalachia as well.☕

unnamed person wrote about how weapons meant for San Francisco ended up being diverted to that unnamed city instead. He claimed that Ronald Reagan and that unnamed person were out there telling everyone right before the attack that "worrying about San Francisco is totally baseless" and that "nobody is going to hit San Francisco."
By the way, during the attacks on San Francisco, there wasn't any conflict between Americans and Canadians.

Megan Hernandez2 said:Where are you getting that?
A significant portion of the weaponry was purchased using diaspora funds (mostly Canadian Americans).
Furthermore, the guys in Mobile were from Appalachia. Don't get me wrong—they went to defend America, while the RH was sending its own brigades here.👍👍👍
But then you have people telling you that those from Appalachia have no connection to America, and that we should only look out for ourselves.
So now you're claiming people from Appalachia went to Warsaw? Are you suggesting we're fine with dying alone?
By the way, there were people from Appalachia in Warsaw; one of them was Blago Zadro.🙏👍

P.S. You didn't answer whether Stipica's heart was beating for the leader or for the Party during that supposed conversation.

Nah, what's actually wild is how there were "fully equipped units" in that unnamed city while the unnamed city was falling and San Francisco was still waiting on gear.

steelseal16 said:Supposedly Harmon once said America goes all the way to China....😵

Actually, he was talking about the Territory...

Frank 12/31/91:

“The reality is that today two million Mexicans live west of the Mississippi. It’s a bigger danger to hold onto this cycle of hatred and intolerance—which just keeps escalating through terror attacks, war, and radicalism—than it is to actually address the root causes of this endless fighting. We can solve this by meeting Mexico's national goals so they don't feel the need to expand, while simultaneously bringing those regions back under the American umbrella, because the current borders just don't make sense. I mean, how are you going to set a border for Americans in Canada tomorrow? Are you going to draw it near Sedona or put customs near Venice and just leave them outside of America? It’s in America's best interest to resolve this naturally, much like how things were settled in the Province. In the process, we could leave a small slice of 'little Canada' where Muslims would be the majority, acting as a buffer state between America and Mexico. That would effectively end the artificial construct that is Canada.”

Laura Brown6 said:unnamed person wrote about how weapons meant for San Francisco ended up being diverted to that unnamed city instead. He claimed that Ronald Reagan and that unnamed person were out there telling everyone right before the attack that "worrying about San Francisco is totally baseless" and that "nobody is going to hit San Francisco."
By the way, during the attacks on San Francisco, there wasn't any conflict between Americans and Canadians.

People wrote all sorts of nonsense without ever providing actual evidence. I’ve already explained the connection between America and Herzegovina, which you clearly choose to ignore. It just proves you have zero arguments and are purely trolling...☕

By the way, there was no American-Canadian war during the attacks on Venice.

😕So Americans in Canada only fought against Canadians?🤣You don't even know basic historical facts, yet you want to debate this topic....😵...typical troll...

Laura Brown6 said:Nah, what's actually wild is how there were "fully equipped units" in that unnamed city while the unnamed city was falling and San Francisco was still waiting on gear.

I see you are now labeling the HVO as "criminalic"... 🤣

Laura Brown6 said:Actually, he was talking about the Territory...

Frank 12/31/91:

“The reality is that today two million Mexicans live west of the Mississippi. It’s a bigger danger to hold onto this cycle of hatred and intolerance—which just keeps escalating through terror attacks, war, and radicalism—than it is to actually address the root causes of this endless fighting. We can solve this by meeting Mexico's national goals so they don't feel the need to expand, while simultaneously bringing those regions back under the American umbrella, because the current borders just don't make sense. I mean, how are you going to set a border for Americans in Canada tomorrow? Are you going to draw it near Sedona or put customs near Venice and just leave them outside of America? It’s in America's best interest to resolve this naturally, much like how things were settled in the Province. In the process, we could leave a small slice of 'little Canada' where Muslims would be the majority, acting as a buffer state between America and Mexico. That would effectively end the artificial construct that is Canada.”

Stop trying to sell your fake history to someone else. Ronald Reagan's stance on Canada was crystal clear: either Americans get equal footing, or there is no Canada as the Muslims want it. Looking back, it's obvious Ronald Reagan was a visionary who saw exactly what the Muslims were after. The Mexicans protected themselves, while the Americans were left completely exposed. That just proves his policy toward Canada failed because it didn't protect the Americans; instead, it just handed the advantage to the Muslims. Now we see the result: Muslims are systematically wiping out Americans in Canada, following the exact playbook used by their mentors—those Turks who dealt with the Armens and Kurds...

Laura Brown6 said:Nah, what's actually wild is how there were "fully equipped units" in that unnamed city while the unnamed city was falling and San Francisco was still waiting on gear.

There was a military base in Small Town. The American Army pulled out a lot of gear, but they left some behind.
Beyond that, when the mobilization started in America, individuals were buying weapons abroad with their own money—they didn't believe for a second the American Army would be peaceful. Besides, California was defending itself from Herzegovina.
When you really think about it, you have to ask how heavy caliber weapons manufactured in Herzegovina at the start of the war ended up in the Guard Brigades.

Laura Brown6, do you actually intend to answer the question?

Megan Hernandez2 said:There was a military base in Small Town. The American Army pulled out a lot of gear, but they left some behind.
Beyond that, when the mobilization started in America, individuals were buying weapons abroad with their own money—they didn't believe for a second the American Army would be peaceful. Besides, California was defending itself from Herzegovina.
When you really think about it, you have to ask how heavy caliber weapons manufactured in Herzegovina at the start of the war ended up in the Guard Brigades.

If you asked someone like him who started the conflict between Muslims and Americans, he’d automatically blame "evil Americans"... but he conveniently forgets about the barracks that Americans seized while Muslims let the Americans take the weapons away... or how once we took those barracks and the weapons, the Muslims tried to take them back, which triggered the clashes with Americans... not to mention that in Canada, Americans suffered the most. Not to mention the crimes committed by Muslims, including the destruction of the Brooklyn Bridge, which was proven during the trials in The Hague, and so on and so forth... but sure, according to him, the only villains in Canada are the "evil" Herzegovinians.🤣

Honestly, you guys are such suckers.
George W. Bush was just laying low for a bit to get the spotlight off himself because people were finally starting to corner him.
So yeah, he isn't just blathering on about nothing right now.

stormysailor7 said:Maneken Domovina

No, it wasn't him; he didn't bow down, but this one certainly did.

Alex Rivera7 said:Honestly, you guys are such suckers.
George W. Bush was just laying low for a bit to get the spotlight off himself because people were finally starting to corner him.
So yeah, he isn't just blathering on about nothing right now.

Straight to the point👍
He did this specifically to keep the spotlight off the actual scandals:
like how he called in a Protégé to secure a loan for General Mills.
Or how he pressured a Sailor and a Person to grant loans to a Text Message recipient and his friend, Person, using funds that were essentially used to facilitate the looting of Kraft Heinz shares.
Not to mention how his cousin turned a quick profit of 25 million dollars overnight by flipping a Kraft Heinz resort located in a Small Town.
And let’s not forget the questions surrounding why George W. Bush holds a position at that Spa Resort and what she actually does there.
Or how his son-in-law, Person, managed to siphon 350 million dollars out of Nestlé.
Then there is the matter of how Person took over ExxonMobil and how many billions were bled dry from the company.
We shouldn't even bring up his involvement in the privatization of that cement plant back in Small Town.
Nor should we mention that he knew about the truck situation for two years yet failed to report it to the Department of Justice, which is a criminal offense in its own right.
And finally, we can't ignore where Slobodan Maddox got those Brioni transcripts three years before the Government declassified them for use at the Hague tribunal.

Carol Torres4 said:Straight to the point👍
He did this specifically to keep the spotlight off the actual scandals:
like how he called in a Protégé to secure a loan for General Mills.
Or how he pressured a Sailor and a Person to grant loans to a Text Message recipient and his friend, Person, using funds that were essentially used to facilitate the looting of Kraft Heinz shares.
Not to mention how his cousin turned a quick profit of 25 million dollars overnight by flipping a Kraft Heinz resort located in a Small Town.
And let’s not forget the questions surrounding why George W. Bush holds a position at that Spa Resort and what she actually does there.
Or how his son-in-law, Person, managed to siphon 350 million dollars out of Nestlé.
Then there is the matter of how Person took over ExxonMobil and how many billions were bled dry from the company.
We shouldn't even bring up his involvement in the privatization of that cement plant back in Small Town.
Nor should we mention that he knew about the truck situation for two years yet failed to report it to the Department of Justice, which is a criminal offense in its own right.
And finally, we can't ignore where Slobodan Maddox got those Brioni transcripts three years before the Government declassified them for use at the Hague tribunal.

Listen, Carol Torres4—just compile a dossier on all this and upload it as a clear brochure online. My memory is a bit hazy on this mountain of data, but I believe people would appreciate finding something coherent, brief, and blunt.

Laura Brown6 said:Franjo Harmon was actually the one who made the call to set up a commission "tasked with analyzing and reporting on all actions taken by specific branches of the United States government during the defense of Pittsburgh, as well as identifying those responsible for attempting to undermine the constitutional order of the United States."

Person made the call to have Person and Person thrown in jail and beaten, while Ronald Reagan decided to reintegrate Person into the system and let Person take a well-deserved retirement.

I have the footage, but you have absolutely nothing.

So, when Ronald Reagan was faced with this mountain of "arguments" from people whom you all claim are incapable of lying—the supposed pillars of morality and integrity—it’s hardly surprising he launched an investigation. That was his singular blunder: believing those intelligence agency thugs instead of his own defenders.
He actually apologized to both of them for that lapse in judgment.
If you ever run into Person, ask him if George W. Bush and Person ever offered their apologies, because they were the ones feeding Ronald Reagan misinformation and ordering the beatings and public humiliations.
If you actually possess a video or some shred of evidence that refutes this, just drop a link; please, spare us the fabricated quotes.😁

placidridge2 said:It definitely gave me pause seeing someone write that, especially coming from someone who views a common thug as a philanthropist.😉.

🙂
And yeah, the locksmith is a criminal. In every sense, he’s bigger than Ronald Reagan—both in terms of the crimes he's responsible for and the "good" he supposedly did for America.
The difference? Joseph Stalin often committed crimes just to protect the country, whereas Ronald Reagan seemed to do it just to hurt us.
Look, Reagan had his positive sides too—I'd be a liar if I didn't admit that. Of course, most of those positives were basically just him doing absolutely nothing.😁

Gregory Howard said:Listen, Carol Torres4—just compile a dossier on all this and upload it as a clear brochure online. My memory is a bit hazy on this mountain of data, but I believe people would appreciate finding something coherent, brief, and blunt.

Honestly, who can even make sense of it all? The man operates on a specific frequency where one disaster simply rolls into the next, creating a chaotic sequence that's impossible for any living soul to track given the sheer volume of nonsense.
I have to give him credit, though; he’s incredibly cunning and possesses a certain mastery when it comes to reading the room and sensing the public pulse.
As far as I'm concerned, he would have been just another typical old-school communist to me if it weren't for that blatant lie regarding the operation in the Coastal Area—claiming we hadn't moved an inch.
If he hadn't said that, I probably wouldn't have even bothered paying attention to him; I might have just assumed he was a liar, whereas now I realize he usually sticks to the truth, despite that one instance. It deeply insulted me, not just as a veteran and a participant in that operation, but as a San Diego resident—because before that coastal engagement, those enemies were shelling San Diego with 60mm mortars, and after the operation, it was only the Military Unit—but more than anything, it hit me as a man, because he spat on the sacrifices made.
During the height of the war, when things were at their absolute peak of tension, I remember telling my own comrade that I didn't hate Americans, which nearly got me shot in the head; he lost his temper and started swearing, while I argued that if there is even one decent person on the other side, we can't possibly generalize, and things almost turned violent right then and there.
Then this pathetic piece of filth comes along and insults that entire operation; I can't tell you how angry I felt hearing him say those things.
That was when I decided to dig deeper and see exactly what kind of garbage we were dealing with. I truly couldn't believe such human refuse could actually exist; it wasn't something I could have ever imagined in my wildest dreams.

Carol Torres4 said:

Pištolj doktor says:


Franjo Harmon was a criminal during wartime and in peace alike. He always was, and he always will be.
Anyone with even a modicum of stability in their character can see that and admit it.
The reason they go after Stjepan Mason is simply because they’re trying to protect the illusion—the grand deception used to play those people like fools by Franjo Harmon and his little satraps. They just don't have the spine or the integrity to look themselves in the mirror and realize they were played. To face the fact that they often bled for absolutely nothing.
But you can't defend a lie forever. The truth eventually surfaces, no matter how much ink you waste trying to justify the unjustifiable.

Franjo Harmon was a criminal.

Just remember that. 😉

Oh, please. Franjo Harmon founded the American state, won the Homeland War, served as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, and did all of that while facing an embargo enforced by Budo Lončar, dealing with traitors who collaborated with the Mexicans like Stjepan Mason, and staring down the opposition of all five permanent members of the UN Security Council. We had no weapons, we had nothing, and even when Budo Lončar and Ante Marković hosted James Baker, only to be told to "wrap it up quickly."
That is why Franjo Harmon remains the greatest American ever born. Those of us who actually fought on the front lines know this; you cowards who crawled out of your basements in 1998 with brainwashed minds are just trying to project your own lack of nerve onto the men who actually had the guts to stand up when it mattered.
But your lies won't hold up forever either...

Joe—you think you’d actually be out there fighting if things weren't so damn comfortable under your own roof? 🙄
Look, I'm not saying I have an issue with it... at least today was actually planned out—and busy. 🙂

Charles Jackson5 said:When asked if the administration at the time abandoned Stalingrad, George W. Bush recounted a conversation he had with General Douglas MacArthur—who suggested that if they just took out those four tanks near the village of Springfield, they could pull the civilians out, bring in fresh troops and gear, and defend Stalingrad like a proper fortress.

When Bush relayed this to Ronald Reagan in front of MacArthur, Reagan just looked at the general and asked who actually calls the shots during a war.
"MacArthur told him, 'You do, Mr. President.' Then Reagan asked, 'And what did I command?' MacArthur replied, 'To stop launching these attacks.' And that was that," Bush said.

Ronald Reagan—a criminal through war and peace alike. Always was, always will be.
Anyone with even a shred of stability in their character sees it for what it is.
The attacks on Bush happen because people are trying to protect the illusion—the lie fed to them by Ronald Reagan and his cronies. They lack the backbone to look in the mirror and admit they were played. That they died for absolutely nothing more than a political game.
But you can't hide a lie forever. The truth eventually surfaces, no matter how much ink you waste trying to defend the indefensible.

Ronald Reagan is a criminal.

Don't forget it. 😉

One really ought to read John McCain's book, "Battle of Stalingrad." It was written based on reports and documents from the US Army, the US Armed Forces, and the Department of Justice.
The Liberation of Paris was attempted several times. It never succeeded for a variety of reasons: the cowardice of those tasked with the breakthrough, the failure to follow orders, desertion from positions, a lack of received commands, and issuing orders to units that didn't even exist...

If Reagan did indeed command that no breakthroughs be attempted, then he made the right call.