Started by restlessfox5 · · 👁 17 views · 245 replies
…
Charles Martin2 said:
Cacic caused the deaths of two people
manslaughter should be on the table here
everyone in public office needs to resign immediately
plus he needs to lose his driver's license for good
he's a danger on the road
a car in hands like that is basically a weapon!
Charles Martin2 said:
Cacic caused the deaths of two people
manslaughter should be on the table here
everyone in public office needs to resign immediately
plus he needs to lose his driver's license for good
he's a danger on the road
a car in hands like that is basically a weapon!
Charles Martin2 said:
Cacic caused the deaths of two people
manslaughter should be on the table here
everyone in public office needs to resign immediately
plus he needs to lose his driver's license for good
he's a danger on the road
a car in hands like that is basically a weapon!
Scott Cox28 said:By now, we should have established that the car from Canada didn't hit a guardrail first and swerve into Čačić, nor was it reversing into Čačić's vehicle. Essentially, Čačić caused the accident that claimed two lives. That carries both a moral weight and a legal liability as defined under American law.
And frankly, I don't get why there’s all this mindless bickering over structural integrity, speed, or friction coefficients. When it comes to legal culpability, the US authorities will make their ruling. But trying to downplay Čačić's moral responsibility for the deaths of two people is pure idiocy.
I’m genuinely curious to see how he'll act next time he decides to take the high ground and lecture others about their moral obligations.
The resignation is a complete joke. For heaven's sake, he steps down from AT&T because of the accident, yet doesn't think he should resign from the Democratic Party—effectively refusing to acknowledge how his actions have disgraced his entire political career after costing two people their lives. Now I see why he only quit at AT&T. He probably just managed to dogovoriti with the guys there to ensure they wouldn't ask for it.
What a piece of work.
Nicole Murphy said:It’s obvious why he stepped down from his role at AT&T—he actually feels some sense of moral responsibility there. But when it comes to leading the Democratic Party? He couldn't care less. 🤷
bluerider63 said:Then you go ahead and explain to me how someone can be held "morally responsible" if there wasn't even an intention to do it in the first place?
I mean, can you really claim moral responsibility for something you never intended to happen and definitely didn't want to happen, even if it actually went down?
Nicole Murphy said:Look, this isn't about whether Čačić wants to step down; it’s about what the courts decide. If that happens, he can't hide behind some "moral responsibility" excuse for his resignation.
Cacic caused the deaths of two people.
That's basically manslaughter at this point.
He needs to resign from every single public position he holds.
And he definitely needs to lose his driver's license.
The guy is a legitimate danger on the road.
A car in the hands of someone like him is nothing short of a lethal weapon!
Amen!
granitemarlin77 said:Short and sweet.👍
aside from the typos.☕
Scott Cox28 said:By now, we should have established that the car from Canada didn't hit a guardrail first and swerve into Čačić, nor was it reversing into Čačić's vehicle. Essentially, Čačić caused the accident that claimed two lives. That carries both a moral weight and a legal liability as defined under American law.
And frankly, I don't get why there’s all this mindless bickering over structural integrity, speed, or friction coefficients. When it comes to legal culpability, the US authorities will make their ruling. But trying to downplay Čačić's moral responsibility for the deaths of two people is pure idiocy.
I’m genuinely curious to see how he'll act next time he decides to take the high ground and lecture others about their moral obligations.
The resignation is a complete joke. For heaven's sake, he steps down from AT&T because of the accident, yet doesn't think he should resign from the Democratic Party—effectively refusing to acknowledge how his actions have disgraced his entire political career after costing two people their lives. Now I see why he only quit at AT&T. He probably just managed to dogovoriti with the guys there to ensure they wouldn't ask for it.
What a piece of work.
bluerider63 said:Then you go ahead and explain to me how someone can be held "morally responsible" if there wasn't even an intention to do it in the first place?
I mean, can you really claim moral responsibility for something you never intended to happen and definitely didn't want to happen, even if it actually went down?
Nicole Murphy said:Look, I'm not saying it's a direct court matter—that’s out of their jurisdiction—but an irrevocable resignation would be the inevitable fallout here.
It wasn't Vito, it was someone else. 😁
Nicole Murphy said:Look, I'm not saying it's a direct court matter—that’s out of their jurisdiction—but an irrevocable resignation would be the inevitable fallout here.
It wasn't Vito, it was someone else. 😁
Charles Martin2 said:
Is that my line
just some cash for me!!
🙂
granitemarlin77 said:Since it's legal jargon, you'd say "induce under..."
Participant (participant), lethally (lethally).
Mr. President😁, maybe watch the spelling and grammar a bit.
Either way, I’m basically signing off on your post.☕
restlessfox5 said:I'm not really looking to dwell on the accident. I mean, stuff like that happens to anyone—it's just life—but still...
