Started by restlessfox5 · · 👁 16 views · 245 replies
…
hiddensurfer17 said:I doubt it. He’ll probably just buy himself an acquittal.
Adam Collins4 said:Aha, so you're just talking nonsense regarding the collision, while I—the supposed "genius" who's actually correcting you—am just using demagoguery? Classic move from people writing about things they clearly don't understand...
Look, it's not my fault gym was your favorite subject back in school...
And the part about probation? That was brought up by actual lawyers... though I highly doubt your grasp of the law is any better than your grasp of physics, so, basically zero...
Nobody is saying he didn't hit them; the point is that we need to determine the exact speed...
People like you think a seventh grader could figure this out—it's a joke, really... though I suppose it does reflect your level of understanding of the subject matter...
It's not my fault if gym class was your favorite subject back in school...
And legal experts were the ones mentioning probation... and I highly doubt your knowledge of the law is any better than your knowledge of physics, so... basically nothing.
Nobody is saying there wasn't a collision, it's just being argued that we need to determine the exact speed...
People like you think a seventh grader could figure this out... it's honestly laughable... though it does show your level of understanding of the subject...
James Nguyen13 said:So, I saw this massive headline on Newsweek today: "Son of powerful Republican Party figure caught up in traffic accident scandal."
I can't help but wonder, will the media coverage stay this intense once the verdict comes down for Kennedy?
briskbison55 said:Wait, where and when did you actually correct me? In any thread? Any topic at all? Don't get ahead of yourself here.It's not my fault if gym class was your favorite subject back in school...
We had gym class with girls too, so if that wasn't your favorite subject, man, you really had it rough :-)And legal experts were the ones mentioning probation... and I highly doubt your knowledge of the law is any better than your knowledge of physics, so... basically nothing.
You won't find an American lawyer anywhere mentioning probation for an offense where someone drove into someone else and killed two people. You wouldn't hear that here, but our justice system doesn't care about that in this case.Nobody is saying there wasn't a collision, it's just being argued that we need to determine the exact speed...
The speed isn't even the point, and it doesn't change the fact that a collision happened with fatal consequences.People like you think a seventh grader could figure this out... it's honestly laughable... though it does show your level of understanding of the subject...
You've started throwing around technical terms now, maybe just slow down and actually read what I'm writing. You'll see that you're very careful when it comes to judging a killer who shares your ideology, but you're incredibly quick to judge anyone who isn't on the party list.
Charles Martin2 said:
A little snippet from Cacic's autobiography!!
Adam Collins4 said:And why exactly would that be the truth?
Because some guy on a forum said so? A guy with, what, 36 posts total? And he just "happens" to pop up right when we're talking about Čačić... hmmm.
Charles Martin2 said:
Oh sure, you and Cacic are the only ones who know the truth
while the rest of us are just liars and idiots!!!
We trust you guys more than our own eyes!!
Don't act like you didn't show up here on purpose!!
What was that you said about those previous failures by Cacic? How did they actually go down?!
Nicole Murphy said:Adam Collins4, are you kidding me right now? For real?
Is there some kind of connection between you and Čačić? Because let’s be real—the facts don't lie. He was speeding, and that's the main reason this tragedy happened. Period.
Adam Collins4 said:I’m just noticing how a guy with practically zero posts suddenly pops up on a thread about Čačić, acting like he has some deep, personal history with him... which is interesting, to say the very least...
Charles Martin2 said:
Like people don't have anything better to do than hang out on this Forum
defending their favorites—like you!!
Look who showed up in the Cacic !!!! thread!!
You're the one who's actually interesting!!!!!
Why do you never ask for proof from the people you actually agree with???!!
Adam Collins4 said:If I say he's guilty, how exactly am I defending him?
Since when does telling people to wait for actual, relevant data count as "defending" someone?
The days of the mob mentality and the mindless pile-ons ended a long time ago...
Charles Martin2 said:
At first you were all like—if he’s guilty!!!!
You even denied that people actually have to adapt to driving conditions!
Now, just because there's a mention of Cacic hitting him with a car,
you immediately call everything suspicious and start counting his posts...
This isn't exactly clean play!!
Just like those EU classifications or those court experts...
If anyone actually paid me to represent people on this Forum,
I’d quit immediately and give the money back. I’d rather take down any accused
by calling them liars, calling them incompetent, or saying we need to wait for a verdict...
And all of this—na rub politika !!!! !!!!!
This isn't some sponsored topic...
At least you were willing to admit stuff is learned during freshman year of college,
but now you've dropped all the way down to middle school and elementary level logic!!
😍
Adam Collins4 said:I wasn't denying that you have to adjust your speed based on road conditions... I was just pointing out that it's not the only factor involved—there are other variables at play too...
Look, if you get hit by a car while you're on a motorcycle, things don't end well... especially if you're sitting around waiting for the police to show up. In most cases, an ambulance is the absolute bare minimum you're going to need...
And yeah, I went down to the elementary school level, because honestly, some of you people on this forum clearly haven't even mastered the basics...
Once again, you're showing a total lack of understanding regarding the correlation between speed and friction... just like that other guy above who can't distinguish types of collisions and doesn't understand the most fundamental laws of energy transfer...
How am I supposed to explain this stuff to you people?
And by the way, where exactly did I say "if he's at fault"?
Charles Martin2 said:
What are you even talking about? What correlation?! And where did I ever mention that?!?!
It's literally provable here that Čačić slammed into a car that had already hit a guardrail!
You're doing the exact same thing right now—trying to claim one impact is bigger than the other just by looking at photos!!!
You're claiming there's no such thing as an "adjustment" formula in the European Union, which I'm gonna prove wrong later!
There's an "if," sure, but I'm done following your trolling!
I've noticed you call everyone a liar, a blowhard, or a loudmouth...
Honestly, you're more exhausting than anyone else here!!
I'm waiting for that famous European Union classification of yours—it's about time!!
Adam Collins4 said:I am not "proving" anything; we are discussing a hypothetical scenario regarding whether that Ford hit the guardrail before or after the collision...
Stop lying and cherry-picking posts like a fraud—show the whole conversation.
I am well and truly done with you, your lies, and your constant manipulation...
Once again, you're displaying a total lack of understanding regarding the relationship between velocity and friction—just like the first time, when I suggested you hit the car in front because you were speeding, and you insisted it wasn't speed, but rather sudden braking...
Son, that is a fundamental failure to grasp the connection between speed and frictional force... and frankly, I don't feel like teaching you physics.
Between your nonsense about hardness versus strength and your confusion over bluntness versus softness, you've made it clear you don't grasp the basics—even though two different people have tried to explain them to you.
And for the record, where did I ever say he wasn't at fault? Where did I write that Čačić isn't to blame?
I'll be waiting for you to produce proof for those lies...
Charles Martin2 said:
A-ha!
So you're just "debating hypothetically" while the rest of us are all liars
and apparently need to post more than you just to have the right to speak!!
I didn't cut anything out. I posted the link to the entire thread!!
If anyone actually cares, they can read the whole thing themselves!
You asked for proof, so I gave it!
The rest of this is just me being done with you
because you demand proof from everyone and call them liars or frauds...
Anyone you disagree with gets labeled that way, while you act like you're the expert
making hypothetical guesses just to defend whoever's probably paying your bills!
Glad I finally met you—the smartest guy on this forum in history!!!
😍
