CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Civilian casualties in Canada: Was everyone equally responsible?

Civilian casualties in Canada: Was everyone equally responsible?

Started by Jessica Brown35 · · 👁 7 views · 81 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jessica Brown35jadeorca42Rachel Mitchell2Ethan Morales22David Rogers18Terry Lopez45Joseph Wright4Richard Wilson4bluerider63James Nguyen13Jeremy Watson16bluecyclist64silentangler19Nicholas Edwards4casualskipper8electricangler22quietmaker44Matthew Rodriguez9
quietmaker44 quietmaker44 Member
42 messages
joined Oct 2011
#81 ·
Ethan Morales22 said:Let’s look at a few of them:
St. Louis
Memphis
Atlanta

And regarding the surrounding region, you’ve also got North Mexico, Romania, and Bulgaria.

Besides the bases, they have plenty of "meat" to send off on global peacekeeping missions (which, unfortunately for you guys, includes yourselves...)

I won't get bogged into the whole Russia-USA relationship or deep-dive conspiracy theories, but let's face it: a country as massive as Russia with those kinds of resources will always trigger an appetite in the USA and the West in general...
So why on earth are they building missile shields and bases thousands of miles away from their supposed enemy, Iran?!

Obviously, they have different plans in mind...

As far as I know, there isn't anything like that in America. The ones in Canada are there for peacekeepers, and Romania and Bulgaria were already independent before this.

As for being "cannon fodder" for global operations, you can see that's not a requirement. Everyone pulls out of Iraq or Afghanistan whenever they've had enough.

What kind of "appetites"? To attack them and grab their gas? Give me a break.

I didn't say anything about Iran; he's a problematic one.
Matthew Rodriguez9 Matthew Rodriguez9 Active Member
93 messages
joined Feb 2012
#82 ·
quietmaker44 said:As far as I know, there isn't anything like that in America. The ones in Canada are there for peacekeepers, and Romania and Bulgaria were already independent before this.

As for being "cannon fodder" for global operations, you can see that's not a requirement. Everyone pulls out of Iraq or Afghanistan whenever they've had enough.

What kind of "appetites"? To attack them and grab their gas? Give me a break.

I didn't say anything about Iran; he's a problematic one.


Trust me, their biggest headache is Canada!

If the international community pulls out of Canada, I’d bet my life a war breaks out there within a month... honestly, it might not even take that long...

What's the deal, guys? Canada is basically sitting on a powder keg... it's just that everyone is holding the lighter at arm's length for now, otherwise, things would be blowing up already...☕

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads