Christian Wells6 said:I see that Eleuthera has entered the fray, so there isn't much left for me to contribute. 🤣
Except, perhaps, for two minor observations.
There are actually two distinct points here; regarding the first, Eleuthera might not be consciously aware of it, though she has likely felt its effects firsthand, whereas concerning the second, she is undoubtedly certain. 🤣
1. Quite rigorous scientific studies, employing strictly empirical methods alongside a control group of "average" individuals, demonstrate a profound disparity in cognitive capacity. Those struggling with alcoholism consistently fall well below the average baseline. Conversely, those dealing with narcotics tend to deviate significantly from the norm—specifically, they trend significantly ABOVE it.
When one factors in their social maladjustment and various other eccentricities, they essentially embody everything we once secretly desired to indulge in, now presented with a rare opportunity. To put it more succinctly: they represent the very essence of our most repressed cravings.
2. When such an individual reaches a certain peak, they don't crash simply because they lack the capacity to do so. 😂 Personally, I refuse to trade a high-functioning addict for someone merely "normal." (Though, naturally, even my convictions have their limits, blah, blah...)
There truly is no lover quite as captivating as a properly wired addict—provided they aren't overdoing it. If we add one small detail to the mix, it’s this: they lack any semblance of moral restraint. It is quite curious that no one ever seems to discuss this, yet it remains a pivotal factor. 🤷
An emotional bond is entirely out of the question. However, enjoying pleasant company with someone who serves a practical purpose? That is quite a different matter altogether.
As for the test you proposed—I would have kicked you to the curb immediately, given that it functions as an ultimatum.
And I find myself laughing heartily, because Eleuthera knows this truth all too well.
🤣
I have to disagree with you there. I really miss that sharp, scientific, and rational edge you always bring to the table. 😁
Quincy:
| Aside from those minor little details. |
Well, there you have it. Just as I thought.
Quincy:
There are actually two small nuances at play here. For the first one, brightridge59 might not be consciously aware of it, though I suspect she has felt its effects firsthand. As for the second, she knows it with absolute certainty. 🤣
When you look at the actual scientific research—the kind conducted with rigorous methods and proper control groups consisting of "typical" individuals—it clearly demonstrates that... I’ve been spending quite a bit of time lately reflecting on the subtle nuances of how we perceive cognitive ability, and I can't help but feel there is a significant, almost profound difference when it comes to how we define true intelligence. It isn't just about how quickly someone can solve a complex equation or memorize a list of facts—though those skills certainly have their place in our academic structures here in the States. To me, it feels much deeper than that. I was sitting in a small coffee shop in San Jose the other day, watching the bustle of people rushing to work, and I started thinking about how often we mistake mere information processing for actual wisdom. There is a certain kind of sharpness that some individuals possess, a way of navigating social complexities and emotional landscapes that seems almost intuitive. It reminds me of some of the concepts discussed in Transactional Analysis; it’s about how we interact, how we read the room, and how we manage the invisible threads of human connection. When you look at it through that lens, the gap between being "smart" and being truly intelligent becomes much more apparent. One is a tool, while the other is a way of being. It’s an interesting distinction to ponder, don't you think?I’ve always found it fascinating how we categorize different types of struggles, but if you look at the data, there is a distinct hierarchy in how people deviate from the baseline. In my view, those struggling with alcohol dependency fall significantly below the threshold of what we consider "normal" functioning. They tend to drift downward, losing that steady grip on everyday reality. On the other hand, individuals dealing with drug addiction tend to swing in the opposite direction—they diverge significantly above the norm, creating a massive, erratic departure from standard behavior. It’s a subtle but profound distinction in how these two paths manifest. |
That’s the truth—though, if I’m being completely honest, I’ve never really had the patience to sit down and dig through mountains of statistical data myself. It just isn't my cup of tea!
Of course, there are always those outliers that defy the rule. I once lived in extremely close proximity to an Alcoholic, and let me tell you, he was anything but "dim-witted." In fact, his IQ was north of 150, which really complicates the usual assumptions we make about those types of patterns.
Honestly, the sheer level of destruction that comes from those two working in tandem is something you can only truly grasp if you’ve walked through that same fire yourself. It’s one of those things you can't quite explain to someone who hasn't lived it; there's a specific kind of chaos they stir up together that leaves everything in its wake feeling completely leveled.
Quincy:
| When you factor in social maladjustment and all those other little quirks, it really boils down to this: everything we’ve ever dreamed of indulging in, we finally have the opportunity to experience. To put it more simply—everything your heart desires is right there within it. |
Oh, please. He’s just so incredibly different from everyone else, isn't he? So uniquely "edgy," so fundamentally unadaptable, such a rebel against the system... oh, please. And, of course, a total addict. 😬
Quincy:
When Eleuther stands up, he isn't falling because he lacks the strength to stay upright. 😂 I’ve decided that today just isn't the day I’m going to go out of my way to pass off an addict as someone who's perfectly stable. I mean, sure, we all have our limits when it comes to being accommodating, but there really is a line you shouldn't cross, right? Honestly, I’ve always felt that you won't find a more passionate lover anywhere else in the world than a well-built addict—provided, of course, they aren't completely lost to the struggle. There is just something about that lack of moral boundaries that changes the entire dynamic. It’s such a fascinating point, really, yet it seems like something people almost never discuss openly, even though it feels like such a pivotal element of the experience. 🤷 |
To be perfectly honest, my ex was on his absolute best behavior for most of our relationship, mostly because I was constantly hovering over him like a hawk. It’s a bit of an absurd way to live, really! 🙄
His toxic behavior—which was really just a byproduct of years of battling addiction—was ultimately what tore our relationship apart.
It was this constant sense of excess in every single aspect of his life. I won't even go into detail; you already know exactly what I mean. 😉
I suppose if they didn't lack a certain moral compass, things might be different, but they truly don't have one.
Quincy:
| An emotional connection is simply out of the question. However, being comfortable with someone who is useful? That can work quite well. |
The truth is, you can't find that kind of "comfortable usefulness" with someone you're actually emotionally bonded to. And since these types only know how to bind you to them through pure manipulation—well, I guess that's just one more thing they excel at, isn't it?
Quincy:
Regarding the testing part—if I were in your shoes, I’d kick them to the curb immediately, because an ultimatum is a final line in the sand. Honestly, I'm laughing because brightridge59 knows that better than anyone. |
😂
I think we are going to have to disagree on this one. We never seem to see eye to eye on these matters.
That said, if I ever found myself in a similar situation, I wouldn't even bother wasting my $53 on a test. I would just show them the door instantly.
No need for any dramatic ultimatums.