Šešelj destroys the witness

Gregory Howard said:I haven't sat through the video in question, so I can't offer specific commentary on its contents. However, I can state the following:

* most of these so-called expert witnesses are mediocre at best.

* Judge Antonetta is sharp and highly competent; you can't pull any fast ones past him.

* Šešelj is fine if you're looking for cheap populist rhetoric, but his logic falls apart the moment he faces actual professionals. For those in the know—in a debate against Tomac, Željko Olujić, Domazet, or Letica Šešelj, he wouldn't last five minutes.

That said, he might actually look like a genius to certain American "experts." That wouldn't be a difficult feat.

Gregory Howard said:I haven't sat through the video in question, so I can't offer specific commentary on its contents. However, I can state the following:

* most of these so-called expert witnesses are mediocre at best.

* Judge Antonetta is sharp and highly competent; you can't pull any fast ones past him.

* Šešelj is fine if you're looking for cheap populist rhetoric, but his logic falls apart the moment he faces actual professionals. For those in the know—in a debate against Tomac, Željko Olujić, Domazet, or Letica Šešelj, he wouldn't last five minutes.

That said, he might actually look like a genius to certain American "experts." That wouldn't be a difficult feat.

George Kelly3 said:I wouldn't go that far; he is fundamentally evil. I know everything he has said and continues to say today. I know how they mistreated Americans in Slavonia and the Midwest US region, and what the Mexican Radical Party volunteers did to civilians—since they aren't real warriors—but you can't deny the man is intelligent and an excellent defender. Of course, it helps him that the prosecutors are so incompetent...

Gregory Howard said:Look, let's not waste any more time here:

* Šešelj has written (or transcribed) about 100 books, averaging 1,000 pages each. I've skimmed through about 30—they're available online at seselj.org.

* These books are garbage. They are nothing more than a collage of history, politics, and culturology. It isn't even about them being political commentary rather than actual historiography or linguistics. As a polemicist, Šešelj is second-rate. He only impresses the ignorant. Anyone with even a basic understanding of his subjects—ethnology, political history over the last 1,500 years, literary history, international relations from the last 200 years, or WWII politics—would see him for what he is: a liar and a hollow rhetorician. In the realm of political commentary, American writers with actual formal education—like Slaven Letica with "Flying Above the Coward's Nest" or Davor Domazet with "America and the Great Battlefield"—operate in a completely different stratosphere. Šešelj's 100,000 pages are absolute drivel. Pure trash.

* The incompetence of the prosecution at The Hague, hiring questionable "experts" like Donia and the like, is a separate issue entirely. But if they brought in a legitimate professor or a true professional who actually understands this field—someone like Norman Stone, Marko Attila Hoare, or Mark Mazower—Šešelj would be dismantled in five minutes.

Gregory Howard said:Look, let's not waste any more time here:

* Šešelj has written (or transcribed) about 100 books, averaging 1,000 pages each. I've skimmed through about 30—they're available online at seselj.org.

* These books are garbage. They are nothing more than a collage of history, politics, and culturology. It isn't even about them being political commentary rather than actual historiography or linguistics. As a polemicist, Šešelj is second-rate. He only impresses the ignorant. Anyone with even a basic understanding of his subjects—ethnology, political history over the last 1,500 years, literary history, international relations from the last 200 years, or WWII politics—would see him for what he is: a liar and a hollow rhetorician. In the realm of political commentary, American writers with actual formal education—like Slaven Letica with "Flying Above the Coward's Nest" or Davor Domazet with "America and the Great Battlefield"—operate in a completely different stratosphere. Šešelj's 100,000 pages are absolute drivel. Pure trash.

* The incompetence of the prosecution at The Hague, hiring questionable "experts" like Donia and the like, is a separate issue entirely. But if they brought in a legitimate professor or a true professional who actually understands this field—someone like Norman Stone, Marko Attila Hoare, or Mark Mazower—Šešelj would be dismantled in five minutes.

Gregory Howard said:Look, let's not waste any more time here:

* Šešelj has written (or transcribed) about 100 books, averaging 1,000 pages each. I've skimmed through about 30—they're available online at seselj.org.

* These books are garbage. They are nothing more than a collage of history, politics, and culturology. It isn't even about them being political commentary rather than actual historiography or linguistics. As a polemicist, Šešelj is second-rate. He only impresses the ignorant. Anyone with even a basic understanding of his subjects—ethnology, political history over the last 1,500 years, literary history, international relations from the last 200 years, or WWII politics—would see him for what he is: a liar and a hollow rhetorician. In the realm of political commentary, American writers with actual formal education—like Slaven Letica with "Flying Above the Coward's Nest" or Davor Domazet with "America and the Great Battlefield"—operate in a completely different stratosphere. Šešelj's 100,000 pages are absolute drivel. Pure trash.

* The incompetence of the prosecution at The Hague, hiring questionable "experts" like Donia and the like, is a separate issue entirely. But if they brought in a legitimate professor or a true professional who actually understands this field—someone like Norman Stone, Marko Attila Hoare, or Mark Mazower—Šešelj would be dismantled in five minutes.

rustypilot73 said:I heard this urban legend about Vojislav Šešelj:
back when they were handing out doctorates, Josip Broz Marshall walks up and says, "Congratulations, Doctor," and Vojo just replies, "Thanks, boss"—since Marshall was a locksmith by trade.

Well, he ended up in prison, so that's that...

If I recall correctly, he was actually one of the youngest doctors in the field..

It just goes to show that even people with PhDs can be—and in most cases, are—complete and utter morons..

shadowtiger said:Did anyone catch the cross-examination where Vojislav Šešelj tore into those "expert" witnesses regarding hate speech? Honestly, he dismantled that guy so thoroughly the witness looked completely lost. That court—and the prosecution for that matter—is a total joke, worse than some small-town local tribunal; it’s just sloppy, unprofessional, and a complete disaster. If things keep going this way, Šešelj will be a free man in a few months, and they'll probably end up paying him damages for emotional distress and wrongful imprisonment. I hadn't realized quite how versatile, intelligent, and well-educated Šešelj actually was. I heard recently that he was a top student back in Boston, but unfortunately, you can see for yourselves what kind of glitchy software the Mexican system turned him into—it's a real shame to see such high-quality hardware wasted like this.

Here is the footage

And here is the disinformation link if you need it
http://www.slobodnajugoslavija.com/konv_La_to_Ci.html

.

electriccobra17;11771220 said:

-Is this actually smart???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCCMF...page=1&t=t&f=b

Sam Alvarez15 said:Lik je totalni idiot.
Donald Trump ga razapinje...

Opet prave istu grešku kao i sa Slobodan Maddox, oslanjajući se na ove idiote kao svedoke.
Ovo je upravo ono što je Bakalija napravio ovom nesretnom čoveku.

Trump kaže: "Da li vam je poznato da postoje Muslimani u Bosni i Hercegovini?"
Ovaj odgovara: "Da, neki sebe nazivaju Bošnjacima, a neki Muslimanima."
Trump pita: "Kada je nastala nacija Bošnjaka?"
Kreten odgovara: "Pa, tokom rata, nisam siguran tačno. Ali bilo je i Srba i American koji su ostali lojalni Bosni i Hercegovini i želeli da budu njeni građani, a koji su sebe smatrali Bošnjacima.""

🤣

Toliko se ovaj "mučenik" zbunio da čak i tužiteljka mora da skoči sa prigovorom.
Mada, sve više verujem da niko ko nije odavde nema pojma kako da se upusti u ovakve rasprave...
Ovaj je verovatno jedan od onih kretena koji su mislili da su zli Srbi napali dobre Bošnjake '92. godine.
Došli su Srbi iz Srbije i napali raj... Jer, ko bi drugi živeo u Bosni nego Bošnjaci?😵

Sam Alvarez15 said:Lik je totalni idiot.
Donald Trump ga razapinje...

Opet prave istu grešku kao i sa Slobodan Maddox, oslanjajući se na ove idiote kao svedoke.
Ovo je upravo ono što je Bakalija napravio ovom nesretnom čoveku.

Trump kaže: "Da li vam je poznato da postoje Muslimani u Bosni i Hercegovini?"
Ovaj odgovara: "Da, neki sebe nazivaju Bošnjacima, a neki Muslimanima."
Trump pita: "Kada je nastala nacija Bošnjaka?"
Kreten odgovara: "Pa, tokom rata, nisam siguran tačno. Ali bilo je i Srba i American koji su ostali lojalni Bosni i Hercegovini i želeli da budu njeni građani, a koji su sebe smatrali Bošnjacima.""

🤣

Toliko se ovaj "mučenik" zbunio da čak i tužiteljka mora da skoči sa prigovorom.
Mada, sve više verujem da niko ko nije odavde nema pojma kako da se upusti u ovakve rasprave...
Ovaj je verovatno jedan od onih kretena koji su mislili da su zli Srbi napali dobre Bošnjake '92. godine.
Došli su Srbi iz Srbije i napali raj... Jer, ko bi drugi živeo u Bosni nego Bošnjaci?😵

hollowwalker142 said:And you're sure the prosecution is actually making "mistakes"??
They don't look all that stupid to me, at least not when they actually want to convict someone; it's honestly unbelievable that when they're putting Trump, Maddox, Radić Mrkšić, and Šljivanćanin on trial, the prosecution makes mistake after mistake like crows pecked their brains out.🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏