CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Dealing with homosexuality in the family: How to handle it?

Dealing with homosexuality in the family: How to handle it?

Started by Samuel Nelson24 · · 👁 17 views · 233 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Samuel Nelson24slywolf45Gary James88William Harris14Roger EvansMichael Booth3Donna Sullivan7James Allen6neonhound10David Vaughn4wanderingscout13feraldriver8Anthony Sanders53briskgull4Mark Lewis4Olivia Lopez41ruggedpanther64lonemason7Drew Bennett2Paul Garcia25gentlemason19Elizabeth Lopez16Peter Parker62Anthony Kim18 …
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#61 ·
wanderingscout13 said:Hold on now, slow down! I never actually said anyone *should* be forced into treatment. No one needs to be treated for any condition unless they want to and aren't causing harm to others. Look, some people might be perfectly content with being gay, while others might not be. I truly believe many latent homosexuals would be much happier if they weren't struggling with their orientation at all.

But really, this is more of a theoretical debate, isn't it? It seems like in reality, things are far more complex—there are clearly innate predispositions, yet childhood environment and everything else still play a role. Also, it seems like very few people are 100% homosexual; most cases likely involve bisexuality.

Haha, I'm definitely on board with that sentiment. You see plenty of guys out there with whole families and lives, yet they still clearly enjoy a little extra attention from men...

That's why it feels like such a disguise, you know? It's always a total shock when you finally realize someone's actually part of the community...
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#62 ·
Well, if we’re going to dive headfirst into this kind of psychological deep-diving, there’s also that school of thought suggesting that everyone is inherently bisexual at their core. The idea is that some people naturally lean into it, while others might repress those feelings deep within their subconscious—or perhaps they find the very concept so unsettling that they end up projecting that discomfort through homophobia...

There’s a study for just about everything, I suppose...
wanderingscout13 wanderingscout13 Member
28 messages
joined Nov 2006
#63 ·
slywolf45 said:Well, if we’re going to dive headfirst into this kind of psychological deep-diving, there’s also that school of thought suggesting that everyone is inherently bisexual at their core. The idea is that some people naturally lean into it, while others might repress those feelings deep within their subconscious—or perhaps they find the very concept so unsettling that they end up projecting that discomfort through homophobia...

There’s a study for just about everything, I suppose...

Yes, I've definitely come across that theory! But think about it: if that were true, wouldn't it mean it only surfaces under specific circumstances? It would imply that certain traits emerge depending on the environment, or perhaps it only comes to light when an individual finds it impossible to keep it repressed any longer...

If that last part were true, wouldn't it essentially force society to implement measures against homosexuality just to prevent it from spreading to the entire population? Honestly, I don't think proving such a hypothesis would even benefit the LGBTQ+ community at all... On the contrary, wouldn't it be much more advantageous for them to demonstrate that the percentage of homosexuals in the population remains relatively constant? That way, you eliminate the societal fear of it "spreading" uncontrollably.
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#64 ·
Trazim_auto As I was saying:
Yeah, I’ve heard that theory floating around, but if we follow that logic to its conclusion, it implies that certain traits only surface under specific circumstances. It’s like saying a person might carry a latent tendency that stays dormant until they hit a certain breaking point—or perhaps when they simply lack the willpower to keep it suppressed. It’s less about a permanent state and more about whether an individual has the mental bandwidth to hold the lid on it.

If this hypothesis actually held water, it would essentially force society to implement countermeasures against homosexuality, based on the fear that it would somehow spread through the entire population. Honestly, proving such a thing wouldn't even benefit the LGBTQ+ community. It would be counterproductive. On the contrary, their best bet would be to demonstrate that the percentage of homosexual individuals in the population remains relatively constant—much like how certain demographic trends stabilize over time. That way, you eliminate the panic regarding some sort of "contagion" effect and remove the pretext for any reactionary social measures.

What kind of fear are we even talking about here? Honestly, it feels like we’re living in some sort of paranoid fever dream lately. It's exhausting.

I honestly can't wrap my head around why anyone would even advocate for measures against homosexuality. To be perfectly blunt, it feels like an incredibly regressive and frankly appalling stance to take.😲 Look, let’s be realistic here: there will always be homosexuals, just as there will always be heterosexuals. It’s simply one of those fundamental constants of human nature.
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#65 ·
slywolf45 said:
Trazim_auto As I was saying:
Yeah, I’ve heard that theory floating around, but if we follow that logic to its conclusion, it implies that certain traits only surface under specific circumstances. It’s like saying a person might carry a latent tendency that stays dormant until they hit a certain breaking point—or perhaps when they simply lack the willpower to keep it suppressed. It’s less about a permanent state and more about whether an individual has the mental bandwidth to hold the lid on it.

If this hypothesis actually held water, it would essentially force society to implement countermeasures against homosexuality, based on the fear that it would somehow spread through the entire population. Honestly, proving such a thing wouldn't even benefit the LGBTQ+ community. It would be counterproductive. On the contrary, their best bet would be to demonstrate that the percentage of homosexual individuals in the population remains relatively constant—much like how certain demographic trends stabilize over time. That way, you eliminate the panic regarding some sort of "contagion" effect and remove the pretext for any reactionary social measures.

What kind of fear are we even talking about here? Honestly, it feels like we’re living in some sort of paranoid fever dream lately. It's exhausting.

I honestly can't wrap my head around why anyone would even advocate for measures against homosexuality. To be perfectly blunt, it feels like an incredibly regressive and frankly appalling stance to take.😲 Look, let’s be realistic here: there will always be homosexuals, just as there will always be heterosexuals. It’s simply one of those fundamental constants of human nature.

😁

Nothing lasts forever!
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#66 ·
neonhound10 said:😁

Nothing lasts forever!

except human stupidity...😁
Anthony Sanders53 Anthony Sanders53 Member
29 messages
joined Jul 2006
#67 ·
I feel like everyone has a bit of a homosexual side to their personality, deep down. It’s honestly pretty heavy how much judgment, misunderूनstanding, and straight-up intolerance there is when it comes to sexuality. Being gay can be about caring for your family, because, sadly, it's so often met with discrimination once you step outside the house... but if that discrimination starts happening within the family too... then things are just truly sad. I guess, unfortunately, it feels like there’s hardly any family out there that doesn't discriminate against their homosexual members, more or less...
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#68 ·
Anthony Sanders53 said:I feel like everyone has a bit of a homosexual side to their personality, deep down. It’s honestly pretty heavy how much judgment, misunderूनstanding, and straight-up intolerance there is when it comes to sexuality. Being gay can be about caring for your family, because, sadly, it's so often met with discrimination once you step outside the house... but if that discrimination starts happening within the family too... then things are just truly sad. I guess, unfortunately, it feels like there’s hardly any family out there that doesn't discriminate against their homosexual members, more or less...

I couldn't agree more.👍
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#69 ·
It honestly feels a lot like those stories you hear from back in the States, right around the time everything was being legalized... 🙂 Back then, it was all one thing after another, and eventually, any crime or offense committed by a Black person just couldn't be prosecuted because people would always step in and claim it was all about race...

I know I’m probably going to deal with a whole crowd of people who just won't grasp what I'm actually trying to say here, but then again, that seems to be the case with certain groups too... if I say I don't want them on my team, it's simply because they aren't a fit for me, and it doesn't mean I have anything against them personally...

That’s what freedom of speech is all about...

Honestly, if they just formed their own separate league and explicitly stated they didn't want straight people in their ranks, nobody would be making a fuss... It wouldn't be seen as discrimination at all, but rather just a group of people setting their own boundaries to protect themselves...
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#70 ·
neonhound10 said:It honestly feels a lot like those stories you hear from back in the States, right around the time everything was being legalized... 🙂 Back then, it was all one thing after another, and eventually, any crime or offense committed by a Black person just couldn't be prosecuted because people would always step in and claim it was all about race...

I know I’m probably going to deal with a whole crowd of people who just won't grasp what I'm actually trying to say here, but then again, that seems to be the case with certain groups too... if I say I don't want them on my team, it's simply because they aren't a fit for me, and it doesn't mean I have anything against them personally...

That’s what freedom of speech is all about...

Honestly, if they just formed their own separate league and explicitly stated they didn't want straight people in their ranks, nobody would be making a fuss... It wouldn't be seen as discrimination at all, but rather just a group of people setting their own boundaries to protect themselves...


I understand perfectly well what you're getting at, and frankly, with every subsequent comment, you're leaving me more stunned... (bolded and underlined)

Even if it was intended as a joke, it really isn't appropriate.
Anthony Sanders53 Anthony Sanders53 Member
29 messages
joined Jul 2006
#71 ·
neonhound10 said:It honestly feels a lot like those stories you hear from back in the States, right around the time everything was being legalized... 🙂 Back then, it was all one thing after another, and eventually, any crime or offense committed by a Black person just couldn't be prosecuted because people would always step in and claim it was all about race...

I know I’m probably going to deal with a whole crowd of people who just won't grasp what I'm actually trying to say here, but then again, that seems to be the case with certain groups too... if I say I don't want them on my team, it's simply because they aren't a fit for me, and it doesn't mean I have anything against them personally...

That’s what freedom of speech is all about...

Honestly, if they just formed their own separate league and explicitly stated they didn't want straight people in their ranks, nobody would be making a fuss... It wouldn't be seen as discrimination at all, but rather just a group of people setting their own boundaries to protect themselves...

That doesn't have anything to do with freedom of speech. That's just called being exclusive and intolerant.👎
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#72 ·
slywolf45 said:I understand perfectly well what you're getting at, and frankly, with every subsequent comment, you're leaving me more stunned... (bolded and underlined)

Even if it was intended as a joke, it really isn't appropriate.

Man, geez, you are way more sensitive than a freaking mimosa plant.

Honestly, people who just can't take a joke are mentally checked out. No offense intended...
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#73 ·
Anthony Sanders53 said:That doesn't have anything to do with freedom of speech. That's just called being exclusive and intolerant.👎

Call it whatever you want, but honestly, why on earth would I feel obligated to be verbally tolerant???

I'm not out here trying to insult anyone, I'm simply stating my own perspective, and I have no intention of turning around and speaking against them just for the sake of it...

And besides, who's actually going to stop me? If they want to throw me in jail, then let them, I couldn't care less...
Anthony Sanders53 Anthony Sanders53 Member
29 messages
joined Jul 2006
#74 ·
neonhound10 said:Man, geez, you are way more sensitive than a freaking mimosa plant.

Honestly, people who just can't take a joke are mentally checked out. No offense intended...

I guess being sensitive basically means you're actually giving someone importance. And honestly? I don't think anyone's really taking what you're saying that seriously.
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#75 ·
We’re all stuck in the same boat here, really... they’re fighting for their rights, and I’m just out here fighting for mine.

Everything is perfectly legal, no shady business involved.

Honestly, you guys are acting so soft, terrified that some liberal activists might influence how we raise our kids.

It’s honestly pathetic how sensitive everyone has become lately... where did we even go wrong? Because personally, I don't see the issue, I'm all about being "tolerant" and all that other nonsense.

I'll be the first to admit it—I'm an aggressive person and probably the least tolerant soul on this planet!

All these overly sensitive types are just driving me absolutely crazy...
Anthony Sanders53 Anthony Sanders53 Member
29 messages
joined Jul 2006
#76 ·
neonhound10 said:We’re all stuck in the same boat here, really... they’re fighting for their rights, and I’m just out here fighting for mine.

Everything is perfectly legal, no shady business involved.

Honestly, you guys are acting so soft, terrified that some liberal activists might influence how we raise our kids.

It’s honestly pathetic how sensitive everyone has become lately... where did we even go wrong? Because personally, I don't see the issue, I'm all about being "tolerant" and all that other nonsense.

I'll be the first to admit it—I'm an aggressive person and probably the least tolerant soul on this planet!

All these overly sensitive types are just driving me absolutely crazy...

Or maybe it's just those sensitive types you sense working at the FBI...
I'm telling you again, man, forget about society and what everyone else is doing. Just look inward. Where is all this irritation even coming from??
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#77 ·
neonhound10 said:We’re all stuck in the same boat here, really... they’re fighting for their rights, and I’m just out here fighting for mine.

Everything is perfectly legal, no shady business involved.

Honestly, you guys are acting so soft, terrified that some liberal activists might influence how we raise our kids.

It’s honestly pathetic how sensitive everyone has become lately... where did we even go wrong? Because personally, I don't see the issue, I'm all about being "tolerant" and all that other nonsense.

I'll be the first to admit it—I'm an aggressive person and probably the least tolerant soul on this planet!

All these overly sensitive types are just driving me absolutely crazy...

Bravo. That’s how you do it. You should have just cut through the pseudo-intellectual BS from the jump instead of making us wade through it.

Truly tragic..
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#78 ·
neonhound10 said:Man, geez, you are way more sensitive than a freaking mimosa plant.

Honestly, people who just can't take a joke are mentally checked out. No offense intended...

Look... it's not that I'm overly sensitive, it's just that I find myself constantly surprised by this level of behavior, and frankly, I'm running out of reasons to be shocked.

Humor? Sorry, but making jokes based on race isn't "humor" to me. It's just cheap.
neonhound10 neonhound10 Active Member
126 messages
joined Aug 2009
#79 ·
That wasn't meant as an insult, which honestly just highlights how much you're missing the point here...

Maybe I should try to explain it to you, though it feels pretty pointless, but I was simply describing the historical reality of how people of color have been treated in the US.

Even today, some of the most intense racism can still be found right here in America, where the intolerance toward darker-skinned individuals remains incredibly high.

But hey, you clearly think you've got it all figured out, so I really don't understand why you're even bothering to engage in these bizarre arguments in the first place...

I personally have no problem accepting gay people in my community, but I have to wonder if they have the capacity to accept my own twisted way of thinking...
slywolf45 slywolf45 Regular
299 messages
joined Apr 2016
#80 ·
neonhound10 said:That wasn't meant as an insult, which honestly just highlights how much you're missing the point here...

Maybe I should try to explain it to you, though it feels pretty pointless, but I was simply describing the historical reality of how people of color have been treated in the US.

Even today, some of the most intense racism can still be found right here in America, where the intolerance toward darker-skinned individuals remains incredibly high.

But hey, you clearly think you've got it all figured out, so I really don't understand why you're even bothering to engage in these bizarre arguments in the first place...

I personally have no problem accepting gay people in my community, but I have to wonder if they have the capacity to accept my own twisted way of thinking...

Oh, wonderful. Now you’ve started quoting those ridiculous Americans? Honestly, man, that is just pure madness.😁

neonhound10 said:That wasn't meant as an insult, which honestly just highlights how much you're missing the point here...

Maybe I should try to explain it to you, though it feels pretty pointless, but I was simply describing the historical reality of how people of color have been treated in the US.

Even today, some of the most intense racism can still be found right here in America, where the intolerance toward darker-skinned individuals remains incredibly high.

But hey, you clearly think you've got it all figured out, so I really don't understand why you're even bothering to engage in these bizarre arguments in the first place...

I personally have no problem accepting gay people in my community, but I have to wonder if they have the capacity to accept my own twisted way of thinking...

Are you kidding me? Where on earth are you pulling that "breaking through" statistic from?🤣 🤣

neonhound10 said:That wasn't meant as an insult, which honestly just highlights how much you're missing the point here...

Maybe I should try to explain it to you, though it feels pretty pointless, but I was simply describing the historical reality of how people of color have been treated in the US.

Even today, some of the most intense racism can still be found right here in America, where the intolerance toward darker-skinned individuals remains incredibly high.

But hey, you clearly think you've got it all figured out, so I really don't understand why you're even bothering to engage in these bizarre arguments in the first place...

I personally have no problem accepting gay people in my community, but I have to wonder if they have the capacity to accept my own twisted way of thinking...

What’s your take on this? It feels like we’re forced to navigate these "warped" perspectives on a daily basis.

It’s all just a rerun at this point. We've seen it before, we're seeing it now, and frankly, we'll probably see it all over again. It's nothing new under the sun.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads