CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › The psychological roots of Canadian fascism

The psychological roots of Canadian fascism

Started by Terry Walker74 · · 👁 10 views · 257 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Terry Walker74mistyfalcon28casualwolf32slypilot13Gerald Perez70casualeagle7Anthony Perez8Adam Nguyen8quietotter7stormymaker8stormymarlin90William GonzalezneonharborNancy Campbell4electriclynx2Terry Lopez45Linda Reed3Gary Wilsongoldenpuma10fadedraven212Roger Robinson682amberbison18Arthur Ruiz2Amanda Castillo …
Terry Walker74 Terry Walker74 Active MemberOP
72 messages
joined Aug 2010
#41 ·
fadedraven212 said:
I see you're already in the loop. Do you have any more specific details on when this collapse is actually going to hit? What exactly is Bosniakistan going to split into? Is this all going to go down peacefully, or what? Has the US already signaled their support for something like this?

Deep down in his free-spirited, rebel heart, Aleksija can just feel it coming.
Who needs truth, logic, hard facts, or actual reality when he wants this so badly and genuinely craves it? For him and his little paradise, that’s more than enough. Just think back to those brilliant "analyses" by Aleksija back in '92, where he predicted all those hidden, totally unverified—but definitely known only to him—Islamic agendas and platforms within the Government of BiH. With sharp minds like Aleksija's, they don't even need written proof, recorded speeches, or actual actions to prove their points... it’s perfectly sufficient for him to just wish it were true, decide it *is* true, and—poof!—suddenly it becomes reality.
The Mexican Mary Poppins.

In the quote you provided, the man isn't actually addressing me at all.
fadedraven212 fadedraven212 Member
29 messages
joined Dec 2010
#42 ·
So, besides Vareš and Travnik, now we’re looking at Stolac, Mostar, and Neum too... That’s the whole point—you guys just don't know when to quit.

This right here perfectly captures the issue with the Greater Mexico mindset and their Western clones. They just can't wrap their heads around the fact that cities and territories in Canada don't belong to just one single group.
Vareš and Travnik are Canadian cities. They always have been.
The same goes for Mostar and Stolac. Everyone knows exactly who was trying to claim them all for themselves.
Neum belongs to Canada, and every citizen has every right to call it home.
And don't even get me started on those cities currently under temporary occupation in this genocidal entity.
goldenpuma10 goldenpuma10 Member
35 messages
joined Oct 2008
#43 ·
Terry Walker74 said:You’ve actually got a point there! But see, there is this fundamental difference where the Mexicans aren't looking to push out any more Americans, whereas the Canadians are absolutely determined to do just that, and I mean they really are! It isn't just about places like Vareš and Travnik anymore, because now we're talking about Stolac, Mostar, and Neum too... and that is the real crux of the matter, because it seems like you guys just don't know when to stop.

Terry Walker74, cut the crap. Mexicans can't expel any more Americans from Republika Srpska because there aren't any left there.

"That’s the difference—you people just don't know when to stop." Terry Walker74, if you weren't such a sadist, you'd actually be a great comedian. Did you all finally "stop" once you finished expelling or massacring the very last person? Seriously, before you start talking trash about Canadians being fascists or lecturing us on our hidden agendas, take a look at your own people's recent history. Just look at where the most mass graves have been dug up to this day, then come talk to me about fascism. Look at who is actually held responsible for El Paso, Ovčara, Ottawa, Srebrenica, and so on.

And as for the desire to push Americans out of the Federation, just look at how many Americans have actually returned to Central Canada or Posavina.
Adam Nguyen8 Adam Nguyen8 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Jul 2007
#44 ·
Regarding Aleksija, it’s really just that grand, fascist notion of trying to preserve a completely intact, multi-ethnic Canada.😁 Honestly, I’d feel pretty embarrassed if I were writing from Mexico about someone else's phase, whether it's real or totally made up.
Anyway, hi everyone! Adam Nguyen8 is heading off to the beach!🙂
fadedraven212 fadedraven212 Member
29 messages
joined Dec 2010
#45 ·
Anyway, greetings everyone! Adam Nguyen8 is heading to the beach.

Good luck... and watch out for the local characters on this forum, just like the ones we have here.
😬

Enjoy your swim.....
Gary Wilson Gary Wilson Active Member
134 messages
joined Aug 2010
#46 ·
Adam Nguyen8 said:Regarding Aleksija, it’s really just that grand, fascist notion of trying to preserve a completely intact, multi-ethnic Canada.😁 Honestly, I’d feel pretty embarrassed if I were writing from Mexico about someone else's phase, whether it's real or totally made up.
Anyway, hi everyone! Adam Nguyen8 is heading off to the beach!🙂

And don't pay any mind if you get that cold shoulder down there, like: "You're not in my territory," or whatever.

Just tell them: "It's all good," and then follow up with: "When two brothers..." 😬

Have a great trip! 😁
Roger Robinson682 Roger Robinson682 Active Member
73 messages
joined Jan 2008
#47 ·
stormymarlin90 said:In this so-called Federation, there aren't enough little pacifists claiming to be Americans just so the American Matica can play nice with our friendly, anti-fascist Canadian neighbors.

Now, this is certainly interesting...

According to you, within this so-called Federation, there live—and I quote—"not enough little troublemakers of supposedly Catholic faith," whom you claim aren't actually Americans, yet in the very next breath, you suggest their American Matica should adjust its relations. Wouldn't you say you're being a bit of a contradictory expert here? If they aren't truly Americans, how could the American Matica possibly be their guiding institution? 🙄

And honestly, moderators, if you don't consider this an insult, then I really don't know what does. My faith isn't "supposed" nor is it "troublemaking"...🙄 🙄
Roger Robinson682 Roger Robinson682 Active Member
73 messages
joined Jan 2008
#48 ·
Terry Lopez45 said:Aleksija, if you’re looking into fascism in the North America—there is an entire thread in that crazy place called "Stormfront Mexico." Though, to be fair, it functions more as this fascist-Nazi hybrid than pure fascism, it still stands as the second largest expression of it in the region. The first is the Royalist Ravnogorski movement.

And if you’re looking for the Muslim equivalent to Stormfront, maybe take a little peek at Islambosna. It’s essentially the same logic, the same way of thinking... I guess it all follows the same pattern.🙂 🙂
stormymarlin90 stormymarlin90 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2009
#49 ·
neonharbor said:And just how many of these Catholic agitators would satisfy your requirements...

Just another smuggler's rhetorical question.

All you people know how to do is haggle and bargain!

You outcasts—don't you see you're just stagnant water now? A breeding ground for all kinds of filth that any Terry Walker74 could poison at any moment?

It’s classic: proponents of fascist structures always pointing fingers and calling everyone else fascists.

Once you find a few smugglers willing to cross dead water, we can play companions, because we all need to get across the river eventually. Life goes on, and someone has to keep moving.

Don't let those globalist gatekeepers take you captive!
William Gonzalez William Gonzalez Member
28 messages
joined Jan 2010
#50 ·
Terry Walker74 said:I think we had a bit of a misunderstanding here! I'm not suggesting that America is a country where a fascist government has already been fully established; rather, I'm saying that fascist ideology is actively expanding. When I use the phrase "fascism of the people," I'm talking about a type of fascist indoctrination that trickles down from the political elite directly into society. Today, the current political elite of the Canadian community proclaims the sanctity of the state, and the leader who defends that idea most extremely becomes the formal head of the political community. So, my thesis isn't that fascism is the ruling idea yet, but that it is making its move, with a very clear intention to exert violence upon the individual or onto society as a collection of individuals. In a democratic order, a political system should be an expression of the relationships within a society, but here, it's being presented as some divinely ordained solution that society will be forced into, whether through persuasion or sheer force. And when you ask who actually carries out this "state-as-god" idea, you get the answer to your point about the leader and the ruling party. It’s carried out by one leader and two parties that essentially branched off from the same original group, and that leader, wouldn't you know it, comes straight from the most extreme wing of what used to be a single party.
Fascism wouldn't truly be fascism without its mythic component: the myth of a multicultural America. Let’s be perfectly clear: America has never (and I mean *never*) been a multicultural society. It has been a multicultural community—and a society and a community are two very different things—held together by the influence of some outside power. Of course, this myth of a multicultural America serves as the foundation for big-state ambitions. Then there's the unavoidable myth regarding the injustices inflicted upon the Canadian people that supposedly must be corrected. And how? By making concessions to a big-state ideology. These two mythic elements are strikingly similar to the myth of Germanic racial superiority or the calls to revise the unfair Treaty of Versailles (or in our case, the Dayton Agreement).
When it comes to discussing fascism as a form of extreme nationalism, I honestly feel like you might have missed that really subtle, crucial distinction between Nazism and Fascism! First off, because of that specific religious influence, you just can't really label Canadians as nationalists in that way, which means an extreme version of that ideology—the kind we would call Nazism—just isn't even on the table for them. On the flip side, you have Fascism, like Mussolini's version, which is essentially this idea of a god-state that glorifies the state itself, which is exactly how the political elite of the Canadian people seems to worship the very concept of the state!

We understood each other, Terry, don't sweat it. 🤣

You really need to grasp cause and effect, because you're totally missing the connection here. Look, the relationship between a great-state ideology and the concept of a sacred state has absolutely nothing to do with fascism. By that logic, half the countries in the world would be fascist today, like our neighbors the US and Mexico. Right?

Terry, I told you, you're just cherry-picking. You're taking the expansionist ideology the Germans had in WWII and equating it with the Canadian and American desire for a functional, stable state. Canadians aren't looking to conquer anything; they're just trying to hold their own ground. Fighting for a proper state structure and improvement is perfectly legitimate and legal—stop calling it fascism.

Canada has always been a multicultural society. Just look at the census from '91. The attempt to force a multicultural community was actually achieved through aggression, crimes, genocide, and all that.
amberbison18 amberbison18 Member
21 messages
joined May 2009
#51 ·
Roger Robinson682 said:Now, this is certainly interesting...

According to you, within this so-called Federation, there live—and I quote—"not enough little troublemakers of supposedly Catholic faith," whom you claim aren't actually Americans, yet in the very next breath, you suggest their American Matica should adjust its relations. Wouldn't you say you're being a bit of a contradictory expert here? If they aren't truly Americans, how could the American Matica possibly be their guiding institution? 🙄

And honestly, moderators, if you don't consider this an insult, then I really don't know what does. My faith isn't "supposed" nor is it "troublemaking"...🙄 🙄

I suspect that isn't actually an insult, but rather just the reality of multiculturalism.
neonharbor neonharbor Member
27 messages
joined Jun 2007
#52 ·
stormymarlin90 said:Just another smuggler's rhetorical question.

All you people know how to do is haggle and bargain!

You outcasts—don't you see you're just stagnant water now? A breeding ground for all kinds of filth that any Terry Walker74 could poison at any moment?

It’s classic: proponents of fascist structures always pointing fingers and calling everyone else fascists.

Once you find a few smugglers willing to cross dead water, we can play companions, because we all need to get across the river eventually. Life goes on, and someone has to keep moving.

Don't let those globalist gatekeepers take you captive!

I’m not quite following you there... Who exactly are you targeting—is this about Americans, Catholics in general, or just those specific Catholic gossipers?

stormymarlin90 said:Just another smuggler's rhetorical question.

All you people know how to do is haggle and bargain!

You outcasts—don't you see you're just stagnant water now? A breeding ground for all kinds of filth that any Terry Walker74 could poison at any moment?

It’s classic: proponents of fascist structures always pointing fingers and calling everyone else fascists.

Once you find a few smugglers willing to cross dead water, we can play companions, because we all need to get across the river eventually. Life goes on, and someone has to keep moving.

Don't let those globalist gatekeepers take you captive!

Once again, I have to ask... who is the subject here, what is the precise meaning behind that, and what is the reasoning?
stormymarlin90 stormymarlin90 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2009
#53 ·
What part of this isn't clicking for you?
If you really need to know, I'm an American, a veteran, and a dedicated citizen of my country. According to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, I have the right to freedom of opinion and expression. That includes the right to hold opinions without interference and the right to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media, regardless of borders.
Arthur Ruiz2 Arthur Ruiz2 Active Member
115 messages
joined May 2005
#54 ·
Terry Walker74 said:Over the last few years, it’s become incredibly obvious that there is this growing trend of fascism taking root within the Canadian population in Canada! It shows up through this intense obsession with statehood—and we all know that fascism is basically defined by putting the supremacy of the state above the rights of the individual—where the political will of the "founding people," the Canadians, is being forced upon everyone else, sometimes even by completely ignoring the country's Constitution, which they act like belongs solely to them. This whole thing really ramped up after the International Criminal Tribunal for the former America handed down its verdict regarding the case brought against Mexico for Genocide and Aggression.

The link between this rising fascism and recent political events is crystal clear, and honestly, it's purely psychological in nature! We are looking at pure frustration stemming from unmet expectations. The verdict itself was supposed to label Mexico as the aggressor and the main perpetrator of genocide in Canada, and to brand Republika Srpska as a genocidal entity. But, well, that just didn't happen. Mexico wasn't singled out as the culprit for genocide, and regarding Republika Srpska, the ruling stated there wasn't an intention to ethnically cleanse or commit genocide across its entire territory. Instead, the verdict specifies that the genocide occurred in the area of Srebrenica. Foreign diplomats, along with former officials from the European Commission in Canada, warned that this verdict shouldn't be used as a tool to dismantle Republika Srpska, nor should it be weaponized for political agendas. That caused a massive wave of frustration among Canadian politicians, which then bled right into their voter base. Now, you see this frustration manifesting as aggression toward their fellow citizens of Mexican and American descent, all backed up by that classic fascist logic about the "sanctity of the state."

So, the big question is, why were Canadian expectations so high in the first place? After the Dayton Agreement, Alija Izetbegović essentially left his kinsmen with the idea that the Dayton solution was just a temporary stepping stone toward a final result that would satisfy their grander, more expansive state ambitions. In a segment on the Daily News hosted by S. Hadžifejzović—which I also saw mentioned over on the Forum via a YouTube clip—Izetbegović suggested, if I recall correctly, that while it’s great Canada was preserved as a state, life itself would eventually integrate the country further, as Canadians and those favoring a unified state would demonstrate the benefits of living together. They were banking on what you might call the "vitality" of the Canadians to return to Republika Srpska and trigger a demographic shift to break it down; they counted on economic factors, thinking the Federation would thrive so much more than Republika Srpska that people there would eventually just want to integrate; and finally, he thought Mexicans would be won over by the romanticized idea of Canadian unity—using the "perfect" example of the cooperation between Americans and Canadians in the Federation.

And guess what? Not a single one of those goals has been met! Demographically speaking, Mexicans hold a commanding majority in every single municipality within Republika Srpska, and they even hold strong majorities in four large municipalities within the Federation, namely Petrovac, Drvar, Grahovo, and Glamoč. Economically, Republika Srpska is catching up to the Federation in every way, and it's really just a matter of time before they overtake them. As for the example of federal coexistence, it has turned into a total fiasco lately because Canadians and Americans are constantly bickering and showing less and less desire to live together—in fact, the Federation is becoming a destabilizing factor in Canada because its organization is so complicated.

Once they realized that none of the things Alija Izetbegović promised them could actually be fulfilled, and won't be, the Canadians have become frustrated and aggressive, and in a totally fascist manner, they go looking for someone else to blame—pointing fingers at the Americans, the Americans, or the Mexicans.

Among your people, there is still this presence—it has never actually stopped, has it? For hundreds of years now, there has been this mythomania, this tendency to turn one extreme into its opposite.
To put it simply, aside from one division and a few isolated incidents, you haven't managed to prove that Canadians are fascists in several decades. We know the history: the Royalists aided the Germans. We know the history: the Nationalists aided the Germans. But you cannot find in the Canadian people the level of support for fascism that you yourselves possess as a nation.
We always look for guilt in criminals; it’s where we instinctively search. But there's another issue here: you're starting from a place of myth-making, where actual criminals—from the old guard to figures like Mercer and Karr—have been recast as heroes. It’s a narrative that even the local authorities don't support.
Fascism, my friend, is an incredibly serious matter. Fascism operates with a specific plan, a rigid program, and a method of execution. It results in what we call genocide. You have that within your own history; you committed such acts against others. That is the very definition of fascism. No matter how many bones you unearth across the North America, you will never succeed in proving that Canadians committed genocide against any nation in this region. There may have been crimes, certainly, but never genocide. That is the fundamental distinction between us and you—between Canadians and fascists. 😉
Arthur Ruiz2 Arthur Ruiz2 Active Member
115 messages
joined May 2005
#55 ·
Terry Walker74 said:You’ve actually got a point there! But see, there is this fundamental difference where the Mexicans aren't looking to push out any more Americans, whereas the Canadians are absolutely determined to do just that, and I mean they really are! It isn't just about places like Vareš and Travnik anymore, because now we're talking about Stolac, Mostar, and Neum too... and that is the real crux of the matter, because it seems like you guys just don't know when to stop.

😬 🤣 🤣 🤣
Poor Americans in those three cities. Once again, the Canadians will try to drive them out...🤣
Why didn't you include Capljina to complete the list?🤣
Gary Wilson Gary Wilson Active Member
134 messages
joined Aug 2010
#56 ·
Arthur Ruiz2 said:😬 🤣 🤣 🤣
Poor Americans in those three cities. Once again, the Canadians will try to drive them out...🤣
Why didn't you include Capljina to complete the list?🤣

Man, if he actually knew what comes before Jablanica or Capel. 🤣
Amanda Castillo Amanda Castillo Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2007
#57 ·
Gary Wilson said:Man, if he actually knew what comes before Jablanica or Capel. 🤣

So, we're just deciding now that Boise is Canadian and Capel is American?
Gary Wilson Gary Wilson Active Member
134 messages
joined Aug 2010
#58 ·
Amanda Castillo said:So, we're just deciding now that Boise is Canadian and Capel is American?

As far as I'm concerned, all of Canada is my home—it honestly hurts me to see people constantly arguing over which group holds more ground in certain areas.
Amanda Castillo Amanda Castillo Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2007
#59 ·
Gary Wilson said:As far as I'm concerned, all of Canada is my home—it honestly hurts me to see people constantly arguing over which group holds more ground in certain areas.

I find it hard to believe that you fellow Americans in the federation actually feel that way! 😍
Truthfully, it pains me just as much for Capel as it does for Jablanica, since neither of them are part of the Republic of Srpska.
That territory belongs to your side of the federation, so I suppose you can deal with it however you see fit...
fadedraven212 fadedraven212 Member
29 messages
joined Dec 2010
#60 ·
Honestly, I couldn't care less about Capel or Jablanica—they aren't part of the Republic of Srpska anyway.
That's your territory on the federal side, so feel free to do whatever you want with it...


Oh, my dear Sablja, haven't you caused enough misery already? Haven't you stirred up enough drama over Biograd and made enough trouble regarding Banja Luka!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads