#21 ·
For those of you who don't quite grasp what nationalism actually entails...
A little online seminar: nation, nationalism, and the people >
Quote:>
>
A little online seminar: nation, nationalism, and the people >
Quote:
| unskilled amateur says:> I was flipping through the seventh volume of the Encyclopædia Britannica when I stumbled upon this: Nation (from the Latin *natio*: a breed, tribe, or people), a social community founded upon: a) the belief among its members in a shared ancestry and a collective destiny in the past; b) unique language, religion, customs, and a variety of symbolic tools used to mark collective belonging (anthems, flags, coats of arms, monuments, celebrations); c) a sense of mutual solidarity, pride, and social equality; d) political organization ranging from movements protecting cultural distinctiveness to full state sovereignty. (There were still four more columns—maybe two whole pages! left after that. For an encyclopedic entry, that’s an absolute mountain of text...) Naturally, I decided to see what they had to say about "nationalism" as well. Nationalism (from the German *Nationalismus* and French *nationalisme*), an idea and political movement in the modern era that emphasizes the unity of a nation, its interests, rights, or political goals, the understanding of a shared history, and its relationship toward other nations or states—in short, its collective identity. (And there went another two columns, if not a full page. Truly excessive for an encyclopedia entry. 😁) So, I thought to myself, it only makes sense to check out the definition of "the people," since given how it was phrased... The People 1. (Under point one, it mentions something along the lines of a group of people in a lower economic class or some such, but that isn't really the angle I was looking for; what matters for this discussion is what follows under point two: ) A little online seminar: nation, nationalism, and the people The People 2. A community of individuals that historically precedes the formation of a nation, whose members are conscious of their commonality and are thus linked by a sense of mutual belonging and devotion. Such a community is characterized by a shared territory with which its members identify completely, as well as a certain linguistic unity, traditional culture, beliefs, aspirations, ambitions, and so on. Older ethnological and socio-cultural anthropological theories treated "the people" as a static social and cultural category where unity was achieved EXCLUSIVELY through objective cultural content. (And then there were another twenty lines or so regarding that theory...) Fascinating, wouldn't you say? 🙂 |