Jose Reyes said:Maybe you need one more little lesson to finally get the point.😛 😳 😠
1) It’s not just about me—it’s about everyone!
2) You still haven't actually answered my two specific questions.
3) I am never claiming that an enlightened being has to fit into some pre-made mold!
So please, stop trying to pin views on me that aren't mine.
My intuition tells me that every free, realized being is truly UNIQUE—special in their own way—and they simply CANNOT be imitated.
They are unique in the same way there is only one Einstein, even though there are thousands of PhD physicists out there.
Or how there is only one Mozart, while there are countless other poets.
And I believe anyone should be able to do whatever they want (provided they aren't causing suffering to others).
4) However, I *do* maintain that you can't claim certain eccentricities for yourself while denying them to others. For instance, you can't look at Osho, Adi Da Samadhi, Krishnamurti, or UG, and then say they aren't enlightened while claiming John is!
5) I’m still sticking to my simple question that you dodged:
By what standard did you measure and decide that
Osho, Krishnamurti, Balesar, Papaji, etc., are NOT "enlightened beings"?
And
why? 6) Give me five examples of public or semi-public enlightened beings who are currently living here in America or anywhere else in the world. Do you even know anyone today who is truly enlightened?