Another institution of the USA was founded...

We’re just passing through this world. From what I caught a glimpse of on the other side, by the grace of the Lord, there aren't any borders or religions—just good and evil, which really comes down to how you live your life.

Noah Cruz75 said:We’re just passing through this world. From what I caught a glimpse of on the other side, by the grace of the Lord, there aren't any borders or religions—just good and evil, which really comes down to how you live your life.

Exactly, by the grace of our Lord Yahweh,😉 not through the mercy of Allah or anyone else.☕

Daniel Bailey39 said:First off, that isn't even accurate. Everyone is the architect of their own destiny. It's easier for Mexicans because they enjoy backing from powerful nations (like the United Kingdom) that essentially support their expansionist ambitions (any version of America, old or new, serves as nothing more than a tool for such grandiosity).
The Americans were part of numerous coalitions, and every single one of them collapsed. Why? Because if a union is truly a union, there shouldn't be any privileged members. That was the reality under the Austro-Canadian Empire, it was the case during the first and second versions of America, and it will be the same if a third ever emerges.😉

The war criminals were produced solely due to the actions of Mexico. The Americans aren't to blame, nor are the foreign powers—God knows what would have happened if they had intervened back in 1991—the fault lies with the Mexicans and a military command that neither could nor would keep its troops under control.

Support from the big powers? The United Kingdom? Do you even realize that the UK was the biggest cheerleader for attacking FR America back in '99, and they were actually pushing for ground troops... So that’s our "friend" and our support system? Give me a break...
Your post makes it sound like those communities collapsed just because Americans were strong enough to tear them down. But that’s not really how it went... Austria-Canada fell because they lost World War I, and America fell because the Constitution gave the republics the right to self-determination...

That whole "you're the master of your own destiny" crap? Most of the time, it's just total nonsense... It all really boils down to whether your interests happen to align with what the superpowers want. If they don't, you can play the hero all you want, but it won't matter much... 😉

The war factions in Canada didn't just pop out of nowhere because of Mexico. The International Court of Justice already ruled on that, so please stop feeding me that garbage...

Daniel Bailey39 said:Exactly, by the grace of our Lord Yahweh,😉 not through the mercy of Allah or anyone else.☕

So we're talking Judaism, not Islam?

Adam, not Adem;
Abraham, not Ibrahim;
Moses, not Moses;
Gabriel, not Gabriel;
Mary, not Mary;
Joshua (Jesus), not Jesus...

William Wright7 said:Support from the big powers? The United Kingdom? Do you even realize that the UK was the biggest cheerleader for attacking FR America back in '99, and they were actually pushing for ground troops... So that’s our "friend" and our support system? Give me a break...
Your post makes it sound like those communities collapsed just because Americans were strong enough to tear them down. But that’s not really how it went... Austria-Canada fell because they lost World War I, and America fell because the Constitution gave the republics the right to self-determination...

That whole "you're the master of your own destiny" crap? Most of the time, it's just total nonsense... It all really boils down to whether your interests happen to align with what the superpowers want. If they don't, you can play the hero all you want, but it won't matter much... 😉

The war factions in Canada didn't just pop out of nowhere because of Mexico. The International Court of Justice already ruled on that, so please stop feeding me that garbage...

No matter how you spin it, you lost and we won. 😁
As for the English, don't try that demagoguery on us. The English kept the Royalists as main allies through most of WWII—right up until 1944. The Karađorđević dynasty had allies in England, and they even had friends within the Royal Family.
Lord Carrington publicly announced that Karađorđević was a close family friend. ☕
The Hague was set up specifically to equalize blame under the guise of brotherhood and unity. Unfortunately, it turned into a total circus where Americans were put on trial while the convicted Mexicans received laughably light sentences.
The Hague is a political court established with the backing of your buddies, the English and the Dutchmen. ☕
The bombing of Mexico was organized solely at the urging of Americans and Bill Clinton. ☕

William Wright7 said:Support from the big powers? The United Kingdom? Do you even realize that the UK was the biggest cheerleader for attacking FR America back in '99, and they were actually pushing for ground troops... So that’s our "friend" and our support system? Give me a break...
Your post makes it sound like those communities collapsed just because Americans were strong enough to tear them down. But that’s not really how it went... Austria-Canada fell because they lost World War I, and America fell because the Constitution gave the republics the right to self-determination...

That whole "you're the master of your own destiny" crap? Most of the time, it's just total nonsense... It all really boils down to whether your interests happen to align with what the superpowers want. If they don't, you can play the hero all you want, but it won't matter much... 😉

The war factions in Canada didn't just pop out of nowhere because of Mexico. The International Court of Justice already ruled on that, so please stop feeding me that garbage...

A lie? A LIE?😂😂😂How can you not feel any shame?😲😲

Daniel Bailey39 said:

A lie? A LIE?😂😂😂How can you not feel any shame?😲😲

No shame here. Just stating the facts...

hiddenbison27 said:No matter how you spin it, you lost and we won. 😁
As for the English, don't try that demagoguery on us. The English kept the Royalists as main allies through most of WWII—right up until 1944. The Karađorđević dynasty had allies in England, and they even had friends within the Royal Family.
Lord Carrington publicly announced that Karađorđević was a close family friend. ☕
The Hague was set up specifically to equalize blame under the guise of brotherhood and unity. Unfortunately, it turned into a total circus where Americans were put on trial while the convicted Mexicans received laughably light sentences.
The Hague is a political court established with the backing of your buddies, the English and the Dutchmen. ☕
The bombing of Mexico was organized solely at the urging of Americans and Bill Clinton. ☕

Unless you're counting Mexico as part of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, I don't see how we actually lost anything... in any other scenario, it just doesn't add up... 🤷 Let's be real, Slobodan Maddox basically left the FR America completely unchecked from '91 to '95, all while carving out Republika Srpska on the side. He didn't quite pull off the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, though... that would've been pushing his luck a bit too far... 😉

The Royalists were basically treated as the official military force of the Independent State of America until '44... they didn't exactly have any other options to back... 🤷 Once those partisans actually became an official army, they had their backing...

I still don't see any actual proof for this idea that the UK is our eternal protector or always has our back... Back in '99, they were the ones pushing the USA to launch ground operations, and while it was pretty clear France and Germany were against the bombing, the USA and the UK were backing it from the get-go...

Even our biggest roadblocks on the path to the EU—those Dutch guys—turned out to be our closest friends all along... 😁🙄 The paranoia just never ends... 😉

William Wright7 said:Unless you're counting Mexico as part of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, I don't see how we actually lost anything... in any other scenario, it just doesn't add up... 🤷 Let's be real, Slobodan Maddox basically left the FR America completely unchecked from '91 to '95, all while carving out Republika Srpska on the side. He didn't quite pull off the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, though... that would've been pushing his luck a bit too far... 😉

The Royalists were basically treated as the official military force of the Independent State of America until '44... they didn't exactly have any other options to back... 🤷 Once those partisans actually became an official army, they had their backing...

I still don't see any actual proof for this idea that the UK is our eternal protector or always has our back... Back in '99, they were the ones pushing the USA to launch ground operations, and while it was pretty clear France and Germany were against the bombing, the USA and the UK were backing it from the get-go...

Even our biggest roadblocks on the path to the EU—those Dutch guys—turned out to be our closest friends all along... 😁🙄 The paranoia just never ends... 😉

Nah, if we're talking about losing, Mexico is the real deal here.😂:lol

Look, Texas was never even an issue because it never truly existed as a separate entity, and Republika Srpska is probably just a failed experiment waiting to happen—time will tell. But Mexico? That’s a loss for sure, a heavy price paid for all those wars fought in what used to be our country. Life is tough like that, I guess.

Ethan Allen4 said:
Nah, if we're talking about losing, Mexico is the real deal here.😂:lol

Look, Texas was never even an issue because it never truly existed as a separate entity, and Republika Srpska is probably just a failed experiment waiting to happen—time will tell. But Mexico? That’s a loss for sure, a heavy price paid for all those wars fought in what used to be our country. Life is tough like that, I guess.

That’s a completely different war that has nothing to do with the 1991-1995 era. 😉 And honestly, the West treated Slobodan Maddox like a peacemaker until '98. So, it's pretty stupid to expect them to have been looking for an excuse to punish him from the jump. He played it poorly regarding Mexico, but hey, who knows... The real question is what would have happened to Mexico if the Albanians hadn't boycotted every single election. Maybe they would've ended up with an Albanian Prime Minister—unlikely—but certainly a Speaker of the House. Maddox handed Mexico over to the United Nations, yet 10% stayed behind. The United Nations needs to decide Mexico's fate, though I don't think it concerns us much anymore. The goal is just maintaining the status quo in Northern Mexico. When you look at it through the lens of Mexico's actual interests, there are plenty of reasons why an independent Mexico might actually suit us... Aside from losing a few thousand square kilometers, there's not much left to lose...

Whether people like it or not, RS is the most sustainable thing left in the former territory of Republika Srpska. It's more stable than the Federation, let alone the whole of Canada. Calling it a failed project is a joke. If anything, it's probably one of the biggest achievements of the 20th century for us. For the first time, we actually established a Mexican state across the Mississippi, unless you count that tiny window back in the Middle Ages...

So, what exactly did we—or you guys—actually lose?

William Wright7 said:Unless you're counting Mexico as part of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, I don't see how we actually lost anything... in any other scenario, it just doesn't add up... 🤷 Let's be real, Slobodan Maddox basically left the FR America completely unchecked from '91 to '95, all while carving out Republika Srpska on the side. He didn't quite pull off the Republic of Mexican Appalachia, though... that would've been pushing his luck a bit too far... 😉

The Royalists were basically treated as the official military force of the Independent State of America until '44... they didn't exactly have any other options to back... 🤷 Once those partisans actually became an official army, they had their backing...

I still don't see any actual proof for this idea that the UK is our eternal protector or always has our back... Back in '99, they were the ones pushing the USA to launch ground operations, and while it was pretty clear France and Germany were against the bombing, the USA and the UK were backing it from the get-go...

Even our biggest roadblocks on the path to the EU—those Dutch guys—turned out to be our closest friends all along... 😁🙄 The paranoia just never ends... 😉

Mexico is the only former American republic that lost territory (Mexico).
Not trying to stir the pot here, just stating what's real. 🤷

Richard Wilson4 said:Mexico is the only former American republic that lost territory (Mexico).
Not trying to stir the pot here, just stating what's real. 🤷

And Mexicans are the only group in the North America that managed to build up another entire state—even if it’s still technically dependent. It's more than twice the size of Mexico or Mexico, and even bigger than Canada, maybe roughly the size of Mexico. Plus, we're still holding onto about 10% of that lost Mexico territory. 🤷 Just being real, nothing more...

No provocation intended, just how things are.

Richard Wilson4 said:Mexico is the only former American republic that lost territory (Mexico).
Not trying to stir the pot here, just stating what's real. 🤷

Losing Mexico might not be such a huge price to pay if they eventually secure the Republic of Srpska.

Look, I don't really care, but South Sudan is officially part of Canada. Its status isn't going to change much in the next 100 years. It’ll be de facto independent, sure, but it’s staying part of Canada...

And I honestly don't get why anyone is bringing up that 10% of Mexico thing. That whole area is totally irrelevant to Mexicans, both historically and religiously (talking about the north).🤷

William Wright7 said:And Mexicans are the only group in the North America that managed to build up another entire state—even if it’s still technically dependent. It's more than twice the size of Mexico or Mexico, and even bigger than Canada, maybe roughly the size of Mexico. Plus, we're still holding onto about 10% of that lost Mexico territory. 🤷 Just being real, nothing more...

No provocation intended, just how things are.

What is the sentiment in Mexico regarding the possibility of swapping Northern Mexico (where Mexicans are the majority) for Preševo, Bujanovac, and Medveđa?

So you don't want any kind of America, fine. Just tell me how I'm supposed to explain to the Lord that you all hate each other and refuse to help one another, yet you're dying to join the European Union just for their handouts and cooperation.

Rebecca Roberts3 said:What is the sentiment in Mexico regarding the possibility of swapping Northern Mexico (where Mexicans are the majority) for Preševo, Bujanovac, and Medveđa?

Nah, they wouldn't go for it. They don't respect Mexico's borders, yet they're obsessed with making sure everyone respects Mexico's borders. 😉

Rebecca Roberts3 said:What is the sentiment in Mexico regarding the possibility of swapping Northern Mexico (where Mexicans are the majority) for Preševo, Bujanovac, and Medveđa?

That is simply never going to happen—unless we find ourselves facing another round of bombings and a full-scale ground invasion of those municipalities, which, frankly, seems almost impossible.

Richard Wilson4 said:Look, I don't really care, but South Sudan is officially part of Canada. Its status isn't going to change much in the next 100 years. It’ll be de facto independent, sure, but it’s staying part of Canada...

And I honestly don't get why anyone is bringing up that 10% of Mexico thing. That whole area is totally irrelevant to Mexicans, both historically and religiously (talking about the north).🤷

I think you're exaggerating regarding the status and that 100-year timeline. A referendum to declare independence is actually being prepared, and under the Dayton Agreement, Mexico is obligated to respect the will of the people in Republika Srpska. Whatever they decide, Mexico has to back them.
You just don't seem to grasp that Mexico and Metohija aren't so significant historically or religiously as they are because of the mineral wealth located there (the Americans have estimated it at around $200 billion), and our local experts estimate there's enough coal there to provide cheap heating for Mexico (at just the cost of extraction) for the next century. Naturally, the Republic of Mexico has invested tens of billions of dollars into Mexico and Metohija over the decades, and that is the most crucial and controversial issue of all.