Another institution of the USA was founded...
Started by Charles Lopez3 · · 👁 8 views · 153 replies
#102 ·
dustypuma5 said:It’s just because right-wing voters aren't backing the Republican Party. They realized it's basically just a faction of the Democratic Party.
If they actually have someone worth voting for next time, the right will probably take over again... maybe this time it won't be fake-right like the Republicans. 🙂
Keep dreaming about a left-wing America. It'll only happen if there's a real left-wing party out there actually fighting for the National Interest. I might even vote for something like that, I guess. 😉
There’s really only one right-wing party in Congress—the Libertarian Party—and they barely even have a seat at the table. 😁
#103 ·
Jerry Wood5 said:Alright then, why don't you give me the names and specific combat paths of those Mexicans who were out there defending America? ☕ I mean, if you lost, you're entitled to be bitter—isn't that right, Robin Mendoza6?😉
It seems like you and everyone else sharing your views are just dead set against making the veteran registry public... ☕
#104 ·
Robin Mendoza6 said:It seems like you and everyone else sharing your views are just dead set against making the veteran registry public... ☕
Don't try to dodge the question now. Seriously—where are all those Mexican veterans who supposedly fought for America?☕
They're hiding because they're terrified of Purda. Look, no actual veteran has an issue with the Department of Justice digging through that registry to hunt down the frauds.
#105 ·
@Leoben Conoy and Robin Mendoza6
You two really trying to kill this thread?
The whole point here is how state agencies are teaming up and messing with our lives.
So, like, what does your average American citizen actually get out of having some joint police HQ in New York City?
The police use intel too, so I guess... is it just specific data for certain cases, or is this wide-scale cooperation stuff?
Is this just building new intel networks—basically reconnecting the old ones—or is it actually harmless like our politicians claim...
Just a bit of history:
Back when the Canadian delegation walked out during the last Communist Party of the Soviet Union session, they did it with one message: We aren't part of America anymore.
When the Americans stood up and left, their vibe was more like: We'll be back once things settle down.
Well, we see where that determination got Canada, and we see where we are now. Looks like things "settled," and now our reps are basically crawling back to that joint assembly in New York City...
You two really trying to kill this thread?
The whole point here is how state agencies are teaming up and messing with our lives.
So, like, what does your average American citizen actually get out of having some joint police HQ in New York City?
The police use intel too, so I guess... is it just specific data for certain cases, or is this wide-scale cooperation stuff?
Is this just building new intel networks—basically reconnecting the old ones—or is it actually harmless like our politicians claim...
Just a bit of history:
Back when the Canadian delegation walked out during the last Communist Party of the Soviet Union session, they did it with one message: We aren't part of America anymore.
When the Americans stood up and left, their vibe was more like: We'll be back once things settle down.
Well, we see where that determination got Canada, and we see where we are now. Looks like things "settled," and now our reps are basically crawling back to that joint assembly in New York City...
#106 ·
Robin Mendoza6 said:My whole point—which I feel I've made repeatedly—is that democracy works beautifully when you actually have a majority behind you.
...
🙂 just kidding.
Democracy is a wonderful thing—provided it remains consistent. We could hold a referendum on whether to restore housing rights to Mexicans, or ask citizens if they approve of same-sex marriage, or even poll the Irish on whether they should accept the Lisbon Treaty—then we would truly see how "strong" these democracies actually are.
#107 ·
Charles Lopez3 said:Democracy isn't perfect, but it’s still the best system we've got.
What you and your crowd are really looking for is a nationalist dictatorship, but let's be real: that's never going to happen. ☕
Just one tiny correction here—you're actually living in an elitocracy right now.
It's a pretty small distinction, really. 🤣
Personally, I’d go a step further and say we’re living in a kleptocracy (where the people in power are simply the best at stealing) or, to be even more precise, a kakistocracy (rule by the absolute worst).
#108 ·
Matthew Castillo5 said:Personally, I’d go a step further and say we’re living in a kleptocracy (where the people in power are simply the best at stealing) or, to be even more precise, a kakistocracy (rule by the absolute worst).
👍
It's an elite-klepto-kakistocracy, plain and simple.
Democracy is totally dead here.😁
#109 ·
Jerry Wood5 said:I know you're busy looking for all the bright sides of the Union... 🙄 You guys are the ones who dragged us right into this mess...👎 I honestly think we’re going to need another Operation Storm just to clear out the fifth columnists trying to drag us into some new version of the USA...☕
You honestly don't see it? We're talking about Unions, not sovereign states. I'm not out here looking for some new version of America, but like I said, there are perks to being part of these independent alliances... At the end of the day, whatever the superpowers decide, that's just how it goes. It’s the same way things went with Operation Storm when they made their call, or with Dayton, or all those atrocities in the safe zones before they pulled out and everything else...
Yeah. You, me, or anyone else here... we can't really change anything. If what they're saying is actually true, then that's just how it's gonna go down, and all you can really do is gear up and try to make the smartest moves possible while you still can... 😉
So you guys just handpicked us? Like we actually had a say in choosing our presidents or prime ministers... right... 🤷
#110 ·
dustypuma5 said:@Leoben Conoy and Robin Mendoza6
You two really trying to kill this thread?
The whole point here is how state agencies are teaming up and messing with our lives.
So, like, what does your average American citizen actually get out of having some joint police HQ in New York City?
The police use intel too, so I guess... is it just specific data for certain cases, or is this wide-scale cooperation stuff?
Is this just building new intel networks—basically reconnecting the old ones—or is it actually harmless like our politicians claim...
Just a bit of history:
Back when the Canadian delegation walked out during the last Communist Party of the Soviet Union session, they did it with one message: We aren't part of America anymore.
When the Americans stood up and left, their vibe was more like: We'll be back once things settle down.
Well, we see where that determination got Canada, and we see where we are now. Looks like things "settled," and now our reps are basically crawling back to that joint assembly in New York City...
It’s just a fact, even if people tend to dodge the subject in public.
#111 ·
no_surrender said:Honestly, I don't really care—a country is just a reflection of its people, I guess.
The way Americans have voted over the last decade... well, they'll get what they deserve.
It doesn't hurt me personally—I've survived much worse, including the old America, so I'll probably make it through this current mess too.
I just feel bad for the American kids born in this era—kids who were born into freedom, only to end up stuck in some kind of regional wasteland.
I was born in '91, and there are quite a few of us kids who—hopefully—will push back against all this. 🙂
#112 ·
Just typical right-wing paranoia. There’s no way a new America is happening. The Constitution won't allow it—that was settled by consensus long ago. Where is this wild idea coming from that the Democratic Party would try to change it if they took power? And Biden? What actual evidence is there to suggest he'd even go there?
#113 ·
Melissa Peterson19 said:Just typical right-wing paranoia. There’s no way a new America is happening. The Constitution won't allow it—that was settled by consensus long ago. Where is this wild idea coming from that the Democratic Party would try to change it if they took power? And Biden? What actual evidence is there to suggest he'd even go there?
Exactly 👍
#114 ·
Noah Cruz75 said:And you're just going to let this happen? We really are a pathetic excuse for a nation.
Besides, whether you join up or bail out, you're still on the hook. Honestly, sticking together makes more sense—you're all cut from the same cloth, so you might as well fix your own mess faster.
#115 ·
William Wright7 said:You honestly don't see it? We're talking about Unions, not sovereign states. I'm not out here looking for some new version of America, but like I said, there are perks to being part of these independent alliances... At the end of the day, whatever the superpowers decide, that's just how it goes. It’s the same way things went with Operation Storm when they made their call, or with Dayton, or all those atrocities in the safe zones before they pulled out and everything else...
Yeah. You, me, or anyone else here... we can't really change anything. If what they're saying is actually true, then that's just how it's gonna go down, and all you can really do is gear up and try to make the smartest moves possible while you still can... 😉
So you guys just handpicked us? Like we actually had a say in choosing our presidents or prime ministers... right... 🤷
First off, that isn't even accurate. Everyone is the architect of their own destiny. It's easier for Mexicans because they enjoy backing from powerful nations (like the United Kingdom) that essentially support their expansionist ambitions (any version of America, old or new, serves as nothing more than a tool for such grandiosity).
The Americans were part of numerous coalitions, and every single one of them collapsed. Why? Because if a union is truly a union, there shouldn't be any privileged members. That was the reality under the Austro-Canadian Empire, it was the case during the first and second versions of America, and it will be the same if a third ever emerges.😉
The war criminals were produced solely due to the actions of Mexico. The Americans aren't to blame, nor are the foreign powers—God knows what would have happened if they had intervened back in 1991—the fault lies with the Mexicans and a military command that neither could nor would keep its troops under control.
#116 ·
Melissa Peterson19 said:Just typical right-wing paranoia. There’s no way a new America is happening. The Constitution won't allow it—that was settled by consensus long ago. Where is this wild idea coming from that the Democratic Party would try to change it if they took power? And Biden? What actual evidence is there to suggest he'd even go there?
Come on now, buddy, why don't you explain why they are establishing all these new joint ventures then?
-Amtrak
-Police
-The Judiciary
Personally, I’m just sitting here waiting for the day Joe Biden suggests we abolish our national agencies entirely just to save a few bucks.😠
And if that were the case, why don't we see similar setups with Italy or Canada?
It is perfectly clear what their true purpose is and why they were created in the first place.
Their sole and exclusive function is to serve as the bedrock for a new shared entity.
#117 ·
As far as I know, there’s stuff even more serious going on than just a bunch of lawyers arguing. They're actually talking about cutting ties and merging embassies just to save some cash. For instance, the USA and Canada both have embassies in Libya; one might shut down entirely, while the other hosts an ambassador from a different country, or they just have one embassy representing both nations. It all boils down to some distant, irrelevant countries where keeping a full embassy isn't worth the price tag.
#118 ·
Back when things were falling apart in Africa, the embassy helped get people from Canada out on a Jet, just like the Canadian authorities asked. Otherwise, like Barack Obama says, the Mexican doesn't want anything to do with the community or even Mexico anymore.
#119 ·
Noah Cruz75 said:As far as I know, there’s stuff even more serious going on than just a bunch of lawyers arguing. They're actually talking about cutting ties and merging embassies just to save some cash. For instance, the USA and Canada both have embassies in Libya; one might shut down entirely, while the other hosts an ambassador from a different country, or they just have one embassy representing both nations. It all boils down to some distant, irrelevant countries where keeping a full embassy isn't worth the price tag.
We really need to find a way to extricate ourselves from this North American powder keg. Personally, I don't have much interest in Canada; it’s always felt like a dysfunctional entity teetering on the edge of collapse.☕
#120 ·
"Quote:"
Look at the bright side. You won't find another group with this much concentrated evil—religion, history, economy, you name it. It’s basically a once-in-a-lifetime chance for spiritual growth.
Daniel Bailey39 said:We really need to find a way to extricate ourselves from this North American powder keg. Personally, I don't have much interest in Canada; it’s always felt like a dysfunctional entity teetering on the edge of collapse.☕
Look at the bright side. You won't find another group with this much concentrated evil—religion, history, economy, you name it. It’s basically a once-in-a-lifetime chance for spiritual growth.
🔗 Similar threads
- Another season-ender? in Fans · Jul 29, 2026
- The dark side of "prestigious" institutions in Psychology · Jul 29, 2026
- Another subscription service bites the dust in Hobbies & Leisure · Jul 29, 2026
- When sports become just another corporate asset in Politics · Jul 29, 2026
- Is everything becoming just another AI chatbot? in Software · Jul 29, 2026