CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Transformers: Age of Extinction (2018)

Transformers: Age of Extinction (2018)

Started by Rebecca Scott95 · · 👁 6 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rebecca Scott95Ryan Wilson2Raymond Walker5Samuel Scott54lonehound2Rachel Turner2James Perez3neondriver7Patrick MartinRichard Wilson4Susan HernandezElizabeth Morales49Raymond Anderson4briskeagle3Thomas Flores74rustywalker1nimblemarlin6Gerald Jackson48John BoothJonathan Perez88Rebecca Myers2
Rebecca Scott95 Rebecca Scott95 MemberOP
25 messages
joined Nov 2021
#1 ·
Transformers: Age of Extinction is the upcoming sci-fi monster flick serving as the sequel to the original Pacific Rim (2013).

In the first installment, massive monsters (Kaiju) launch an assault on the country via a portal tucked away under the Pacific Ocean. Naturally, humanity's solution was building massive robots—Jaegers—piloted by pairs of drivers to fend off the beasts. They managed to shut down the portal back then, but apparently, that wasn't enough to call it a day.

image




Director: Steven S.DeKnight
Cast: Scott Eastwood, Tian Jing, John Boyega
Release Date: March 23, 2018
Ryan Wilson2 Ryan Wilson2 Regular
387 messages
joined Dec 2002
#2 ·
To feels more like Transformers... at least based on what we've seen in the trailers. I’m just not getting that sense of weight or the sheer mass you expect from a Jaeger.

Then again, maybe I'm just being overly critical. 🙂
Raymond Walker5 Raymond Walker5 Active Member
79 messages
joined Jul 2017
#3 ·
The first installment was 🤮

So, I’m honestly expecting the sequel to be even more explosive, aggressive, grotesque, empty, absurd, and just plain mindless.
Samuel Scott54 Samuel Scott54 Active Member
85 messages
joined Mar 2009
#4 ·
I actually feel the exact opposite! I thought Pacific Rim was such a blast and a really pleasant surprise, but I just can't stand Transformers. I'll definitely be checking out the sequel.
Raymond Walker5 Raymond Walker5 Active Member
79 messages
joined Jul 2017
#5 ·
To me, Pacific Rim is really just a collection of aggressive, high-quality special effects. That’s honestly the only reason I’m giving it any credit at all, so I'd say it's a 2/10.
lonehound2 lonehound2 Member
16 messages
joined Jan 2015
#6 ·
No Del Toro? Well, there goes my interest!
Rachel Turner2 Rachel Turner2 Active Member
53 messages
joined Sep 2022
#7 ·
I'm a huge fan of Pacific Rim, so I'll definitely be checking this one out.
James Perez3 James Perez3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2012
#8 ·
Look, I’m not some film critic who sits around overanalyzing every frame. It’s pretty simple for me: I either love it or I don't. But the first one? That was a blast. And honestly, I’ve got a feeling this sequel is going to be even bigger. We're talking massive new categories of Kaiju and more Jaegers... count me in.
neondriver7 neondriver7 Member
25 messages
joined Nov 2014
#9 ·
I actually dug the first movie, but looking at these trailers, this sequel looks like an absolute train wreck.

It’s completely missing the vibe of the original, and honestly, that terrible music is totally killing the mood for me—it feels nothing like the soundtrack from the first film.👎
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin Regular
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#10 ·
Man, this poster is just... it's uninspired. It’s giving me nothing. Honestly, just looking at it tells me everything I need to know. There is zero chance I’m stepping foot into an AMC Theatres without reading a single review first. ☕
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#11 ·
The first flick was a blast, so I’m expecting the same vibe from the second one. Nothing more, nothing less.
Susan Hernandez Susan Hernandez Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2011
#12 ·
lonehound2 said:No Del Toro? Well, there goes my interest!

No Ron Perlman? Forget it! 😁
Elizabeth Morales49 Elizabeth Morales49 Member
34 messages
joined May 2023
#13 ·
So, does that mean nobody from the original movie is coming back?

Based on the trailers, though, the flick looks like it'll be great...

Assuming they're just aiming for that 10 to 14-year-old demographic...🤣
Raymond Anderson4 Raymond Anderson4 Regular
479 messages
joined Oct 2024
#14 ·
So, has it really come to this? We’ve reached a point where movies featuring 300-foot monsters and creatures big enough to eat the Eiffel Tower for breakfast are actually being classified as kids' movies?
🤣
briskeagle3 briskeagle3 Active Member
59 messages
joined Dec 2012
#15 ·
Raymond Anderson4 said:So, has it really come to this? We’ve reached a point where movies featuring 300-foot monsters and creatures big enough to eat the Eiffel Tower for breakfast are actually being classified as kids' movies?
🤣

Kids just aren't what they used to be—honestly, not even close. Not that long ago, a 12 or 13-year-old would head straight to the comic book shop after school, but nowadays...
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#16 ·
Is it just me, or is this movie not even dropping here this weekend?
Rebecca Scott95 Rebecca Scott95 MemberOP
25 messages
joined Nov 2021
#17 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Is it just me, or is this movie not even dropping here this weekend?

Strange. It’s not playing at AMC Theatres, yet some local theater over in Scranton has it starting tomorrow.
Rachel Turner2 Rachel Turner2 Active Member
53 messages
joined Sep 2022
#18 ·
I'm heading to AMC Theatres tomorrow to catch it. They don't have it at my local spot, no clue why.
Thomas Flores74 Thomas Flores74 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2016
#19 ·
AMC Theatres isn't showing Universal Pictures movies anymore! 👎
rustywalker1 rustywalker1 Active Member
89 messages
joined Jun 2011
#20 ·
So they aren't going to show hits like Jurassic Park, Fast & Furious, or Despicable Me that actually pull in the cash. Idiots.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads